ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: First responders and other public safety personnel (PSP; e.g. correctional workers, firefighters, paramedics, police, public safety communicators) are often exposed to events that have the potential to be psychologically traumatizing. Such exposures may contribute to poor mental health outcomes and a greater need to seek mental health care. However, a theoretically driven, structured qualitative study of barriers and facilitators of help-seeking behaviours has not yet been undertaken in this population. This study used the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify and better understand critical barriers and facilitators of help-seeking and accessing mental health care for a planned First Responder Operational Stress Injury (OSI) clinic. METHODS: We conducted face-to-face, one-on-one semistructured interviews with 24 first responders (11 firefighters, five paramedics, and eight police officers), recruited using purposive and snowball sampling. Interviews were analyzed using deductive content analysis. The TDF guided study design, interview content, data collection, and analysis. RESULTS: The most reported barriers included concerns regarding confidentiality, lack of trust, cultural competency of clinicians, lack of clarity about the availability and accessibility of services, and stigma within first responder organizations. Key themes influencing help-seeking were classified into six of the TDF's 14 theoretical domains: environmental context and resources; knowledge; social influences; social/professional role and identity; emotion; and beliefs about consequences. CONCLUSION: The results identified key actions that can be utilized to tailor interventions to encourage attendance at a First Responder OSI Clinic. Such approaches include providing transparency around confidentiality, policies to ensure greater cultural competency in all clinic staff, and clear descriptions of how to access care; routinely involving families; and addressing stigma.
Subject(s)
Emergency Responders , Police , Humans , Mental Health , Paramedics , Emergency Responders/psychology , Qualitative ResearchABSTRACT
Terms in the current glossary are arranged alphabetically by the most commonly used synonym. Most of the terms have two complementary definitions: a "general public definition" or introductory definition, geared towards a wider readership, and an "academic definition," which may be more detailed, or "expert." There is some overlap between the definitions, and readers may choose to read either or both.
Les termes du glossaire sont classés par ordre alphabétique selon le synonyme le plus couramment utilisé. La plupart des termes comportent deux définitions complémentaires : une « définition grand public ¼, c'est-à-dire une définition d'introduction, destinée à un lectorat plus vaste, et une « définition scientifique ¼, susceptible d'être plus détaillée ou destinée à des « spécialistes ¼11-76. Il y a un certain chevauchement entre les définitions, et les lecteurs ont le choix de lire l'une, l'autre ou les deux.
Subject(s)
Psychological Trauma , Humans , Terminology as TopicABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients who present to emergency departments after intentional self-harm are at an increased risk of dying by suicide. This applies particularly to men, who represent nearly two-thirds of those who die by suicide in Ontario. One way of potentially addressing this gap is to offer a course of blended problem-solving therapy, comprised of a brief course of evidence-based psychotherapy for individuals at risk for suicide, facilitated by the use of a patient-facing smartphone application and a clinician-facing "dashboard." This approach has the potential to combine the benefits of face-to-face therapy and technology to create a novel intervention. METHODS: This is a cohort study nested within a larger pragmatic multicentre pre- and post-design cluster randomised trial. Suicidal ideation assessed by the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation is the primary outcome variable. Secondary outcome measures include depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale), post-traumatic stress disorder (Primary Care PTSD Screen), health-related quality of life (EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire), meaning in life (Experienced Meaning in Life Scale), perceived social supports (Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support), alcohol use (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test), drug use (Drug Abuse Screening Test Short Form 10), problem-solving skills (Social Problem-Solving Inventory-Revised Short Form), and self-reported healthcare costs, as well as health service use measured using Ontario administrative health data. A process evaluation will also be conducted following study completion. DISCUSSION: The cohort study will test whether better adherence to the intervention results in better outcomes. The value of the cohort study design is that we can examine in more detail certain subgroups or other variables that are not available in the larger cluster randomised trial. This trial will aim to improve standards by informing best practice in management of men who self-harm and present to hospitals in Ontario. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03473535 . Registered on March 22, 2018.
Subject(s)
Alcoholism , Self-Injurious Behavior , Cohort Studies , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Male , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Ontario , Psychotherapy , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Self-Injurious Behavior/diagnosis , Self-Injurious Behavior/therapy , SmartphoneABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the essential role of public safety personnel in serving and protecting all Canadians. Public safety personnel were reporting challenges with mental health and well-being before the COVID-19 pandemic; accordingly, the new stressors may mean public safety personnel need additional resources to sustainably help them help us. This article suggests elements of support that may be attainable avenues for supporting the well-being of public safety personnel during the protracted stress caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustained self-care may be critical for maintaining the mental health and well-being of public safety personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic.
La pandémie de COVID-19 a mis en évidence le rôle essentiel du personnel de sécurité publique dans le service et la protection de l'ensemble des Canadiens. Le personnel de sécurité publique signalant déjà des problèmes de santé mentale et de bien-être avant même la pandémie de COVID-19, les nouveaux facteurs de stress pourraient augmenter les besoins en ressources supplémentaires chez ce personnel afin qu'il soit capable de nous aider à long terme. Cet article propose divers éléments de soutien pouvant constituer des pistes pertinentes en vue de favoriser le bien-être du personnel de sécurité publique pendant la période de stress prolongé provoqué par la pandémie de COVID-19. Les autosoins peuvent s'avérer essentiels au maintien de la santé mentale et du bien-être du personnel de sécurité publique pendant la pandémie de COVID-19.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , Emergency Responders/psychology , Occupational Health , Occupational Stress/prevention & control , Communication , Emergency Responders/education , Humans , Leadership , Occupational Stress/psychology , Quarantine , SARS-CoV-2 , Self CareABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Depression is a common mental disorder with a high social burden and significant impact on suicidality and quality of life. Treatment is often limited to drug therapies because of long waiting times to see psychological therapists face to face, despite several guidelines recommending that psychological treatments should be first-line interventions for mild to moderate depression. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate, among patients on a waitlist to receive secondary mental health care services for depression, how effective coach-guided web-based therapy (The Journal) is, compared with an information-only waitlist control group, in reducing depression symptoms after 12 weeks. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial with 2 parallel arms and a process evaluation, which included interviews with study participants. Participants assigned to the intervention group received 12 weeks of web-based therapy guided by a coach who had a background in social work. Patients in the control group receive a leaflet of mental health resources they could access. The primary outcome measure was a change in depression scores, as measured by the Patient-Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). RESULTS: A total of 95 participants were enrolled (intervention, n=47; control, n=48). The mean change in PHQ-9 scores from baseline to week 12 was -3.6 (SD 6.6) in the intervention group and -3.1 (SD 6.2) in the control group, which was not a statistically significant difference with a two-sided alpha of .05 (t91=-0.37; P=.72, 95% CI -3.1 to 2.2). At 12 weeks, participants in the intervention group reported higher health-related quality of life (mean EuroQol 5 dimensions visual analogue scale [EQ-5D-VAS] score 66.8, SD 18.0) compared with the control group (mean EQ-5D VAS score 55.9, SD 19.2; t84=-2.73; P=.01). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in health service use following their initial consultation with a psychiatrist. The process evaluation showed that participants in the intervention group completed a mean of 5.0 (SD 2.3) lessons in The Journal and 8.8 (SD 3.1) sessions with the coach. Most participants (29/47, 62%) in the intervention group who completed the full dose of the intervention, by finishing 6 or more lessons in The Journal, were more likely to have a clinically important reduction in depressive symptoms at 12 weeks compared with the control group (Χ21=6.3; P=.01, Φ=0.37). Participants who completed the interviews reported that the role played by the coach was a major factor in adherence to the study intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that the use of guided web-based therapy for the treatment of depression is not more effective than information-only waitlist control. However, it showed that the coach has the potential to increase adherence and engagement with web-based depression treatment protocols. Further research is needed on what makes the coach effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02423733; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02423733.
Subject(s)
Depression/therapy , Health Resources/standards , Mental Health/standards , Telemedicine/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Internet , Male , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Blended therapy describes the use of computerised therapy combined with face-to-face therapy to extend the depth, range and nature of the face-to-face therapy. We wanted to develop a treatment manual for a randomised trial of blended therapy combining face-to-face problem solving and a smartphone app in men who present to hospital with self-harm. OBJECTIVE: To develop a treatment manual and to describe the experience of receiving and delivering a blended therapy. METHODS: After completion of the blended therapy, semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with participants to describe their experience of the treatment. Two independent coders analysed the material using a thematic, grounded theory approach. FINDINGS: Seven men were enrolled in the study, and six completed the qualitative interviews. The two main themes identified were of trust and connection. Participants attended 85% of their appointments. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment manual, we emphasised the themes of trust and connection by allowing time to discuss the app in the face-to-face to sessions, ensuring that therapists are familiar with the app and know how to respond to technical queries. Identification of trust and connection generates novel questions about the importance of the therapeutic alliance with technology rather than with people. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Clinicians and app developers need to pay attention to the therapeutic relationship with technology as trust and good communication can be easily damaged, resulting in disengagement with the app. Blended therapy may result in increased adherence to face-to-face sessions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02718248.
