Comparison of Intraocular Lens Power Prediction Accuracy Between 2 Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometry Devices.

PURPOSE: To compare intraocular lens (IOL) power prediction accuracy of the Eyestar 900 (EyeS900) and the IOLMaster 700 (IOLM700) based on estimated and measured posterior corneal power. DESIGN: Retrospective, interinstrument reliability study. METHODS: Setting: Institutional. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred twenty-five eyes of 225 cataract surgery patients. MEASUREMENTS: Patients underwent measurements by both devices preoperatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Spherical Equivalent Prediction Error (SEQ-PE), spread of the SEQ-PE (precision) and the absolute SEQ-PE (accuracy) of each device using Barrett Universal II (BUII) formula with either estimated posterior keratometry (E-PK) or measured posterior keratometry (M-PK). RESULTS: Trimmed mean SEQ-PEs of EyeS900 E-PK, EyeS900 M-PK, IOLM700 E-PK, and IOLM700 M-PK were 0.03, 0.08, 0.02, and 0.09 D, respectively with no significant differences between EyeS900 E-PK and IOLM700 E-PK (P = 0.31) as well as between EyeS900 M-PK and IOLM700 M-PK (P = 0.31). Statistically significant SEQ-PE differences were found when E-PK and M-PK were compared, regardless of the device used, showing hyperopic SEQ-PE in M-PK calculations. Excellent correlation and agreement in SEQ-PE were found between the devices for both E-PK (P < 0.001, r = 0.848, mean bias: +0.01 D, 95% LOA of -0.32 to +0.34 D) and M-PK (P < 0.001, r = 0.776, mean bias: -0.01 D, 95% LOA of -0.42 to +0.39 D). No significant differences were found comparing absolute SEQ-PE and precision of the devices. CONCLUSION: The Eyestar 900 and the IOLMaster 700 show comparable IOL power prediction accuracy by the BUII formula using either estimated or measured posterior keratometry. An adjusted lens factor may be required for BUII when utilizing measured posterior keratometry in both devices.

Hyperopic LASIK and postoperative corneal steepness: revisiting the 49-diopter limit.

PURPOSE: To compare corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) outcomes of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a postoperative corneal steepness above vs below 49 diopters (D). SETTING: Care-Vision Laser Centers, Tel-Aviv, Israel. DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHODS: This study included consecutive patients who underwent hyperopic LASIK between January 2013 and December 2019. Hyperopic patients were divided into 2 groups based on postoperative corneal steepness with steep corneas defined >49.0 D and the control group ≤49.0 D. Adjustments were performed to account for differences in baseline and intraoperative parameters. RESULTS: Overall, 1703 eyes of 1703 patients were included. Mean age was 48.3 ± 10.0 years, and 45.3% were male. Preoperatively, the steep group (2.4%, n = 41/1703) had steeper mean (44.6 D vs 43.1 D, P < .001) and steep (45.1 D vs 43.5 D, P < .001) keratometry, worse logMAR CDVA (0.07 vs 0.04, P = .02), and higher sphere (4.9 D vs 2.9 D, P < .001). Intraoperatively, they had a higher spherical treatment (4.6 D vs 2.8 D, P < .001). After hyperopic LASIK, the steep group had worse logMAR CDVA (0.10 vs 0.06, P = .01). However, after accounting for differences in baseline and spherical treatment, no significant differences were found in postoperative logMAR CDVA (0.06 vs 0.06, P = .99). The factors that remained associated with worse postoperative CDVA were higher spherical treatment (0.01 logMAR per 1 D, P < .001) and preoperative CDVA (0.60 logMAR per 1.00 logMAR, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative corneal steepness greater than 49 D is not associated with worse visual outcomes after hyperopic LASIK. However, lower preoperative visual potential and higher spherical treatment applied are associated with worse outcomes. The 49 D cutoff should be revisited.

Corneal pseudoectasia: a case series.

OBJECTIVE: To raise awareness of conditions that can tomographically mimic corneal ectasia and describe the actions required to avoid misdiagnosis. METHODS: We report a retrospective case series of seven patients presenting at two tertiary care centers in Israel with a presumed diagnosis of keratoconus or post-refractive ectasia. Upon further examination, the ectasia diagnosis was reconsidered and eventually ruled out. RESULTS: Included were ten eyes of seven patients. Cases included bilateral diffuse Salzmann's nodular degeneration, ophthalmoplegia with strabismus which precluded proper fixation during the acquisition of tomography images, two cases of incorrect Pentacam parameter settings, a patient with a history of hyperopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) treatment in one eye and myopic LASIK in the fellow eye, a case of old post-photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) stromal haze, and a patient with posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy. CONCLUSIONS: Tomography patterns mimicking corneal ectasia can appear in patients without ectatic pathology. The comprehensive ophthalmologist should be aware of such cases as they may substantially alter the treatment course and prognosis of these patients.

Factors Predicting the Need for Re-treatment After Laser Refractive Surgery in Patients With Mixed Astigmatism.

PURPOSE: To identify risk factors that increase the likelihood of re-treatment following refractive surgery in patients with mixed astigmatism. METHODS: This was a retrospective study including patients who underwent either laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) between 2000 and 2019 and had mixed astigmatism (spherical error of +0.50 D or greater and spherical equivalent of less than 0.00 diopters [D]). Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they underwent re-treatments during the study period. RESULTS: Overall, 785 eyes (785 patients) were included. In total, 5.2% of the eyes (n = 41) underwent re-treatment. The re-treatment group was more likely to have preoperative high astigmatism (80.5% vs 48.3%, P < .001), moderate to high hyperopia (36.6% vs 22.3%, P = .035), and to have undergone surgery earlier during the study period (P < .001). They were also more likely to have undergone surgery using the Wave-Light EX200 rather than the EX500 laser platform (Alcon Laboratories, Inc) (P < .001), have a treated optical zone of 6 mm rather than 6.5 mm (P < .001 for both), and their maximum ablation depth was greater (P < .001). There was no difference between the re-treatment and control groups regarding procedure type (PRK vs LASIK). Binary logistic regression found preoperative high astigmatism (odds ratio = 3.97, P < .001) and the type of laser platform used (EX200, odds ratio = 7.78, P < .001) as the only independent factors associated with re-treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Re-treatment rates following correction of mixed astigmatism were 5.2% over 20 years. Use of a sixth-generation laser platform significantly reduced the risk of re-treatment. Presence of high astigmatism is a significant risk factor for re-treatment. There was no difference in retreatment risk between PRK and LASIK. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(2):e73-e78.].

Factors Predicting Slow Visual Recovery Following Hyperopic LASIK.

PURPOSE: To identify factors predicting slow visual recovery following hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: The study included consecutive patients who underwent hyperopic LASIK between January 2005 and December 2019 at a single medical center. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they experienced normal recovery of visual acuity (1-week visit) or slow visual recovery (1-month visit). Visual recovery was defined as achieving an efficacy index of 0.9 or greater. Efficacy index was calculated as postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity / preoperative corrected distance visual acuity. A comparison of baseline and intraoperative parameters was performed. Binary logistic regression was performed to identify potential predictors of slow visual recovery. RESULTS: Overall, 861 eyes of 861 patients were included. Mean age was 48.0 ± 9.5 years and 55.9% were women. Two hundred forty-nine patients (28.9%) experienced slow visual recovery. Younger age (P = .01), a larger preoperative spherical equivalence (P = .002), and greater maximum ablation depth (P = .002) were predictors of slow visual recovery. In binary logistic regression, female gender (P = .036) and greater spherical equivalence (P = .007) remained significant predictors of slow visual recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Female gender and greater preoperative spherical equivalence were associated with slow visual recovery. Patients may be advised accordingly. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(1):e42-e47.].

Factors Predicting Slow Visual Recovery Following Hyperopic LASIK.

PURPOSE: To identify factors predicting slow visual recovery following hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: The study included consecutive patients who underwent hyperopic LASIK between January 2005 and December 2019 at a single medical center. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they experienced normal recovery of visual acuity (1-week visit) or slow visual recovery (1-month visit). Visual recovery was defined as achieving an efficacy index of 0.9 or greater. Efficacy index was calculated as postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity / preoperative corrected distance visual acuity. A comparison of baseline and intraoperative parameters was performed. Binary logistic regression was performed to identify potential predictors of slow visual recovery. RESULTS: Overall, 861 eyes of 861 patients were included. Mean age was 48.0 ± 9.5 years and 55.9% were women. Two hundred forty-nine patients (28.9%) experienced slow visual recovery. Younger age (P = .01), a larger preoperative spherical equivalence (P = .002), and greater maximum ablation depth (P = .002) were predictors of slow visual recovery. In binary logistic regression, female gender (P = .036) and greater spherical equivalence (P = .007) remained significant predictors of slow visual recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Female gender and greater preoperative spherical equivalence were associated with slow visual recovery. Patients may be advised accordingly. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(1):e42-e47.].

Factors Predicting Loss of Best-Corrected Visual Acuity After Hyperopic Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for the loss of corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) after uncomplicated hyperopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: A retrospective study including hyperopic patients who underwent microkeratome-assisted LASIK between January 2000 and December 2019 at Care-Vision Laser Centers, Tel-Aviv, Israel. Loss of CDVA was defined as ≥ 2 lines (0.20 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] increase). Excluded were patients who had loss of CDVA because of intraoperative or postoperative complications or developed cataract at their final visit. RESULTS: Overall, 1998 eyes of 1998 patients were included in the study, of which 35 eyes (1.75%) had CDVA loss at final follow-up (mean 387 days). The vision-loss group had a significantly greater spherical treatment (3.4 vs. 2.8 D, P = 0.02), ablation depth (69.4 vs. 53.8 µm, P = 0.01), a higher proportion of treatments with a smaller optic zone (6.0 mm) (31.4% vs. 13.4%, P = 0.002), treatment with the EX200 (Alcon) excimer rather than the EX500 (Alcon) (74.3% vs. 39.0%, P < 0.001), and treatment with the Moria M2-90 microkeratome rather than the Moria Sub-Bowman's keratomileusis (SBK) microkeratome (65.7% vs. 29.6%, P < 0.001). In multivariate binary logistic regression, factors that remained significant predictors of CDVA loss were a greater spherical treatment (per 1 D treatment, odds ratio = 1.42, 95% CI, 1.11-1.81, P = 0.004) and the use of the Moria M2-90 microkeratome (odds ratio = 4.66, 95% CI, 2.30-9.45, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing uncomplicated hyperopic LASIK, a greater spherical hyperopic treatment is associated with a higher risk for vision loss. Transition to a newer microkeratome model significantly reduced vision loss rate.

Use of a three-dimensional head-mounted digital visualization platform in cataract surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To report preliminary experience using the BeyeonicsOne (Beyeonics Vision, Haifa, Israel) digital visualization platform and the utilization of its three-dimensional (3D) head-mounted display (HMD) in cataract surgery. METHODS: An interventional case series including patients who underwent cataract surgery using the 3D HMD platform at the Tel Aviv Medical Center. The system uses the HMD unit to display high-resolution real-time 3D surgical field images. Collected data included patient demographics, ocular comorbidities, risk factors for complex cataract surgery, cataract grading, preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and intra- and postoperative complications. RESULTS: In total, 60 eyes of 60 subjects (mean age 73.1 ± 8.4 years) were included. Mean preoperative BCVA was 0.40 ± 0.30 logMAR (Snellen equivalent ~20/50) and improved to 0.10 ± 0.10 logMAR (Snellen equivalent ~20/25, p < 0.001). None of the patients suffered BCVA loss. All procedures and follow-ups were uneventful except for one case of a posterior capsular tear and one case of post-surgical cystoid macular edema. CONCLUSION: The visualization platform and its embedded 3D head-mounted display can be easily used in routine cataract surgery with the added benefits of improved ergonomics, high picture quality and enhanced image control.

Comparison of biometry measurements and intraocular lens power prediction between 2 SS-OCT-based biometers.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the agreement in biometry measurements and intraocular lens (IOL) power prediction between the Eyestar 900 and the IOLMaster 700. SETTING: Institutional. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. METHODS: Patients were evaluated before cataract surgery using both devices on the same visit. Axial length, anterior and posterior keratometry, anterior chamber depth, corneal diameter (CD), central corneal thickness, and lens thickness were recorded by both devices. The agreement in measurements and in IOL power calculations was evaluated using the Barrett Universal II (BU-II) formula with either predicted or measured posterior keratometry. RESULTS: In total, 402 eyes of 402 consecutive patients were included. The mean age was 72.0 ± 9.2 years. Clinically, mean differences in measured variables were small, albeit slightly larger for posterior flat and steep keratometry (0.43 diopters [D] and 0.42 D, respectively). The measurement correlation and agreement between the devices were good for all variables with slightly lower agreement in CD measurements. Consistent bias was seen in measurements of posterior flat and steep keratometry. Good agreement was also found in anterior and posterior astigmatism measurements. Good IOL power calculation agreement was found using either predicted posterior keratometry (95% limits of agreement [LoA] of -0.40 to +0.30 D) or measured posterior keratometry (95% LoA of -0.45 to +0.40 D). The agreement was within ±0.5 D in 394 eyes (98.0%) using predicted posterior keratometry and in 386 eyes (96.0%) using measured posterior keratometry. CONCLUSIONS: The Eyestar 900 and the IOLMaster 700 show strong agreement in biometry measurements and IOL power prediction by the BU-II formula using either standard or total corneal keratometry and can be used interchangeably.

A randomized controlled trial comparing femtosecond-enabled deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and standard deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (FEDS Study).

OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes of femtosecond-enabled deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (FE-DALK) and standard deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (S-DALK). METHODS: An open label, randomized controlled trial (Kensington Eye Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada) including 100 eyes of 97 participants with either keratoconus or corneal scarring, randomized to either FE-DALK (n = 48) or S-DALK (n = 49). PRIMARY OUTCOMES: postoperative astigmatism and surgically induced corneal astigmatism (SIA) - both at 15 months. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: 6-, 12- and 15-month postoperative uncorrected- and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, steep and flat keratometry, manifest sphere and astigmatism, rate of conversion to penetrating keratoplasty (PK), big-bubble success, central corneal thickness, endothelial cell count and complications. RESULTS: In intention-to-treat analysis, mean postoperative astigmatism in the FE-DALK (n = 30) and S-DALK (n = 30) groups at 15 months was 7.8 ± 4.4 D and 6.3 ± 5.0 D, respectively (p = 0.282) with an adjusted mean difference of 1.3 D (95% CI -1.08, +3.65). Mean SIA (arithmetic) was 9.2 ± 7.8 and 8.8 ± 5.4 D, respectively (p = 0.838) with a mean difference of 0.4 D (95% CI -3.13, +3.85). In an analysis of successful DALK cases only, mean postoperative astigmatism in the FE-DALK (n = 24) and S-DALK (n = 20) groups at 15 months (after excluding 4 eyes with AEs) was 7.3 ± 4.4 and 6.2 ± 4.9 D, respectively (p = 0.531) with an adjusted mean difference of 0.9 D (95% CI -1.94, +3.71). Mean SIA (arithmetic) was 9.1 ± 7.8 and 7.9 ± 4.6 D, respectively (p = 0.547) with a mean difference of 1.2 D (95% CI -2.70,+5.02). Comparison of secondary outcomes showed only weak statistical evidence. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized controlled trial, FE-DALK and S-DALK showed comparable functional and anatomical outcomes.

Phototherapeutic keratectomy versus epithelial debridement combined with anterior stromal puncture or diamond burr for recurrent corneal erosions.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) versus epithelial debridement combined with anterior stromal puncture (ASP) or diamond burr for the treatment of recurrent corneal erosions (RCES) in a large tertiary centre. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of RCES secondary to trauma or epithelial basement membrane dystrophy who underwent a surgical procedure between 2009 and 2019 were included in the study. The following data were collected: demographics, ocular history, prior medical treatment, ocular surgeries, intervention, complete epithelialization at postoperative week 1, recurrences, and complications. Recurrence was defined as either an objective finding of a corneal epithelial defect or symptoms suggestive of recurrent epithelial erosion on history. Recurrence rate and time to epithelialization were compared between groups. RESULTS: A total of 97 eyes (73 patients) were included in the study. Mean patient age was 51 ± 16.1 years, and mean follow-up was 474 days. RCES was secondary to epithelial basement membrane dystrophy in 80% (n = 78 of 97), trauma (15%, n = 15 of 97), or idiopathic (4%, n = 4 of 97). Epithelial debridement with ASP was performed in 34 eyes (35%), diamond burr in 33 eyes (33%), and PTK in 30 eyes (31%). Compared with epithelial debridement with ASP (recurrence 29.4%), the recurrence rate was significantly lower for both the diamond burr (9.1%, p = 0.031) and PTK groups (10%, p = 0.048). The diamond burr and PTK groups also had a significantly higher rate of complete epithelialization at 1 week (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with epithelial debridement with ASP, diamond burr and PTK have significantly lower rates of recurrence and time to epithelialization and may be considered first for surgical management of RCES.

Five-Year Safety and Efficacy of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate 5-year safety and efficacy outcomes of femtosecond-enabled Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (F-DMEK) in patients with Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy (FED). METHODS: This was a retrospective study, including patients with FED and cataract who underwent either F-DMEK (16 eyes of 15 patients) or manual DMEK (M-DMEK) (42 eyes of 37 patients) combined with cataract extraction. Outcome measures included visual acuity, graft detachment, graft survival, and endothelial cell loss. RESULTS: The average follow-up in F-DMEK and M-DMEK was 57.1 ± 12.4 months and 58.5 ± 17.3 months, respectively ( P = 0.757). The rates of primary failure (0% vs. 9.5%, P = 0.567), secondary failure (0% for both), and graft rejection (0% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.533) did not differ significantly between the groups. Improvement in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was similar in F-DMEK and M-DMEK (0.32 ± 0.27 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution and 0.35 ± 0.44 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, respectively, P = 0.165) and persisted at 2, 3, 4, and 5 years and at the last follow-up. The rates of graft detachment and rebubbling were significantly lower with 6.25% in F-DMEK and 33.3% in M-DMEK ( P = 0.035). Cell-loss rates were lower in F-DMEK compared with M-DMEK throughout the follow-up, significantly so up to 2 years with a difference of 8.6% at 1 year ( P = 0.023), 11.8% at 2 years ( P = 0.021), 7.6% at 3 years ( P = 0.088), 5.8% at 4 years ( P = 0.256), 13.6% at 5 years ( P = 0.169), and 7.1% at the final follow-up ( P = 0.341). CONCLUSIONS: F-DMEK had an excellent safety and efficacy profile which was maintained over 5 years of follow-up. Lower endothelial cell-loss rates in F-DMEK compared with M-DMEK may help extend the duration of graft survival.

Use of a Novel Three-dimensional Head-mounted Digital Visualization Platform in Corneal Endothelial Transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: To report the first endothelial keratoplasty procedures performed using a 3D digital head-mounted ophthalmic exoscope. METHODS: Three patients underwent Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) using a 3D digital ophthalmic exoscope (Beyeonics One, Beyeonics Vision, Haifa, Israel) at the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel. RESULTS: All procedures were uneventful, leading to resolution of corneal edema and vision improvement. Surgeons reported excellent visualization and minimal lag, almost negligible, with the benefits of improved ergonomics and the use of head gestures to control zoom, focus, brightness, and panning. There were no postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: The new 3D digital ophthalmic exoscope system can be successfully used in DSAEK surgery with potential advantages in ergonomics, picture quality, and image control. Further studies can compare this system with either standard operating microscopes or 3D heads-up display systems.

Long-Term Stability of Femtosecond Astigmatic Keratotomy After Treatment of High Postkeratoplasty Astigmatism.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess long-term stability and outcomes of femtosecond astigmatic keratotomy (FSAK) after treatment of high postkeratoplasty astigmatism. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent FSAK for high astigmatism (≥4 D) after penetrating keratoplasty or deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Main outcome measures were corneal astigmatism, uncorrected visual acuity, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 1 month and 1, 5, and 10 years. RESULTS: Overall, 61 eyes of 61 patients (mean age 56 ± 19 years, 54.1% male) were included in this study. Preoperative corneal astigmatism ranged from 4 to 25 D. One month after FSAK, mean corneal astigmatism was significantly reduced from 9.02 ± 3.97 D to 4.86 ± 3.10 D ( P < 0.001). Thereafter, corneal astigmatism remained stable at all visits up to 10 years ( P < 0.05 for all compared with baseline). After FSAK, there was a significant improvement in logMAR uncorrected visual acuity from 1.21 ± 0.48 to 0.87 ±0.54 ( P < 0.001) and logMAR BCVA from 1.03 ± 0.55 to 0.49 ± 0.45 ( P < 0.001) which remained stable up to 10 years. A mild reduction in BCVA improvement was seen between 1 month and 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Femtosecond astigmatic keratotomy was effective and stable at reducing very high magnitudes of postkeratoplasty astigmatism over the long term. The procedure also had a stable effect on visual acuity, albeit some reduction in the degree of BCVA improvement was seen over the early postoperative period.

Use of machine learning to achieve keratoconus detection skills of a corneal expert.

PURPOSE: To construct an automatic machine-learning derived algorithm discriminating between normal corneas and suspect irregular or keratoconic corneas. METHODS: A total of 8526 corneal tomography images of 4904 eyes obtained between November 2010 and July 2017 using a combined Scheimpflug/Placido tomographer were retrospectively evaluated. Each image was evaluated for acquisition quality and was labeled as normal, suspect irregular or keratoconic by a cornea specialist. Two algorithms were built. The first was based on 94 instrument-derived output parameters, and the second integrated keratoconus prediction indices of the device with the 94 instrument-derived output parameters. Both models were compared with the tomographer's keratoconus detection algorithms. Out of the 8526 images evaluated, 7104 images of 3787 eyes had sufficient acquisition quality. Of those, 5904 examinations were randomly chosen for construction of the models using the random forest algorithm. The models were then validated using the remaining 1200 examinations. RESULTS: Both RF algorithms had a larger AUC compared with any of the tomographer's KC detection algorithms (p < 10-9). The first constructed model had 90.2% accuracy, sensitivity of 94.2%, and specificity of 89.6% (Youden 0.838). Calculated AUC was 0.964. The second model had 91.5% accuracy, sensitivity of 94.7%, and specificity of 89.8% (Youden 0.846). Calculated AUC was 0.969. CONCLUSION: Using the RF machine-learning algorithm, accuracy of discrimination between normal, suspect irregular and keratoconic corneas approximates that of an experienced corneal expert. Applying machine learning to corneal tomography can facilitate keratoconus screening in large populations as well as off-site screening of refractive surgery candidates.

Comparison of two new integrated SS-OCT tomography and biometry devices.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the agreement in biometry measurements and intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations between 2 integrated swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) tomography/biometry devices: the Eyestar 900 and the Anterion. SETTING: Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. METHODS: 113 eyes of 66 consecutive patients who were evaluated prior to cataract surgery using both devices on the same visit were included. Measurements of axial length, anterior and posterior keratometry, anterior chamber depth, corneal diameter (CD), central corneal thickness, and lens thickness were recorded from both devices and analyzed for agreement and correlation. IOL power calculations using Barrett Universal II formula were compared between the devices in addition to prediction error (PE) and the mean absolute error (MAE). RESULTS: The mean age was 71.6 ± 9.8 years. Clinically, the mean differences in measured variables were small. Measurement correlation and agreement between the devices were excellent for all variables, except for CD (Spearman r = 0.763, P &lt; .001, and Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement -0.21 to +0.65 mm). Good agreement was found between the devices in IOL power calculations, PE, and MAE, and the agreement was better when using the Eyestar 900 reflective keratometry measurements than the Eyestar 900 SS-OCT keratometry measurements (IOL power agreement within ±0.5 diopter (D) in 90.5% [n = 95] and 81.0% [n = 85], respectively [ P = .076], and within ±0.25 D in 64.8% [n = 68] and 44.8% [n = 47], respectively [ P = .005]). CONCLUSIONS: The 2 integrated SS-OCT tomography/biometry devices had good agreement in biometry measurements and IOL power calculations. Agreement was better when the Eyestar 900 reflective anterior keratometry measurements were used rather than the Eyestar 900 SS-OCT anterior keratometry measurements. Measurements of CD had reduced agreement and were not interchangeable.

Outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract and refractive lens surgery in patients with prior radial keratotomy.

PURPOSE: To investigate outcomes of femtosecond laser (FL)-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and refractive lens exchange (RLE) in patients with prior radial keratotomy (RK). SETTING: Single clinical practice. DESIGN: Retrospective observational case series. METHODS: All patients with prior RK undergoing FLACS- or FL-assisted RLE surgeries over a 6-year period were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were diurnal stability and stable manifest refraction. Exclusion criteria were any other incisional corneal surgery, macular or glaucomatous pathology, or vision loss due to any other cause. Data collected included demographics, visual acuity, laser settings, and complications. Main outcome measures were intraoperative and postoperative complications and visual outcomes. Safety and efficacy indices were evaluated. RESULTS: 16 eyes of 9 patients were included. Mean age and follow-up time were 59.9 ± 9.9 years (range 44 to 75 years) and 3.3 ± 2.5 months, respectively. The mean number of RK cuts was 11.8 ± 5.3 (range 8 to 20). Mean preoperative uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were 0.9 ± 0.4 logMAR (Snellen 20/160) and 0.2 ± 0.3 logMAR (Snellen 20/30), respectively. 2 intraoperative anterior capsule tears were identified. 1 postoperative intraocular lens dislocation occurred. Postoperatively, the mean UDVA and CDVA were 0.2 ± 0.2 logMAR (20/30) and 0.1 ± 0.1 logMAR (20/25), respectively. The safety index was 1.6, and the efficacy index was 1.2. CONCLUSIONS: FLACS- or FL-assisted RLE surgery in RK patients has a high risk for anterior capsule tear and should be avoided. Thickened incisional scars are potential sources of incomplete laser penetrance. Toric lens implantation in RK eyes provide unpredictable astigmatic correction and should also be avoided.

Factors Predicting the Need for Re-treatment After Laser Refractive Surgery in Patients With High Astigmatism: A Large Database Analysis.

PURPOSE: To identify the potential risk factors that increase the likelihood of requiring re-treatment following refractive surgery in patients with high astigmatism (3.00 diopters or greater). METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) between January 2005 and December 2019 at the Care-Vision Laser Centers, Tel-Aviv, Israel. Patients with high astigmatism (3.00 diopters or greater) were included and divided into two groups according to whether or not they underwent additional refractive surgery (re-treatment) during the study period. RESULTS: Overall, 2,024 eyes (2,024 patients) were included in the final analysis of this study. In total, 3.1% of the eyes (n = 63) underwent re-treatment. Throughout the study period, there was a significant reduction in the 2-year annual re-treatment rates, with a decline from 7.0% for primary surgeries performed in 2005 to 0.0% for primary surgeries performed in 2017 (r =-0.65, P = .015). The re-treatment group had significantly older preoperative age. They were also more likely to be male and have preoperative against-the-rule astigmatism and preoperative mixed astigmatism. Binary logistic regression analysis demonstrated that preoperative age, male gender, mixed astigmatism, and earlier year of surgery were all associated with higher re-treatment rates. CONCLUSIONS: The following factors are associated with higher rates of re-treatment in patients with high astigmatism: older preoperative age, male gender, and mixed astigmatism. These factors may be incorporated into nomograms to reduce future re-treatment rates in this population. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(6):366-371.].