Is the outcome of a revision carpal tunnel release as good as those of a primary release? A matched cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare primary and revision carpal tunnel release outcomes in all patients with carpal tunnel syndrome and when corrected for baseline severity and demographics. METHODS: A total of 903 hands of primary and 132 hands of revision patients underwent carpal tunnel release and patients completed online questionnaires on demographics, clinical severity, and satisfaction. The primary outcome measure, the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), was administered at intake and six months after surgery. RESULTS: The BCTQ total score at six months was better in primary (1.55±0.58) than revision patients (1.94±0.73, p=<0.001), and primary patients improved more on the BCTQ total score (1.10±0.71 vs. 0.90±0.72, p=0.003). In patients matched on similar baseline characteristics using propensity score matching, the BCTQ total score at six months was also better in primary patients (1.65±0.63) than in revision patients (1.92±0.73, p=0.002), and primary patients still had more improvement in BCTQ total score (1.18±0.73 vs. 0.89±0.73, p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the outcome after revision carpal tunnel release is only 16% worse compared to primary carpal tunnel release. Preoperative symptom severity, functional status, and demographics may play a role since correcting for these factors reduces the difference in outcome between primary and revision CTR.

Patient Mindset and the Success of Carpal Tunnel Release.

BACKGROUND: Depression and pain catastrophizing are aspects of the patient's mindset that have been shown to be important in relation to the outcome of carpal tunnel release. However, other factors of the patient's mindset have been understudied, such as treatment expectations and illness perceptions. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of these mindset aspects on outcome of carpal tunnel release, in addition to psychological distress and pain catastrophizing. METHODS: A total of 307 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome who visited outpatient hand surgery clinics and who completed online questionnaires regarding demographic and psychosocial characteristics and carpal tunnel syndrome severity were included. The patient mindset was measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire-4, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, the Credibility Expectancy Questionnaire, and the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire. Hierarchical linear regression models were used to examine the relation between self-reported severity 6 months after carpal tunnel release, as measured with the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, and psychosocial aspects of mindset, adjusting for preoperative Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire score, patient characteristics, and comorbidities. RESULTS: Independent associations with better self-reported outcome were found for higher treatment expectations (ß = -0.202; p < 0.001) and illness comprehensibility (ß = -0.223; p < 0.001). The additional explained variance in Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire scores by the patient's mindset was 13.2 percent (psychological distress and pain catastrophizing together, 2.1 percent; treatment expectations and illness perceptions together, 11.1 percent). CONCLUSION: Treatment outcome expectations and comprehensibility of illness are both independently associated with the outcome of carpal tunnel release, showing the importance of these aspects of the patient's mindset for the outcome of carpal tunnel release. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Influence of illness perceptions, psychological distress and pain catastrophizing on self-reported symptom severity and functional status in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of illness perceptions, pain catastrophizing and psychological distress on self-reported symptom severity and functional status in patients diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). METHODS: A total of 674 patients with CTS scheduled for surgery at an outpatient treatment center for hand and wrist conditions (September 2017 to August 2018) completed online questionnaires regarding demographic and psychosocial characteristics and self-reported CTS severity. Self-reported severity of CTS was measured with the functional status scale and the symptom severity scale of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. To measure psychosocial factors, the Patient Health Questionnaire-4, Pain Catastrophizing Scale and the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire were used. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to assess univariable relations. Hierarchical linear regression models were used to examine the relation between psychosocial factors and self-reported severity, and the relative contribution of psychosocial factors to self-reported severity, adjusting for patient characteristics and comorbidities. RESULTS: Medium-sized correlations (range 0.32-0.44) with self-reported severity were observed for psychological distress, pain catastrophizing, consequences, identity, concern and emotional representation. Furthermore, these factors (except for concern) were also associated with self-reported severity, when adjusted for baseline characteristics and comorbidities. Hierarchical linear regression models showed that these psychosocial factors explained an additional 20-25% of the variance in self-reported severity of CTS. CONCLUSION: This study shows that psychological distress, pain catastrophizing and illness perceptions play an independent role in self-reported severity of CTS. Clinicians should take these psychosocial factors into account when they are consulted by patients with CTS.

Recurrent and persistent carpal tunnel syndrome: predicting clinical outcome of revision surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the self-reported outcome of revision surgery in patients with recurrent and persistent carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and to identify predictors of clinical outcome of revision surgery. METHODS: A total of 114 hands in 112 patients were surgically treated for recurrent and persistent CTS in one of 10 specialized hand clinics. As part of routine care, patients were asked to complete online questionnaires regarding demographic data, comorbidities, and clinical severity measures. The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) was administered at intake and at 6 months postoperatively to evaluate clinical outcome. The BCTQ comprises the subscales Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) and Functional Status Scale (FSS), and the individual scores were also assessed. Using multivariable regression models, the authors identified factors predictive of the outcome as measured by the BCTQ FSS, SSS, and total score at 6 months. RESULTS: Revision surgery significantly improved symptoms and function. Longer total duration of symptoms, a higher BCTQ total score at intake, and diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) along with CTS were associated with worse outcome after revision surgery at 6 months postoperatively. The multivariable prediction models could explain 33%, 23%, and 30% of the variance in outcome as measured by the FSS, SSS, and BCTQ total scores, respectively, at 6 months. Although patients with higher BCTQ scores at intake have worse outcomes, they generally have the most improvement in symptoms and function. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified total duration of symptoms, BCTQ total score at intake, and diagnosis of CRPS along with CTS as predictors of clinical outcome and confirmed that revision surgery significantly improves self-reported symptoms and function in patients with recurrent and persistent CTS. Patients with more severe CTS symptoms have greater improvement in symptoms at 6 months postoperatively than patients with less severe CTS, but 80% of patients still had residual symptoms 6 months postoperatively. These results can be used to inform both patient and surgeon to manage expectations on improvement of symptoms.

Increased incidence of diuretic use in critically ill obese patients.

OBJECTIVE: Sodium retention occurs commonly in cardiac and liver disease, requiring the administration of diuretics to restore fluid balance. Whether obesity is associated with sodium retention has not been fully evaluated. METHODS: In a large single-center cohort of critically ill patients, we evaluated whether admission body mass index was associated with the administration of either oral or intravenous diuretics during the intensive care unit (ICU) stay. MAIN RESULTS: Of 7724 critically ill patients, 3946 (51.1%) were prescribed diuretics during the ICU stay. Overweight, class I obesity, and class II/III obesity were associated with a 1.35 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-1.53; P < .001), 1.56 (95% CI, 1.35-1.80; P < .001), and 1.91 (95% CI, 1.61-2.26; P < .001) adjusted risk of receiving diuretics within the ICU, respectively. In adjusted analysis, a 5-kg/m(2) increment of body mass index was associated with a 1.19 (95% CI, 1.14-1.23; P < .001) increased adjusted risk of within-ICU diuretics. Among those patients receiving loop diuretics, obese patients received significantly larger daily diuretic doses. CONCLUSION: Critically ill obese patients are more likely to receive diuretics during their stay in the ICU and to receive higher dosages of diuretics. Our data suggest that obesity is an independent risk factor for sodium retention.