Evaluation of transrectal ultrasound-guided tru-cut biopsy as a complementary method for predicting pathological complete response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment: a phase II prospective and diagnostic trial.

IMPORTANCE: Patients with pathological complete response (pCR) of rectal cancer following neoadjuvant treatment had better oncological outcomes. However, reliable methods for accurately predicting pCR remain limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether transrectal ultrasound-guided tru-cut biopsy (TRUS-TCB) adds diagnostic value to conventional modalities for predicting pathological complete response in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study evaluated data of patients with rectal cancer who were treated with neoadjuvant treatment and reassessed using TRUS-TCB and conventional modalities before surgery. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was accuracy, along with secondary outcomes including sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value in predicting tumour residues. Final surgical pathology was used as reference standard. RESULTS: Between June 2021 and June 2022, a total of 74 patients were enroled, with 63 patients ultimately evaluated. Among them, 17 patients (28%) exhibited a complete pathological response. TRUS-TCB demonstrated an accuracy of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.58-0.82) in predicting tumour residues. The combined use of TRUS-TCB and conventional modalities significantly improved diagnostic accuracy compared to conventional modalities alone (0.75 vs. 0.59, P =0.02). Furthermore, TRUS-TCB correctly reclassified 52% of patients erroneously classified as having a complete clinical response by conventional methods. The occurrence of only one mild adverse event was observed. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: TRUS-TCB proves to be a safe and accessible tool for reevaluation with minimal complications. The incorporation of TRUS-TCB alongside conventional methods leads to enhanced diagnostic performance.

HBV Infection Status Indicates Different Risks of Synchronous and Metachronous Liver Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study of 3132 Patients with a 5-Year Follow-Up.

Purpose: Previous studies on the effect of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection on colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) are contradictory. This study revealed different, more specific impacts of HBV on CRLM. Patients and Methods: A total of 3132 colorectal cancer patients treated from 2013 to 2015 were analyzed retrospectively and followed up for five years. The patients were divided into three groups: group A (chronic HBV infection, CHB); group B, (occult HBV infection, OHB) and group C (no HBV infection, NHB). The risk factors for CRLM, 5-year overall survival (OS), and liver disease-free survival (LDFS) were analyzed. Results: A total of 905 patients (28.9%) had CRLM, with poor survival compared to those without CRLM (P < 0.01). The incidence of CRLM was 33.41% (138/413) in group A, 21.63% (138/638) in group B and 30.23% (629/2081) in group C (P < 0.05). Synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastasis (SYN-CRLM) was found in 425 patients (13.57%). CHB increased the risk of SYN-CRLM (P < 0.01), with a worse prognosis (P < 0.05). Metachronous colorectal cancer liver metastasis (MET-CRLM) was found in 480 patients (15.33%). OHB decreased the risk of MET-CRLM after surgery (P = 0.02), with a better 5-year LDFS (P = 0.01). Even without surgery, patients with OHB showed a lower incidence rate of MET-CRLM (P < 0.01). Conclusion: The incidence of CRLM in this study was approximately 28.9%. Surgery and different HBV infection statuses affected the occurrence of CRLM. Chronic HBV infection increased the risk of SYN-CRLM with poor prognosis. Occult HBV infection reduced the risk of MET-CRLM with better LDFS after surgery.

Elevated tumor-to-liver uptake ratio (TLR) from 18F-FDG-PET/CT predicts poor prognosis in stage IIA colorectal cancer following curative resection.

PURPOSE: The prognostic value of the tumor-to-liver uptake ratio (TLR) from 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) in the early stage of colorectal cancer (CRC) is unclear. Notably, some stage IIA CRC patients experience early recurrence even after curative resection and might benefit from neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. This study aims to evaluate whether elevated TLR from 18F-FDG-PET/CT can predict poor prognosis in stage IIA CRC patients undergoing curative resection. METHODS: From April 2010 to December 2013, 504 consecutive CRC patients with different TNM stages (I-IV) underwent 18F-FDG-PET/CT scans at the 6th Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University. Among the patients, 118 with stage IIA CRC who accepted preoperative 18F-FDG-PET/CT scanning and were treated with curative surgery alone were reviewed retrospectively. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in the primary tumor, TLR, and demographic, clinical, histopathological, and laboratory data were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors associated with patient disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: ROC curve analysis demonstrated that TLR was superior to primary tumor SUVmax in predicting the risk of recurrence in stage IIA CRC. The optimal TLR cutoff was 6.2. Univariate analysis indicated that elevated TLR, tumor size, and lymphovascular/neural invasion correlated with DFS (P = 0.001, P = 0.002, and P = 0.001, respectively) and OS (P = 0.001, P = 0.003, and P < 0.001, respectively). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS rates were 98.4%, 96.9%, and 96.9% for stage IIA CRC patients with lower TLR (≤6.2) versus 77.8%, 60.6%, and 60.6% for those with elevated TLR (>6.2), respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 100.0%, 100.0%, and 98.3% for the patients with lower TLR versus 98.1%, 83.3%, and 74.3% for those with elevated TLR. Cox regression analysis showed that elevated TLR [>6.2; hazard ratio (HR): 3.109-57.463; P < 0.001] and tumor size (>4.4 cm; HR: 1.636-19.155; P = 0.006) were independent risk factors for DFS. Meanwhile, elevated TLR (>6.2; HR: 1.398-84.945; P = 0.023) and lymphovascular/neural invasion (positive; HR: 1.278-12.777; P = 0.017) were independent risk factors for OS. CONCLUSION: Elevated TLR predicted worse DFS and OS for stage IIA CRC patients and might serve as a potential radiological index to identify candidates for neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Stage IIA CRC patients with elevated TLR should be monitored carefully for early detection of possible recurrence.

KRAS as a predictor of poor prognosis and benefit from postoperative FOLFOX chemotherapy in patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The KRAS gene frequently mutates in colorectal cancer (CRC). Here we investigated the prognostic and predictive role of KRAS mutation in patients with stage II or III CRC. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A consecutive cohort of patients with stage II or III CRC from a single center database was studied. The association between KRAS status, adjuvant FOLFOX therapy, and 3-year disease-free survival (3-y DFS) was analyzed. RESULTS: Of our 433 patients, 166 (38.3%) exhibited the KRAS mutation. Among the 190 patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy, those with KRAS mutation tumors had a worse 3-y DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.924; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.078-3.435; P = 0.027). Among patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, KRAS mutation was not correlated with worse 3-y DFS (HR, 1.083; 95% CI, 0.618-1.899; P = 0.781). Adjuvant chemotherapy improved 3-y DFS only among patients with KRAS mutant tumors (78.0% vs 69.2%) on multivariate analysis adjusted for age, stage, grade, site, vessel invasion, and carcinoembryonic antigen level (HR, 0.454; 95% CI, 0.229-0.901; P = 0.024). In contrast, there was no benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in the KRAS wild-type group (84.3% vs 82.0%). CONCLUSIONS: KRAS mutation indicates poor prognosis. FOLFOX adjuvant chemotherapy benefits patients with stage II or III colorectal cancer with KRAS mutant tumors and is worth further investigation.

Multi-microarray identifies lower AQP9 expression in adjuvant chemotherapy nonresponders with stage III colorectal cancer.

Approximately 25% of stage III colorectal cancer patients do not benefit from standard adjuvant chemotherapies. To identify biomarkers for nonresponders, fresh-frozen tissues of 19 nonresponders and 16 responders were analyzed with gene expression and microRNA arrays. Fifty-nine genes and 17 miRNAs were differentially expressed by at least two folds. AQP9, SATB2, and WIF1 were simultaneously lower expressed in the nonresponders and modulated by the differentially expressed miRNAs. RT-PCR validated the differential expression of AQP9 (p=0.035). In conclusion, lower AQP9 gene expression is related with non-response to adjuvant chemotherapy, showing potential as predictive marker and therapeutic target.

Association between carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and body mass index in colorectal cancer patients.

Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) have been well recognized as tumor markers for colorectal cancer. Previous studies suggested that obesity is inversely associated with the screening of CEA and CA19-9 levels and may reduce screening sensitivity. This study was conducted to evaluate the association of body mass index (BMI) with serum CEA and CA19-9 concentration in colorectal cancer patients. A total of 300 patients were enrolled in the study, selected from 2,950 consecutive colorectal cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment between August, 1994 and December, 2005. The association of BMI with CEA concentration, total circulating CEA mass and plasma volume was assessed by determining P-values for trends. The multivariate linear regression analysis was used to adjust for clinicopathological confounding factors to analyze the main outcome measures when CEA and CA19-9 had been log-transformed. Increased BMI was linearly correlated with a higher plasma volume. Using the stepwise method, the multiple regression model including BMI categories was reconstructed as follows: loge[CEA]=0.208+0.241[liver metastasis]+0.051 [differentiation]+0.092[TNM]; loge[CA19-9]=0.969+0.233 [gender]+0.141[ascites]+0.09[TNM]. The mean survival time in CEA+/CA19-9-, CEA+/CA19-9+, CEA-/CA19-9- and CEA-/CA19-9+ patients was 84.8, 58.2, 100.6 and 74.7 months, respectively. The 1-/3-year survival rates in each group was 76.0/59.8, 66.2/43.5, 96.3/87.6 and 71.7/41.0, respectively. In conclusion, the decreased concentration of CEA and CA19-9 in patients of higher BMIs may be the result of the hemodilution effect. The BMI factor should be considered during the surveillance of colorectal cancer. In addition, patients with simultaneous positive expression of CEA and CA19-9 exhibited shorter survival time.