Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Shock ; 57(5): 617-629, 2022 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35583910

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Despite advances in early revascularization, percutaneous hemodynamic support platforms, and systems of care, cardiogenic shock (CS) remains associated with a mortality rate higher than 50%. Several risk stratification models have been derived since the 1990 s to identify patients at high risk of adverse outcomes. Still, limited information is available on the differences between scoring systems and their relative applicability to both acute myocardial infarction and advanced decompensated heart failure CS. Thus, we reviewed the similarities, differences, and limitations of published CS risk prediction models and herein discuss their suitability to the contemporary management of CS care.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Myocardial Infarction , Hemodynamics , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Shock, Cardiogenic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL