Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Radiother Oncol ; 199: 110438, 2024 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39013503

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To develop a combined radiomics and deep learning (DL) model in predicting radiation esophagitis (RE) of a grade ≥ 2 for patients with esophageal cancer (EC) underwent volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) based on computed tomography (CT) and radiation dose (RD) distribution images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 273 EC patients underwent VMAT were retrospectively reviewed and enrolled from two centers and divided into training (n = 152), internal validation (n = 66), and external validation (n = 55) cohorts, respectively. Radiomic and dosiomic features along with DL features using convolutional neural networks were extracted and screened from CT and RD images to predict RE. The performance of these models was evaluated and compared using the area under curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC). RESULTS: There were 5 and 10 radiomic and dosiomic features were screened, respectively. XGBoost achieved a best AUC of 0.703, 0.694 and 0.801, 0.729 with radiomic and dosiomic features in the internal and external validation cohorts, respectively. ResNet34 achieved a best prediction AUC of 0.642, 0.657 and 0.762, 0.737 for radiomics based DL model (DLR) and RD based DL model (DLD) in the internal and external validation cohorts, respectively. Combined model of DLD + Dosiomics + clinical factors achieved a best AUC of 0.913, 0.821 and 0.805 in the training, internal, and external validation cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although the dose was not responsible for the prediction accuracy, the combination of various feature extraction methods was a factor in improving the RE prediction accuracy. Combining DLD with dosiomic features was promising in the pretreatment prediction of RE for EC patients underwent VMAT.


Subject(s)
Deep Learning , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophagitis , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Humans , Esophageal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/adverse effects , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Esophagitis/etiology , Esophagitis/diagnostic imaging , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Aged , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Radiotherapy Dosage , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Radiomics
2.
Radiat Oncol ; 19(1): 72, 2024 Jun 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38851718

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To integrate radiomics and dosiomics features from multiple regions in the radiation pneumonia (RP grade ≥ 2) prediction for esophageal cancer (EC) patients underwent radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: Total of 143 EC patients in the authors' hospital (training and internal validation: 70%:30%) and 32 EC patients from another hospital (external validation) underwent RT from 2015 to 2022 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Patients were dichotomized as positive (RP+) or negative (RP-) according to CTCAE V5.0. Models with radiomics and dosiomics features extracted from single region of interest (ROI), multiple ROIs and combined models were constructed and evaluated. A nomogram integrating radiomics score (Rad_score), dosiomics score (Dos_score), clinical factors, dose-volume histogram (DVH) factors, and mean lung dose (MLD) was also constructed and validated. RESULTS: Models with Rad_score_Lung&Overlap and Dos_score_Lung&Overlap achieved a better area under curve (AUC) of 0.818 and 0.844 in the external validation in comparison with radiomics and dosiomics models with features extracted from single ROI. Combining four radiomics and dosiomics models using support vector machine (SVM) improved the AUC to 0.854 in the external validation. Nomogram integrating Rad_score, and Dos_score with clinical factors, DVH factors, and MLD further improved the RP prediction AUC to 0.937 and 0.912 in the internal and external validation, respectively. CONCLUSION: CT-based RP prediction model integrating radiomics and dosiomics features from multiple ROIs outperformed those with features from a single ROI with increased reliability for EC patients who underwent RT.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms , Nomograms , Radiation Pneumonitis , Humans , Esophageal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiation Pneumonitis/etiology , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Aged , Radiotherapy Dosage , Prognosis , Aged, 80 and over , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Radiomics
3.
Comput Methods Programs Biomed ; 254: 108295, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38905987

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of radiomics, dosiomics, and deep learning (DL) in predicting Radiation Pneumonitis (RP) in lung cancer patients underwent volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to improve radiotherapy safety and management. METHODS: Total of 318 and 31 lung cancer patients underwent VMAT from First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (WMU) and Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of WMU were enrolled for training and external validation, respectively. Models based on radiomics (R), dosiomics (D), and combined radiomics and dosiomics features (R+D) were constructed and validated using three machine learning (ML) methods. DL models trained with CT (DLR), dose distribution (DLD), and combined CT and dose distribution (DL(R+D)) images were constructed. DL features were then extracted from the fully connected layers of the best-performing DL model to combine with features of the ML model with the best performance to construct models of R+DLR, D+DLD, R+D+DL(R+D)) for RP prediction. RESULTS: The R+D model achieved a best area under curve (AUC) of 0.84, 0.73, and 0.73 in the internal validation cohorts with Support Vector Machine (SVM), XGBoost, and Logistic Regression (LR), respectively. The DL(R+D) model achieved a best AUC of 0.89 and 0.86 using ResNet-34 in training and internal validation cohorts, respectively. The R+D+DL(R+D) model achieved a best performance in the external validation cohorts with an AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.81(0.62-0.99), 0.81, 0.84, and 0.67, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The integration of radiomics, dosiomics, and DL features is feasible and accurate for the RP prediction to improve the management of lung cancer patients underwent VMAT.


Subject(s)
Deep Learning , Lung Neoplasms , Radiation Pneumonitis , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Humans , Radiation Pneumonitis/diagnostic imaging , Radiation Pneumonitis/etiology , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Male , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/adverse effects , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Radiotherapy Dosage , Multiomics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL