Economic burden of acute steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease in commercially insured pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), a potentially life-threatening complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), often occurs within 100 days of HSCT. While steroids are typically used as first-line treatment, there is no consensus on second-line steroid-refractory (SR) treatments. SR aGVHD is associated with significantly worse pediatric health outcomes, but less is known about its economic impact. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the economic burden of SR pediatric aGVHD in a commercially insured US patient population. METHODS: Retrospective analyses were conducted using medical and pharmacy claims data from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database (study period January 1, 2006-May 31, 2019). Included patients had at least 1 claim for allogeneic HSCT (earliest HSCT claim set as index date), no claims for autologous HSCT, and no pre-index GVHD. Patients were aged less than 18 years with no minimum pre- or post-index continuous enrollment. The GVHD cohort included patients with at least 1 claim for aGVHD over 100 days from index with at least 1 claim for any steroid and at least 1 claim for second-line therapy, both on or after the date of the first aGVHD claim. Patients post-HSCT with no GVHD claims over follow-up formed the comparison cohort. Health care resource utilization and costs over 12 months from the index date were calculated and compared between cohorts using parametric testing. RESULTS: 38 patients with SR aGVHD and 184 controls were included. Mean age and sex were similar for aGVHD (8.6 years, 50% female) and control (8.2 years, 45% female). During the 12-month post-index follow-up, SR aGVHD patients had higher rates of complications vs controls (* for P < 0.05): anemia (79% vs 68%), drug-induced anemia* (53% vs 34%), neutropenia (63% vs 53%), thrombocytopenia (58% vs 42%), gastrointestinal complications* (95% vs 65%), and infections* (95% vs 79%). Mean inpatient length of stay was longer by 31.6 days (P < 0.01) with a total average of 96.0 days for those with SR aGVHD vs 64.3 days for the controls. More SR aGVHD patients required inpatient total parenteral nutrition (71% vs 58%), readmission within 12 months of discharge from index hospitalization* (89% vs 60%), ER visits (34% vs 24%), and outpatient visits (100% vs 86%). Total 12-month mean medical costs were higher in aGVHD patients: $1,212,944 vs $673,491 (P < 0.001), mostly because of complication-related costs: $868,966 vs $396,757 (P < 0.001). Among patients with SR aGVHD, mean total costs were higher by about $1.8 million ($2,609,445 vs $812,385; P = 0.014) for those who died compared with those who were alive within 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: SR aGVHD in pediatric patients following HSCT is associated with incremental 12-month medical costs of greater than $500,000, driven largely by complications. DISCLOSURES: This research was sponsored by Mesoblast, Inc. Grabner is an employee of HealthCore, Inc., which acted as consultants to Mesoblast, Inc., during the conduct of this research. Strati is an employee of Mesoblast, Inc. Sandman and Forsythe are employees of Purple Squirrel Economics, which acted as consultants to Mesoblast, Inc., during the conduct of this research. This work was presented at the AMCP Annual Meeting online in April 2020 and was an encore presentation at AMCP Nexus 2020 Virtual in October 2020.

Comparative Effectiveness of Remestemcel-L-rknd versus Ruxolitinib in Pediatric Patients with Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease using Simulated Treatment Comparisons.

Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) can be a lifesaving treatment for hematologic malignancies, but acute graft-versus-host-disease (aGVHD) is a potentially deadly adverse effect experienced by up to half of allo-HSCT recipients. Inadequate response to steroid therapy for aGVHD is associated with poor prognosis and high mortality, including among pediatric patients, who are the focus of this study. Ruxolitinib and remestemcel-L-rknd were evaluated for the treatment of steroid-refractory (SR) aGVHD in two separate single-arm trials. To effectively compare the safety and efficacy of these treatments without a head-to-head trial, a simulated treatment comparison (STC) was conducted. Methods: Regression techniques were used to adjust individual patient-level data from the remestemcel-L-rknd trial to mutually reported baseline characteristics from the ruxolitinib trial. Outcomes of interest included a 28-day overall response rate (ORR), a 28-day ORR in the grade III-IV aGVHD population, and adverse events (AEs). Results: In the full populations, the STC of risk ratios (RRs) found treatment with remestemcel-L-rknd to be associated with a numerical but not statistically significant improvement in the 28-day ORR versus ruxolitinib. In the grade III-IV aGVHD sub-group, the STC showed significantly improved 28-day ORR for remestemcel-L-rknd versus ruxolitinib (P=0.04). Remestemcel-L-rknd was also associated with improved safety outcomes (P<0.05) in 17 out of 30 AEs, including hematologic events, peripheral edema, muscular weakness, nausea, back pain, and fatigue. Conclusion: Remestemcel-L-rknd was associated with significant improvements in day 28 ORR compared with ruxolitinib in patients with severe (grade III-IV) SR aGVHD. Across all grades of SR aGVHD, remestemcel-L-rknd was associated with fewer all-grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (27/30) available for comparison, including the majority reaching statistical significance.