Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 5 de 5
1.
J Pediatr Orthop B ; 31(4): 391-396, 2022 Jul 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34908030

The study aimed to investigate the correlation between baropodometric parameters and the functional score in the evaluation of the results of surgery in patients with clubfoot. Fifty-one patients (77 feet) underwent surgical treatment, with a mean follow-up of 9.58 years (5-15 years), and a mean age of 10.2 years (7-16 years). A total of 39 males and 12 females were included, with 25 unilateral cases and 26 bilateral cases. The patients underwent a functional evaluation and an assessment of plantar pressure distribution using computerized baropodometry. The functional evaluation results were statistically analyzed to investigate any correlations. Unilateral and bilateral cases were studied in two different groups. The Mann-Whitney and Spearman correlation tests were used for these analyses. The static contact area, weight bearing time, gait speed, and plantar pressure peak were not correlated with the functional evaluation in the unilateral and bilateral cases. There was a statistically significant correlation (P < 0.05) among the integral plantar force, distribution of force, total plantar pressure, distance between the center of foot pressure and center of body mass, and dynamic contact area only in the bilateral cases. Baropodometry was correlated with the functional evaluation of several parameters in patients with bilateral involvement.


Clubfoot , Child , Clubfoot/therapy , Female , Foot/surgery , Gait , Humans , Lower Extremity , Male , Physical Therapy Modalities
2.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 43(1): E1-E6, 2018 Jan 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28767620

STUDY DESIGN: Animal experimental study. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the effect of physical activity and overtraining condition on glycosaminoglycan concentration on the intervertebral disc (IVD) using a rat running model. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Some guidelines recommend the implementation of a physical exercise program as treatment for low back pain; however, cyclic loading impact on the health of the IVD and whether there is a dose-response relationship is still incompletely understood. METHODS: Thirty-two rats ages 8 weeks were divided into four groups with eight animals each. The first 8 weeks were the adaptive phase, the overtraining phase was from the ninth to the eleventh week, which consisted of increasing the number of daily training sessions from 1 to 4 and the recovery phase was represented by the 12th and 13th weeks without training. Control group 1 (CG1) did not undergo any kind of training. Control group 2 (CG2) completed just the adaptive phase. Overtraining group 1 (OT1) completed the overtraining phase. Overtraining group 2 (OT2) completed the recovery phase. Running performance tests were used to assess the "overtraining" status of the animals. IVD glycosaminoglycans were extracted and quantified, and identified by electrophoresis. RESULTS: Glycosaminoglycans showed a distribution between chondroitin sulfate and dermatan sulfate. Glycosaminoglycans quantification showed decreasing concentration at the following order: OT1 > CG2 > OT2 > CG1. Increased expression of dermatan sulfate was verified at the groups submitted to any training. CONCLUSION: Overtraining condition, as assessed by muscle and cardiovascular endurance did not lessen glycosaminoglycan concentration in the IVD. In fact, physical exercise increased glycosaminoglycan concentration in the IVD in proportion to the training load, even at overtraining condition, returning to normal levels after the recovery phase and glycosaminoglycan production is a reversible acute positive response for mechanical stimulation of the IVD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.


Intervertebral Disc/metabolism , Low Back Pain/metabolism , Physical Conditioning, Animal/physiology , Proteoglycans/metabolism , Animals , Glycosaminoglycans/metabolism , Male , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Running/physiology
3.
Trials ; 14: 246, 2013 Aug 07.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23924198

BACKGROUND: Humeral shaft fractures account for 1 to 3% of all fractures in adults and for 20% of all humeral fractures. Non-operative treatment is still the standard treatment of isolated humeral shaft fractures, although this method can present unsatisfactory results. Surgical treatment is reserved for specific conditions. Modern concepts of internal fixation of long bone shaft fractures advocate relative stabilisation techniques with no harm to fracture zone. Recently described, minimally invasive bridge plate osteosynthesis has been shown to be a secure technique with good results for treating humeral shaft fractures. There is no good quality evidence advocating which method is more effective. This randomised controlled trial will be performed to investigate the effectiveness of surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures with bridge plating in comparison with conservative treatment with functional brace. METHODS/DESIGN: This randomised clinical trial aims to include 110 patients with humeral shaft fractures who will be allocated after randomisation to one of the two groups: bridge plate or functional brace. Surgical treatment will be performed according to technique described by Livani and Belangero using a narrow DCP plate. Non-operative management will consist of a functional brace for 6 weeks or until fracture consolidation. All patients will be included in the same rehabilitation program and will be followed up for 1 year after intervention. The primary outcome will be the DASH score after 6 months of intervention. As secondary outcomes, we will assess SF-36 questionnaire, treatment complications, Constant score, pain (Visual Analogue Scale) and radiographs. DISCUSSION: According to current evidence shown in a recent systematic review, this study is one of the first randomised controlled trials designed to compare two methods to treat humeral shaft fractures (functional brace and bridge plate surgery).


Bone Plates , Braces , Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation , Humeral Fractures/surgery , Osseointegration , Research Design , Brazil , Clinical Protocols , Equipment Design , Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects , Fracture Fixation, Internal/rehabilitation , Fracture Healing , Humans , Humeral Fractures/diagnosis , Pain Measurement , Predictive Value of Tests , Prosthesis Design , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
4.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 11: 137, 2010 Jun 29.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20587064

BACKGROUND: At present, there is no conclusive evidence regarding the best treatment method for reducible unstable fractures of the distal radius. This study compared the effectiveness of two methods used in surgical treatment of such fractures: percutaneous pinning and external fixation. METHODS: We randomly allocated 100 patients into two groups treated surgically with modified De Palma percutaneous pinning and bridging external fixation. Independent but not blinded evaluators administered the DASH quality-of-life questionnaire at postoperative months 6 and 24, performed functional assessment of pain, range of motion, and palm grip strength, and radiographic examinations (volar and radial angle, and height of the radius) before the operation, immediately afterwards, and at 6 and 24 months postoperative. Modified De Palma percutaneous pinning patients used an above-elbow cast whereas external fixation group had unrestricted elbow motion after surgery. Patients who for any reason demonstrated treatment failure or required additional interventions were followed up and their results were included in the group into which these patients had initially been randomised according to the intention-to-treat principle. A significance level of 5% (alpha = 0.05). was used for all statistical tests, such that tests presenting a p-value less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Ninety one (58.8 mean age and 66 participants were female) were included in the final assessment at 24 months. The DASH questionnaire evaluation showed a statistically significant result favouring the De Palma group (mean difference = -7.1 p = 0.044) after six months, but this was not maintained at 24 months. There were no statistically differences between the groups with respect to palm grip strength. Analysis of the range-of-motion limitation index (uninjured side minus affected side motion of) showed a statistical difference (mean difference = 2.4 p = 0.043) favoring the external fixator group with regard to the supination movement 6 months after the operation; however, this was not maintained at 24 months. The final results of the radiographic evaluation were similar for the two groups. Overall, five patients developed complications: two with De Palma pinning and three with external fixation. CONCLUSION: There was a small statistically significant difference favouring the De Palma method in early functional at 6 months according to the DASH questionnaire, and for supination movement favouring the fixator group. However, both were not clinical relevant. By 24 months the groups were similar for all outcomes TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN04892785.


Bone Nails , External Fixators , Fracture Fixation/instrumentation , Radius Fractures/surgery , Radius/injuries , Radius/surgery , Adult , Aged , Bone Nails/standards , External Fixators/standards , Female , Fracture Fixation/methods , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Radiography , Radius/pathology , Radius Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Radius Fractures/pathology , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
5.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 10: 120, 2009 Oct 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19793401

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the proximal radius need to be classified in an appropriate and reproducible manner. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of the three most widely used classification systems. METHODS: Elbow radiographs images of patients with proximal radius fractures were classified according to Mason, Morrey, and Arbeitsgemeinschaft für osteosynthesefragen/Association for the Study of Internal Fixation (AO/ASIF) classifications by four observers with different experience with this subject to assess their intra- and inter-observer agreement. Each observer analyzed the images on three different occasions on a computer with numerical sequence randomly altered. RESULTS: We found that intra-observer agreement of Mason and Morrey classifications were satisfactory (kappa = 0.582 and 0.554, respectively), while the AO/ASIF classification had poor intra-observer agreement (kappa = 0.483). Inter-observer agreement was higher in the Mason (kappa = 0.429-0.560) and Morrey (kappa = 0.319-0.487) classifications than in the AO/ASIF classification (kappa = 0.250-0.478), which showed poor reliability. CONCLUSION: Inter- and intra-observer agreement of the Mason and Morey classifications showed overall satisfactory reliability when compared to the AO/ASIF system. The Mason classification is the most reliable system.


Radius Fractures/classification , Radius Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Radiography , Reproducibility of Results
...