Predicting adverse outcomes in pregnant patients positive for SARS-CoV-2: a machine learning approach- a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Pregnant people are particularly vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection and to ensuing severe illness. Predicting adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes could aid clinicians in deciding on hospital admission and early initiation of treatment in affected individuals, streamlining the triaging processes. METHODS: An international repository of 1501 SARS-CoV-2-positive cases in pregnancy was created, consisting of demographic variables, patient comorbidities, laboratory markers, respiratory parameters, and COVID-19-related symptoms. Data were filtered, preprocessed, and feature selection methods were used to obtain the optimal feature subset for training a variety of machine learning models to predict maternal or fetal/neonatal death or critical illness. RESULTS: The Random Forest model demonstrated the best performance among the trained models, correctly identifying 83.3% of the high-risk patients and 92.5% of the low-risk patients, with an overall accuracy of 89.0%, an AUC of 0.90 (95% Confidence Interval 0.83 to 0.95), and a recall, precision, and F1 score of 0.85, 0.94, and 0.89, respectively. This was achieved using a feature subset of 25 features containing patient characteristics, symptoms, clinical signs, and laboratory markers. These included maternal BMI, gravidity, parity, existence of pre-existing conditions, nicotine exposure, anti-hypertensive medication administration, fetal malformations, antenatal corticosteroid administration, presence of dyspnea, sore throat, fever, fatigue, duration of symptom phase, existence of COVID-19-related pneumonia, need for maternal oxygen administration, disease-related inpatient treatment, and lab markers including sFLT-1/PlGF ratio, platelet count, and LDH. CONCLUSIONS: We present the first COVID-19 prognostication pipeline specifically for pregnant patients while utilizing a large SARS-CoV-2 in pregnancy data repository. Our model accurately identifies those at risk of severe illness or clinical deterioration, presenting a promising tool for advancing personalized medicine in pregnant patients with COVID-19.

Guideline No. 437: Diagnosis and Management of Adenomyosis.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the current evidence-based diagnosis and management of adenomyosis. TARGET POPULATION: All patients with a uterus of reproductive age. OPTIONS: Diagnostic options include transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Treatment options should be tailored to symptoms (heavy menstrual bleeding, pain, and/or infertility) and include medical options (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, tranexamic acid, combined oral contraceptives, levonorgestrel intrauterine system, dienogest, other progestins, gonadotropin-releasing analogues), interventional options (uterine artery embolization), and surgical options (endometrial ablation, excision of adenomyosis, hysterectomy). OUTCOMES: Outcomes of interest include reduction in heavy menstrual bleeding, reduction in pelvic pain (dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain), and improvement in reproductive outcomes (fertility, miscarriage, adverse pregnancy outcomes). BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: This guideline will benefit patients with gynaecological complaints that may be caused by adenomyosis, especially those patients who wish to preserve their fertility, by presenting diagnostic methods and management options. It will also benefit practitioners by improving their knowledge of various options. EVIDENCE: Databases searched were MEDLINE Reviews, MEDLINE ALL, Cochrane, PubMed, EMBASE. The initial search was completed in 2021 and updated with relevant articles in 2022. Search terms included adenomyosis, adenomyoses, endometritis (used/indexed as adenomyosis before 2012), (endometrium AND myometrium) uterine adenomyosis/es, symptom/s/matic adenomyosis] AND [diagnosis, symptoms, treatment, guideline, outcome, management, imaging, sonography, pathogenesis, fertility, infertility, therapy, histology, ultrasound, review, meta-analysis, evaluation]. Articles included randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, observational studies, and case reports. Articles in all languages were searched and reviewed. VALIDATION METHODS: The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Table A1 for definitions and Table A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations). INTENDED AUDIENCE: Obstetrician-gynaecologists, radiologists, family physicians, emergency physicians, midwives, registered nurses, nurse practitioners, medical students, residents, and fellows. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Adenomyosis is common in reproductive-aged women. There are diagnostic and management options that preserve fertility available. SUMMARY STATEMENTS: RECOMMENDATIONS.

Directive clinique no 437 : Diagnostic et prise en charge de l'adénomyose.

OBJECTIF: Décrire les pratiques actuelles fondées sur des données probantes pour le diagnostic et la prise en charge de l'adénomyose. POPULATION CIBLE: Toutes les patientes en âge de procréer qui ont un utérus. OPTIONS: Les options diagnostiques sont l'échographie endovaginale et l'imagerie par résonance magnétique. Les options thérapeutiques doivent être adaptées aux symptômes (saignements menstruels abondants, douleur et/ou infertilité) et comprendre des options médicamenteuses (anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens, acide tranexamique, contraceptifs oraux combinés, système intra-utérin à libération de lévonorgestrel, diénogest, autres progestatifs, analogues de la gonadotrophine), des options interventionnelles (embolisation de l'artère utérine) et des options chirurgicales (ablation de l'endomètre, excision de l'adénomyose, hystérectomie). RéSULTATS: Les critères de jugement sont la réduction des saignements menstruels abondants, l'atténuation de la douleur pelvienne (dysménorrhée, dyspareunie, douleur pelvienne chronique) et l'amélioration du devenir reproductif (fertilité, avortement spontané, issues de grossesse défavorables). BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: Par la présentation des méthodes de diagnostic et des options de prise en charge, cette directive sera bénéfique pour les patientes qui expriment des plaintes de nature gynécologique potentiellement causées par l'adénomyose, en particulier celles qui souhaitent préserver leur fertilité. La directive sera également utile aux praticiens qui pourront améliorer leurs connaissances sur les différentes options. DONNéES PROBANTES: Des recherches ont été effectuées dans les bases de données MEDLINE Reviews, MEDLINE ALL, Cochrane, PubMed et Embase. La recherche initiale a été réalisée en 2021 et mise à jour avec les articles pertinents en 2022. Les termes de recherche utilisés sont les suivants : adenomyosis, adenomyoses, endometritis (utilisés ou indexés sous adenomyosis avant 2012), (endometrium AND myometrium) uterine adenomyosis/es, symptom/s/matic adenomyosis ET [diagnosis, symptoms, treatment, guideline, outcome, management, imaging, sonography, pathogenesis, fertility, infertility, therapy, histology, ultrasound, review, meta-analysis, evaluation]. Les articles retenus sont des essais cliniques randomisés, des méta-analyses, des revues systématiques, des études observationnelles et des études de cas. Des articles dans toutes les langues ont été répertoriés et examinés. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant le cadre méthodologique GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Voir l'annexe A en ligne (Tableau A1 pour les définitions et Tableau A2 pour l'interprétation des recommandations fortes et conditionnelles [faibles]). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Obstétriciens-gynécologues, radiologistes, médecins de famille, urgentologues, sages-femmes, infirmières autorisées, infirmières praticiennes, étudiants en médecine, résidents et moniteurs cliniques (fellows). RéSUMé POUR TWITTER: L'adénomyose est fréquemment observée chez les femmes en âge de procréer. Il existe des options de diagnostic et de prise en charge qui préservent la fertilité. DÉCLARATIONS SOMMAIRES: RECOMMANDATIONS.

What is the Role of Video-Based Assessment of Laparoscopic Surgical Skill in Residency Training? A Qualitative Study of Trainee and Faculty Perspectives.

OBJECTIVES: Surgical training programs are starting to experiment with video-based assessment (VBA) of residents' technical skills. VBA may limit the effect of interpersonal bias on assessment scores. However, before VBA is implemented widely, stakeholders' perceptions ought to be explored, including potential benefits and challenges. METHODS: Using the qualitative methods of hermeneutical phenomenology, the authors explored both trainee and faculty educators' perspectives on VBA using semi-structured interviews. Participants were recruited from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of Toronto. Data underwent thematic analysis and was validated by the investigator and theoretical triangulation. RESULTS: The authors interviewed 9 physicians (5 faculty and 4 residents). Four dominant themes were identified, including advantages compared to traditional methods, the role of feedback and coaching, challenges integrating VBA, and considerations for implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical trainees and faculty feel that VBA is a worthy tool to advance equity and fairness in assessment, but felt it was better as a vehicle for feedback and coaching. VBA cannot be used as a standalone assessment metric without additional evidence for its validity. If implemented, residency programs can use VBA as an adjunct to other evaluation measures to facilitate coaching, provide asynchronous feedback, and limit assessment bias.

Meta-Analysis of Long-Term (>1 Year) Cardiac Outcomes of Peripartum Cardiomyopathy.

Peripartum cardiomyopathy is the development of heart failure toward the end of pregnancy or in the months after delivery in the absence of other attributable causes, with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) generally <45%. Given that patients are relatively young at the time of diagnosis, this study was performed to summarize current evidence surrounding the long-term cardiac outcomes. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and CINAHL were searched for original studies that reported long-term (>1 year) patient outcomes. Of the 3,144 total records identified, 62 studies involving 4,282 patients met the selection criteria. The mean LVEF was 28% at diagnosis and 47% at the time of the last follow-up. Approximately half of the patients achieved myocardial recovery (47%), most commonly defined as an LVEF >50% (n = 21). The prevalence of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator use, left ventricular assist device implantation, and heart transplantation was 12%, 7%, and 11%, respectively. The overall all-cause mortality was 9%, and despite having more cardiovascular risk factors, patients residing in high-income countries had superior outcomes, including reduced rates of mortality.

Pregnancy outcomes with donor oocyte embryos in patients diagnosed with adenomyosis using the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment criteria.

OBJECTIVE: To use the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) criteria to evaluate the impact of adenomyosis on the live birth rate after donor egg embryo transfer. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary fertility care center. PATIENT(S): A total of 100 patients who received 223 donor embryo transfers from January 2014-2020. All patients underwent ultrasound before their first transfer. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Our study was powered (80%) to assess the primary outcome of live birth rate; the secondary outcomes included the clinical pregnancy, biochemical pregnancy, and miscarriage rates. RESULT(S): Only 22 of 100 patients were diagnosed with adenomyosis on the original ultrasound report. When the MUSA criteria were applied, 76 patients had at least 1 possible ultrasonographic feature of adenomyosis; all 76 patients had an interrupted junctional zone. The second most common feature of adenomyosis was a globular and/or enlarged uterus (89.4%). Adjusted modeling demonstrated that a single ultrasound feature, 2 or more features, specific features, or the location of features did not affect the live birth outcome. A per-centimeter increase in the diameter of focal lesions was significantly associated with a decrease in the odds of live birth by the factor of 0.91. CONCLUSION(S): To our knowledge, our study is the first to characterize adenomyosis using the MUSA criteria in the donor oocyte population. Overall, our data were reassuring in that the ultrasonographic features of adenomyosis may not impact reproductive outcomes. However, we identified that the location and size of focal lesions may be important and should be studied further.

Awareness, knowledge, and misconceptions of adolescents and young people regarding long-acting reversible contraceptives: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the awareness, knowledge, and misconceptions of young people regarding long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs). DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines of MEDLINE-Ovid, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed with formal tests for heterogeneity and publication bias. Additional outcomes were summarized using thematic analysis. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Adolescents and young adults (aged 12-25 years) with a uterus. INTERVENTION(S): Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Patient-reported outcomes related to awareness, knowledge, and misconceptions of LARCs (including intrauterine devices, subdermal implants, and injections) were analyzed. RESULT(S): Of the 4,077 database citations, we included 40 studies encompassing 10,470 adolescents and young people. Twenty studies were eligible for meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence described that only 65.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51-78) of participants were aware of at least 1 type of LARC (I2 = 100). The meta-regression noted that the region, risk of bias, gravidity, sexual history, previous LARC experience, and postsecondary education were not associated with awareness. There were numerous misconceptions regarding eligibility, safety, and usage. Notably, 62% (95% CI, 20-91) did not understand that LARCs could be used in nulliparous individuals, and 37% (95% CI, 21-56) believed that LARCs could cause infertility. CONCLUSION(S): There are notable knowledge gaps among adolescents and young people regarding LARCs, such as eligibility criteria, the reversibility of long-acting options, and misconceptions regarding infertility. Clinicians should specifically counsel regarding the suitability for LARCs in nulliparous populations and that LARCs do not cause infertility.

Pregnancy and childbirth during incarceration: A qualitative systematic review of lived experiences.

BACKGROUND: Incarcerated individuals who experience pregnancy or childbirth in correctional facilities face unique considerations for obstetric care and consequently are at greater risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To characterise patient experiences regarding pregnancy and childbirth during incarceration via qualitative synthesis. SEARCH STRATEGY: Medline-OVID, EMBASE, CINAHL, Sociological Abstracts, Social Work Abstracts, Web of Science, Scopus and PsycInfo were systematically searched from inception to 24 December 2020. Supplementary searches were performed using the Scopus database. SELECTION CRITERIA: Only original, peer-reviewed literature was examined. Eligible studies were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. RESULTS: After screening 4173 original database citations, 24 studies that met inclusion criteria were included and analysed via thematic analysis. The 24 studies included perspectives from 645 female patients who had experienced incarceration, 69 healthcare providers and 70 prison staff. Key patient-reported concerns for the well-being of pregnant individuals during incarceration included mental health challenges, dehumanisation of prenatal care and delivery, lack of privacy, stigma, psychological trauma, lack of emotional support and shackle usage during pregnancy and/or labour. The studies reported a lack of support for patients to access female correctional officers or guards, privacy during intimate examinations, timely medical care and support for breastfeeding. Above all, the psychological trauma of separation from one's newborn after birth was of utmost devastation. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review highlights the dire need for accountability and interventions to improve pregnancy and childbirth care for incarcerated individuals. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: This systematic review describes lived experiences of pregnancy & childbirth during incarceration, including dehumanisation, psychological trauma, and use of shackles.