Revision Rotator Cuff Repair Versus Primary Repair: An Assessment of Longitudinal Outcomes Outcomes in Revision Rotator Cuff Repair.

BACKGROUND: Information about outcomes after revision rotator cuff repair (RCR) is limited. A more thorough investigation of pain, range of motion (ROM), strength, and functional outcomes is needed. Comparing outcomes between primary and revision rotator cuff repair patients can help surgeons guide patient expectations of the revision procedure. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of a revision repair group to a control group of primary RCR patients. We expect revision RCR patients to have worse clinical outcomes than primary RCR patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent primary or revision RCR between 2012 to 2020 was performed. The case group included 104 revision patients, and the control group included 414 primary RCR patients. Patient visual analog score (VAS) for pain, ROM, strength, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and Constant-Murley scores were collected at baseline, 12 months, 24 months, and final follow-up. RESULTS: The average final follow-up was 43.9 months for primary patients and 63.8 months for revision patients. 352 primary patients and 55 revision patients had a final follow-up of 2 or more years. By final follow-up, primary patients had less pain than revision patients (Δ of 2.11, P < .0001), but both groups improved overall. Primary patients had significant improvements in forward flexion, external rotation, internal rotation, and abduction at 2 years that were lost by final follow-up, but revision patients did not experience any long-term improvement in ROM. These differences in ROM between groups were not significant. Supraspinatus strength in the revision group did not improve nor decline by final follow-up. By final follow-up, both primary and revision patients had improved SST and ASES scores from baseline. Primary patient ASES scores were 17.9 points higher (P < .0001) than revision patients by final follow-up, and there was no difference between groups in SST scores at this time. CONCLUSION: Revision RCR significantly improves patient pain, SST score, and ASES score at 4 years. Revision patients should not expect to see the improvements in range of motion that may occur after primary repair.

Prospective validation of a hospital triage predictive model to decrease undertriage: an EAST multicenter study.

Background: Tiered trauma team activation (TTA) allows systems to optimally allocate resources to an injured patient. Target undertriage and overtriage rates of <5% and <35% are difficult for centers to achieve, and performance variability exists. The objective of this study was to optimize and externally validate a previously developed hospital trauma triage prediction model to predict the need for emergent intervention in 6 hours (NEI-6), an indicator of need for a full TTA. Methods: The model was previously developed and internally validated using data from 31 US trauma centers. Data were collected prospectively at five sites using a mobile application which hosted the NEI-6 model. A weighted multiple logistic regression model was used to retrain and optimize the model using the original data set and a portion of data from one of the prospective sites. The remaining data from the five sites were designated for external validation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) were used to assess the validation cohort. Subanalyses were performed for age, race, and mechanism of injury. Results: 14 421 patients were included in the training data set and 2476 patients in the external validation data set across five sites. On validation, the model had an overall undertriage rate of 9.1% and overtriage rate of 53.7%, with an AUROC of 0.80 and an AUPRC of 0.63. Blunt injury had an undertriage rate of 8.8%, whereas penetrating injury had 31.2%. For those aged ≥65, the undertriage rate was 8.4%, and for Black or African American patients the undertriage rate was 7.7%. Conclusion: The optimized and externally validated NEI-6 model approaches the recommended undertriage and overtriage rates while significantly reducing variability of TTA across centers for blunt trauma patients. The model performs well for populations that traditionally have high rates of undertriage. Level of evidence: 2.

Lack of Association of Initial Vasopressor Dosing with Survival and Cardiac Re-Arrest Likelihood After Return of Spontaneous Circulation.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest occurs in approximately 350,000 patients outside the hospital and approximately 30,000 patients in the emergency department (ED) annually in the United States. When return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is achieved, hypotension is a common complication. However, optimal dosing of vasopressors is not clear. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine if initial vasopressor dosing was associated with cardiac re-arrest in patients after ROSC. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center analysis of adult patients experiencing cardiac arrest prior to arrival or within the ED. Patients were assigned to one of four groups based on starting dose of vasopressor: low dose (LD; < 0.25 µg/kg/min), medium dose (MD; 0.25-0.49 µg/kg/min), high dose (HD; 0.5-0.99 µg/kg/min), and very high dose (VHD; ≥ 1 µg/kg/min). Data collection was performed primarily via manual chart review of medical records. The primary outcome was incidence of cardiac re-arrest within 1 h of vasopressor initiation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify any covariates strongly associated with the primary outcome. RESULTS: No difference in cardiac re-arrest incidence was noted between groups. The VHD group was significantly more likely to require a second vasopressor (p = 0.003). The HD group had lower survival rates to hospital discharge compared with the LD and MD groups (p = 0.0033 and p = 0.0147). In the multivariate regression, longer duration of pre-vasopressor re-arrests and hyperkalemic cardiac arrest etiology were significant predictors of cardiac re-arrest after vasopressor initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Initial vasopressor dosing was not found to be associated with risk of cardiac re-arrest or, conversely, risk of adverse events.

Prospective Observational Evaluation of Predatory Journals in Critical Care Pharmacy Practice: Defining Characteristics Associated With Receiving Unsolicited Invitations to Publish.

Open-access publishing promotes accessibility to scholarly research at no cost to the reader. The emergence of predatory publishers, which exploit the author-pay model by charging substantial publication fees for publication in journals with questionable publishing processes, is on the rise. Authors are solicited through aggressive marketing tactics, though who is targeted is not well described. The purpose of this study was to identify characteristics associated with critical care pharmacists that make them targets of unsolicited invitations to publish. A prospective, observational study of critical care pharmacists was performed. Participants archived emails received by their professional email that were unsolicited invitations to submit their original work for publication in a journal (unsolicited journals). Variables were evaluated to determine which were associated with unsolicited invitations; these were compared to legitimate journals, defined as all PubMed-indexed journals in which the participants were previously published. Twenty-three pharmacist participants were included, all of whom were residency and/or fellowship trained and practicing in an academic medical center. Participants had a median of 7 years of experience since their post-graduate training, 6 years since their last change in professional email address, and 2 years since their first PubMed-indexed publication. From these participants, 136 unsolicited and 59 legitimate journals were included. The average number of invitations increased 1.04 (95% CI, 1.02-1.05) times for every additional PubMed-indexed publication (P < .001). Most unsolicited journals were considered predatory. Legitimate and unsolicited journals differed significantly. The number of previous PubMed-indexed publications strongly correlates with the likelihood of critical care pharmacists receiving unsolicited publication invitations, often from predatory journal.

Peripherally inserted concomitant surgical right and left ventricular support, the Propella, is associated with low rates of limb ischemia, with mortality comparable with peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical circulatory support effectively treats adult cardiogenic shock. Whereas cardiogenic shock confers high mortality, acute limb ischemia is a known complication of mechanical circulatory support that confers significant morbidity. We compared our novel approach to peripheral mechanical circulatory support with a conventional femoral approach, with a focus on the incidence of acute limb ischemia. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients treated with mechanical circulatory support between January 1, 2015 and December 5, 2021 at our institution. Patients receiving any femoral peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were compared with those receiving minimally invasive, peripherally inserted, concomitant right and left ventricular assist devices. These included the Impella 5.0 (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) left ventricular assist device and the ProtekDuo (LivaNova, London, UK) right ventricular assist device used concomitantly (Propella) approach. The primary outcome was incidence of acute limb ischemia. The baseline patient characteristics, hemodynamic data, and post-mechanical circulatory support outcomes were collected. Fisher exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for the categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test were used to estimate overall survival probabilities and survival experience, respectively. RESULTS: Fifty patients were treated with mechanical circulatory support at our institution for cardiogenic shock, with 13 patients supported with the novel Propella strategy and 37 with peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The baseline characteristics, including patient organ function and medical comorbidities, were similar among the groups. Nine patients suffered mortality in ≤48 hours of mechanical circulatory support initiation and were excluded. Twenty patients (69%) suffered acute limb ischemia in the peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation group; 0 patients receiving Propella suffered acute limb ischemia (P < .001). The percentages of patients surviving to discharge in peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and Propella groups were 24% and 69%, respectively (P = .007). CONCLUSION: Patients treated with the Propella experienced a lower incidence of acute limb ischemia compared with patients treated with peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Achievement of serum uric acid target by rheumatology clinic pharmacists compared with primary care providers in patients with gout.

BACKGROUND: The American College of Rheumatology strongly recommends a treat-to-target management strategy to achieve and maintain serum uric acid (sUA) less than 6 mg/dL to decrease risk of gouty flare recurrence and permanent joint damage. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of rheumatology clinic pharmacists and primary care providers (PCPs) in achieving a target sUA goal in patients with gout. METHODS: This retrospective chart review included patients aged 18 years and older starting urate-lowering therapy (ULT) (allopurinol, febuxostat, or probenecid) for gout between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019. Exclusion criteria were ULT use within the previous 6 months, baseline sUA less than 6 mg/dL, and death within 12 months of starting ULT. From ULT initiation, data were collected until sUA less than 6 mg/dL was achieved or a maximum of 12 months. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who achieved sUA less than 6 mg/dL. Key secondary outcomes were percent reduction in sUA and time to sUA target achievement. RESULTS: Of 62 patients included in each group, 75.8% of patients in the pharmacist cohort versus 30.6% of patients in the PCP cohort achieved target sUA less than 6 mg/dL (odds ratio 7.09, 95% confidence interval 3.28-16.11, P < 0.001). Patients in the pharmacist-managed group also achieved a greater reduction in mean sUA (-36.7% vs. -26.9% respectively, P = 0.001). Among patients achieving target sUA, median time to target was similar at 92 and 86 days, respectively, despite significantly lower initial mean allopurinol doses in the pharmacist-managed group (102 mg/d vs. 145 mg/d, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The odds of achieving target sUA within 12 months were 7 times higher if gout was managed by a rheumatology clinic pharmacist as compared with a PCP. This study suggests the need for prescriber education and supports expansion of pharmacist-led gout management to primary care settings.

Predictive Model for Heart Failure Readmission Using Nationwide Readmissions Database.

Objective: To generate a heart failure (HF) readmission prediction model using the Nationwide Readmissions Database to guide management and reduce HF readmissions. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for patients listed for HF admissions in the Nationwide Readmissions Database from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2014. A Cox proportional hazards model for sample survey data for the prediction of readmission for all patients with HF was implemented using a derivation cohort (2010-2012). We generated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and estimated area under the ROC curve at each time point (30, 60, 90, and 180 days) to assess the accuracy of our predictive model using the derivation cohort (2010-2012) and compared it with the validation cohort (2013-2014). A risk score was computed for the validation cohort. On the basis of the total risk score, we calculated the probability of readmission at 30, 60, 90, and 180 days. Results: Approximately 1,420,564 patients were admitted for HF, contributing to 1,817,735 total HF admissions. Of these, 665,867 patients had at least 1 readmission for HF. The 10 most common comorbidities for readmitted patients included hypertension, diabetes mellitus, renal failure, chronic pulmonary disease, deficiency anemia, fluid and electrolyte disorders, obesity, hypothyroidism, peripheral vascular disorders, and depression. The area under the ROC curve for the prediction model was 0.58 in the derivation cohort and 0.59 in the validation cohort. Conclusion: The prediction model will find clinical utility at point of care in optimizing the management of patients with HF and reducing HF readmissions.

RhoBTB1 reverses established arterial stiffness in angiotensin II-induced hypertension by promoting actin depolymerization.

Arterial stiffness predicts cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality, but its treatment remains challenging. Mice treated with angiotensin II (Ang II) develop hypertension, arterial stiffness, vascular dysfunction, and a downregulation of Rho-related BTB domain-containing protein 1 (RhoBTB1) in the vasculature. RhoBTB1 is associated with blood pressure regulation, but its function is poorly understood. We tested the hypothesis that restoring RhoBTB1 can attenuate arterial stiffness, hypertension, and vascular dysfunction in Ang II-treated mice. Genetic complementation of RhoBTB1 in the vasculature was achieved using mice expressing a tamoxifen-inducible, smooth muscle-specific RhoBTB1 transgene. RhoBTB1 restoration efficiently and rapidly alleviated arterial stiffness but not hypertension or vascular dysfunction. Mechanistic studies revealed that RhoBTB1 had no substantial effect on several classical arterial stiffness contributors, such as collagen deposition, elastin content, and vascular smooth muscle remodeling. Instead, Ang II increased actin polymerization in the aorta, which was reversed by RhoBTB1. Changes in the levels of 2 regulators of actin polymerization, cofilin and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein, in response to RhoBTB1 were consistent with an actin depolymerization mechanism. Our study reveals an important function of RhoBTB1, demonstrates its vital role in antagonizing established arterial stiffness, and further supports a functional and mechanistic separation among hypertension, vascular dysfunction, and arterial stiffness.

Glycemic relapse in a collaborative primary care-based type 2 diabetes management program.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the incidence of glycemic relapse in patients who attained their glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) goal through a health system-wide collaborative primary care-based pharmacist- and Certified Diabetes Care and Education Specialist (CDCES)-led type 2 diabetes (T2D) management program and to identify relapse risk factors. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined patients with T2D in the diabetes management program with a baseline A1C of at least 9% who attained their A1C goal. The primary outcome was incidence of glycemic relapse. Time to relapse was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curve, and a cox proportional hazards model was fitted to identify the risk factors for glycemic relapse. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty-two patients were followed-up for a median of 10.5 (interquartile range 12.1) months after program completion; 38 patients (10.5%) experienced a glycemic relapse. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated a 12-month relapse rate of 8.3%. The presence of a medication adherence barrier, presence of a higher number of chronic medications at baseline, presence of a baseline body mass index (BMI) of 30-39.9, and use of insulin at program completion increased risk for glycemic relapse in a univariate model. In multivariate regression, baseline BMI of 30-39.9 remained statistically significant. Older age at baseline was associated with a statistically significantly decreased relapse risk in both models. CONCLUSION: This study highlights a low incidence of glycemic relapse for patients with T2D who reach their A1C goal through a collaborative primary care-based pharmacist- and CDCES-led T2D management program. The presence of risk factors for glycemic relapse may indicate a need for ongoing intensive care despite achieving A1C goal.