Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Curr Glaucoma Pract ; 14(2): 64-67, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33304062

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The eyeWatch™ is a novel device in glaucoma surgery aiming at the control of aqueous flow through the use of an external magnetic control unit. We propose the modification of this approach through the use of an injectable perforated tube rather than a plated valve. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Procedures were performed at the Department of Ophthalmology of the University of Crete. Three blind painful eyes of three patients were included. All patients were operated under topical anesthesia. A purpose designed blunt-ended injector was used to insert intraorbitally a perforated 4 cm-long silicone tube. The tube was then connected to an eyeWatch™ device which was placed in a standard fashion along the superior-temporal quadrant of the eyeball. The procedure was uneventful in cases I and II, whereas in case III the tube had to be trimmed by 1.5 cm because of cicatricial changes in the orbit. The eyeWatch™ was left closed (position VI) at the conclusion of surgeries. Patients were examined on the 1-day, 1-week, 2-week, 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month intervals and in one case on the 12-month interval. RESULTS: No major complications were observed. The intraocular pressure (IOP) remained under 15 mm Hg without anti-glaucomatous medications in all postoperative intervals in cases I and 2 with readjustment of eyeWatch™ at position IV. In case III, despite the change of the eyeWatch™ to the open position, the IOP remained high (40 mm Hg). DISCUSSION: The combination of the eyeWatch™ with an insertable perforated tube instead of a standard non-valved plate may prove a valid minimally invasive option. Modifications of the technique, such as an increased number and diameter of tube perforations, increased inserted tube length, perhaps aided by a sharp-ended injector, and selection of the insertion quadrant, may increase the effectiveness of the method. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: eyeWatch™ combined with a single tube instead of a plated valve is a feasible, quick, and minimally invasive technique that can be used in glaucoma surgery. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Detorakis ET, Villamarin A, Roy S, et al. eyeWatch™ System Combined with Non-plated Intraorbital Tube Insertion for the Management of Refractory Glaucoma: A Case Series. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2020;14(2):64-67.

2.
J Glaucoma ; 29(5): 401-405, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32097256

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of a glaucoma procedure to control intraocular pressure (IOP) using the adjustable eyeWatch glaucoma drainage device compared with Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) in refractory glaucoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Monocentric, retrospective, comparative clinical trial. Patients suffering from refractory glaucoma after failed surgeries and requiring a further glaucoma procedure including an aqueous shunt were enrolled in this study. The first group AGV included patients with an AGV. The second group eW-B included patients receiving an eyeWatch used in connection with a Baerveldt glaucoma implant. The primary outcome was the success rate, defined as an IOP≤16 mm Hg and reduction of >20% from baseline, and IOP≥5 mm Hg. Secondary outcomes were mean IOP, number of antiglaucoma medications, visual acuity, number and type of complications. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were included. The mean follow-up time was 13.2±3.4 months. Mean IOP decreased from 24.8±9.0 mm Hg before surgery to 13.8±3.6 mm Hg at 12 months for group AGV, and 27.3±7.0 to 12.8±2.4 mm Hg for group eW-B, respectively (P<0.05). Mean number of glaucoma medications decreased from 3.0±0.7 before surgery to 0.3±0.7 at last control for group AGV, and 2.9±0.8 before surgery to 0.2±0.4 for group eW-B, respectively (P<0.05). The complete and overall success rates were 50% and 58% for group AGV, and 67% and 89% for group eW-B, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative adjustability of the eyeWatch is believed to help with getting fewer complications and better IOP management whereas AGV cannot be adjusted postoperatively.


Subject(s)
Glaucoma Drainage Implants , Glaucoma/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Glaucoma/physiopathology , Humans , Intraocular Pressure/physiology , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications , Prosthesis Implantation , Retrospective Studies , Tonometry, Ocular , Treatment Outcome , Visual Acuity/physiology
3.
J Glaucoma ; 28(5): 452-458, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31048640

ABSTRACT

PRéCIS:: In this study, we report clinical results after implantation of an adjustable glaucoma drainage device. The intraocular pressure (IOP) profile was efficiently controlled postoperatively as the resistance to aqueous humor outflow was finely adjusted. PURPOSE: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the new adjustable glaucoma drainage device eyeWatch used in conjunction with a Baerveldt glaucoma implant in refractory glaucoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicentric, prospective, noncomparative clinical trial. Patients older than 18 years of age suffering from refractory glaucoma after failed surgeries, with IOP of ≥20 mm Hg, in whom a further glaucoma procedure using an aqueous shunt was planned, were enrolled in this study. The primary outcome was the success rate, defined as an IOP≤18 mm Hg and reduction of >20% from baseline, IOP≥6 mm Hg. Secondary outcomes were mean IOP, visual acuity, number of antiglaucoma medications, number, and type of complications. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were included. The mean follow-up time was 15.6±3.5 months. The mean baseline IOP decreased from 26.2±6.8 mm Hg before surgery to 11.9±2.8 mm Hg at 12 months (P<0.001). The mean number of glaucoma medications decreased from 3.0±0.7 before surgery to 0.8±0.9 at last visit (P<0.001). The success rate was 40% for complete success and 93% for overall success at last follow-up. Complication rate was 7%. CONCLUSIONS: The novel glaucoma device allows for perioperative and postoperative noninvasive adjustments of the resistance to aqueous humor outflow. This leads to better management of IOP during the early postoperative period, preventing ocular hypotony and eliminating the need for obstructive elements and reinterventions. The rate of complications was low, IOP was adequately controlled and lowered, with a substantial reduction in the number of antiglaucoma medication.


Subject(s)
Filtering Surgery/adverse effects , Glaucoma Drainage Implants , Glaucoma/surgery , Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Prosthesis Implantation , Reoperation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Glaucoma/physiopathology , Glaucoma Drainage Implants/adverse effects , Humans , Intraocular Pressure , Male , Middle Aged , Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Reoperation/adverse effects , Reoperation/instrumentation , Reoperation/methods , Tonometry, Ocular , Treatment Failure , Treatment Outcome , Visual Acuity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL