Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
QJM ; 115(10): 653-660, 2022 Oct 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35092293

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bone mineral deficits are one of the most common complications in cancer survivors. However, there are no studies evaluating bone mineral density (BMD) and the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis among patients with different types of cancers. AIM: The objective was to assess BMD and evaluate the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis among US adults with cancer. DESIGN: A cross-section propensity score matching study. METHODS: We extracted data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey database from 2005 to 2018. We compared BMD in participants with and without cancer which was further analyzed according to cancer type. We conducted logistic regression to evaluate adjusted odds ratios of osteopenia and osteoporosis and determine risk factors for their development. RESULTS: We found that BMD was significantly higher in participants without cancer than cancer patients. Furthermore, the median BMD of patients with breast cancer or skin cancer (including melanoma) was significantly lower than participants without cancer. People with breast, lung, genitourinary and skin cancers were more likely to incur osteopenia/osteoporosis than those without cancer. CONCLUSIONS: BMD differs depending upon type in survivors. Individuals with a history of cancer have a poor understanding of osteoporosis and its risk factors. Understanding risk factors in patients with cancers identified in our study may be helpful for preventing osteoporosis and fractures and the development of screening guidelines.


Subject(s)
Bone Diseases, Metabolic , Neoplasms , Osteoporosis , Humans , Bone Density , Nutrition Surveys , Bone Diseases, Metabolic/epidemiology , Osteoporosis/epidemiology , Osteoporosis/etiology , Odds Ratio , Neoplasms/epidemiology
2.
Anaesth Intensive Care ; 40(5): 795-802, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22934861

ABSTRACT

In this randomised prospective study we aimed to evaluate whether preoperative anaesthetic education delivered to children on the day of surgery reduces anxiety behaviour during induction of anaesthesia. One hundred children, six to 15 years of age, undergoing general anaesthesia for ambulatory surgery were allocated at random to a preoperative education group (n=50) or a control group (n=50). The main outcomes were behaviour score, self-reporting of satisfaction score and identification of the stage when children felt most fearful. Data from all 100 participants were analysed. There was no difference in behaviour score at induction or satisfaction score between the groups. Eighteen percent in the intervention group reported no fear preoperatively vs 10% in the control group. Intravenous induction failed in nine out of 38 children in the intervention group (23.7%) compared to five out of 40 in the control group (12.5%). When intravenous induction failed, eight out of nine (89%) of the intervention group remained co-operative during gas induction compared to two out of five (40%) of the control group. Preoperative education delivered on the day of surgery did not reduce anxiety behaviour in children during intravenous induction of anaesthesia, but did reduce anxiety during subsequent inhalational induction.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Intravenous/psychology , Anxiety/prevention & control , Child Behavior , Fear , Patient Education as Topic , Child , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Preoperative Period , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...