Protecting Human and Animal Health: The Road from Animal Models to New Approach Methods.

Animals and animal models have been invaluable for our current understanding of human and animal biology, including physiology, pharmacology, biochemistry, and disease pathology. However, there are increasing concerns with continued use of animals in basic biomedical, pharmacological, and regulatory research to provide safety assessments for drugs and chemicals. There are concerns that animals do not provide sufficient information on toxicity and/or efficacy to protect the target population, so scientists are utilizing the principles of replacement, reduction, and refinement (the 3Rs) and increasing the development and application of new approach methods (NAMs). NAMs are any technology, methodology, approach, or assay used to understand the effects and mechanisms of drugs or chemicals, with specific focus on applying the 3Rs. Although progress has been made in several areas with NAMs, complete replacement of animal models with NAMs is not yet attainable. The road to NAMs requires additional development, increased use, and, for regulatory decision making, usually formal validation. Moreover, it is likely that replacement of animal models with NAMs will require multiple assays to ensure sufficient biologic coverage. The purpose of this manuscript is to provide a balanced view of the current state of the use of animal models and NAMs as approaches to development, safety, efficacy, and toxicity testing of drugs and chemicals. Animals do not provide all needed information nor do NAMs, but each can elucidate key pieces of the puzzle of human and animal biology and contribute to the goal of protecting human and animal health. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Data from traditional animal studies have predominantly been used to inform human health safety and efficacy. Although it is unlikely that all animal studies will be able to be replaced, with the continued advancement in new approach methods (NAMs), it is possible that sometime in the future, NAMs will likely be an important component by which the discovery, efficacy, and toxicity testing of drugs and chemicals is conducted and regulatory decisions are made.

Society for birth defects research and prevention's multidisciplinary research needs workshop 2022: A call to action.

The Society for Birth Defects Research and Prevention (BDRP) strives to understand and protect against potential hazards to developing embryos, fetuses, children, and adults by bringing together scientific knowledge from diverse fields. The theme of 62nd Annual Meeting of BDRP, "From Bench to Bedside and Back Again", represented the cutting-edge research areas of high relevance to public health and significance in the fields of birth defects research and surveillance. The multidisciplinary Research Needs Workshop (RNW) convened at the Annual Meeting continues to identify pressing knowledge gaps and encourage interdisciplinary research initiatives. The multidisciplinary RNW was first introduced at the 2018 annual meeting to provide an opportunity for annual meeting attendees to participate in breakout discussions on emerging topics in birth defects research and to foster collaboration between basic researchers, clinicians, epidemiologists, drug developers, industry partners, funding agencies, and regulators to discuss state-of-the-art methods and innovative projects. Initially, a list of workshop topics was compiled by the RNW planning committee and circulated among the members of BDRP to obtain the most popular topics for the Workshop discussions. Based on the pre-meeting survey results, the top three discussion topics selected were, A) Inclusion of pregnant and lactating women in clinical trials. When, why, and how? B) Building multidisciplinary teams across disciplines: What cross-training is needed? And C) Challenges in applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning for risk factor analysis in birth defects research. This report summarizes the key highlights of the RNW workshop and specific topic discussions.

Development of a primate model to evaluate the effects of ketamine and surgical stress on the neonatal brain.

With advances in pediatric and obstetric surgery, pediatric patients are subject to complex procedures under general anesthesia. The effects of anesthetic exposure on the developing brain may be confounded by several factors including pre-existing disorders and surgery-induced stress. Ketamine, a noncompetitive N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, is routinely used as a pediatric general anesthetic. However, controversy remains about whether ketamine exposure may be neuroprotective or induce neuronal degeneration in the developing brain. Here, we report the effects of ketamine exposure on the neonatal nonhuman primate brain under surgical stress. Eight neonatal rhesus monkeys (postnatal days 5-7) were randomly assigned to each of two groups: Group A (n = 4) received 2 mg/kg ketamine via intravenous bolus prior to surgery and a 0.5 mg/kg/h ketamine infusion during surgery in the presence of a standardized pediatric anesthetic regimen; Group B (n = 4) received volumes of normal saline equivalent to those of ketamine given to Group A animals prior to and during surgery, also in the presence of a standardized pediatric anesthetic regimen. Under anesthesia, the surgery consisted of a thoracotomy followed by closing the pleural space and tissue in layers using standard surgical techniques. Vital signs were monitored to be within normal ranges throughout anesthesia. Elevated levels of cytokines interleukin (IL)-8, IL-15, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1ß at 6 and 24 h after surgery were detected in ketamine-exposed animals. Fluoro-Jade C staining revealed significantly higher neuronal degeneration in the frontal cortex of ketamine-exposed animals, compared with control animals. Intravenous ketamine administration prior to and throughout surgery in a clinically relevant neonatal primate model appears to elevate cytokine levels and increase neuronal degeneration. Consistent with previous data on the effects of ketamine on the developing brain, the results from the current randomized controlled study in neonatal monkeys undergoing simulated surgery show that ketamine does not provide neuroprotective or anti-inflammatory effects.

Establishment of neural stem cells from fetal monkey brain for neurotoxicity testing.

Neurotoxicity assessments are generally performed using laboratory animals. However, as in vitro neurotoxicity models are continuously refined to reach adequate predicative concordance with in vivo responses, they are increasingly used for some endpoints of neurotoxicity. In this study, gestational day 80 fetal rhesus monkey brain tissue was obtained for neural stem cells (NSCs) isolation. Cells from the entire hippocampus were harvested, mechanically dissociated, and cultured for proliferation and differentiation. Immunocytochemical staining and biological assays demonstrated that the harvested hippocampal cells exhibited typical NSC phenotypes in vitro: (1) cells proliferated vigorously and expressed NSC markers nestin and sex-determining region Y-box 2 (SOX2) and (2) cells differentiated into neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes, as confirmed by positive staining with class III ß-tubulin, glial fibrillary acidic protein, and galactocerebroside, respectively. The NSC produced detectable responses following neurotoxicant exposures (e.g. trimethyltin and 3-nitropropionic acid). Our results indicated that non-human primate NSCs may be a practical tool to study the biology of neural cells and to evaluate the neurotoxicity of chemicals in vitro, thereby providing data that are translatable to humans and may also reduce the number of animals needed for developmental neurotoxicological studies.

Artificial intelligence and real-world data for drug and food safety - A regulatory science perspective.

In 2013, the Global Coalition for Regulatory Science Research (GCRSR) was established with members from over ten countries (www.gcrsr.net). One of the main objectives of GCRSR is to facilitate communication among global regulators on the rise of new technologies with regulatory applications through the annual conference Global Summit on Regulatory Science (GSRS). The 11th annual GSRS conference (GSRS21) focused on "Regulatory Sciences for Food/Drug Safety with Real-World Data (RWD) and Artificial Intelligence (AI)." The conference discussed current advancements in both AI and RWD approaches with a specific emphasis on how they impact regulatory sciences and how regulatory agencies across the globe are pursuing the adaptation and oversight of these technologies. There were presentations from Brazil, Canada, India, Italy, Japan, Germany, Switzerland, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and the United States. These presentations highlighted how various agencies are moving forward with these technologies by either improving the agencies' operation and/or preparing regulatory mechanisms to approve the products containing these innovations. To increase the content and discussion, the GSRS21 hosted two debate sessions on the question of "Is Regulatory Science Ready for AI?" and a workshop to showcase the analytical data tools that global regulatory agencies have been using and/or plan to apply to regulatory science. Several key topics were highlighted and discussed during the conference, such as the capabilities of AI and RWD to assist regulatory science policies for drug and food safety, the readiness of AI and data science to provide solutions for regulatory science. Discussions highlighted the need for a constant effort to evaluate emerging technologies for fit-for-purpose regulatory applications. The annual GSRS conferences offer a unique platform to facilitate discussion and collaboration across regulatory agencies, modernizing regulatory approaches, and harmonizing efforts.

Application of Nonhuman Primate Models in the Studies of Pediatric Anesthesia Neurotoxicity.

Numerous animal models have been used to study developmental neurotoxicity associated with short-term or prolonged exposure of common general anesthetics at clinically relevant concentrations. Pediatric anesthesia models using the nonhuman primate (NHP) may more accurately reflect the human condition because of their phylogenetic similarity to humans with regard to reproduction, development, neuroanatomy, and cognition. Although they are not as widely used as other animal models, the contribution of NHP models in the study of anesthetic-induced developmental neurotoxicity has been essential. In this review, we discuss how neonatal NHP animals have been used for modeling pediatric anesthetic exposure; how NHPs have addressed key data gaps and application of the NHP model for the studies of general anesthetic-induced developmental neurotoxicity. The appropriate application and evaluation of the NHP model in the study of general anesthetic-induced developmental neurotoxicity have played a key role in enhancing the understanding and awareness of the potential neurotoxicity associated with pediatric general anesthetics.

Emerging technologies and their impact on regulatory science.

There is an evolution and increasing need for the utilization of emerging cellular, molecular and in silico technologies and novel approaches for safety assessment of food, drugs, and personal care products. Convergence of these emerging technologies is also enabling rapid advances and approaches that may impact regulatory decisions and approvals. Although the development of emerging technologies may allow rapid advances in regulatory decision making, there is concern that these new technologies have not been thoroughly evaluated to determine if they are ready for regulatory application, singularly or in combinations. The magnitude of these combined technical advances may outpace the ability to assess fit for purpose and to allow routine application of these new methods for regulatory purposes. There is a need to develop strategies to evaluate the new technologies to determine which ones are ready for regulatory use. The opportunity to apply these potentially faster, more accurate, and cost-effective approaches remains an important goal to facilitate their incorporation into regulatory use. However, without a clear strategy to evaluate emerging technologies rapidly and appropriately, the value of these efforts may go unrecognized or may take longer. It is important for the regulatory science field to keep up with the research in these technically advanced areas and to understand the science behind these new approaches. The regulatory field must understand the critical quality attributes of these novel approaches and learn from each other's experience so that workforces can be trained to prepare for emerging global regulatory challenges. Moreover, it is essential that the regulatory community must work with the technology developers to harness collective capabilities towards developing a strategy for evaluation of these new and novel assessment tools.

Neuroprotective Effects of Carnitine and Its Potential Application to Ameliorate Neurotoxicity.

Carnitine is an essential metabolite that is absorbed from the diet and synthesized in the kidney, liver, and brain. It ferries fatty acids across the mitochondrial membrane to undergo ß-oxidation. Carnitine has been studied as a therapy or protective agent for many neurological diseases and neurotoxicity (e.g., prolonged anesthetic exposure-induced developmental neurotoxicity in preclinical models). Preclinical and clinical data support the notion that carnitine or acetyl carnitine may improve a patient's quality of life through increased mitochondrial respiration, release of neurotransmitters, and global gene expression changes, showing the potential of carnitine beyond its approved use to treat primary and secondary carnitine deficiency. In this review, we summarize the beneficial effects of carnitine or acetyl carnitine on the central nervous system, highlighting protective effects against neurotoxicity-induced damage caused by various chemicals and encouraging a thorough evaluation of carnitine use as a therapy for patients suffering from neurotoxicant exposure.

Regulatory landscape of nanotechnology and nanoplastics from a global perspective.

Nanotechnology and more particularly nanotechnology-based products and materials have provided a huge potential for novel solutions to many of the current challenges society is facing. However, nanotechnology is also an area of product innovation that is sometimes developing faster than regulatory frameworks. This is due to the high complexity of some nanomaterials, the lack of a globally harmonised regulatory definition and the different scopes of regulation at a global level. Research organisations and regulatory bodies have spent many efforts in the last two decades to cope with these challenges. Although there has been a significant advancement related to analytical approaches for labelling purposes as well as to the development of suitable test guidelines for nanomaterials and their safety assessment, there is a still a need for greater global collaboration and consensus in the regulatory field. Furthermore, with growing societal concerns on plastic litter and tiny debris produced by degradation of littered plastic objects, the impact of micro- and nanoplastics on humans and the environment is an emerging issue. Despite increasing research and initial regulatory discussions on micro- and nanoplastics, there are still knowledge gaps and thus an urgent need for action. As nanoplastics can be classified as a specific type of incidental nanomaterials, current and future scientific investigations should take into account the existing profound knowledge on nanotechnology/nanomaterials when discussing issues around nanoplastics. This review was conceived at the 2019 Global Summit on Regulatory Sciences that took place in Stresa, Italy, on 24-26 September 2019 (GSRS 2019) and which was co-organised by the Global Coalition for Regulatory Science Research (GCRSR) and the European Commission's (EC) Joint Research Centre (JRC). The GCRSR consists of regulatory bodies from various countries around the globe including EU bodies. The 2019 Global Summit provided an excellent platform to exchange the latest information on activities carried out by regulatory bodies with a focus on the application of nanotechnology in the agriculture/food sector, on nanoplastics and on nanomedicines, including taking stock and promoting further collaboration. Recently, the topic of micro- and nanoplastics has become a new focus of the GCRSR. Besides discussing the challenges and needs, some future directions on how new tools and methodologies can improve the regulatory science were elaborated by summarising a significant portion of discussions during the summit. It has been revealed that there are still some uncertainties and knowledge gaps with regard to physicochemical properties, environmental behaviour and toxicological effects, especially as testing described in the dossiers is often done early in the product development process, and the material in the final product may behave differently. The harmonisation of methodologies for quantification and risk assessment of nanomaterials and micro/nanoplastics, the documentation of regulatory science studies and the need for sharing databases were highlighted as important aspects to look at.

Application of microRNA profiling to understand sevoflurane-induced adverse effects on developing monkey brain.

We have described that prolonged sevoflurane exposure at a clinically-relevant concentration of 2.5 % caused neuronal cell death in the developing monkey brain. Postnatal day 5 or 6 rhesus monkeys (n = 3) were exposed to 2.5 % sevoflurane for 8 h. Monkeys kept at environmental conditions in the procedure room served as controls (n = 3). Brain tissues were harvested four hours after sevoflurane exposure for histological analysis, and RNA or protein extraction. MicroRNA (miRNA) profiling on the frontal cortex of monkey brains was performed using next-generation sequencing. 417 miRNAs were identified in the frontal cortex, where most neuronal cell death was observed. 7 miRNAs were differentially expressed in frontal cortex after sevoflurane exposure. Five of these were expressed at significantly lower levels than controls and the other two miRNAs were expressed significantly higher. These differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs) were then loaded to the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis database for pathway analysis, in which targeting information was available for 5 DEMs. The 5 DEMs target 2,919 mRNAs which are involved in pathways that contribute to various cellular functions. Of note, 78 genes that are related to axon guidance signaling were targeted, suggesting that development of the neural circuit may be affected after sevoflurane exposure. Such changes may have long-term effects on brain development and function. These findings are supplementary to our previous observations and provide more evidence for better understanding the adverse effects of sevoflurane on the developing brain after an 8 -h exposure.

Approaches to Dose Finding in Neonates, Illustrating the Variability between Neonatal Drug Development Programs.

Drug dosing in neonates should be based on integrated knowledge concerning the disease to be treated, the physiological characteristics of the neonate, and the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of a given drug. It is critically important that all sources of information be leveraged to optimize dose selection for neonates. Sources may include data from adult studies, pediatric studies, non-clinical (juvenile) animal models, in vitro studies, and in silico models. Depending on the drug development program, each of these modalities could be used to varying degrees and with varying levels of confidence to guide dosing. This paper aims to illustrate the variability between neonatal drug development programs for neonatal diseases that are similar to those seen in other populations (meropenem), neonatal diseases related but not similar to pediatric or adult populations (clopidogrel, thyroid hormone), and diseases unique to neonates (caffeine, surfactant). Extrapolation of efficacy from older children or adults to neonates is infrequently used. Even if a disease process is similar between neonates and children or adults, such as with anti-infectives, additional dosing and safety information will be necessary for labeling, recognizing that dosing in neonates is confounded by maturational PK in addition to body size.

Regulatory landscape of dietary supplements and herbal medicines from a global perspective.

The number of Individuals that use dietary supplements and herbal medicine products are continuous to increase in many countries. The context of usage of a dietary supplement varies widely from country-to-country; in some countries supplement use is just limited to general health and well-being while others permit use for medicinal purposes. To date, there is little consensus from country to country on the scope, requirements, definition, or even the terminology in which dietary supplement and herbal medicines categories could be classified. Transparent science-based quality standards for the ingredients across these regulatory frameworks/definitions becomes even more important given the international supply chain. Meanwhile, there has been a rapid advancement in emerging technologies and data science applied to the field. This review was conceived at the Global Summit on Regulatory Sciences that took place in Beijing on September 2018 (GSRS2018) which is organized by Global Coalition for Regulatory Science Research (GCRSR) that consists of the global regulatory agencies from over ten countries including the European Union. This review summarizes a significant portion of discussions relating to a longitudinal comparison of the status for dietary supplements and herbal medicines among the different national jurisdictions and to the extent of how new tools and methodologies can improve the regulatory application.

Dr. Daniel Acosta and In Vitro toxicology at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's National Center for Toxicological Research.

For the past five years, Dr. Daniel Acosta has served as the Deputy Director of Research at the National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR), a principle research laboratory of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Over his career at NCTR, Dr. Acosta has had a major impact on developing and promoting the use of in vitro assays in regulatory toxicity and product safety assessments. As Dr. Acosta nears his retirement we have dedicated this paper to his many accomplishments at the NCTR. Described within this paper are some of the in vitro studies that have been conducted under Dr. Acosta's leadership. These studies include toxicological assessments involving developmental effects, and the development and application of in vitro reproductive, heart, liver, neurological and airway cell and tissue models.

Effects of Xenon-Based Anesthetic Exposure on the Expression Levels of Polysialic Acid Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule (PSA-NCAM) on Human Neural Stem Cell-Derived Neurons.

Numerous studies suggest a long duration of anesthesia during the late gestation period and infancy is associated with an increased risk of neuronal damage and neurocognitive impairment. The noble gas xenon is an anesthetic that is reported to have neuroprotective effects in some circumstances at certain concentrations. Currently, the effects of xenon on the brain and its potential neuroprotective properties, and/or the effects of xenon used in combination with other anesthetics, are not clearly understood and some reported data appear contradictory. In the present study, human neural stem cells were employed as a human-relevant model to evaluate the effects of xenon when it was co-administered with propofol, a frequently used anesthetic in pediatric anesthesia, and to understand the mechanism(s). The expression of polysialic acid (PSA) neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) on human neural stem cell-differentiated neurons was investigated as a key target molecule. PSA is a specific marker of developing neurons. It is essential for neuronal viability and plasticity. Human neural stem cells were maintained in neural differentiation medium and directed to differentiate into neuronal and glial lineages, and were exposed to propofol (50 µM) for 16 h in the presence or absence of xenon (33%). The neural stem cell-derived neurons were characterized by labelling cells with PSA-NCAM, after 5 days of differentiation. Propofol- and/or xenon-induced neurotoxicities were determined by measuring PSA immunoreactivity. A time course study showed that neuronal cell surface PSA was clearly cleaved off from NCAM by endoneuraminidase N (Endo-N), and eliminated PSA immunostaining was not re-expressed 4, 8, or 16 h after Endo-N washout. However, in the presence of 33% xenon, intense PSA staining on neuronal cell surface and processes was evident 16 h after Endo-N washout. In addition, prolonged (16 h) propofol exposure significantly decreased the positive rate of PSA-labeled neurons. When combined with xenon, propofol's adverse effects on neurons were attenuated. This work, conducted on the human neural stem cell-derived models, has provided evidence of the beneficiary effects of xenon on neurons and helps develop xenon-based anesthesia regimens in the pediatric population.

Protective Effects of Xenon on Propofol-Induced Neurotoxicity in Human Neural Stem Cell-Derived Models.

Early life exposure to general anesthetics can have neurotoxic consequences. Evidence indicates that xenon, a rare noble gas with anesthetic properties, may lessen neuronal damage under certain conditions. However, its potential neuroprotective properties, when used alone or in combination with other anesthetics, remain largely unknown. While it is difficult to verify the adverse effects of long duration anesthetic exposure in infants and children, the utilization of relevant non-clinical models (i.e., human-derived neural stem cells) may serve as a "bridging" model for evaluating the vulnerability of the nervous system. Neural stem cells, purchased from PhoenixSongs Biologicals, Inc., were guided to differentiate into neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes, which were then exposed to propofol (50 µM) for 16 h in the presence or absence of xenon (33%). Differentiation into cells of the neural lineage was confirmed by labelling with cell-specific markers, ß-tubulin for neurons, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) for astrocytes, and galactocerebroside (GALC) for oligodendrocytes after 5 days of differentiation. The presence and severity of neural damage induced by anesthetic exposures were assessed by several methods, including the TUNEL assay, and immuno-histochemical measurements. Our data demonstrate that prolonged exposure to propofol results in a significant increase in the number of TUNEL-positive cells, indicating increased neural apoptosis. No significant changes were detected in the number of GFAP-positive astrocytes or GALC-positive oligodendrocytes. However, the number of ß-tubulin-positive neurons was substantially reduced in the propofol-exposed cultures. Co-administration of xenon effectively blocked the propofol-induced neuronal damage/loss. No significant effects were observed when xenon was administered alone. The data indicate that prolonged exposure to propofol during development produces elevated levels of neuronal apoptosis in a human neural stem cell-derived model. However, sub-clinical, non-anesthetic concentrations of xenon, when used in combination with propofol, can prevent or ameliorate the toxic effects associated with prolonged anesthetic exposure. This is important as a more complete understanding of the neurotoxic mechanisms associated with a variety of clinically relevant anesthetic combinations becomes available. Protective approaches are critical for developing sound guidance on best practices for the use of these agents in the pediatric setting.

Saline Load Test for Detecting Traumatic Arthrotomy in the Wrist.

Background Open injuries communicating with the wrist joint are essential to detect to facilitate timely, appropriate treatment. While the saline load test to detect traumatic arthrotomy has been well studied in the knee and ankle, it has not been studied in the wrist, and therefore the appropriate volume of saline infusion to detect traumatic arthrotomy is not known. Purpose The purpose of this study was to utilize wrist arthroscopy to determine the saline infusion volume necessary to achieve 99% sensitivity in detecting traumatic arthrotomy. Methods Twenty consecutive patients undergoing elective wrist arthroscopy were prospectively enrolled. A 5-mm arthrotomy was established between the third and fourth dorsal extensor compartments. An 18-gauge needle was inserted into the 6R portal on the radial side of the extensor carpi ulnaris. Sterile normal saline was injected into the wrist joint through the needle at a rate of 0.1 mL per second until extravasation from the 3-4 portal was visualized. Saline volumes required for extravasation were analyzed. Results The mean saline volume required for extravasation was 0.8 mL. The volume of saline needed to achieve sensitivities of 50, 90, 95, and 99% were 0.4, 2.2, 2.3, and 2.5 mL respectively. Conclusions The saline infusion volume required to detect a dorsal radiocarpal arthrotomy with 99% sensitivity was 2.5 mL. We recommend using at least 2.5 mL when performing the saline load test to rule out a potential arthrotomy to the wrist in the traumatic setting. Level of Evidence: This is a Level II, diagnostic study.

A randomized controlled laboratory study on the long-term effects of methylphenidate on cardiovascular function and structure in rhesus monkeys.

BACKGROUND: Whether long-term methylphenidate (MPH) results in any changes in cardiovascular function or structure can only be properly addressed through a randomized trial using an animal model which permits elevated dosing over an extended period of time. METHODS: We studied 28 male rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) approximately 7 years of age that had been randomly assigned to one of three MPH dosages: vehicle control (0 mg/kg, b.i.d., n = 9), low dose (2.5 mg/kg, b.i.d., n = 9), or high dose (12.5 mg/kg, b.i.d., n = 10). Dosage groups were compared on serum cardiovascular and inflammatory biomarkers, electrocardiograms (ECGs), echocardiograms, myocardial biopsies, and clinical pathology parameters following 5 years of uninterrupted dosing. RESULTS: With the exception of serum myoglobin, there were no statistical differences or apparent dose-response trends in clinical pathology, cardiac inflammatory biomarkers, ECGs, echocardiograms, or myocardial biopsies. The high-dose MPH group had a lower serum myoglobin concentration (979 ng/mL) than either the low-dose group (1882 ng/mL) or the control group (2182 ng/mL). The dose response was inversely proportional to dosage (P = .0006). CONCLUSIONS: Although the findings cannot be directly generalized to humans, chronic MPH exposure is unlikely to be associated with increased cardiovascular risk in healthy children.