ABSTRACT
Introduced by the Hatch-Waxman Amendments of 1984, 505(b)(2) applications permit the US Food and Drug Administration to rely, for approval of a new drug application, on information from studies not conducted by or for the applicant and for which the applicant has not obtained a right of reference. This pathway is designed to circumvent the unnecessary duplication of studies already conducted on a previously approved drug. It can lead to a considerably more efficient and expedited route to approval compared to a traditional development path. Model-informed drug development refers to the utilization of a diverse array of quantitative models in drug development to streamline the decision-making process. In this approach, diverse quantitative models that integrate knowledge of physiology, disease processes, and drug pharmacology are employed to address drug development challenges and guide regulatory decisions. Integration of these model-informed approaches into 505(b)(2) regulatory submissions and decision-making can further expedite the approval of new drugs. This article discusses some applications of model-informed approaches that were used to support 505(b)(2) drug development and regulatory actions. Specifically, various quantitative models such as population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response models have been employed to provide evidence of effectiveness, guide dosing in subgroups such as subjects with hepatic or renal impairment, and inform policies. These case study examples collectively underscore the significance of model-informed approaches in drug development and regulatory decisions associated with 505(b)(2) submissions.
ABSTRACT
Reformulation with addition of antioxidants is one potential mitigation strategy to prevent or reduce nitrosamine drug substance-related impurities (NDSRIs) in drug products. To explore whether there could be other approaches to demonstrate bioequivalence for a reformulated oral product, which typically needs in vivo bioequivalence studies to support the changes after approval, the effects of antioxidant on the in vitro permeability of BCS III model drug substances were investigated to see whether there could be any potential impact on drug absorption. Six antioxidants were screened and four (ascorbic acid, cysteine, α-tocopherol and propyl gallate) were selected based on their nitrosamine inhibition efficiencies. The study demonstrated that these four antioxidants, at the tested amounts, did not have observable impact on the in vitro permeability of the BCS III model drug substances across Caco-2 cell monolayers in the In Vitro Dissolution Absorption System (IDAS). An in vitro permeability study could be considered as part of one potential bioequivalence bridging approach for reformulated low-risk immediate release solid oral products and oral suspension products. Other factors such as the influence of antioxidants on intestinal transporter activities should be considered where appropriate.
ABSTRACT
This report summarizes the proceedings for Day 1 Session 3 of the 2-day public workshop entitled "Best Practices for Utilizing Modeling Approaches to Support Generic Product Development," a jointly sponsored workshop by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Center for Research on Complex Generics (CRCG) in the year 2022. The aims of this workshop were to discuss how to modernize approaches for efficiently demonstrating bioequivalence (BE), to establish their role in modern paradigms of generic drug development, and to explore and develop best practices for the use of modeling and simulation approaches in regulatory submissions and approval. The theme of this session is mechanistic modeling approaches supporting BE assessments for oral drug products. As a summary, with more successful cases of PBPK absorption modeling being developed and shared, the general strategies/frameworks on using PBPK for oral products are being formed; this will help further evolvement of this area. In addition, the early communications between the industry and the agency through appropriate pathways (e.g., pre-abbreviated new drug applications (pre-ANDA) meetings) are encouraged, and this will speed up the successful development and utility of PBPK modeling for oral products.
Subject(s)
Drug Development , Drugs, Generic , United States , Therapeutic Equivalency , Computer Simulation , United States Food and Drug AdministrationABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To establish bioequivalence for topical ophthalmic corticosteroid suspensions, some of U.S. product-specific guidances (PSGs) for generic drug products recommend evaluation of aqueous humor (AH) pharmacokinetics (PK). However, the AH PK study is complex because the relationships among AH PK, subject demographics, ocular anatomy, physiology and the compounds' physicochemical characteristics are not well understood. The objective of this research is to provide an overview of the in vivo human AH studies submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for ophthalmic corticosteroid suspensions and to investigate the impact of subject demographics on the human AH PK. METHODS: We summarized demographic data, sampling time points, sample size per time point and PK parameters to investigate correlations in the studies submitted to the FDA. RESULTS: In the evaluation of subject-specific covariates, the area under the concentration-time curves (AUC) and maximum concentrations (Cmax) were significantly different among ethnicities and age groups. Gender was not primarily associated with differences in AH PK. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the difference in ethnicity and age of the study population play an important role in the AH PK profiles of topical ophthalmic corticosteroid suspensions. Considering the subject-specific covariate effects in designing bioequivalence studies with AH PK endpoints could reduce bias from covariate imbalance and help identify true effects of formulation differences.
Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/pharmacokinetics , Administration, Ophthalmic , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aqueous Humor/metabolism , Demography , Ethnicity , Eye/metabolism , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sex Factors , Suspensions , Therapeutic Equivalency , United States , United States Food and Drug AdministrationABSTRACT
There are several drug products that bind phosphate or bile acid in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract to exert their therapeutic efficacy. In vitro binding studies are used to assess bioequivalence (BE) of these products. The objective of this study is to identify the common deficiencies in Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) for these products. Deficiencies were compiled from ANDAs containing in vitro binding BE studies. The deficiencies were classified into eight categories: Pre-Study Method Validation, During-Study Sample Analysis, Study Design, Study Procedure, Dissolution/Disintegration, Analytical Site Inspection, Data Submission, and Formulations. Within each category, additional subcategories were defined to characterize the deficiencies. A total of 712 deficiencies from 95 ANDAs for 11 drug products were identified and included in the analysis. The four categories with the most deficiencies were During-Study Sample Analysis (27.8%), Pre-Study Method Validation (17.3%), Data Submission (16.7%), and Study Design (15.7%). For the During-Study Sample Analysis category, failure to submit complete raw data or analytical runs ranked as the top deficiency (32.8%). For the Study Design category, using an unacceptable alternate study design (26.8%) was the most common deficiency. Within this category, other commonly occurring deficiencies included incorrect/insufficient number of absorbent concentrations, failure to pre-treat drug product with acid, insufficient number of replicates in study, incorrect calculation of k1 and k2 values, incorrect dosage form or pooled samples used in the study, and incorrect pH of study medium. The review and approval of these products may be accelerated if these common deficiencies are addressed in the original ANDA submissions.
Subject(s)
Drug Approval/legislation & jurisprudence , Drugs, Generic/pharmacokinetics , Pharmaceutical Research/standards , Research Design/standards , Drugs, Generic/administration & dosage , Gastrointestinal Tract/metabolism , Phosphates/metabolism , Therapeutic Equivalency , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration/legislation & jurisprudence , United States Food and Drug Administration/standards , Validation Studies as TopicABSTRACT
The FDA guidance on application of the biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS) for waiver of in vivo bioequivalence (BE) studies was issued in August 2000. Since then, this guidance has created worldwide interest among biopharmaceutical scientists in regulatory agencies, academia, and industry toward its implementation and further expansion. This article describes how the review implementation of this guidance was undertaken at the FDA and results of these efforts over last dozen years or so across the new, and the generic, drug domains are provided. Results show that greater than 160 applications were approved, or tentatively approved, based on the BCS approach across multiple therapeutic areas; an additional significant finding was that at least 50% of these approvals were in the central nervous system (CNS) area. These findings indicate a robust utilization of the BCS approach toward reducing unnecessary in vivo BE studies and speeding up availability of high quality pharmaceutical products. The article concludes with a look at the adoption of this framework by regulatory and health policy organizations across the globe, and FDA's current thinking on areas of improvement of this guidance.
Subject(s)
Biopharmaceutics/standards , Drug Approval , Drug Industry/standards , Drugs, Generic/pharmacokinetics , Biological Availability , Biopharmaceutics/legislation & jurisprudence , Clinical Trials as Topic/economics , Clinical Trials as Topic/standards , Cost Savings , Drug Industry/economics , Drug Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Drugs, Generic/classification , Drugs, Generic/economics , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Intestinal Absorption/physiology , Permeability , Solubility , Therapeutic Equivalency , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration/legislation & jurisprudence , United States Food and Drug Administration/standardsABSTRACT
Administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) through nasogastric tubes may present risks. If the PPI drug products are not prepared properly, clogging or obstruction of nasogastric tubes can pose a safety concern. In addition, the integrity of the enteric coating of the drug product may be damaged resulting in reduced bioavailability of the active moiety. From the perspective of administration of generic PPIs when compared to the reference drug product, differences in formulation can potentially result in a greater relative risk for the generic drug product. As part of the assessment of bioequivalence, the Office of Generic Drugs (OGD) has developed a suite of in vitro testing to compare the delivery of the generic and reference products via nasogastric tubes. These in vitro tests assess essential attributes associated with the likelihood of clogging and maintenance of the enteric coating. These in vitro tests include studies evaluating sedimentation, granule size distribution, drug recovery, and acid resistance. One of the challenges is that while the administration of PPIs through nasogastric tubes is common in clinical practice, this issue is not uniformly addressed in the FDA approved label of the reference drug products. This paper discusses the design and rationale for in vitro testing of PPI formulations with respect to bioequivalence via nasogastric tube administration and in addition, it summarizes commonly occurring deficiencies in the in vitro nasogastric tube testing of 14 recent Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDA) submitted for five generic PPI drug products.
Subject(s)
Drugs, Generic/pharmacokinetics , Intubation, Gastrointestinal , Proton Pump Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Drug Compounding , Drugs, Generic/administration & dosage , Humans , Proton Pump Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Therapeutic EquivalencyABSTRACT
The US FDA's rule on "Requirements for Submission of Bioequivalence Data" requiring submission of all bioequivalence (BE) studies conducted on the same formulation of the drug product submitted for approval was published in Federal Register in January 2009. With the publication of this rule, we evaluated the impact of data from non-pivotal BE studies in assessing BE and identified the reasons for failed in vivo BE studies for generic oral delayed-release (DR) drug products only. We searched the Agency databases from January 2009 toDecember 2016 to identify Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) submitted for DR drug products containing non-pivotal BE studies. Out of 202 ANDAs, 43 ANDAs contained 102 non-pivotal BE studies. Forty-nine non-pivotal BE studies were conducted on the to-be-marketed (TBM) formulation and 53 were conducted on formulations different from the TBM formulation. These experimental formulations primarily differed in the ratio of components of the enteric coating layer and/or amount (i.e., %w/w) of enteric coating layer. Of the 49 non-pivotal BE studies conducted on the TBM formulation, 41 failed to meet the BE acceptance criteria. The majority of failed non-pivotal BE studies on the TBM DR generic products had insufficient power, which was expected as these studies are exploratory in nature and not designed to have adequate power to pass the BE statistical criteria. In addition, among the failed non-pivotal BE studies on the TBM DR generic products, the most commonly failing pharmacokinetic parameter was Cmax. The data from these non-pivotal BE studies indicate that inadequate BE study design can lead to failure of the BE on the same formulation. Also, the non-pivotal BE studies on formulations different from the TBM formulation help us link the formulation design to the product performance in vivo. This article is open to POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW. Registered readers (see "For Readers") may comment by clicking on ABSTRACT on the issue's contents page.
Subject(s)
Pharmaceutical Preparations/metabolism , Chemistry, Pharmaceutical , Databases, Factual , Humans , Pharmaceutical Preparations/administration & dosage , Therapeutic EquivalencyABSTRACT
In vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) is a predictive mathematical model describing the relationship between an in vitro property and a relevant in vivo response. The main objective of an IVIVC is to serve as a surrogate for human bioequivalence (BE) studies, which may reduce the number of BE studies performed during the initial approval process as well as with certain scale-up and postapproval changes. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a regulatory guidance related to development, evaluation, and applications of IVIVC for extended-release (ER) oral dosage forms in September 1997. Despite the publication of this guidance, the deficiencies related to IVIVC are still identified by the Division of Bioequivalence in the process of Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) review. Thus, the main objective of this article is to present the most commonly occurring deficiencies associated with IVIVCs via selected case studies from the ANDAs for oral ER drug products only. We searched internal FDA databases from January 1996 to December 2014 to identify the ANDAs for proposed generic oral ER drug products containing IVIVC. Only 14 ANDA submissions had IVIVC data, and most were not acceptable. Only one ANDA submission included adequate information related to IVIVC data enabling the completion of BE review within first review cycle. It is hoped that awareness of the deficiencies presented in our article would help the generic drug applicants to submit complete and appropriate information related to IVIVC data, ultimately, resulting in a more timely approval of ANDAs.
Subject(s)
Drug Design , Drugs, Generic/standards , Models, Theoretical , Delayed-Action Preparations , Drug Approval , Drugs, Generic/pharmacokinetics , Humans , Investigational New Drug Application , Therapeutic Equivalency , United States , United States Food and Drug AdministrationABSTRACT
The objective of this article is to discuss the similarities and differences in accepted bioequivalence (BE) approaches for generic topical dermatological drug products between international regulatory authorities and organizations. These drug products are locally applied and not intended for systemic absorption. Therefore, the BE approaches which serve as surrogates to establish safety and efficacy for topical dosage forms tend to differ from the traditional solid oral dosage forms. We focused on 15 different international jurisdictions and organizations that currently participate in the International Generic Drug Regulators Pilot Project. These are Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Chinese Taipei, the European Medicines Association (EMA), Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, Singapore (a member of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations), South Africa, South Korea, Switzerland, the USA and the World Health Organization (WHO). Upon evaluation, we observed that currently only Canada, the EMA, Japan, and the USA have specific guidance documents for topical drug products. Across all jurisdictions and organizations, the three approaches consistently required are (1) BE studies with clinical endpoints for most topical drug products; (2) in vivo pharmacodynamic studies, in particular the vasoconstrictor assay for topical corticosteroids; and (3) waivers from BE study requirements for topical solutions. Japan, South Africa, the USA, and the WHO are also making strides to accept other BE approaches such as in vivo pharmacokinetic studies for BE assessment, in vivo dermatopharmacokinetic studies and/or BE studies with in vitro endpoints.
Subject(s)
Dermatologic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Drug Approval , Drugs, Generic/pharmacokinetics , Administration, Topical , Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Drugs, Generic/administration & dosage , Humans , International Cooperation , Therapeutic EquivalencyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The US FDA published A Guidance for Industry: Bioanalytical Method Validation in May 2001. Despite the publication of the guidance, companies continue to submit bioequivalence studies with bioanalytical deficiencies that preclude Abbreviated New Drug Application approval. The Divisions of Bioequivalence in the FDA's Office of Generic Drugs conducted a survey of the bioequivalence submissions over a 10-year period (2001-2011) to identify the most commonly occurring bioanalytical deficiencies. RESULTS: Data from a total of 4028 Abbreviated New Drug Application submissions were collected to identify bioanalytical deficiencies. Of the three categories of bioanalytical deficiencies (method, validation and report), the majority of the deficiencies were from the bioanalytical method validation section. Globally, the percentage of bioanalytical method validation deficiencies was 62%. CONCLUSIONS: The approval of generic drugs would be accelerated if these deficiencies were avoided by generic companies by adhering to the guidance and therefore submitting a more complete application.
Subject(s)
Drug Approval , Drugs, Generic/pharmacokinetics , Databases, Factual , Drug Delivery Systems , Government Regulation , Humans , Therapeutic Equivalency , Validation Studies as TopicABSTRACT
"For-cause" inspections are initiated during the review of bioequivalence (BE) data submitted to Abbreviated New Drug Applications when possible scientific misconduct and study irregularities are discovered. We investigated the common reasons for initiating "for-cause" inspections related to the clinical, analytical, and dissolution study sites associated with BE studies. This information may help the pharmaceutical industry to understand the root causes of compliance failures in BE studies and help them to improve compliance with FDA's regulations, thereby facilitating more rapid approval of safe and effective generic drugs.
Subject(s)
Therapeutic Equivalency , Humans , United States , United States Food and Drug AdministrationSubject(s)
Central Nervous System Stimulants/pharmacokinetics , Drugs, Generic/pharmacokinetics , Methylphenidate/pharmacokinetics , Area Under Curve , Central Nervous System Stimulants/administration & dosage , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Delayed-Action Preparations , Drugs, Generic/administration & dosage , Humans , Methylphenidate/administration & dosage , Therapeutic EquivalencyABSTRACT
Delivery of antigenic protein to the cytosol of antigen-presenting cells (APCs), such as macrophages (MPhi) and dendritic cells (DCs), is required for an efficient CD8 T-cell-mediated immune response. We have previously shown that co-encapsulation of antigenic protein inside pH-sensitive liposomes with listeriolysin O (LLO), a pore-forming protein of Listeria monocytogenes, generates efficient major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC I)-restricted immune responses both in vitro and in vivo. In this study, we sought to analyze the relative efficiency of LLO-mediated cytosolic delivery of liposomal antigen in two important APCs, macrophages and dendritic cells, by examining the sequential steps involved in antigen presentation to T-cells in cultured mouse bone marrow-derived MPhis (BMMPhis) and DCs (BMDCs). BMMPhis overall presented liposomal antigen better than BMDCs at a given concentration of liposomal antigen incubated with cells, and the trend was also observed after the presentation was normalized by the uptake of antigen. When soluble antigen was directly introduced into the cytosol, however, BMDCs presented the antigen more efficiently than BMMPhis. In addition, when the APCs were externally loaded with the antigenic peptide of the protein, BMDCs displayed a higher level of cell surface MHC I-peptide complexes and presented the peptide more efficiently than BMMPhis. These results combined together suggest that LLO-mediated release of liposomal antigen from the endosomal/lysosomal compartment may be more pronounced in BMMPhis than in BMDCs, and further implicates differential activity of LLO and varying efficiency of LLO-mediated endosomal escape in different antigen-presenting cell types.
Subject(s)
Bacterial Toxins , Cytosol/immunology , Dendritic Cells/immunology , Heat-Shock Proteins , Liposomes , Macrophages/immunology , Animals , Antigen Presentation , Antigen-Presenting Cells/immunology , Cells, Cultured , Drug Delivery Systems , Female , Flow Cytometry , Hemolysin Proteins , Hybridomas , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Recombinant Proteins/administration & dosage , T-Lymphocytes/immunologyABSTRACT
Gelonin is a type I plant toxin that has potential as an effective anti-tumor agent by virtue of its enzymatic capacity to inactivate ribosomes and arrest protein synthesis, thereby effectively limiting the growth of cancer cells. Being a hydrophilic macromolecule, however, gelonin has limited access to its target subcellular compartment, the cytosol; it is effectively plasma membrane-impermeant and subject to rapid degradation within endosomes and lysosomes upon cellular uptake as it lacks the membrane-translocating capability that is typically provided by a disulfide-linked B polypeptide found in the type II toxins (e.g. ricin). These inherent characteristics generate the need for the development of a specialized cytosolic delivery strategy for gelonin as an effective anti-tumor therapeutic agent. Here we describe an efficient means of delivering gelonin to the cytosol of B16 melanoma cells. Gelonin was co-encapsulated inside pH-sensitive liposomes with listeriolysin O, the pore-forming protein that mediates escape of the intracellular pathogen Listeria monocytogenes from the endosome into the cytosol. In in vitro experiments, co-encapsulated listeriolysin O enabled liposomal gelonin-mediated B16 cell killing with a gelonin IC50 of approximately 0.1 nM with an extreme efficiency requiring an incubation time of only 1 h. By contrast, cells treated with equivalent concentrations of unencapsulated gelonin or gelonin encapsulated alone in pH-sensitive liposomes exhibited no detectable cytotoxicity. Moreover, treatment by direct intratumor injection into subcutaneous solid tumors of B16 melanoma in a mouse model showed that pH-sensitive liposomes containing both listeriolysin O and gelonin were more effective than control formulations in curtailing tumor growth rates.