NLRP1 inflammasome promotes senescence and senescence-associated secretory phenotype.

BACKGROUND: Senescence is a cellular aging-related process triggered by different stresses and characterized by the secretion of various inflammatory factors referred to as senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), some of which are produced by the NLRP3 inflammasome. Here, we present evidence that the NLRP1 inflammasome is a DNA damage sensor and a key mediator of senescence. METHODS: Senescence was induced in fibroblasts in vitro and in mice. Cellular senescence was assessed by Western blot analysis of several proteins, including p16, p21, p53, and SASP factors, released in the culture media or serum. Inflammasome components, including NLRP1, NLRP3 and GSDMD were knocked out or silenced using siRNAs. RESULTS: In vitro and in vivo results suggest that the NLRP1 inflammasome promotes senescence by regulating the expression of p16, p21, p53, and SASP factors in a Gasdermin D (GSDMD)-dependent manner. Mechanistically, the NLRP1 inflammasome is activated in response to genomic damage detected by the cytosolic DNA sensor cGMP-AMP (cGAMP) synthase (cGAS). CONCLUSION: Our findings show that NLRP1 is a cGAS-dependent DNA damage sensor during senescence and a mediator of SASP release through GSDMD. This study advances the knowledge on the biology of the NLRP1 inflammasome and highlights this pathway as a potential pharmcological target to modulate senescence.

Polydatin and Nicotinamide Rescue the Cellular Phenotype of Mitochondrial Diseases by Mitochondrial Unfolded Protein Response (mtUPR) Activation.

Primary mitochondrial diseases result from mutations in nuclear DNA (nDNA) or mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) genes, encoding proteins crucial for mitochondrial structure or function. Given that few disease-specific therapies are available for mitochondrial diseases, novel treatments to reverse mitochondrial dysfunction are necessary. In this work, we explored new therapeutic options in mitochondrial diseases using fibroblasts and induced neurons derived from patients with mutations in the GFM1 gene. This gene encodes the essential mitochondrial translation elongation factor G1 involved in mitochondrial protein synthesis. Due to the severe mitochondrial defect, mutant GFM1 fibroblasts cannot survive in galactose medium, making them an ideal screening model to test the effectiveness of pharmacological compounds. We found that the combination of polydatin and nicotinamide enabled the survival of mutant GFM1 fibroblasts in stress medium. We also demonstrated that polydatin and nicotinamide upregulated the mitochondrial Unfolded Protein Response (mtUPR), especially the SIRT3 pathway. Activation of mtUPR partially restored mitochondrial protein synthesis and expression, as well as improved cellular bioenergetics. Furthermore, we confirmed the positive effect of the treatment in GFM1 mutant induced neurons obtained by direct reprogramming from patient fibroblasts. Overall, we provide compelling evidence that mtUPR activation is a promising therapeutic strategy for GFM1 mutations.

Does NLRP1 Inflammasome Activation in Immune Cells in Kidney Transplantation Relate with Donor Organ Age?

Inflammation causes a wide range of health disorders. In this process, the formation of inflammasome complexes plays a key role. Although inflammasomes have been extensively studied during kidney disease, their role in kidney transplantation has not been fully elucidated. In this study, we evaluate the gene and protein expression of several components of the inflammasome pathway before and at several time points after kidney transplantation in a cohort of patients of different ages and receiving an organ from older or younger donors. Our findings indicate the activation of the NLRP1 inflammasome in several immune cell population, monocytes and CD4+ and CD8+ cells mainly, in renal transplant, and its level increases gradually in patients who receive an older organ, whereas it has the opposite effect on older patients who receive a younger organ. Despite treatment with immunosuppressants, inflammation persists in some patients. These results lead to the hypothesis that the donor's age is a critical factor in post-transplant inflammasome activation and that specific NLRP1 inflammasome inhibitors should be considered to increase the success of kidney transplantation long-term.

Does Donor Age Have Effects on Senescence Biomarkers in Kidney-Transplanted Patients?

Renal transplantation is an effective treatment for severe chronic kidney diseases. However, young patients often face a scarcity of kidneys from donors of similar age, resulting in the transplantation of older organs, which increase the risk of graft rejection and several complications compared with older individuals who receive kidneys from donors of similar age or younger. This article focuses on studying different senescence biomarkers in donors and patients who received kidneys from various age ranges complying with the STROBE requirements. We studied 61 patients subjected to renal transplant isolating blood samples 24 h before, and 24 h, 3 days, 7 days, 3 months, and 6 months after transplant. The patients were divided into three groups: older donor than the patient (Old Donor), younger donor than the patient (Young Donor), and similar age (Matched). We studied different senescence markers such as p16, p21, interleukin 6 (IL-6), and senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) release. Young patients who receive older organs showed increased mRNA and protein expression of the senescence makers. Hence, increased SASP release was also observed in patients from older donor. In contrast, older patients who receive younger organs showed a slow but consistent improvement in their initial senescent phenotype. In addition, macrophage cell model treated with blood-derived serum from patients 6 months after the transplant showed a pro-senescence environment in macrophages proposed by the SASP from the patients. These results lead the hypothesis that senolytics could reduce the presence of senescent cells and mitigate the complications associated with the transplantation of older organs in young patients.

mtUPR Modulation as a Therapeutic Target for Primary and Secondary Mitochondrial Diseases.

Mitochondrial dysfunction is a key pathological event in many diseases. Its role in energy production, calcium homeostasis, apoptosis regulation, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) balance render mitochondria essential for cell survival and fitness. However, there are no effective treatments for most primary and secondary mitochondrial diseases to this day. Therefore, new therapeutic approaches, such as the modulation of the mitochondrial unfolded protein response (mtUPR), are being explored. mtUPRs englobe several compensatory processes related to proteostasis and antioxidant system mechanisms. mtUPR activation, through an overcompensation for mild intracellular stress, promotes cell homeostasis and improves lifespan and disease alterations in biological models of mitochondrial dysfunction in age-related diseases, cardiopathies, metabolic disorders, and primary mitochondrial diseases. Although mtUPR activation is a promising therapeutic option for many pathological conditions, its activation could promote tumor progression in cancer patients, and its overactivation could lead to non-desired side effects, such as the increased heteroplasmy of mitochondrial DNA mutations. In this review, we present the most recent data about mtUPR modulation as a therapeutic approach, its role in diseases, and its potential negative consequences in specific pathological situations.

Precision Medicine in Rare Diseases.

Rare diseases are those that have a low prevalence in the population (less than 5 individuals per 10,000 inhabitants). However, infrequent pathologies affect a large number of people, since according to the World Health Organization (WHO), there are about 7000 rare diseases that affect 7% of the world's population. Many patients with rare diseases have suffered the consequences of what is called the diagnostic odyssey, that is, extensive and prolonged serial tests and clinical visits, sometimes for many years, all with the hope of identifying the etiology of their disease. For patients with rare diseases, obtaining the genetic diagnosis can mean the end of the diagnostic odyssey, and the beginning of another, the therapeutic odyssey. This scenario is especially challenging for the scientific community, since more than 90% of rare diseases do not currently have an effective treatment. This therapeutic failure in rare diseases means that new approaches are necessary. Our research group proposes that the use of precision or personalized medicine techniques can be an alternative to find potential therapies in these diseases. To this end, we propose that patients' own cells can be used to carry out personalized pharmacological screening for the identification of potential treatments.

Dynamic Reorganization of the Cytoskeleton during Apoptosis: The Two Coffins Hypothesis.

During apoptosis, cells undergo characteristic morphological changes in which the cytoskeleton plays an active role. The cytoskeleton rearrangements have been mainly attributed to actinomyosin ring contraction, while microtubule and intermediate filaments are depolymerized at early stages of apoptosis. However, recent results have shown that microtubules are reorganized during the execution phase of apoptosis forming an apoptotic microtubule network (AMN). Evidence suggests that AMN is required to maintain plasma membrane integrity and cell morphology during the execution phase of apoptosis. The new "two coffins" hypothesis proposes that both AMN and apoptotic cells can adopt two morphological patterns, round or irregular, which result from different cytoskeleton kinetic reorganization during the execution phase of apoptosis induced by genotoxic agents. In addition, round and irregular-shaped apoptosis showed different biological properties with respect to AMN maintenance, plasma membrane integrity and phagocyte responses. These findings suggest that knowing the type of apoptosis may be important to predict how fast apoptotic cells undergo secondary necrosis and the subsequent immune response. From a pathological point of view, round-shaped apoptosis can be seen as a physiological and controlled type of apoptosis, while irregular-shaped apoptosis can be considered as a pathological type of cell death closer to necrosis.