Strengthening self-regulation and reducing poverty to prevent adolescent depression and anxiety: Rationale, approach and methods of the ALIVE interdisciplinary research collaboration in Colombia, Nepal and South Africa.

AIMS: Depression and anxiety are the leading contributors to the global burden of disease among young people, accounting for over a third (34.8%) of years lived with disability. Yet there is limited evidence for interventions that prevent adolescent depression and anxiety in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where 90% of adolescents live. This article introduces the 'Improving Adolescent mentaL health by reducing the Impact of poVErty (ALIVE)' study, its conceptual framework, objectives, methods and expected outcomes. The aim of the ALIVE study is to develop and pilot-test an intervention that combines poverty reduction with strengthening self-regulation to prevent depression and anxiety among adolescents living in urban poverty in Colombia, Nepal and South Africa. METHODS: This aim will be achieved by addressing four objectives: (1) develop a conceptual framework that identifies the causal mechanisms linking poverty, self-regulation and depression and anxiety; (2) develop a multi-component selective prevention intervention targeting self-regulation and poverty among adolescents at high risk of developing depression or anxiety; (3) adapt and validate instruments to measure incidence of depression and anxiety, mediators and implementation parameters of the prevention intervention; and (4) undertake a four-arm pilot cluster randomised controlled trial to assess the feasibility, acceptability and cost of the selective prevention intervention in the three study sites. RESULTS: The contributions of this study include the active engagement and participation of adolescents in the research process; a focus on the causal mechanisms of the intervention; building an evidence base for prevention interventions in LMICs; and the use of an interdisciplinary approach. CONCLUSIONS: By developing and evaluating an intervention that addresses multidimensional poverty and self-regulation, ALIVE can make contributions to evidence on the integration of mental health into broader development policy and practice.

Adverse sequelae of the COVID -19 pandemic on mental health services in Chile.

Objective: This study seeks to describe the adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health services in Chile. Methods: This study is part of ongoing multicountry research known as the Mental Health Care - Adverse Sequelae of COVID-19 study (or the MASC study) that includes seven countries. Chile is the only one in Latin America. This study used a convergent mixed methods design. The quantitative component analyzed data about public mental health care collected between January 2019 and December 2021 from the open-access database at the Ministry of Health. The qualitative component analyzed data collected from focus groups of experts that included professionals in charge of mental health services, policy-makers, service users and caregivers. Finally, the data synthesis was performed by triangulation of both components. Results: By April 2020, mental health service provision had been reduced by 88% in primary care; moreover, secondary and tertiary levels had also reduced their mental health activities by, respectively, 66.3% and 71.3% of pre-COVID levels. Negative sequelae were described at the health systems level, and full recovery had not been achieved by the end of 2021. The pandemic affected the essential characteristics of community-based mental health services, with adverse impacts on the continuity and quality of care, reduced psychosocial and community support, and negative effects on health workers' mental health. Digital solutions were widely implemented to enable remote care, but challenges included the availability of equipment, its quality and the digital divide. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has had significant and enduring adverse effects on mental health care. Lessons learned can inform recommendations for good practices for the ongoing and future pandemics and health crises, and highlight the importance of prioritizing the strengthening of mental health services in response to emergencies.

Adverse sequelae of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health services in Chile

[ABSTRACT]. Objective. This study seeks to describe the adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health ser- vices in Chile. Methods. This study is part of ongoing multicountry research known as the Mental Health Care – Adverse Sequelae of COVID-19 study (or the MASC study) that includes seven countries. Chile is the only one in Latin America. This study used a convergent mixed methods design. The quantitative component analyzed data about public mental health care collected between January 2019 and December 2021 from the open-access database at the Ministry of Health. The qualitative component analyzed data collected from focus groups of experts that included professionals in charge of mental health services, policy-makers, service users and caregivers. Finally, the data synthesis was performed by triangulation of both components. Results. By April 2020, mental health service provision had been reduced by 88% in primary care; moreover, secondary and tertiary levels had also reduced their mental health activities by, respectively, 66.3% and 71.3% of pre-COVID levels. Negative sequelae were described at the health systems level, and full recovery had not been achieved by the end of 2021. The pandemic affected the essential characteristics of community-based mental health services, with adverse impacts on the continuity and quality of care, reduced psychosocial and community support, and negative effects on health workers’ mental health. Digital solutions were widely imple- mented to enable remote care, but challenges included the availability of equipment, its quality and the digital divide. Conclusions. The COVID-19 pandemic has had significant and enduring adverse effects on mental health care. Lessons learned can inform recommendations for good practices for the ongoing and future pandemics and health crises, and highlight the importance of prioritizing the strengthening of mental health services in response to emergencies.

[RESUMEN]. Objetivo. Este estudio pretende describir los efectos adversos de la pandemia de COVID-19 en los servicios de salud mental en Chile. Métodos. El estudio forma parte de una investigación multinacional en curso denominada estudio Mental Health Care – Adverse Sequelae of COVID-19 (atención de salud mental: secuelas adversas de la COVID-19), o estudio MASC, en el que participan siete países. Chile es el único de América Latina. En este estudio se utilizó un diseño de métodos mixtos convergentes. En el componente cuantitativo se analizaron los datos de atención en salud mental del sector público obtenidos entre enero del 2019 y diciembre del 2021, provenien- tes de la base de datos de acceso libre del Ministerio de Salud. En el componente cualitativo se analizaron los datos obtenidos a partir de grupos focales de expertos entre los que había profesionales a cargo de servicios de salud mental, responsables de la formulación de políticas, personas usuarias de los servicios y personas prestadoras de cuidados. Por último, la síntesis de los datos se realizó mediante la triangulación de ambos componentes. Resultados. En abril del 2020, la prestación de servicios de salud mental en atención primaria había dis- minuido en un 88%; además, los niveles secundario y terciario también habían reducido sus intervenciones en salud mental en un 66,3% y un 71,3%, respectivamente, respecto a los niveles previos a la COVID-19. Se describieron secuelas negativas a nivel de los sistemas de salud, que a fines del 2021 aún no habían logrado su plena recuperación. La pandemia afectó las características esenciales de los servicios de salud mental prestados en la comunidad, con consecuencias adversas en la continuidad y la calidad de la atención, una reducción del apoyo psicosocial y comunitario, y efectos negativos en la salud mental del personal de salud. Se generalizó la adopción de soluciones digitales para posibilitar la atención a distancia, pero algunos de los principales problemas fueron la disponibilidad de equipos, su calidad y la brecha digital. Conclusiones. La pandemia de COVID-19 ha tenido efectos adversos importantes y duraderos en la atención de salud mental. Las enseñanzas extraídas pueden servir de base para formular recomendaciones de buenas prácticas para las pandemias y crisis sanitarias presentes y futuras, a la vez que resaltan la importancia de dar prioridad al fortalecimiento de los servicios de salud mental en las situaciones de respuesta a emergencias.

[RESUMO]. Objetivo. Descrever os efeitos adversos da pandemia de COVID-19 nos serviços de saúde mental do Chile. Métodos. Este estudo é parte de uma pesquisa em andamento em vários países, denominada Mental Health Care - Adverse Sequelae of COVID-19 (Atenção à saúde mental: sequelas adversas da COVID-19, também conhecido como estudo MASC), que inclui sete países. O Chile é o único país da América Latina incluído. O estudo utilizou um delineamento convergente de métodos mistos. O componente quantitativo analisou dados da atenção pública à saúde mental coletados entre janeiro de 2019 e dezembro de 2021 do banco de dados de acesso livre do Ministério da Saúde. O componente qualitativo analisou dados coletados de grupos focais de especialistas que incluíam profissionais responsáveis por serviços de saúde mental, formuladores de políticas, usuários de serviços e cuidadores. Por último, os dados foram sintetizados por triangulação dos dois componentes. Resultados. Até abril de 2020, havia ocorrido uma redução de 88% na prestação de serviços de saúde mental na atenção primária; além disso, os níveis secundários e terciários também haviam reduzido suas atividades de saúde mental em 66,3% e 71,3% dos níveis pré-COVID, respectivamente. Sequelas negativas foram descritas no nível dos sistemas de saúde, e a recuperação total não havia sido alcançada até o final de 2021. A pandemia afetou as características essenciais dos serviços de saúde mental de base comunitária, com impactos adversos na continuidade e na qualidade do atendimento, redução do apoio psicossocial e comunitário e efeitos negativos na saúde mental dos profissionais de saúde. Soluções digitais foram ampla- mente implementadas para permitir o atendimento remoto, mas os desafios incluíam a disponibilidade de equipamentos, sua qualidade e a exclusão digital. Conclusões. A pandemia de COVID-19 tem tido efeitos adversos significativos e duradouros na atenção à saúde mental. As lições aprendidas podem contribuir para recomendações de boas práticas em pandemias e crises de saúde atuais e futuras. Além disso, destacam a importância de priorizar o fortalecimento dos serviços de saúde mental em resposta a emergências.

Adverse sequelae of the COVID -19 pandemic on mental health services in Chile / Secuelas adversas de la pandemia de COVID-19 en los servicios de salud mental en Chile / Sequelas adversas da pandemia de COVID-19 nos serviços de saúde mental do Chile

ABSTRACT Objective. This study seeks to describe the adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health services in Chile. Methods. This study is part of ongoing multicountry research known as the Mental Health Care - Adverse Sequelae of COVID-19 study (or the MASC study) that includes seven countries. Chile is the only one in Latin America. This study used a convergent mixed methods design. The quantitative component analyzed data about public mental health care collected between January 2019 and December 2021 from the open-access database at the Ministry of Health. The qualitative component analyzed data collected from focus groups of experts that included professionals in charge of mental health services, policy-makers, service users and caregivers. Finally, the data synthesis was performed by triangulation of both components. Results. By April 2020, mental health service provision had been reduced by 88% in primary care; moreover, secondary and tertiary levels had also reduced their mental health activities by, respectively, 66.3% and 71.3% of pre-COVID levels. Negative sequelae were described at the health systems level, and full recovery had not been achieved by the end of 2021. The pandemic affected the essential characteristics of community-based mental health services, with adverse impacts on the continuity and quality of care, reduced psychosocial and community support, and negative effects on health workers' mental health. Digital solutions were widely implemented to enable remote care, but challenges included the availability of equipment, its quality and the digital divide. Conclusions. The COVID-19 pandemic has had significant and enduring adverse effects on mental health care. Lessons learned can inform recommendations for good practices for the ongoing and future pandemics and health crises, and highlight the importance of prioritizing the strengthening of mental health services in response to emergencies.

RESUMEN Objetivo. Este estudio pretende describir los efectos adversos de la pandemia de COVID-19 en los servicios de salud mental en Chile. Métodos. El estudio forma parte de una investigación multinacional en curso denominada estudio Mental Health Care - Adverse Sequelae of COVID-19 (atención de salud mental: secuelas adversas de la COVID-19), o estudio MASC, en el que participan siete países. Chile es el único de América Latina. En este estudio se utilizó un diseño de métodos mixtos convergentes. En el componente cuantitativo se analizaron los datos de atención en salud mental del sector público obtenidos entre enero del 2019 y diciembre del 2021, provenientes de la base de datos de acceso libre del Ministerio de Salud. En el componente cualitativo se analizaron los datos obtenidos a partir de grupos focales de expertos entre los que había profesionales a cargo de servicios de salud mental, responsables de la formulación de políticas, personas usuarias de los servicios y personas prestadoras de cuidados. Por último, la síntesis de los datos se realizó mediante la triangulación de ambos componentes. Resultados. En abril del 2020, la prestación de servicios de salud mental en atención primaria había disminuido en un 88%; además, los niveles secundario y terciario también habían reducido sus intervenciones en salud mental en un 66,3% y un 71,3%, respectivamente, respecto a los niveles previos a la COVID-19. Se describieron secuelas negativas a nivel de los sistemas de salud, que a fines del 2021 aún no habían logrado su plena recuperación. La pandemia afectó las características esenciales de los servicios de salud mental prestados en la comunidad, con consecuencias adversas en la continuidad y la calidad de la atención, una reducción del apoyo psicosocial y comunitario, y efectos negativos en la salud mental del personal de salud. Se generalizó la adopción de soluciones digitales para posibilitar la atención a distancia, pero algunos de los principales problemas fueron la disponibilidad de equipos, su calidad y la brecha digital. Conclusiones. La pandemia de COVID-19 ha tenido efectos adversos importantes y duraderos en la atención de salud mental. Las enseñanzas extraídas pueden servir de base para formular recomendaciones de buenas prácticas para las pandemias y crisis sanitarias presentes y futuras, a la vez que resaltan la importancia de dar prioridad al fortalecimiento de los servicios de salud mental en las situaciones de respuesta a emergencias.

RESUMO Objetivo. Descrever os efeitos adversos da pandemia de COVID-19 nos serviços de saúde mental do Chile. Métodos. Este estudo é parte de uma pesquisa em andamento em vários países, denominada Mental Health Care - Adverse Sequelae of COVID-19 (Atenção à saúde mental: sequelas adversas da COVID-19, também conhecido como estudo MASC), que inclui sete países. O Chile é o único país da América Latina incluído. O estudo utilizou um delineamento convergente de métodos mistos. O componente quantitativo analisou dados da atenção pública à saúde mental coletados entre janeiro de 2019 e dezembro de 2021 do banco de dados de acesso livre do Ministério da Saúde. O componente qualitativo analisou dados coletados de grupos focais de especialistas que incluíam profissionais responsáveis por serviços de saúde mental, formuladores de políticas, usuários de serviços e cuidadores. Por último, os dados foram sintetizados por triangulação dos dois componentes. Resultados. Até abril de 2020, havia ocorrido uma redução de 88% na prestação de serviços de saúde mental na atenção primária; além disso, os níveis secundários e terciários também haviam reduzido suas atividades de saúde mental em 66,3% e 71,3% dos níveis pré-COVID, respectivamente. Sequelas negativas foram descritas no nível dos sistemas de saúde, e a recuperação total não havia sido alcançada até o final de 2021. A pandemia afetou as características essenciais dos serviços de saúde mental de base comunitária, com impactos adversos na continuidade e na qualidade do atendimento, redução do apoio psicossocial e comunitário e efeitos negativos na saúde mental dos profissionais de saúde. Soluções digitais foram amplamente implementadas para permitir o atendimento remoto, mas os desafios incluíam a disponibilidade de equipamentos, sua qualidade e a exclusão digital. Conclusões. A pandemia de COVID-19 tem tido efeitos adversos significativos e duradouros na atenção à saúde mental. As lições aprendidas podem contribuir para recomendações de boas práticas em pandemias e crises de saúde atuais e futuras. Além disso, destacam a importância de priorizar o fortalecimento dos serviços de saúde mental em resposta a emergências.

Evaluation of an anti-stigma intervention for Mexican psychiatric trainees.

BACKGROUND: There is research evidence regarding the presence of stigmatising attitudes in psychiatrists towards people with mental illness, but a lack of studies and interventions focused on this issue in low and middle-income countries. AIMS: To assess the feasibility of implementing an anti-stigma intervention for Mexican psychiatric trainees, and its potential effects. METHODS: This study comprised a pre-post design with outcome measures compared between baseline and 3-month follow-up. Quantitative outcome measures were used to evaluate the potential effects of the intervention, whilst the process evaluation required the collection and analysis of both quantitative and qualitative data. RESULTS: Twenty-nine trainees (25% of those invited) participated in the intervention, of whom 18 also participated in the follow-up assessment. Outcome measures showed the intervention had moderately large effects on reducing stereotypes and the influence of other co-workers on trainees' own attitudes. The main mechanisms of impact identified were recognition of negative attitudes in oneself and colleagues, self-reflection about the impact of stigma, one's own negative attitudes and recognition of one's ability to make change. Participants accepted and were satisfied with the intervention, which many considered should be part of their routine training. However, trainees' work overload and lack of support from the host organisation were identified as barriers to implement the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: A brief anti-stigma intervention for Mexican psychiatric trainees is feasible, potentially effective, well accepted and was considered necessary by participants. This study also suggests mechanisms of impact and mediators should be considered for developing further interventions, contributing to reducing the damaging effects that mental health-related stigma has on people's lives.

Mexican Psychiatric Trainees' Attitudes Towards People with Mental Illness: A Qualitative Study.

Despite their training, psychiatrists have been found to have negative attitudes towards people with mental illness, including the patients they treat. Similarly, studies focused on service users have identified psychiatrists as a source of stigma. Even though negative attitudes in psychiatrists have been identified in different countries and settings, in Mexico the attitudes of these professionals have never been assessed. Because of this, we invited psychiatric trainees from a hospital in Mexico to participate in individual interviews to describe their opinions regarding mental health-related stigma, to evaluate their attitudes towards people with mental illness and to identify factors that could be influencing their attitudes. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. A total of 29 trainees participated in the study. The results suggested that trainees recognised psychiatrists can have negative attitudes towards people with mental illness, such as poor empathy, judgement and labelling, and mainly towards patients considered difficult and with borderline personality disorder. Participants recognised these attitudes can influence their relationship with patients, and considered it is necessary to develop interventions to improve their own attitudes and reduce mental health stigma. From this study we concluded Mexican psychiatrists are not free from stigma towards people with mental illness. However, Mexican psychiatric trainees are interested in improving their attitudes and reactions towards their patients.

Latent structure and factor reliability of the National Health Service Community Mental Health Service User Questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: National Health Service use the Community Mental Health Service User Questionnaire (NHS-CMH) to assess care quality. However, its reliability and internal validity is uncertain. AIMS: To test the NHS-CMH structure, reliability and item-level characteristics. METHODS: We used data from 11,373 participants who answered the 2017 NHS-CMH survey. First, we estimated the NHS-CMH structure using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) in half of the dataset. Second, we tested the best EFA-derived model with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). We tested the internal validity, construct reliability (omega - ω), explained common variance of each factor (ECV), and item thresholds. RESULTS: EFA suggested a 4-factor solution. The structure derived from the EFA was confirmed, demonstrating good reliability for the four correlated dimensions: "Relationship with Staff" (ω = 0.952, ECV = 40.1%), "Organizing Care" (ω = 0.855, ECV = 21.4%), "Medication and Treatments" (ω = 0.837, ECV = 13.3%), and "Support and Well-being" (ω = 0.928, ECV = 25.3%). A second-order model with a high-order domain of "Quality of Care" is also supported. CONCLUSIONS: The NHS-CMH can be used to reliably assess four user-informed dimensions of mental health care quality. This model offers an alternative for its current use (item-level and untested sum scores analysis).

Mental Health Service Users' Perceptions of Stigma, From the General Population and From Mental Health Professionals in Mexico: A Qualitative Study.

Negative attitudes towards people with mental health disorders have been widely studied and identified in the general population, and even within health care professionals. Moreover, studies focused on service users have also identified mental health professionals, including psychiatrists, as a source of stigma. However, in Mexico and Latin America few studies have been conducted addressing this issue. To explore mental health service users' perceptions of stigma by members of the general population and by psychiatrists in Mexico, service users at a psychiatric hospital in Mexico were invited to participate in either focus groups or individual interviews, which were audio recorded, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. A total of 47 service users participated in this study. The results suggested that participants were not only aware of the possible consequences of mental health related stigma, but they have also experienced stigmatisation for having a mental illness. Participants also considered psychiatrists can hold negative attitudes towards people with mental illness, something that can represent a barrier for them to have optimal quality of care. Therefore, participants agreed that these attitudes should be addressed to improve the care they received from these professionals. This study suggests that, like members of the general population, psychiatrists are also considered as a source of stigma by people with mental illness in Mexico. These findings not only add to previous work conducted in Mexico and other countries, they also confirm the importance of addressing negative attitudes in this group of health professionals.

Burden of Mental, Neurological, Substance Use Disorders and Self-Harm in North America: A Comparative Epidemiology of Canada, Mexico, and the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the burden of mental, neurological, substance use disorders and self-harm (MNSS) in Canada, Mexico, and the United States. METHOD: We extracted 2017 data from the Global Burden of Disease online database. Based on a previously developed framework to classify and aggregate the burden of specific disorders and symptoms, we reestimated the MNSS burden to include suicide, alcohol use, drug use, specific neurological, and painful somatic symptom disorders. We analyzed age-sex-specific patterns within and between countries. RESULTS: The MNSS burden is the largest of all disorder groupings. It is lowest in Mexico, intermediate in Canada, and highest in the United States. Exceptions are alcohol use, bipolar, conduct disorders, and epilepsy, which are highest in Mexico; and painful somatic syndromes and headaches, which are highest in Canada. The burden of drug use disorders in the United States is twice the burden in Canada, and 7 times the burden in Mexico. MNSS become the most burdensome of all disorder groups by age 10, staying at the top until age 60, and show a distinct pattern across the lifetime. The top three MNSS disorders for men are a combination of substance use disorders and self-harm (United States), with the addition of painful somatic syndromes (Canada), and headaches (Mexico). For women, the top three are headaches and depression (all countries), drug use (United States), neurocognitive disorders (Mexico), and painful somatic syndromes (Canada). CONCLUSION: MNSS are the most burdensome disease grouping and should be prioritized for funding in Canada, Mexico, and the United States.

Disease burden and government spending on mental, neurological, and substance use disorders, and self-harm: cross-sectional, ecological study of health system response in the Americas.

BACKGROUND: Disorders affecting mental health are highly prevalent, can be disabling, and are associated with substantial premature mortality. Yet national health system responses are frequently under-resourced, inefficient, and ineffective, leading to an imbalance between disease burden and health expenditures. We estimated the disease burden in the Americas caused by disorders affecting mental health. This measure was adjusted to include mental, neurological, and behavioural disorders that are frequently not included in estimates of mental health burden. We propose a framework for assessing the imbalance between disease burden and health expenditures. METHODS: In this cross-sectional, ecological study, we extracted disaggregated disease burden data from the Global Health Data Exchange to produce country-level estimates for the proportion of total disease burden attributable to mental disorders, neurological disorders, substance use disorders, and self-harm (MNSS) in the Americas. We collated data from the WHO Assessment Instrument for Mental Health Systems and the WHO Mental Health Atlas on country-level mental health spending as a proportion of total government health expenditures, and of psychiatric hospital spending as a proportion of mental health expenditures. We used a metric capturing the imbalance between disease burden and mental health expenditures, and modelled the association between this imbalance and real (ie, adjusted for purchasing power parity) gross domestic product (GDP). FINDINGS: Data were collected from July 1, 2016, to March 1, 2017. MNSS comprised 19% of total disability-adjusted life-years in the Americas in 2015. Median spending on mental health was 2·4% (IQR 1·3-4·1) of government health spending, and median allocation to psychiatric hospitals was 80% (52-92). This spending represented an imbalance in the ratio between disease burden and efficiently allocated spending, ranging from 3:1 in Canada and the USA to 435:1 in Haiti, with a median of 32:1 (12-170). Mental health expenditure as a proportion of government health spending was positively associated with real GDP (ß=0·68 [95% CI 0·24-1·13], p=0·0036), while the proportion allocated to psychiatric hospitals (ß=-0·5 [-0·79 to -0·22], p=0·0012) and the imbalance in efficiently allocated spending (ß=-1·38 [-1·97 to -0·78], p=0·0001) were both inversely associated with real GDP. All estimated coefficients were significantly different from zero at the 0·005 level. INTERPRETATION: A striking imbalance exists between government spending on mental health and the related disease burden in the Americas, which disproportionately affects low-income countries and is likely to result in undertreatment, increased avoidable disability and mortality, decreased national economic output, and increased household-level health spending. FUNDING: Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University.

Systematic review of pathways to mental health care in Brazil: narrative synthesis of quantitative and qualitative studies.

BACKGROUND: Pathways to care are actions and strategies employed by individuals in order to get help for health-related distress and the related processes of care providers. On several systematic reviews regarding pathways to mental health care (PMHC), studies regarding South American countries were not present. This review synthesizes qualitative and quantitative research about PMHC in Brazil. METHODS: LILACS, MEDLINE and SCIELO databases were searched for papers regarding PMHC in Brazil. The results were organized in pathway stages, based on Goldberg and Huxley's 'model of Levels and Filters' and on Kleinman's framework of 'Popular, Folk and Professional health sectors'. Analysis also considered the changes in national mental health policy over time. RESULTS: 25 papers were found, with data ranging from 1989 to 2013. Complex social networks were involved in the initial recognition of MH issues. The preferred points of first contact also varied with the nature and severity of problems. A high proportion of patients is treated in specialized services, including mild cases. There is limited capacity of primary care professionals to identify and treat MH problems, with some improvement from collaborative care in the more recent years. The model for crisis management and acute care remains unclear: scarce evidence was found over the different arrangements used, mostly stressing lack of integration between emergency, hospital and community services and fragile continuity of care. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of primary care and the regulation of acute demands, especially crisis management, are the most critical aspects on PMHC. Although primary care performance seems to be improving, the balanced provision and integration between services for adequate acute and long-term care is yet to be achieved.

[Sustainable development goals and mental health]. / Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible y Salud Mental.

In 2015, the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) set the course for a more equitable distribution of resources globally. For the first time in history, this collective global commitment explicitly included mental health-related objectives, and manifested them as targets in the health SDG 3. This represents a unique opportunity to increase coverage and quality of services, especially in low- and middle-income countries, in which the current treatment gap surpasses 80% even for the most severe disorders. Importantly, although not explicitly highlighted in the SDGs, mental health is implicitly cross-linked to multiple of the other goals and targets, which stresses the importance of investing in improving population-level mental health as a pre-condition to: ending hunger, achieving food security and improved nutrition, and promoting sustainable agriculture (SDG 2); ensuring inclusive and equitable quality education and promoting life-long learning opportunities for all (SDG 4); promoting sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth (SDG 8); reducing inequality within and among countries (SDG 10); making cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable (SDG 11); promoting peaceful and inclusive societies (SDG 16); and, obviously, ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all at all ages (SDG 3). In this article, we revise the reasons why investing in, and improving, mental health systems and services, constitutes a fundamental step towards achieving the overall SDGs, and we highlight the role that civil society, NGOs, and academic organizations need to play to ensure that these commitments are fulfilled.

Adaptation of the Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation (BACE) scale to the Brazilian social and cultural context / Adaptação da Escala de Avaliação das Barreiras ao Acesso ao Cuidado (BACE) para o contexto social e cultural brasileiro

INTRODUCTION: A significant gap between the number of individuals who need mental health care and the ones who actually have access to it has been consistently demonstrated in studies conducted in different countries. Recognizing the barriers to care and their contributions to delaying or preventing access to mental health services is a key step to improve the management of mental health care. The Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation (BACE) scale is a 30-item self-report instrument conceived to evaluate obstacles to proper mental health care. The main constraint in the investigation of these barriers in Brazil is the lack of a reliable instrument to be used in the Brazilian social and cultural context. OBJECTIVE: To describe the translation and adaptation process of the BACE scale to the Brazilian social and cultural context. METHOD: The translation and adaptation process comprised the following steps: 1) translation from English to Brazilian Portuguese by two authors who are Brazilian Portuguese native speakers, one of whom is a psychiatrist; 2) evaluation, comparison and matching of the two preliminary versions by an expert committee; 3) back-translation to English by a sworn translator who is an English native speaker; 4) correction of the back-translated version by the authors of the original scale; 5) modifications and final adjustment of the Brazilian Portuguese version. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The processes of translation and adaptation described in this study were performed by the authors and resulted in the Brazilian version of a scale to evaluate barriers to access to mental health care (AU)

INTRODUÇÃO: Uma lacuna significativa entre o número de indivíduos que necessitam de cuidado na área de saúde mental e aqueles que efetivamente têm acesso a ela tem sido consistentemente demonstrada em estudos realizados em diferentes países. Reconhecer as barreiras ao cuidado e suas contribuições no sentido de retardar e até impedir o acesso a serviços de saúde mental é um passo essencial para melhorar o manejo em saúde mental. A escala Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation (BACE) é um instrumento de autorrelato, composto de 30 itens, concebido para avaliar os obstáculos ao cuidado adequado em saúde mental. O principal empecilho na investigação dessas barreiras no Brasil é a inexistência de um instrumento confiável para ser utilizado no contexto social e cultural brasileiro. Objetivo: Descrever o processo de tradução e adaptação da escala BACE para o contexto social e cultural brasileiro. MÉTODO: O processo de tradução e adaptação incluiu os seguintes passos: 1) tradução do inglês para o português brasileiro por dois autores, falantes nativos de português brasileiro, sendo que um deles é psiquiatra; 2) avaliação, comparação e correspondência das duas versões preliminares por um comitê especialista; 3) retrotradução para inglês por um tradutor juramentado, falante nativo de inglês; 4) correção da versão retrotraduzida pelos autores da escala original; 5) alterações e ajustes finais da versão em português brasileiro. RESULTADOS E CONCLUSÃO: Os processos de tradução e adaptação aqui descritos foram realizados pelos autores e resultaram na versão brasileira de uma escala para avaliar as barreiras ao acesso ao cuidado em saúde mental (AU)

Adaptation of the Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation (BACE) scale to the Brazilian social and cultural context.

INTRODUCTION: A significant gap between the number of individuals who need mental health care and the ones who actually have access to it has been consistently demonstrated in studies conducted in different countries. Recognizing the barriers to care and their contributions to delaying or preventing access to mental health services is a key step to improve the management of mental health care. The Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation (BACE) scale is a 30-item self-report instrument conceived to evaluate obstacles to proper mental health care. The main constraint in the investigation of these barriers in Brazil is the lack of a reliable instrument to be used in the Brazilian social and cultural context. OBJECTIVE: To describe the translation and adaptation process of the BACE scale to the Brazilian social and cultural context. METHOD: The translation and adaptation process comprised the following steps: 1) translation from English to Brazilian Portuguese by two authors who are Brazilian Portuguese native speakers, one of whom is a psychiatrist; 2) evaluation, comparison and matching of the two preliminary versions by an expert committee; 3) back-translation to English by a sworn translator who is an English native speaker; 4) correction of the back-translated version by the authors of the original scale; 5) modifications and final adjustment of the Brazilian Portuguese version. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The processes of translation and adaptation described in this study were performed by the authors and resulted in the Brazilian version of a scale to evaluate barriers to access to mental health care.

The development and psychometric properties of the Humanitarian Emergency Settings Perceived Needs (HESPER) Scale.

OBJECTIVES: We developed the Humanitarian Emergency Settings Perceived Needs (HESPER) Scale, a valid and reliable scale to rapidly assess perceived needs of populations in humanitarian settings in low- and middle-income countries. METHODS: We generated items through a literature review; reduced the number of items on the basis of a survey with humanitarian experts; pilot-tested the scale in Gaza, Jordan, Sudan, and the United Kingdom; and field-tested it in Haiti, Jordan, and Nepal. RESULTS: During field-testing, intraclass correlation coefficients (absolute agreement) for the total number of unmet needs were 0.998 in Jordan, 0.986 in Haiti, and 0.995 in Nepal (interrater reliability), and 0.961 in Jordan and 0.773 in Nepal (test-retest reliability). Cohen's κ for the 26 individual HESPER items ranged between 0.66 and 1.0 (interrater reliability) and between 0.07 and 1.0 (test-retest reliability) across sites. Most HESPER items correlated as predicted with related questions of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-100 (WHOQOL-100), and participants found items comprehensive and relevant, suggesting criterion (concurrent) validity and content validity. CONCLUSIONS: The HESPER Scale rapidly provides valid and reliable population-based data on perceived needs in humanitarian settings.

Boas práticas em saúde mental comunitária / Best practices in community mental health

Boas Práticas em Saúde Mental Comunitária é uma obra fundamental que visa auxiliar no estabelecimento, desenvolvimento e avaliação dos serviços modernos de saúde mental. Este livro fornece evidências relevantes que asseguram as melhores escolhas entre os diferentes modelos de cuidado e um guia passo a passo do que deve ser feito e como. Para tanto, os autores levam em consideração as necessidades das pessoas com transtornos mentais na população em geral, os recursos disponíveis e as principais exigências práticas, utilizando-se de exemplos de diversos países. Nesta obra também são explicadas as principais questões acerca dos acordos internacionais de direitos humanos e as diretivas da melhor maneira de se reduzir o estigma e a discriminação das pessoas com transtornos mentais.

Quais são os argumentos a favor da atenção comunitária à saúde mental? / What are the arguments for community based mental health care?

Transtornos mentais são responsáveis por aproximadamente 12-15% da desabilidade mundial total – mais que as doenças cardiovasculares, e duas vezes mais que o câncer. Seu impacto na vida diária é ainda mais amplo, respondendo por mais de 30% de todos os anos vividos com desabilidade. Achados: Não há argumentos convincentes ou dados que apóiem uma abordagem unicamente hospitalar. Também não há evidência científica de que serviços comunitários isoladamente podem prover integralidade na atenção. Ao contrário, a opinião dos profissionais e os resultados dos estudos disponíveis apóiam a atenção equilibrada. A atenção equilibrada é essencialmente comunitária, mas os hospitais têm um importante papel de retaguarda. Isto quer dizer que serviços de saúde mental são oferecidos nos contextos comunitários habituais próximos à população atendida, e internações hospitalares são tão breves quanto possível, disponibilizadas prontamente e empregadas somente quando necessário. É importante coordenar os esforços de uma diversidade de serviços de saúde mental, sejam estes governamentais, não-governamentais ou privados, e garantir que as interfaces entre eles funcionem de modo apropriado. (AU)

The issue: Mental disorders are responsible for about 12 - 15 % of the world’s total disability – more than cardiovascular diseases, and twice as much as cancer. Their impact on daily life is even more extensive, accounting for more than 30% of all years lived with disability. Findings: There are no persuasive arguments or data to support a hospital-only approach. Nor is there any scientific evidence that community services alone can provide satisfactory comprehensive care. Instead, the weight of professional opinion and results from available studies support balanced care. Balanced care is essentially community-based, but hospitals play an important backup role. This means that mental health services are provided in normal community settings close to the population served, and hospital stays are as brief as possible, arranged promptly and employed only when necessary. It is important to coordinate the efforts of various mental health services, whether governmental, nongovernmental or private, and to ensure that the interfaces between them function properly. Cost-effectiveness studies on the institutionalization and of community mental health care teams have demonstrated that quality of care is closely related to expenditure. Community-based mental health services generally cost the same as the hospital-based services they replace. Policy considerations: The priorities and policy goals for a particular country depend largely on the financial resources available. Low-resource countries should focus on establishing and improving mental health services within primary care settings, using specialist services as a backup. (AU)