BACKGROUND: Statin agents play a major role in secondary prevention after acute cerebral ischemia (ACI) events but are not indicated in all patients with ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. National guidelines recommend statins for patients with ACI of large or small vessel atherosclerotic origin and without these stroke mechanisms but coexisting coronary artery disease or primary prevention indications. The potential adverse effect burden of statin overuse in the remaining ACI patients have not been well delineated. METHODS: Per Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we performed systematic meta-analyses of: (1) statin randomized clinical trials to determine absolute risk increases for 6 major adverse events; (2) large clinical series to determine the proportion of ACI events due to large or small vessel atherosclerotic disease; and (3) the proportion of remaining patients with coronary artery disease/primary prevention statin indications. RESULTS: For adverse effects, data were available from 63 randomized clinical trials enrolling 155â 107 patients. Statin therapy was associated with an increased risk of the occurrence of 6 conditions: diabetes, myalgia or muscle weakness, myopathy, liver disease, renal insufficiency, and eye disease. Across 55 large series enrolling 53â 501 patients, the rate of ACI due to large and small artery atherosclerosis was 45.0% (large artery atherosclerosis 21.6%, small vessel disease 23.4%), the rate of remaining patients with coronary artery disease/primary prevention statin indications was 31.8%, and the rate of patients without statin indications was 23.2%. Data synthesis indicated that, in the United States, were all patients with ACI without statin indications treated with statins, a total of 5601 patients would develop needless adverse events each year, most commonly diabetes, myopathy, and eye disease. CONCLUSIONS: More than one-fifth of patients with ACI do not have an indication for statins, and statin overuse in these patients could annually lead to over 5600 adverse events each year in the United States, including diabetes, myopathy, and eye disease. These findings emphasize the importance of adhering to guideline indications for the start of statin therapy in ACI.
Increasing evidence indicates that circadian and diurnal rhythms robustly influence stroke onset, mechanism, progression, recovery, and response to therapy in human patients. Pioneering initial investigations yielded important insights but were often single-center series, used basic imaging approaches, and used conflicting definitions of key data elements, including what constitutes daytime versus nighttime. Contemporary methodologic advances in human neurovascular investigation have the potential to substantially increase understanding, including the use of large multicenter and national data registries, detailed clinical trial data sets, analysis guided by individual patient chronotype, and multimodal computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging. To fully harness the power of these approaches to enhance pathophysiologic knowledge, an important foundational step is to develop standardized definitions and coding guides for data collection, permitting rapid aggregation of data acquired in different studies, and ensuring a common framework for analysis. To meet this need, the Leducq Consortium International pour la Recherche Circadienne sur l'AVC (CIRCA) convened a Consensus Statement Working Group of leading international researchers in cerebrovascular and circadian/diurnal biology. Using an iterative, mixed-methods process, the working group developed 79 data standards, including 48 common data elements (23 new and 25 modified/unmodified from existing common data elements), 14 intervals for time-anchored analyses of different granularity, and 7 formal, validated scales. This portfolio of standardized data structures is now available to assist researchers in the design, implementation, aggregation, and interpretation of clinical, imaging, and population research related to the influence of human circadian/diurnal biology upon ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke.
Stroke , Humans , Stroke/diagnostic imaging , Stroke/therapy , Data Collection , Research Design , Registries , Biology , Multicenter Studies as Topic
Background: The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is the most common endpoint in acute stroke trials, but its power is limited when analyzed dichotomously and its indication of effect size is challenging to interpret when analyzed ordinally. To address these issues, the utility-weighted-mRS (UW-mRS) has been developed as a patient-centered, linear scale. However, appropriate data visualizations of UW-mRS results are needed, as current stacked bar chart displays do not convey crucial utility-weighting information. Design/Methods: Two UW-mRS display formats were devised: (1) Utility Staircase charts, and (2) choropleth-stacked-bar-charts (CSBCs). In Utility Staircase displays, mRS segment height reflects the utility value of each mRS level. In CSBCs, mRS segment color intensity reflects the utility of each mRS level. Utility Staircase and CSBC figures were generated for 15 randomized comparisons of acute ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke therapies, including fibrinolysis, endovascular reperfusion, blood pressure moderation, and hemicraniectomy. Display accuracy in showing utility outcomes was assessed with the Tufte-lie-factor and ease-of-use assessed by formal ratings completed by a panel of 4 neurologists and emergency physicians and one nurse-coordinator. Results: The Utility Staircase and CSBC displays rapidly conveyed patient-centered valuation of trial outcome distributions not available in conventional ordinal stacked bar charts. Tufte-lie-factor (LF) scores indicated "substantial distortion" of utility-valued outcomes for 93% (14/15) of conventional stacked bar charts, vs. "no distortion" for all Utility Staircase and CSBC displays. Clinician ratings on the Figural Display Questionnaire indicated that utility information encoded in row height (Utility Staircase display) was more readily assimilated than that conveyed in segment hue intensity (CSBC), both superior to conventional stacked bar charts. Conclusions: Utility Staircase displays are an efficient graphical format for conveying utility weighted-modified Rankin Scale primary endpoint results of acute stroke trials, and choropleth-stacked-bar-charts a good alternative. Both are more accurate in depicting quantitative, health-related quality of life results and preferred by clinician users for utility results visualization, compared with conventional stacked bar charts.
