Surgery or No Surgery? Exploring the Dilemma of Epistaxis Management in Patients with HHT.

Background: Epistaxis, particularly in Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT) patients, is a common otolaryngological emergency, often requiring complex management. A hierarchy of increasingly invasive interventions, from external compression of the nasal pyramid to nostril closure, is typically proposed and applied. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on HHT patients to assess the effectiveness and longevity of invasive procedures postoperatively. Data were collected using the Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS) questionnaire. The primary focus was on changes in the frequency and intensity of epistaxis, while the secondary focus was on the overall quality of life. Results: This study found that invasive procedures initially improved the frequency and intensity of epistaxis in HHT patients. However, within 1 to 9 months postoperatively, these benefits often diminished, with hemorrhagic symptoms recurring at similar or worsened levels. Conclusions: The findings suggest a need for a cautious and restrained approach to using invasive treatments in managing epistaxis in HHT patients. Highly invasive procedures should be reserved for cases where less invasive methods fail, due to their temporary effectiveness and the risk of causing anatomical-functional changes in the rhino-sinus area, complicating future management of severe epistaxis.

Diagnosing acute mastoiditis in a Pediatric Emergency Department: a retrospective review.

Background and aim Acute mastoiditis (AM) is a common complication of acute otitis media in children. There is currently no consensus on criteria for diagnosis. Head CT is the most frequent diagnostic tool used in the ED although the increasing awareness on the use of ionized radiations in children has questioned the use of CT imaging versus solely using clinical criteria. Our research aimed to understand if CT imaging was essential in making a diagnosis of AM. Methods We retrospectively analyzed medical records from pediatric patients who accessed our Pediatric Emergency Department (ED) between January 2014 and December 2020, with a clinical suspicion of AM. We reviewed clinical symptoms upon presentation, head CT and lab values (white blood cell count or WBC, C-Reactive Protein or CRP) when done, presence of complications and discharge diagnosis. A multilogistic regression model was specified to establish the role of clinical features and of CT in the diagnosis of AM based on 77 patients. Results Otalgia (OR= 5.01; 95% CI= 1.52-16.51), protrusion of the auricle (OR= 8.42; 95% CI= 1.37-51.64) and hyperemia (OR= 4.07; 95% CI= 1.09-15.23) of the mastoid were the symptoms strongly associated with a higher probability of AM. In addition to clinical features, the adjusted OR conferred by head CT was 3.09 (95% CI = 0.92-10.34). Conclusions Clinical signs were most likely predictive of AM in our sample when compared to Head CT. Most common symptoms were protrusion of the auricle, hyperemia or swelling behind the ear and otalgia.

Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Lung Ultrasound B-Lines in Acute Heart Failure With Concomitant Pneumonia.

Purpose: To evaluate the potential confounding effect of concomitant pneumonia (PNM) on lung ultrasound (LUS) B-lines in acute heart failure (AHF). Methods: We enrolled 86 AHF patients with (31 pts, AHF/PNM) and without (55 pts, AHF) concomitant PNM. LUS B-lines were evaluated using a combined antero-lateral (AL) and posterior (POST) approach at admission (T0), after 24 h from T0 (T1), after 48 h from T0 (T2) and before discharge (T3). B-lines score was calculated at each time point on AL and POST chest, dividing the number of B-lines by the number of explorable scanning sites. The decongestion rate (DR) was calculated as the difference between the absolute B-lines number at discharge and admission, divided by the number of days of hospitalization. Patients were followed-up and hospital readmission for AHF was considered as adverse outcome. Results: At admission, AHF/PNM patients showed no difference in AL B-lines score compared with AHF patients [AHF/PNM: 2.00 (IQR: 1.44-2.94) vs. AHF: 1.65 (IQR: 0.50-2.66), p = 0.072], whereas POST B-lines score was higher [AHF/PNM: 3.76 (IQR: 2.70-4.77) vs. AHF = 2.44 (IQR: 1.20-3.60), p < 0.0001]. At discharge, AL B-lines score [HR: 1.907 (1.097-3.313), p = 0.022] and not POST B-lines score was found to predict adverse events (AHF rehospitalization) after a median follow-up of 96 days (IQR: 30-265) in the overall population. Conclusions: Assessing AL B-lines alone is adequate for diagnosis, pulmonary congestion (PC) monitoring and prognostic stratification in AHF patients, despite concomitant PNM.