Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Hepatol ; 27(3): 100685, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35192964

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic imperiled the global health system. We aimed to determine the impact of COVID-19 on the care continuum of HCV-infected patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two hundred and fifty-six patients who were prescribed a course of DAA therapy at three tertiary medical centers in the US and China between January 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020 were included. We assessed the proportions of patients who completed DAA therapy and had HCV RNA testing during and after the end of therapy. We also assessed the impact of utilization of telemedicine. RESULTS: The proportion of patients undergoing HCV RNA testing during DAA treatment decreased from >81.7% before pandemic to 67.8% during the pandemic (P=0.006), with a more prominent decrease in the US. There were significant decreases in HCV RNA testing >12 (P<0.001) and >20 weeks (P<0.001) post-treatment during COVID-19 era. Compared to pre-COVID period, post-treatment clinic encounters during COVID-19 era decreased significantly in China (Xi'an: 13.6% to 7.4%; Nanjing: 16.7% to 12.5%) but increased in the US (12.5% to 16.7%), mainly due to the use of telemedicine. There was a 4-fold increase in utilization of telemedicine in the US. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 pandemic carried profound impact on care for HCV patients in both the US and China. HCV cure rate assessment decreased by half during COVID era but the proportion of patients finishing DAA therapy was not significantly affected. Increased utilization of telemedicine led to increased compliance with DAA therapy but did not encourage patients to have their laboratory assessment for HCV cure.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hepatitis C, Chronic , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hepacivirus/genetics , Hepatitis C, Chronic/diagnosis , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Hepatitis C, Chronic/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics , RNA
2.
Hepatology ; 72(1): 230-239, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31677284

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) results in extremely high short-term mortality in patients with underlying cirrhosis. The European Association for the Study of the Liver criteria grade ACLF severity from 1 (least severe) to 3 (most severe) based on organ failures (OFs) that develop after an acute decompensation (AD). However, the implications of surviving low-grade ACLF in terms of risk of subsequent high-grade ACLF are unclear. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with compensated cirrhosis in the Veterans Health Administration database from January 2008 to June 2016. Propensity matching for grade 1 (G1) ACLF, followed by Cox regression, was used to model risk of subsequent grade 3 (G3) ACLF. Stratified analyses of different ADs and OFs were also performed. We identified 4,878 patients with well-matched propensity scores. G1 ACLF events conferred a significantly increased risk of subsequent G3 ACLF relative no previous G1 ACLF (hazard ratio, 8.69; P < 0.001). When stratified by AD, patients with ascites or hepatic encephalopathy were significantly more likely to develop G3 ACLF relative to those with gastrointestinal bleed or infection as an AD (P < 0.001). Risk of G3 ACLF also varied significantly by type of OF characterizing previous G1 ACLF, with liver, coagulation, and circulatory failure posing the highest increased risk. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who recover from G1 ACLF have substantially increased risk of later developing G3 ACLF as compared to those who never have G1 ACLF. Moreover, reversible decompensations for G1 ACLF have a lower risk of G3 ACLF, and liver-intrinsic OFs confer a much higher risk of G3 ACLF. These findings have implications for prognosis, future surveillance, and triaging early transplant evaluation.


Subject(s)
Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure/complications , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index
3.
Ann Hepatol ; 17(5): 759-768, 2018 Aug 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30145578

ABSTRACT

Alcoholic hepatitis (AH) is a condition of acute liver inflammation in the setting of heavy alcohol use that is often managed with corticosteroids in severe cases. Among non-responders to steroids, however, prognosis is poor with up to 75% mortality within 6 months after treatment failure. Early liver transplantation (LT) can achieve an acceptable short-term survival, and initial studies have demonstrated 3-year survival rates of up to 84%. However, the practice of early LT in severe AH remains controversial with concerns over the 6-month rule of sobriety and risk of alcohol relapse post-transplant. Proponents of LT advocate for better understanding of alcohol use as a disorder rather than self-inflicted cause of illness, aim to redefine the misguided application of the 6-month rule, and point out similar relapse rates among patients with early LT and those with greater than 6 months abstinence before transplant. Opponents of LT emphasize the correlation between alcohol relapse and graft failure and mortality, public resistance and potential for distrust among donors, and arguments that transplant centers need to establish improved models to predict relapse and standardize candidate selection criteria across centers. Here we review recent literature on this controversy and provide recommendations for moving forward to consensus.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis, Alcoholic/surgery , Liver Transplantation , Alcohol Abstinence , Clinical Decision-Making , Decision Support Techniques , Graft Survival , Hepatitis, Alcoholic/diagnosis , Hepatitis, Alcoholic/mortality , Humans , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Liver Transplantation/mortality , Patient Selection , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Recurrence , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Pediatr ; 162(2): 319-23.e1, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22906509

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To validate King's College Hospital criteria (KCHC) in children with non-acetaminophen induced pediatric acute liver failure (PALF) and to determine whether re-optimizing the KCHC would improve predictive accuracy. STUDY DESIGN: We used the PALF study group database. Primary outcomes were survival without liver transplantation vs death at 21 days following enrollment. Classification and regression tree analysis was used to determine if modification of KCHC parameters would improve classification of death vs survival. RESULTS: Among 163 patients who met KCHC, 54 patients (33.1%) died within 21 days. Sensitivity of KCHC in this cohort was significantly lower than in the original study (61% vs 91%, P = .002), and specificity did not differ significantly. The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of KCHC for this cohort was 33% and 88% respectively. Classification and regression tree analysis yielded the following optimized parameters to predict death: grade 2-4 encephalopathy, international normalized ratio >4.02, and total bilirubin >2.02 mg/dL. These parameters did not improve PPV, but NPV was significantly better (88% vs 92%, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: KCHC does not reliably predict death in PALF. With a PPV of 33%, twice as many participants who met KCHC recovered spontaneously than died, indicating that using KCHC may cause over utilization of liver transplantation. Re-optimized cutpoints for KCHC parameters improved NPV, but not PPV. Parameters beyond the KCHC should be evaluated to create a predictive model for PALF.


Subject(s)
Liver Failure, Acute/etiology , Liver Failure, Acute/mortality , Acetaminophen , Adolescent , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Liver Function Tests/standards , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL