ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate research from Brazilian postgraduate students who provide evidence of effectiveness for Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC). METHODS: We conducted a literature review study of thesis and dissertations available in the Brazilian Digital Library of Dissertations and Theses (D/T) in May 2021 regardless of the year they were conducted. In those studies that did not utilize the NIC in the effectiveness evaluation, the cross-mapping methodology was employed between NIC and the interventions used by the authors of the studies. RESULTS: Using a systematic process, we identified 91 studies. Twenty-seven met a priori inclusion and exclusion criteria. We found an increase in studies that focused on nursing interventions in the last 10 years (n = 19), a large proportion of clinical trials (n = 16), and the majority of articles from the Southeast region of Brazil (n = 20). The areas of focus were adult and elderly care, and with a special interest in the behavioral domain (n = 11). Two sensitivity criteria were identified in all D/T (n = 27), and each study presented evidence of effectiveness of a minimum of three criteria simultaneously. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the effectiveness criteria, the Brazilian scientific production in postgraduate programs carried out by nurses provides evidence of the effectiveness for NIC nursing interventions. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: It is recommended to conduct further research that uses the NIC in the planning, conduct, and evaluation of interventions, based on effectiveness criteria of nursing sensitivity.
Subject(s)
Standardized Nursing Terminology , Adult , Humans , Brazil , Vocabulary, ControlledABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To develop a nursing outcome, consistent with the standardized format of outcomes within the nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC). This outcome will include an outcome label, an outcome definition, and clinical indicators. The proposed use for this outcome is to evaluate the access site of a percutaneous procedure. METHODS: Concept analysis with a scoping review. Initially, content experts were recruited to validate the indicators of the proposed outcome in order to complete a consensus validation. After consensus validation, a review of the proposed outcome and its indicators was completed by two of the editors of the NOC team to confirm that the outcome label, definition, and indicators were consistent with the NOC taxonomy. During this review, edits were made on the label name and definition. FINDINGS: After a series of reviews, the initial outcome of Vascular Status: Percutaneous Procedure Access was changed to Tissue Injury Severity: Percutaneous Procedure. In addition, the original definition of the condition of an access site for percutaneous procedure by venous or arterial puncture and health of surrounding tissues was edited to: Severity of complications from a needle-puncture access through the skin and into deeper tissues. The outcome has 11 indicators to be used to formulate a target rating for use in the clinical setting. The indicators were not edited over the course of the reviews. CONCLUSION: The proposed outcome will assist nurses in evaluating the access site of percutaneous procedures and in identifying possible complications. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE NURSING PRACTICE: This research contributes to the refinement of the NOC taxonomy by having a new outcome that meets clinical practice needs.
OBJETIVOS: Desenvolver um resultado de enfermagem, consistente com o formato padronizado de resultados da Classificação dos Resultados de Enfermagem (NOC). Este resultado incluirá um título de resultado, uma definição de resultado e indicadores clínicos. O uso proposto para esse resultado é avaliar o local de acesso de um procedimento percutâneo. MÉTODOS: Análise de conceito com revisão de escopo. Inicialmente, especialistas de conteúdo foram utilizados para validar os indicadores do resultado proposto em uma validação por consenso. Após a validação por consenso, uma revisão do resultado proposto e de seus indicadores foi realizada por dois editores da equipe da Classificação dos Resultados de Enfermagem para confirmar o título do resultado, definição e indicadores para serem consistentes com a taxonomia NOC. Durante esta revisão, foram feitas edições no título e na definição. RESULTADOS: Após uma série de revisões, o resultado denominado inicialmente de Estado Vascular: Acesso Procedimento Percutâneo foi alterado para Gravidade da Lesão Tecidual: Procedimento Percutâneo. Além disso, a definição original de condição de um local de acesso de procedimento percutâneo por punção venosa ou arterial e saúde dos tecidos adjacentes foi editada para - Gravidade das complicações de um acesso por punção com agulha através da pele e em tecidos mais profundos. O resultado tem 11 indicadores a serem usados para formular uma classificação-alvo para uso no ambiente clínico. Os indicadores não foram editados ao longo das revisões. CONCLUSÃO: O resultado proposto auxiliará o enfermeiro a avaliar o local de acesso dos procedimentos percutâneos e identificar possíveis complicações. IMPLICAÇÕES PARA A PRÁTICA DE ENFERMAGEM: Esta pesquisa contribui para o refinamento da taxonomia NOC por ter um novo resultado que atende às necessidades da prática clínica.
Subject(s)
Vocabulary, Controlled , Consensus , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The use of electronic health record (EHR) systems encourages and facilitates the use of data for the development and surveillance of quality indicators, including pain management. AIM: to conduct an integrative review on pain management research using data extracted from EHR in order to synthesize and analyze the following elements: pain management (assessments, interventions, and outcomes) and study results with potential clinical implications, data source, clinical sample characteristics, and method description. DESIGN: An integrative review of the literature was undertaken to identify exemplars of scientific research studies that explore pain management using data from EHR, using Cooper's framework. RESULTS: Our search of 1,061 records from PubMed, Scopus, and Cinahl was narrowed down to 28 eligible articles to be analyzed. CONCLUSION: Results of this integrative review will make a critical contribution, assisting others in developing research proposals and sound research methods, as well as providing an overview of such studies over the past 10 years. Through this review it is therefore possible to guide new research on clinical pain management using EHR.
Subject(s)
Electronic Health Records , Pain Management , Humans , Pain , Research DesignABSTRACT
AIM: To compare the domains of the Multidimensional Model of Successful Aging (MMSA) with the nursing terminologies, such as, NANDA International (NANDA-I), Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC) and Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC), in order to find similarities among them. METHOD: Cross-mapping between MMSA and nursing terminologies in two stages: individual analysis and comparison between the MMSA and the nursing terminologies, based on the mapping process rules; consensus among researchers to validate the results. RESULTS: All NOC and NIC domains were mapped with similarity in the MMSA domains, and 12 of the 13 NANDA-I domains showed similarity to the MMSA domains. In addition, similarity was identified between MMSA and most classes of the three classifications. CONCLUSIONS: The similarity between MMSA, NANDA-I, NIC and NOC supported the idea that the MMSA framework can be used in the nursing process to qualify the nursing practice in the elderly care.
Subject(s)
Aging , Health Transition , Nursing Process , Standardized Nursing Terminology , Adaptation, Psychological , Cognition , Cross-Sectional Studies , Emotions , Humans , Physical Functional Performance , Resilience, Psychological , Social Support , SpiritualityABSTRACT
Resumo Objetivo Validar definições conceituais e operacionais para os indicadores do resultado NOC "Autocontrole da doença cardíaca". Métodos Estudo metodológico de validação consensual desenvolvido em três etapas: revisão integrativa da literatura, elaboração de definições conceituais e operacionais para os indicadores do resultado NOC "Autocontrole da doença cardíaca" e validação das definições por consenso de 20 especialistas. Foi realizado teste binomial para análise da proporção de especialistas que concordaram que as definições elaboradas eram relevantes e claras. Valores de p inferiores a 0,05 indicavam diferença significativa na opinião dos especialistas quanto à relevância e a clareza das definições. Resultados Na avaliação dos especialistas, as definições conceituais de 43 indicadores apresentaram valores de p > 0,05 para clareza e 43 para relevância. Nas definições operacionais 36 indicadores apresentaram valor de p>0,05 para clareza e 43 para relevância. Para indicadores com o p<0,05 reajustes foram feitos conforme as sugestões dos especialistas. Conclusão O estabelecimento de definições conceituais e operacionais para indicadores NOC torna o processo de avaliação mais confiável, orientando a prática clínica em direção a melhores resultados. Quando validados, esses indicadores podem oferecer maior precisão, aumentando a efetividade da prática clínica.
Resumen Objetivo Validar definiciones conceptuales y operativas para los indicadores del resultado NOC "Autocontrol de la enfermedad cardíaca" Métodos Estudio metodológico de validación consensual realizado en tres etapas: revisión integradora de la literatura, elaboración de definiciones conceptuales y operacionales para los indicadores del resultado NOC "Autocontrol de la enfermedad cardíaca" y validación de las definiciones por consenso de 20 especialistas. Se realizó test binomial para analizar la proporción de especialistas que estaba de acuerdo con que las definiciones elaboradas eran relevantes y claras. Valores de p inferiores a 0,05 indicaban diferencia significativa en la opinión de los especialistas con relación a la relevancia y claridad de las definiciones. Resultados En el análisis de los especialistas, las definiciones conceptuales de 43 indicadores presentaron valores de p>0,05 respecto a la claridad y 43 a la relevancia. En las definiciones operativas, 36 indicadores presentaron valores de p>0,05 respecto a la claridad y 43 a la relevancia. Con relación a los indicadores con p<0,05, se realizaron ajustes según las sugerencias de los especialistas. Conclusión Establecer definiciones conceptuales y operativas para indicadores NOC permite que el proceso de evaluación sea más confiable, lo que orienta la práctica clínica a la obtención de mejores resultados. Al validarlos, estos indicadores pueden ofrecer mayor precisión y aumentar la efectividad de la práctica médica.
Abstract Objective To validate conceptual and operational definitions of the indicators for NOC outcomes: cardiac disease self-management. Methods This consensus-validation study was developed in three steps: integrative literature review, development of conceptual and operational definitions of the indicators for NOC outcome: cardiac disease self-management, and consensus-validation of definitions by 20 nursing specialists. A binomial test was conducted to analyze the proportion of nursing specialists who agreed on the relevance and clarity of definitions. P-values lower than 0.05 indicated a significant difference of the opinion among nursing specialits concerning the relevance and clarity of definitions. Results After the reviewing by nursing specialits, the conceptual definitions of 43 indicators for clarity and 43 for relevance had a p >0.05. Operational definitions of 36 indicators presented for clarity and 43 for relevance had a p-value >0.05. Indicators showing p <0.05 were adjusted accordingly to reflect the opinion of nursing specialists. Conclusion To establish conceptual and operational definitions for NOC indicators turn the assessment process more, and guide the clinical practice towards better results. Once validated, these indicators may provide higher precision and increase effectiveness in clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Humans , Patient Outcome Assessment , Self-Control , Standardized Nursing Terminology , Heart Diseases , Heart Failure , Health Status Indicators , Evaluation Study , Validation Studies as TopicABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Aim: To compare the domains of the Multidimensional Model of Successful Aging (MMSA) with the nursing terminologies, such as, NANDA International (NANDA-I), Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC) and Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC), in order to find similarities among them. Method: Cross-mapping between MMSA and nursing terminologies in two stages: individual analysis and comparison between the MMSA and the nursing terminologies, based on the mapping process rules; consensus among researchers to validate the results. Results: All NOC and NIC domains were mapped with similarity in the MMSA domains, and 12 of the 13 NANDA-I domains showed similarity to the MMSA domains. In addition, similarity was identified between MMSA and most classes of the three classifications. Conclusions: The similarity between MMSA, NANDA-I, NIC and NOC supported the idea that the MMSA framework can be used in the nursing process to qualify the nursing practice in the elderly care.
RESUMEN Objetivo: Comparar dominios del Modelo Multidimensional del Envejecimiento Exitoso (MMES) con las terminologías de enfermería, NANDA International (NANDA-I), Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC) y Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) en busca de similitudes. Métodos: Mapeo cruzado entre MMES y las terminologías de enfermería realizado en dos etapas: análisis individual y comparación de MMES con las terminologías de enfermería, basado en las reglas del proceso de mapeo; consenso entre los investigadores para validar resultados. Resultados: Todos los dominios NOC y NIC se asignaron con similitud en los campos MMES, y 12 de los 13 dominios NANDA-I mostraron similitud con los campos MMES. Además, se identificó similitud entre el MMES y la mayoría de las clases de las clasificaciones. Conclusiones: La similitud entre MMES y NANDA-I, NIC, NOC fortaleció la idea de que el referencial del MMES puede entrelazarse con el proceso de enfermería para calificar la práctica de enfermería en el cuidado al anciano.
RESUMO Objetivo: Comparar domínios do Modelo Multidimensional do Envelhecimento Bem Sucedido (MMES) com as terminologias de enfermagem, NANDA International (NANDA-I), Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC) e Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) em busca de semelhanças entre eles. Métodos: Mapeamento cruzado entre MMES e terminologias de enfermagem realizado em duas etapas: análise individual e comparação do MMES e terminologias de enfermagem, com base nas regras do processo de mapeamento; consenso entre os pesquisadores para validar os resultados. Resultados: Todos os domínios NOC e NIC foram mapeados com similaridade nos domínios MMES, e 12 dos 13 domínios NANDA-I mostraram semelhança com os domínios MMES. Além disso, identificou-se semelhança entre o MMES e a maioria das classes das três classificações. Conclusões: A similaridade entre MMES e NANDA-I, NIC, NOC fortaleceu a ideia de que o referencial do MMES pode ser entrelaçado com o processo de enfermagem para qualificar a prática de enfermagem no cuidado ao idoso.
Subject(s)
Humans , Aging , Health Transition , Standardized Nursing Terminology , Nursing Process , Social Support , Adaptation, Psychological , Cross-Sectional Studies , Cognition , Spirituality , Emotions , Resilience, Psychological , Physical Functional PerformanceABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Select and validate outcomes from Nursing Outcomes Classification and interventions from Nursing Interventions Classification for diagnoses Risk for Frail Elderly Syndrome and Frail Elderly Syndrome/NANDA International. METHODS: A consensus study with 15 gerontological nursing specialists. Data were collected by a Google forms instrument developed by the research team and analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: For the risk diagnosis, 11 outcomes and seven interventions were validated. For the problem-focused diagnosis, 12 outcomes and eight interventions were validated. CONCLUSION: The outcomes and interventions showed up as important elements applicable in the health assistance to older adults care with risk or Frail Elderly Syndrome. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Those outcomes and interventions are a linkages proposal with the diagnoses to be applied in the clinical practice.
OBJETIVO: Selecionar e validar intervenções/NIC e resultados/NOC para os diagnósticos Risco de síndrome do idoso frágil e Síndrome do idoso frágil/NANDA-I. MÉTODOS: Estudo de consenso entre 15 especialistas em enfermagem gerontológica, com dados coletados em instrumento construído no Google forms® e analisados usando estatística descritiva. RESULTADOS: Para o diagnóstico de risco foram validadas sete intervenções e onze resultados. Para o diagnóstico com foco no problema foram validadas oito intervenções e doze resultados. CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados e as intervenções se apresentaram como importantes elementos aplicáveis para o cuidado ao idoso com risco ou síndrome do idoso frágil. IMPLICAÇÕES PARA A PRÁTICA DE ENFERMAGEM: As intervenções e resultados validados são uma proposta de ligação com os diagnósticos para qualificar a prática clínica.
Subject(s)
Standardized Nursing Terminology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Nursing Diagnosis , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To identify self-care behaviors, instruments, techniques, parameters for the assessment of self-care behaviors in people with heart failure, compare these behaviors with the indicators of the Nursing Outcomes Classification outcome, Self-Management: Cardiac Disease. METHOD: Integrative literature review performed in Lilacs, Medline, CINAHL, and Cochrane, including publications from 2009 to 2015. One thousand six hundred ninety-one articles were retrieved from the search, of which 165 were selected for analysis. RESULTS: Ten self-care behaviors and several different assessment instruments, techniques, and parameters were identified. The addition and removal of some indicators are proposed, based on this review. The data provide substrate for the development of conceptual and operational definitions of the indicators, making the outcome more applicable for use in clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Self Care , Behavior , Standardized Nursing Terminology , Heart Failure , NursingABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To identify self-care behaviors, instruments, techniques, parameters for the assessment of self-care behaviors in people with heart failure, compare these behaviors with the indicators of the Nursing Outcomes Classification outcome, Self Management: Cardiac Disease. METHOD: Integrative literature review performed in Lilacs, Medline, CINAHL, and Cochrane, including publications from 2009 to 2015. One thousand six hundred ninety-one articles were retrieved from the search, of which 165 were selected for analysis. RESULTS: Ten self-care behaviors and several different assessment instruments, techniques, and parameters were identified. The addition and removal of some indicators are proposed, based on this review. The data provide substrate for the development of conceptual and operational definitions of the indicators, making the outcome more applicable for use in clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Heart Failure/psychology , Self Care , Heart Failure/nursing , HumansABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The study aims to validate nursing outcomes from the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) related to the nursing diagnosis of impaired tissue integrity (00044) in adults with pressure ulcer (PU). METHODS: It was a consensus validation study using the focus group technique. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, and NOCs that obtained 100% consensus were considered validated. FINDINGS: Of the 16 NOCs evaluated, nine were validated. CONCLUSIONS: The NOCs validated may identify the effectiveness, impact, and quality of interventions, making it possible to maintain or change the care planning of PU patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: This work may serve to contribute to the future development of NOC, making it possible to evaluate the outcomes of PU patients in terms of the interventions performed in nursing practice.
Subject(s)
Nursing Diagnosis , Pressure Ulcer/pathology , Adult , Focus Groups , Humans , Nursing Staff , Pressure Ulcer/diagnosis , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Objective To identify factors associated with excessive bleeding (ExB) after cardiac surgery in adults. Background Excessive bleeding after cardiac surgery must be anticipated for implementation of timely interventions. Methods A prospective cohort study with 323 adults requiring open-chest cardiac surgery. Potential factors associated with ExB were investigated through univariate analysis and logistic regression. The accuracy of the relationship between the independent variables and the outcome was depicted through the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve. ResultsThe factors associated with ExB included gender, body mass index (BMI), preoperative platelet count, intraoperative heparin doses and intraoperative platelet transfusion. The ROC curve cut-off points were 26.35 for the BMI; 214,000 for the preoperative platelet count, and 6.25 for intraoperative heparin dose. This model had an accuracy = 77.3%, a sensitivity = 81%, and a specificity = 62%. Conclusions Male gender, BMI, preoperative platelet count, dose of intraoperative heparin >312.5 mg without subsequent platelet transfusion, are factors associated with ExB.
Subject(s)
Thoracic Surgery , Risk Factors , Postoperative Hemorrhage , Surgical Procedures, OperativeSubject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Nursing Care/methods , Nursing Diagnosis , Quality of Health CareSubject(s)
Male , Female , Humans , /methods , Nursing/standards , Nursing Audit , Nursing Services/classificationABSTRACT
A total of 420 children with infantile hemangioma (IH) were compared with 353 age-matched controls. Using multivariate logistic regression, low birth weight was the most significant risk factor; for every 500-g decrease in birth weight, the risk of IH increased by 40%. A positive family history also increased the risk of IH (33% vs 15% of controls; P < .001).