Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Qual Health Res ; 29(8): 1213-1226, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30741102

ABSTRACT

Interactionally, the workplace may be dilemmatic for a person with "invisible" chronic illness. Risks of stigmatization exist if they disclose their condition to colleagues. Meanwhile, not disclosing threatens well-being and entitlements. Using Bakhtin's dialogism as a theoretical framework, we explored these social aspects of illness: inductively analyzing narratives from 20 participants with multiple sclerosis (MS). Capitalizing on concepts from dialogical and conversation analysis, links between (in)visibility, knowledge, and belief were examined with respect to symptoms and co-worker judgment. Perceived medical legitimacy creates a core social dilemma. At the intersection of genre and action, participants systematically used parody to subvert the traditional workplace hierarchy. "Oh-prefaced" direct reported speech (OPDRS) was deployed to exaggerate workplace interactions, undermining managers/colleagues who misattributed (in)visible symptoms. Parodic OPDRS index emotive interactional dilemmas. As subversions of organizational power, OPDRS denote those very areas where employees feel disempowered. Sensitivity to OPDRS can provide diagnostic support and complement evaluation frameworks.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/psychology , Workplace/psychology , Female , Health Status , Humans , Male , Mental Health , Multiple Sclerosis/physiopathology , Multiple Sclerosis/psychology , Qualitative Research , Stereotyping , United Kingdom
2.
Psychol Health ; 34(6): 695-714, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30693807

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to understand how to facilitate the job retention of employees with chronic illness. We focus on multiple sclerosis (MS) as a criterion chronic illness. DESIGN: An opportunity sample of 20 individuals of working age (13 female; 7 male) were recruited who had been in paid employment for over 28 months with a concurrent diagnosis of MS. Participants took part in one of three focus groups with a topic guide comprising keywords: work, coping, performance, support, future, expectations, sharing and symptoms. Data were analysed using dialogical analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: As a qualitative study, no outcome measure was used. However, the specific focus of interest was to search for differential patterns of 'timespace' - chronotope - that people with chronic illness utilise to manage their condition in the workplace. RESULTS: Participants oriented to two distinct chronotope types: unsustainable epic (characterised by condensed time) and temporary idyll (characterized by condensed space). Perceived managerial discretion was identified as possibly influencing participants' chronotope preference. CONCLUSION: Identifying chronotope preference has practical implications for health psychologists and related professionals who provide and advise on support to facilitate people with chronic illness to thrive in the workplace.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/psychology , Chronobiology Phenomena , Multiple Sclerosis/psychology , Workplace/organization & administration , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Qualitative Research
3.
Mult Scler ; 25(3): 419-426, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29363395

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Maintaining paid work is a key issue for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Different factors, including psychological attributes, can influence job retention. Understanding their role should inform potential interventions to help PwMS retain employment. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify the key factors which improve job retention in an employed cohort of PwMS. METHODS: This three-year longitudinal study used validated self-completed measures of physical and psychological factors at four time points over 28 months. RESULTS: Of 208 employed PwMS, just over 1 in 10 was no longer working at the end of the study. Three variables were predictive of continuing employment; low 'work instability' at baseline increased the odds of job retention by a factor of 12.76; high levels of self-efficacy by a factor of 4.66 and being less than 50 years of age increased the odds of job retention by a factor of 3.90. Path analysis demonstrated the mediating role of self-efficacy between the physical impact of MS and the level of work instability at exit. CONCLUSION: Screening for work instability and self-efficacy in a clinical setting followed by appropriate interventions to increase self-efficacy and reduce work instability could aid job retention in MS.


Subject(s)
Employment/psychology , Multiple Sclerosis/psychology , Self Efficacy , Adult , Age Factors , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Sclerosis/epidemiology , Young Adult
4.
J Rehabil Med ; 48(9): 799-805, 2016 Oct 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27671124

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: People with multiple sclerosis often stop working earlier than expected. Psychological factors may have an impact on job retention. Investigation may inform interventions to help people stay in work. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the associations between psychological factors and work instability in people with multiple sclerosis. METHODS: A multi-method, 2-phased study. Focus groups were held to identify key themes. Questionnaire packs using validated scales of the key themes were completed at baseline and at 8-month follow-up. RESULTS: Four key psychological themes emerged. Out of 208 study subjects 57.2% reported medium/high risk of job loss, with marginal changes at 8 months. Some psychological variables fluctuated significantly, e.g. depression fell from 24.6% to 14.5%. Work instability and anxiety and depression were strongly correlated (χ2 p < 0.001). Those with probable depression at baseline had 7.1 times increased odds of medium/high work instability, and baseline depression levels also predicted later work instability (Hosmer-Lemeshow test 0.899; Nagelkerke R Square 0.579). CONCLUSION: Psychological factors fluctuated over the 8-month follow-up period. Some psychological variables, including anxiety and depression, were significantly associated with, and predictive of, work instability. Longitudinal analysis should further identify how these psychological attributes impact on work instability and potential job loss in the longer term.


Subject(s)
Employment/psychology , Multiple Sclerosis/psychology , Workload/psychology , Adult , Anxiety Disorders , Depressive Disorder , Female , Humans , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
5.
Clin Rehabil ; 24(2): 110-21, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20103574

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the effectiveness of medications used to improve attention in people with non-progressive acquired brain injury. DESIGN: A systematic review. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINALH, PUBMED and PsychINFO databases were used to identify studies published between 1987 and 2008 meeting the following criteria: studies with subjects older than 18 years; diagnosis of new onset or previous acquired brain injury; medication given to improve attention and use of outcome to measure attention. Studies involving subjects in low arousal states or with neurogenerative conditions were excluded. The studies were categorized into three evidence levels: I - Randomized controlled trials; II - Prospective studies, controlled trials with methodological limitations; and III - Retrospective studies, clinical case series. RESULTS: Forty-seven articles were identified on initial search. Twenty-six met the pre-specified criteria. Five articles were assessed as meeting the level I evidence criteria, 12 were level II studies and 9 were level III studies. Methylphenidate can improve information processing speed but not all attention aspects in some people after traumatic brain injury. There is weak evidence for use of dopamine agonists to improve neglect/inattention after stroke. There is little evidence on the frequency of adverse effects and long-term functional benefits. CONCLUSION: Although there is lack of robust evidence to recommend the routine use of medication to improve attention after traumatic brain injury and stroke, the existing evidence indicates potential for benefit in some patents and therefore further research is warranted.


Subject(s)
Attention/drug effects , Brain Injuries/drug therapy , Adult , Brain Injuries/physiopathology , Brain Injuries/rehabilitation , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...