High-frequency pressure-control ventilation with high positive end-expiratory pressure in children with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Animal models suggest that high-frequency ventilation with low tidal volumes and high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) minimize secondary injury to the lung. We hypothesized that using a high-frequency pressure-control mode of ventilation with high PEEP in children with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) would be associated with improved survival. DESIGN: The study was a retrospective and prospective clinical study at a 24-bed tertiary care pediatric critical care unit. Fifty-three patients with severe ARDS were studied during a 37-month period, 30 prospectively and 23 retrospectively. Severe ARDS was defined as (1) rapid onset of severe bilateral infiltrates of noncardiac origin, (2) partial pressure of oxygen (arterial)/fraction of inspired oxygen less than 200 on PEEP of 6 cm H2O or more for 24 hours or longer, and (3) Murray disease severity score greater than 2.5. All patients meeting these criteria underwent ventilation in the pressure-control mode; the protocol for ventilation had the following general guidelines: (1) fraction of inspired oxygen limited to 0.5, (2) mean airway pressure titrated with PEEP to maintain arterial partial pressure of oxygen of 55 mm Hg or greater (7.3 kPa), (3) peak inspiratory pressure minimized to allow hypercapnia (arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide, 45 to 60 mm Hg (6.0 to 8.0 kPa), and (4) ventilator rates of 40 to 120/min. Percutaneous thoracostomy and mediastinal tubes were placed for treatment of air leak. RESULTS: The survival rate was 89% (47/53) in children with severe ARDS. Nonsurvivors had significantly higher peak inspiratory pressures (75 vs 40 cm H2O, p = 0.0006), PEEP (23 vs 17 cm H2O, p = 0.0004), mean airway pressure (40 vs 28 cm H2O, p = 0.04), alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient (579 vs 540 mm Hg, p = 0.03), and oxygenation index (43 vs 19, p = 0.0008) than survivors. Air leak was present in 51% of patients; there was no difference in the incidence of air leak between survivors and nonsurvivors (p = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: The high-frequency positive-pressure mode of ventilation was safe and was associated with an improved survival rate (89%) for children with severe ARDS. Limitation of both inspired oxygen and tidal volume, along with aggressive treatment of air leak, may have contributed to the improved survival rate.

New concepts in the treatment of children with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Recent advances in mechanical ventilation, accompanied with a better understanding of the pathophysiology of ARDS, have resulted in a brighter outlook for the child who acquires this still dreaded disease. A greater understanding of the pathophysiology of ARDS has led to a heightened awareness that the care of these patients should be more than just supportive. The potential for exacerbation of lung injury by mechanical ventilation is real. Many new therapies are being evaluated for the treatment of ARDS; all are intended to reduce ventilator-induced injury. With the recognition of "volutrauma" as a serious complication of mechanical ventilation in ARDS, the mode of ventilation used should minimize the potential for this complication in a child with signs of progressive lung disease requiring mechanical ventilation. Optimal integration of the many new techniques into the treatment of pediatric ARDS will require more research and experience. Surfactant replacement in ARDS as an adjunct to the basic care of these patients may be beneficial. Liquid ventilation is another exciting new ventilation technique that has a significant protective effect in animal models of ARDS. Other therapies, such as tracheal gas insufflation, or other new modes of ventilation may also improve outcome. Techniques of high-frequency ventilation and ECMO in the treatment of children already show potential for improved outcome. The decision between using ECMO or "nonconventional" forms of mechanical ventilation should be considered carefully, after the morbidity of the procedures, the duration of therapy, and the cost have been weighed. Centers with experience using ECMO in the setting of pediatric ARDS have better results than those where ECMO is infrequently used for this purpose. It is imperative that future studies of both mechanical ventilation and ECMO describe ventilation strategy and prospectively identify protocols or algorithms for ventilator management. Coupled with severity scores, ventilator techniques and ECMO can then be systematically compared in children with ARDS.