Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 22
1.
Rheumatol Ther ; 10(5): 1277-1295, 2023 Oct.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37460856

INTRODUCTION: This drug utilization study evaluated the impact of 2019 label changes on real-world febuxostat utilization among patients with gout. We describe the numbers and proportions of patients initiating febuxostat as new users (allopurinol-naïve) or prevalent new users (prior allopurinol use) and data on febuxostat users with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidities before, during, and after the 2019 label changes. METHODS: This descriptive, non-interventional, cross-sectional study used data from two large administrative claims databases in the United States, the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus database and the Optum Research Database (ORD). The study population included patients with gout initiating febuxostat on or after June 1, 2016. Data were collected on febuxostat and allopurinol use, established CVD morbidities, comorbidities of interest, concomitant medications, and patient demographics. RESULTS: In both databases, the total number of febuxostat users and proportion of patients who initiated febuxostat as new users both decreased during the study period. Of 13,848 patients in the PharMetrics Plus cohort, 42.7% were new users of febuxostat and 57.3% were prevalent new users. In the ORD cohort, 40.5% of the 10,198 patients were new users and 59.5% were prevalent new users. The most common established CVD morbidities in the 12 months prior to initiation of febuxostat were diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, and heart failure/cardiomyopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Although the benefit-risk profile for febuxostat is considered favorable for the treatment of hyperuricemia in certain patients with gout, real-world febuxostat utilization decreased during the study period, presumably in response to the label change.

2.
Ann Clin Psychiatry ; 34(3): 197-206, 2022 08.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35849771

BACKGROUND: Systematic data regarding long-term neurobehavioral effects of maternal antidepressant use during pregnancy are sparse. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of gestational exposure to antidepressants on later neurodevelopmental function. METHODS: This study describes a cohort of mother-child dyads (44 mothers, 54 children) in which maternal depressive symptoms and medication exposures were prospectively collected across pregnancy and the postpartum period. Children age 6 to 17 were assessed using validated instruments across domains of childhood behavior and executive memory and functioning. RESULTS: No associations were found between maternal use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) during pregnancy and atypical neurodevelopment of children. Borderline clinical or clinical ranges of internalizing symptoms were associated with exposure to a higher maternal depressive symptom burden during pregnancy compared with those in the normal range. Compared with age- and sex-matched controls, the SSRI-exposed group showed superior performance on executive function tasks; findings did not demonstrate elevated risk for abnormal neurodevelopment in children age 6 to 17 exposed to SSRIs in utero. Deviations from the norm were instead associated with higher in utero exposure to maternal depression burden. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the need for rigorous studies of long-term outcomes after fetal antidepressant exposure.


Pregnancy Complications , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects , Adolescent , Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects , Child , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/drug therapy , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use
3.
Lung Cancer ; 174: 174-185, 2022 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35717343

INTRODUCTION: High-grade pneumonitis is a severe and potentially life-threatening adverse event associated with concurrent chemoradiation (cCRT) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to summarize and quantify the incidence of severe (grade 3-5) cCRT-induced pneumonitis in unresectable stage III NSCLC patients. METHODS: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Published literature was searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, and non-randomized trials from 2014 to April 2020. The primary outcome of interest was incidence of grade 3-5 pneumonitis. RESULTS: Included were 17 studies for the review and 11 for the meta-analysis (1,788 participants); all studies examined radiation-related pneumonitis (RP). The pooled incidence of cCRT-induced grade 3-5 RP in unresectable stage III NSCLC patients was estimated to be 3.62% [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.65-6.21] in RCTs, 5.98% [95% CI: 2.26-12.91] in observational studies, and 7.85% [95% CI: 4.08-13.10] in observational studies using platinum-based doublet chemotherapies. CONCLUSION: These results suggest the incidence of severe and fatal RP in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC treated with cCRT ranges from 3.62% to 7.85%, with incidence varying by study design and chemotherapy regimen. Estimates of RP incidence were higher in the real-world setting compared to RCTs. These results can be used to contextualize the baseline risk of cCRT-induced pneumonitis in unresectable stage III NSCLC to better understand the adverse event of pneumonitis associated with novel immunotherapy treatments indicated for concomitant use with this modality.


Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Pneumonia , Radiation Pneumonitis , Humans , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/therapy , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Radiation Pneumonitis/diagnosis , Radiation Pneumonitis/epidemiology , Radiation Pneumonitis/etiology , Pneumonia/etiology , Pneumonia/chemically induced
4.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 115: 106718, 2022 04.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35247632

BACKGROUND: Historically, females have been underrepresented in clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of investigational drugs and devices. We assessed participation by sex in recent clinical trials. METHODS: We extracted data over a 4-year period (2016-2019) from ClinicalTrials.gov on US-based, pharmaceutical industry or government-funded Phase 1-3 clinical trials of drugs and devices. We included trials with adult cardiovascular, psychiatric, and cancer endpoints whose protocol planned to enroll both sexes. Average proportions of females enrolled per trial were described overall and by disease area. RESULTS: Across 1433 trials including 302,664 participants in our analysis, on average, 41.2% were female. Females were underrepresented compared with their proportion of the disease population in cardiovascular disease trials (41.9% female participants vs. 49% female population with cardiovascular disease). In psychiatry, where females comprise 60% of patients, the mean participation of females in clinical trials was 42.0%. Similarly, for cancer trials, where 51% of patients are female, only 41.0% of cancer clinical trial participants were female. For each therapeutic area analyzed, the participation of females in clinical trials fell short of the benchmark derived from national prevalence data. CONCLUSIONS: While the participation of females in clinical trials has improved compared to previous reports, sex-based gaps still persist between trial populations and those expected to use these drugs/devices based on distributions of diseases in the population. Given potential sex-based differences in treatment responses and toxicities, adequate inclusion of females in clinical trials remains critical.


Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Patient Participation , Adult , Cardiovascular Diseases/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prevalence , United States
6.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 82(4)2021 08 03.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34352165

Objective: Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are prescribed for a wide range of indications in women of reproductive age. The National Pregnancy Registry for Atypical Antipsychotics (NPRAA) was established to determine the risk of major malformations among infants exposed to these medications during the first trimester relative to a comparison group of unexposed infants of mothers with histories of psychiatric morbidity.Methods: Women, aged 18-45 years, with histories of psychiatric illness were prospectively followed through pregnancy and during the postpartum period. Pediatric and maternal medical records were obtained and screened for evidence of major malformations. Potential cases were adjudicated by a dysmorphologist who was blinded to drug exposure.. Recruitment to the Registry, which is based at the Ammon-Pinizzotto Center for Women's Mental Health at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), includes nationwide provider referral, self-referral, and advertisement through the MGH Center for Women's Mental Health website.Results: As of April 9, 2020, 1,906 women had enrolled, including 889 in the exposure group and 1,017 controls. A total of 1,311 women completed the study and were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. Medical records were obtained for 81.3% of participants. Among 640 live births in the exposure group, 16 (2.50%) had confirmed major malformations reported, and among 704 live births in the control group, 14 (1.99%) had confirmed major malformations reported. The estimated odds ratio for major malformations comparing exposed and unexposed infants was 1.48 (95% CI, 0.625-3.517).Conclusions: Data from the Registry assessing SGAs as a class indicate that they are unlikely to have a major teratogenic effect. These findings provide pertinent information for women and their health care providers regarding decisions about atypical antipsychotic use during pregnancy.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrails.gov identifier: NCT01246765.


Abnormalities, Drug-Induced/epidemiology , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Massachusetts/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Registries , Single-Blind Method
7.
J Psychosom Res ; 123: 109735, 2019 08.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31376871

OBJECTIVE: Obesity is associated with an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. As individuals with psychiatric disorders are at a higher risk of obesity than the general population, we aimed to examine the effect of obesity on neonatal and maternal outcomes in this population. METHODS: Pregnant women with psychiatric disorders were enrolled in the Massachusetts General Hospital National Pregnancy Registry for Psychiatric Medications (NCT01246765) and followed prospectively until 6 months postpartum. Pre-pregnancy body mass index was used to categorize participants as normal-weight, overweight, and obese to assess comparative risk of adverse outcomes. RESULTS: Within our sample of 584 participants (N = 252 normal-weight; N = 170 overweight; N = 162 obese), obesity was not significantly associated with higher risk for birth defects (OR: 3.19; 95% CI:0.79,12.95; p = 0.10; unadjusted due to the rarity of this outcome in the sample). After adjustment, women with obesity were at higher risk for gestational diabetes (p = 0.011; OR:3.23; 95% CI:1.30,7.98), as were women in the overweight BMI category (p = 0.003; OR:3.77; 95% CI:1.58,9.00). Among women with obesity, there was a tendency for a higher C-section rate (p = 0.07) compared to women in the normal-weight BMI category. Other outcomes were not significantly different among groups. CONCLUSIONS: Peripartum complications associated with obesity are common among women with psychiatric illness; thus, it is important to develop antenatal weight management interventions for this population.


Obesity/complications , Pregnancy Complications/etiology , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Psychotic Disorders/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/psychology , Prospective Studies , Psychotic Disorders/psychology , Registries , Young Adult
8.
Ann Clin Psychiatry ; 31(1): 4-16, 2019 02.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30699214

BACKGROUND: Women often seek antidepressant alternatives for major depressive disorder (MDD) in anticipation of or during pregnancy. In this preliminary study, EnBrace HR, a prenatal supplement containing methylfolate, was investigated for depressive relapse prevention and for acute treatment of MDD in women planning pregnancy or during pregnancy. METHODS: This 12-week open-label study included women with histories of MDD who were planning pregnancy or pregnant < 28 weeks. At enrollment, Group 1 participants were well (not depressed) and planned to discontinue antidepressants for pregnancy. Group 2 participants were depressed. Primary outcome variables by group included MDD relapse and depressive symptoms, verified with the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview and the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), respectively. Biomarkers of inflammation and the folate cycle were collected. RESULTS: Group 1 participants (N = 11) experienced lower rates of depressive relapse (27.3% P = .005) than expected from a historical comparison group and no significant changes in MADRS scores. Group 2 participants (N = 6) experienced significant improvements in MADRS scores (P = .001), with 5 (83.3%) improving >50% and 1 improving 33.3%. One adverse event occurred, a hospitalization for depression. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest EnBrace HR is a well-tolerated intervention with potential efficacy for prevention and treatment of perinatal depression. Larger controlled trials are necessary.


Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/prevention & control , Dietary Supplements , Prenatal Care , Tetrahydrofolates/administration & dosage , Adult , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Secondary Prevention/statistics & numerical data
9.
Depress Anxiety ; 35(12): 1130-1136, 2018 12.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30192044

BACKGROUND: Maternal major depressive disorder (MDD) has an adverse effect on child development and increases risk for child psychopathology. It is paramount to understand the course of maternal depression during the childhood years particularly before, during, and after pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: To follow the course of MDD in women with prior histories of depression followed during an index pregnancy. METHODS: Subjects were women with histories of MDD who had participated in prior prospective, observational studies during pregnancy. In the follow-up, participants completed a structured interview that addressed (1) the course of MDD since their index pregnancy, (2) new psychiatric diagnoses, and (3) the course of MDD and treatment across subsequent pregnancies. RESULTS: Out of 129 eligible women, 48.8% participated (N = 63) with an average/mean time of 12.9 years (SD = 1.9, 8.8-16.7) elapsed since participation in the prior pregnancy studies. Although approximately one third reported sustained remission from MDD since the pregnancy during which they had been originally followed, of the remaining two thirds of women who reported subsequent depressive episodes, almost one fifth (∼12% of the total sample) endorsed depression more than 50% of the time following their index pregnancy. A total of 6.3% of the women with previous validated diagnoses of MDD reported new diagnoses of bipolar disorder. Women reported similar treatment choices regarding the use of antidepressants during pregnancies subsequent to the one followed in the previous study. CONCLUSION: Women with MDD experienced high rates of recurrent depression across the childbearing years. This represents a critical variable for clinical care and research.


Depression, Postpartum/physiopathology , Depressive Disorder, Major/physiopathology , Disease Progression , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Pregnancy
10.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 79(4)2018 07 17.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30153401

Pregnancy labeling of prescription medications in the US is in the midst of a major transformation. The FDA's previous system, which used letter ratings to convey drug safety, was simple but led to misunderstandings-both faulty assurances and undue concerns. The new system, established under the Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule, aims for more descriptive and up-to-date explanations of risk as well as context needed for informed decision-making based on available data. In April 2017, a conference titled "Pharmacovigilance, Reproductive Safety, and the Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule" brought together clinicians and researchers, FDA officials, and representatives of the public and industry to discuss a host of questions relating to the new system. This Academic Highlights article summarizes their discussions, which included topics such as how the new system came about and how the new labeling can be used effectively to inform physician-patient conversations about use of medications during pregnancy and ultimately the clinical decisions that follow.​​.


Drug Labeling/standards , Psychotropic Drugs/adverse effects , Reproduction/drug effects , United States Food and Drug Administration/standards , Female , Humans , Male , Pregnancy , United States
11.
Am J Psychiatry ; 175(12): 1225-1231, 2018 12 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30111186

OBJECTIVE: Second-generation antipsychotics are commonly prescribed to reproductive-age women for the treatment of a spectrum of psychiatric disorders. Quetiapine is the most commonly prescribed medication in this class, and therefore a better understanding of its reproductive safety profile is critical. The goal of this study was to determine the risk of major malformations among infants exposed to quetiapine during pregnancy compared with a group of infants whose mothers had a history of psychiatric morbidity but who did not use a second-generation antipsychotic during pregnancy. METHOD: The National Pregnancy Registry for Atypical Antipsychotics interviews pregnant women ages 18-45 during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Obstetric, labor, and delivery medical records and pediatric medical records from the first 6 months of life were screened for evidence of major malformations, followed by adjudication by a blinded dysmorphologist. Women with first-trimester exposure to quetiapine were compared with control subjects without exposure to second-generation antipsychotics. RESULTS: As of March 2017, 888 women had enrolled prospectively and 357 were eligible for analysis. Of these, 152 women with first-trimester exposure to quetiapine were compared with 205 control subjects without any second-generation antipsychotic exposure. For the 155 infants born to women in the exposed group (including three sets of twins), two major malformations were confirmed (1.3%), compared with three major malformations among the 210 infants born in the unexposed group (including five sets of twins) (1.4%). The unadjusted odds ratio for major malformations between infants with and without quetiapine exposure was 0.90 (95% CI=0.15, 5.46), which is consistent with the pooled estimate of the available controlled data on fetal exposure to quetiapine. CONCLUSIONS: These data regarding the safety of fetal exposure to quetiapine in a small sample of well-characterized participants are reassuring given that the confidence interval does not exceed a fivefold increased risk of major malformations relative to psychiatric control subjects. Future analyses based on ongoing data collection will produce more precise estimates.


Abnormalities, Drug-Induced/etiology , Antipsychotic Agents/toxicity , Quetiapine Fumarate/toxicity , Adolescent , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Registries , Risk Factors , Young Adult
12.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 27(11): 1408-1414, 2018 11.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30067141

BACKGROUND: Despite high prevalence rates among women of mood disorders and of infertility, there is a paucity of systematic data to inform the treatment of women at risk for psychiatric morbidity in the context of assisted reproductive technologies (ART). The objective was to delineate predictors of depressive relapse in women with histories of mood disorders during ART, including the role of psychotropic medication continuation. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of women undergoing ART with past diagnoses of major depressive disorder (MDD) or bipolar depression. For 6-months, follow-up included assessments of mood, perceived stress, and partner support. A subsample participated in biomarker collection. Depressive relapse was confirmed using Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview. RESULTS: N = 38 were evaluable. Participants with MDD (N = 25) experienced a depressive relapse rate of 44.0%. Relapse rates among antidepressant maintainers (N = 15; relapse rate = 40.0%) and antidepressant discontinuers (N = 10; relapse rate = 50.0%) were not significantly different. Among participants with bipolar disorder (N = 13), the overall relapse rate was 30.8%. Among psychotropic medication maintainers (N = 10), 40.0% relapsed, and among discontinuers (N = 3), none relapsed. Scores on the Perceived Stress Scale correlated with relapse risk (odds ratio [OR] = 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-1.26, p = 0.0065). C-reactive protein was associated with relapse (OR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.43-2.55, p < 0.0001); blood cortisol and interleukin-6 were not. CONCLUSIONS: Risk of depressive relapse among women undergoing ART is considerable. Medication continuation does not adequately confer relapse prevention. Stress and inflammation appear to contribute to risk of relapse. Additional strategies to mitigate depressive relapse in at-risk women undergoing ART are needed.


Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder, Major , Infertility, Female , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Stress, Psychological , Adult , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Infertility, Female/psychology , Infertility, Female/therapy , Massachusetts/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Recurrence , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/psychology , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment , Secondary Prevention , Stress, Psychological/diagnosis , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Stress, Psychological/physiopathology , Stress, Psychological/prevention & control
13.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 53: 73-79, 2018.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29958100

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this analysis was to examine the effect of benzodiazepine use during pregnancy on maternal and neonatal outcomes in a cohort of women with psychiatric disorders. METHODS: 794 evaluable women from the Massachusetts General Hospital National Pregnancy Registry for Psychiatric Medications were followed across pregnancy (N = 144 exposed to benzodiazepines and N = 650 unexposed). Data obtained through maternal report and medical records included maternal outcomes (cesarean section, preeclampsia) and neonatal outcomes (birth weight, breathing difficulty, feeding difficulty, head circumference, 5-minute Apgar score, muscular and/or extrapyramidal symptoms, NICU admission, prematurity). RESULTS: In adjusted analyses, infants exposed to benzodiazepines in utero were more likely to be admitted to the NICU (OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.11, 3.66) and to have small head circumferences (OR: 3.89, 95% CI: 1.25, 12.03) compared to unexposed infants. Other neonatal adverse effects such as respiratory distress or muscular symptoms including hypotonia were not observed. There were no significant differences in adverse obstetrical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Infants exposed to benzodiazepines during pregnancy had an increased risk of NICU admissions and small head circumferences. Confounding from psychiatric symptoms and other variables cannot be ruled out as contributors to these findings.


Benzodiazepines/adverse effects , Cesarean Section , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/chemically induced , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Pre-Eclampsia/etiology , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Pre-Eclampsia/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology
14.
Psychosomatics ; 59(2): 125-134, 2018.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29078988

BACKGROUND: Obesity during pregnancy is the most common high-risk obstetric condition, resulting in increased rates of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Individuals with psychiatric disorders have a higher risk of obesity than the general population, but data regarding implications of obesity in women with psychiatric disorders are sparse. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess pre-pregnancy weights and gestational weight gain in women who were exposed to second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) during pregnancy compared to controls. METHODS: We assessed pre-pregnancy weights and gestational weight gain from the Massachusetts General Hospital National Pregnancy Registry for Atypical Antipsychotics for patients exposed to SGAs and controls unexposed to these medicines during pregnancy. Both groups experienced similar psychiatric morbidity. RESULTS: A total of 403 participants had evaluable data for these analyses (N = 279 exposed to SGAs; N = 124 controls). The mean pre-pregnancy weight, body mass index (BMI), and likelihood to begin pregnancy with an obese BMI were significantly higher in the exposed group compared to controls (p = 0.0003, p < 0.0001, and p < 0.0001 respectively), as were the mean weight and BMI at delivery (p < 0.0001). The mean weight gain did not differ significantly between groups. Across pre-pregnancy BMI categories, both groups gained more than the recommended amount of weight during pregnancy. CONCLUSION: We found that women exposed to SGAs began pregnancy with higher BMIs than controls. Both exposed and unexposed groups experienced similar weight gain during pregnancy. Strategies are needed to prevent excessive gestational weight gain and to reduce pre-pregnancy obesity in women with psychiatric disorders, especially those treated with SGAs.


Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Gestational Weight Gain/drug effects , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Body Mass Index , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Mental Disorders/complications , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Young Adult
15.
Ann Clin Psychiatry ; 29(4): 249-257, 2017 Nov.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29069110

BACKGROUND: In a preliminary trial, we assessed the efficacy of vortioxetine for major depressive disorder (MDD) during the menopausal transition. Secondary outcomes included hot flashes (HFs), anxiety, and cognitive complaints. METHODS: Perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women with MDD (N = 27) received 8 weeks of open-label, flexible-dose treatment with vortioxetine. The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) was the primary outcome measure. Secondary measures included: HF frequency, the Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS), Menopause-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MEN-QOL), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ), Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), and Cogstate testing. RESULTS: Of the 27 women, 24 (88.8%) were evaluated (≥1 follow-up), and 21 (77.8%) completed the study; 1 discontinued because of adverse effects. The mean MADRS score decreased significantly (P = .0001) from 31.3 (standard deviation [SD] = 5.5) at pretreatment to 8.1 (SD = 7.8) at posttreatment. The depression response rate (≥50% reduction in MADRS) and remission rate (final MADRS ≤10) were 75% and 70.8%, respectively. GCS, MEN-QOL, BAI, CPFQ, and DSST scores improved significantly (P = .0030, P = .0001, P = .0001, P = .0001, and P = .0133, respectively); Cogstate test scores did not. Frequency and severity of HFs improved significantly (P = .0291 and P = .0299, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These data support further study of vortioxetine for treating menopausal depression and associated symptoms.


Cognition/drug effects , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Menopause/drug effects , Piperazines/administration & dosage , Sulfides/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Treatment Outcome , Vortioxetine
16.
J Psychiatr Res ; 95: 84-90, 2017 12.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28810177

BACKGROUND: Second generation antipsychotic medications (SGAs) are widely used by reproductive-age women to treat a number of psychiatric illnesses. Some SGAs have been associated with an increased risk of developing diabetes, although information regarding their diabetogenic effect in pregnant women is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of gestational diabetes (GDM) among women treated with SGA. METHOD: The Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) National Pregnancy Registry for Atypical Antipsychotics (NPRAA) collects data on drug use, pregnancy outcomes, and other characteristics from pregnant women, ages 18-45 years, using 3 phone interviews conducted at (1) enrollment during pregnancy, (2) 7 months' gestation, and (3) 2-3 months postpartum. Information on GDM was abstracted from obstetric and delivery medical records. The study population was restricted to women without pre-gestational diabetes. Pregnancies exposed to SGAs during the first trimester were compared with a reference group of women with psychiatric conditions but not treated with SGAs during pregnancy. Generalized linear models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for GDM. RESULTS: Of 303 women exposed to SGAs, 33 (10.9%) had GDM compared to 16 (10.7%) in the 149 non-exposed women. The crude OR of GDM for SGA was 1.02 (95% CI, 0.54-1.91). After adjustment for maternal age, race, marital status, employment status, level of education, smoking, and primary psychiatric diagnosis, the OR moved to 0.79 (0.40-1.56). CONCLUSIONS: Findings did not suggest an increased risk of GDM associated with exposure to SGAs during pregnancy in women who had used SGA before pregnancy without developing diabetes, compared to psychiatrically ill women who were not exposed to SGA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01246765.


Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Diabetes, Gestational/chemically induced , Mental Disorders , Pregnancy/drug effects , Registries , Adult , Comorbidity , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Young Adult
18.
Am J Psychiatry ; 173(3): 263-70, 2016 Mar 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26441156

OBJECTIVE: Second-generation antipsychotics are used to treat a spectrum of psychiatric illnesses in reproductive-age women. The National Pregnancy Registry for Atypical Antipsychotics was established to determine the risk of major malformations among infants exposed to second-generation antipsychotics during pregnancy relative to a comparison group of unexposed infants of mothers with histories of psychiatric morbidity. METHOD: Women were prospectively followed during pregnancy and the postpartum period; obstetric, labor, delivery, and pediatric medical records were obtained. Eligible enrollees were pregnant women ages 18-45. The Registry is based at the Center for Women's Mental Health at Massachusetts General Hospital. Women were recruited through provider referral, self-referral, and the Center's web site. RESULTS: As of December 2014, 487 women were enrolled: 353 who used second-generation antipsychotics and 134 comparison women. Medical records were obtained for 82% of participants. A total of 303 women had completed the study and were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. Of 214 live births with first-trimester exposure to second-generation antipsychotics, three major malformations were confirmed. In the control group (N=89), one major malformation was confirmed. The absolute risk of major malformations was 1.4% for exposed infants and 1.1% for unexposed infants. The odds ratio for major malformations comparing exposed infants with unexposed infants was 1.25 (95% CI=0.13-12.19). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that it would be unlikely for second-generation antipsychotics to raise the risk of major malformations more than 10-fold beyond that observed in the general population or among control groups using other psychotropic medications. If the estimate stabilizes around the null with ongoing data collection, findings may be reassuring for both clinicians and women trying to make risk-benefit treatment decisions about using atypical antipsychotics during pregnancy. These findings are timely given the renewed focus of regulatory agencies on reproductive safety.


Abnormalities, Drug-Induced , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Mental Disorders , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects , Abnormalities, Drug-Induced/diagnosis , Abnormalities, Drug-Induced/epidemiology , Abnormalities, Drug-Induced/etiology , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Antipsychotic Agents/classification , Female , Humans , Massachusetts/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy Trimesters/drug effects , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/epidemiology , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/etiology , Registries/statistics & numerical data
19.
Arch Womens Ment Health ; 19(3): 437-41, 2016 06.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26472040

Women of reproductive age commonly use integrative treatments. However, the reproductive safety for most complementary products lacks systematic study. We aimed to study the use of supplements by women in a prospective pregnancy registry. The Massachusetts General Hospital National Pregnancy Registry for Atypical Antipsychotics was established to evaluate the reproductive safety of atypical antipsychotics. Exposed and control participants were systematically queried about the use of vitamins and supplements. Slightly greater than half (53.2 %) of the participants eligible for analysis (N = 534) were using at least one vitamin or supplement at the time of enrollment, not including prenatal vitamins or folic acid. The most common supplements used were omega-3 fatty acids (38.0 %), vitamin D (11.0 %), calcium (8.2 %), and iron (4.7 %). Probiotics and melatonin were used by 2.6 and 0.9 %, respectively. In this prospective pregnancy registry, we found that over half of the participants were taking supplements or vitamins other than prenatal vitamins and folic acid. These findings underscore the need for active query on the part of health care providers about the use of supplements during pregnancy, and the need to obtain rigorous reproductive safety and efficacy data for supplements used by pregnant women and reproductive aged women.


Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Dietary Supplements , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Vitamin D/administration & dosage , Vitamins/administration & dosage , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Female , Folic Acid/administration & dosage , Hospitals, General , Humans , Massachusetts/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Pregnant Women , Prenatal Care , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
20.
PLoS One ; 10(9): e0137388, 2015.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26397111

The superoxide dismutase mimetic manganese [III] tetrakis [5,10,15,20]-benzoic acid porphyrin (MnTBAP) is a potent antioxidant compound that has been shown to limit weight gain during short-term high fat feeding without preventing insulin resistance. However, whether MnTBAP has therapeutic potential to treat pre-existing obesity and insulin resistance remains unknown. To investigate this, mice were treated with MnTBAP or vehicle during the last five weeks of a 24-week high fat diet (HFD) regimen. MnTBAP treatment significantly decreased body weight and reduced white adipose tissue (WAT) mass in mice fed a HFD and a low fat diet (LFD). The reduction in adiposity was associated with decreased caloric intake without significantly altering energy expenditure, indicating that MnTBAP decreases adiposity in part by modulating energy balance. MnTBAP treatment also improved insulin action in HFD-fed mice, a physiologic response that was associated with increased protein kinase B (PKB) phosphorylation and expression in muscle and WAT. Since MnTBAP is a metalloporphyrin molecule, we hypothesized that its ability to promote weight loss and improve insulin sensitivity was regulated by heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), in a similar fashion as cobalt protoporphyrins. Despite MnTBAP treatment increasing HO-1 expression, administration of the potent HO-1 inhibitor tin mesoporphyrin (SnMP) did not block the ability of MnTBAP to alter caloric intake, adiposity, or insulin action, suggesting that MnTBAP influences these metabolic processes independent of HO-1. These data demonstrate that MnTBAP can ameliorate pre-existing obesity and improve insulin action by reducing caloric intake and increasing PKB phosphorylation and expression.


Adiposity/drug effects , Anti-Obesity Agents/pharmacology , Insulin/physiology , Metalloporphyrins/pharmacology , Obesity/drug therapy , Animals , Anti-Obesity Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Glucose , Diet, High-Fat/adverse effects , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Energy Intake/drug effects , Energy Metabolism , Homeostasis , Male , Metalloporphyrins/therapeutic use , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Obesity/etiology , Obesity/metabolism , Phosphorylation , Protein Processing, Post-Translational , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt/metabolism
...