Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(4): e247193, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38635269

ABSTRACT

Importance: Somatic symptoms are a major concern among the pediatric population because of frequency and burden. The association between adverse childhood experiences and somatic symptoms in adults is well established but less is known concerning somatic symptoms in young people. Objective: To explore the frequency and intensity of somatic symptoms in children and adolescents exposed to traumatic events. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study was conducted from January 1 to December 31, 2021, at the Nice Pediatric Psychotrauma Referral Center in Nice, France. Participants included pediatric outpatients, aged 7 to 17 years, who were referred to the center. Statistical analysis was performed in January 2022. Exposure: All participants experienced at least 1 traumatic event during life. Main Outcome and Measure: Somatic and posttraumatic stress symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-13 (PHQ-13) and Child PTSD Checklist (CPC). Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and non-PTSD groups were defined based on CPC symptoms severity score. In the hypothesized association between somatic symptoms and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS), PTSD and non-PTSD groups were compared, correlations between PTSS and severity of CPC were analyzed, and a regression model was performed. Results: There were 363 participants included (mean [SD] age, 13.58 [0.25] years; 174 [47.9%] female, 189 [52.1%] male). Compared with the non-PTSD group, the PTSD group presented with a higher mean (SD) number of somatic symptoms (7.0 [2.5] vs 4.0 [2.5] symptoms; t360 = 11.7; P < .001), and higher mean (SD) intensity (10.4 [4.6] vs 4.8 [3.7] points; t360 = 12.6; P < .001). Most of the explored somatic symptoms positively correlated with the intensity of PTSS and their functional alterations (eg, PTSS intensity correlated with stomach pain symptoms [r = .30; P < .001]; and with headaches symptoms [r = .44; P < .001]). In the regression model, the combination of migraines, palpitation, nausea, tiredness, and sleep disorders explained 6.5% of the variance in the PTSD group. (F1,341 = 22.651; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, somatic symptoms were positively correlated with PTSS both in frequency and intensity among youths. These results suggest that the systematic screening for somatic symptoms in youths with traumatic exposure should be a routine evaluation procedure.


Subject(s)
Medically Unexplained Symptoms , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Adult , Humans , Adolescent , Child , Female , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Abdominal Pain , France
2.
Psychiatry Res ; 334: 115786, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38387164

ABSTRACT

A significant heterogeneity prevails in antipsychotics (APs) safety monitoring recommendations. Youths are deemed more vulnerable to cardiometabolic side effects. We aimed to assess age-dependent reporting of cardiac and metabolic disorders in youths, relying on the WHO safety database (VigiBase®). VigiBase® was queried for all reports of cardiac, glucose, lipid and nutritional disorders involving APs. Patients <18 years were classified as pediatric population. Disproportionality analyses relied on the Information Component (IC): the positivity of the lower end of its 95 % confidence interval was required to suspect a signal. We yielded 4,672 pediatric reports. In disproportionality analysis, nutritional disorders were leading in youths (IC 3.9 [3.9-4.0]). Among healthcare professionals' reports, stronger signals were detected in youths than in adults. Children had the greatest signal with nutritional disorders (IC 4.7 [4.6-4.8]). In adolescents, aripiprazole was ascribed to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Our findings, based on real-world data, support the hypothesis of a greater propensity for nutritional disorders in youths, despite limitations of pharmacovigilance studies. We suggest specific safety profiles, such as aripiprazole and NASH. Pending more answers from population-based studies, a careful anamnesis should seek for risk factors before AP initiation. A cautious monitoring is warranted to allow earlier identification of side effects.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease , Nutrition Disorders , Adult , Humans , Child , Adolescent , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Aripiprazole , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/chemically induced , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/drug therapy , World Health Organization , Nutrition Disorders/chemically induced , Nutrition Disorders/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL