A comparative analysis between low-dose-rate brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer in Asian men.

OBJECTIVE: To report the long-term clinical outcomes of low-risk (LR) and intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer patients treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men with biopsy-proven low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer received EBRT and LDR-BT in an Asian academic center from 2000 to 2019 were reviewed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to compare biochemical failure-free survival (bFFS) and overall survival (OS) between LDR and EBRT in the low- and intermediate-risk cohorts. RESULTS: 642 patients (521 EBRT and 121 LDR-BT) with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer were included for analysis. In the intermediate-risk group, 5- and 10-year bFFS was 96%, 89% and 86%, 61% for LDR-BT and EBRT, respectively. LDR-BT was associated with a statistically significant improvement of bFFS in the intermediate-risk cohort (HR 2.7, p = 0.02). In the low-risk cohort, no difference of bFFS was found between LDR-BT and EBRT (HR 1.9, p = 0.08). Hormone therapy was more common in EBRT than LDR-BT for intermediate-risk group (71% versus 44%, p < 0.05). Prostate cancer-specific mortality was low in both EBRT (1%) and LDR-BT (2%) cohorts. No significant difference in OS was found between LDR-BT and EBRT in low- and intermediate-risk group (HR 2.1, p = 0.2 and HR = 1.7, p = 0.3). CONCLUSION: In our retrospective study, LDR-BT is associated with superior bFFS compared with EBRT in Asian men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Prostate specific antigen bounce after intensity-modulated radiation therapy in an Asian population.

OBJECTIVE: Serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) is commonly used to evaluate treatment response after definitive radiation therapy (RT). However, PSA levels can temporarily rise without a clear reason, termed "PSA bounce", and often engender great anxiety for both patients and physicians. The present study aimed to determine the prevalence and factors that predict "PSA bounce" after intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and the relevance to biochemical failure and cancer recurrence in an Asian population. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 206 patients who received IMRT for prostate cancer from 2004 to 2012 in the National Cancer Centre Singapore. These patients were followed up with regular PSA monitoring. We defined "PSA bounce" as a rise of 0.1 ng/mL, followed by two consecutive falls. Patients with biochemical failure (PSA nadir + 2 ng/mL) were further evaluated for cancer recurrence. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (29.6%) experienced "PSA bounce", at a median time of 16 months and lasted for 12 months. Age remained the most consistent predictor of the incidence, duration and extent of "PSA bounce". Other contributory factors included baseline PSA, Gleason score and PSA nadir. Hormonal therapy and prostate volume did not affect this phenomenon. Sixteen patients (7.8%) developed biochemical recurrence, at median time of 32 months, of which 11 were confirmed to have metastatic disease. The median follow-up time was 71 months. CONCLUSION: A younger age predicts PSA bounce incidence, duration and magnitude. The extent of bounce appears to be lower in Asian population. The interval to occurrence and extent of PSA elevation separates PSA bounce from disease recurrence.

An assessment of the magnitude of intra-fraction movement of head-and-neck IMRT cases and its implication on the action-level of the imaging protocol.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A planning margin ⩽3 mm is employed in some head-and-neck IMRT cases due to the proximity of critical structures. This study aims to explore the need to redefine the action-level in the head-and-neck imaging protocol in consideration of the intra-fraction movement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a local study of 18 patients treated using the same immobilisation system and setup protocol. Post-treatment orthogonal pair of kilovoltage X-ray images was acquired on the first three days of treatment. 106 sets of pre- and post-treatment kV X-ray images acquired over 53 fractions were analysed against the treatment planning DRR for calculation of intra-fraction movement. RESULTS: Individual mean intra-fraction movement in all directions ranged from -1.8 to 1.1 mm. Population mean (median) intra-fraction movement in the x-, y-, and z-planes were -0.1 mm (0 mm), -0.3 mm (-0.3 mm) and -0.2 mm (-0.2 mm) respectively. Intra-fraction movement in all three dimensions, x-, y- and z-planes were considered statistically significant (p<0.05). 7 out of 53 fractions (13.2%) were highlighted as the combined magnitude of the intra-fraction motion with the uncorrected pre-treatment setup errors had exceeded the boundaries of given margins. CONCLUSIONS: 3 mm-AL was not adequate to account for intra-fraction movement when the CTV-PTV margin was ⩽3 mm and should be excluded from the routine imaging protocol and daily image-guided radiotherapy should be employed. Adjusting the action-level to 2 mm would allow a more confident approach in delivery of the prescribed dose in head-and-neck IMRT cases.