ABSTRACT
Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 significantly elevate the risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer. Limited data exists regarding the prevalence of BRCA mutations, and optimal, cost-effective testing strategies in developing countries like India. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of a Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) panel for BRCA1/2 mutation testing among women diagnosed with, or at risk of developing hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. We also aimed to identify population specific BRCA1/2 mutation hotspots, to enable the development of more affordable testing strategies. We identified 921 patients with breast and ovarian cancer who underwent mutation testing. The target enrichment was followed by targeted NGS in 772 patients and an allele-specific PCR (ASPCR) based genotyping for BRCA1:c.68_69delAG (or 185delAG), was carried out in 149 patients. We identified 188 (20.4%) patients with BRCA1/2 variants: 118 (62.8%) with pathogenic/likely pathogenic and 70 (37.2%) with VUS. The 185delAG was identified as a recurrent mutation in the Southern Indian population, accounting for 24.6% of the pathogenic variants. In addition, a family history of breast, ovary, pancreas, or prostate (BOPP) cancer was found to be associated with an increased risk of identifying a deleterious BRCA1/2 variant [OR = 2.11 (95% CI 1.45-3.07) p ≤ 0.001]. These results suggest that Targeted NGS is a sensitive and specific strategy for BRCA testing. For Southern Indian patients, a two-tiered approach can be considered: Initial screening with ASPCR for BRCA1 185delAG followed by NGS for those testing negative. Expanding the gene panel and identifying other population-specific mutation hot spots is a promising area with potential for improvements in testing and treatment strategies.
ABSTRACT
We assessed the efficacy, tolerability, and cost-effectiveness of a novel neoadjuvant regimen comprising docetaxel-cyclophosphamide alternating with epirubicin-cisplatin (ddDCEP) administered biweekly for 16 weeks in 116 patients with early triple-negative breast cancer. This regimen achieved a high pathological complete response (ypT0/TisN0) rate of 55.2% and favorable survival outcomes (30-month event-free survival, 91.2%; overall survival, 97%). Febrile neutropenia was observed in 4.3% of patients, and 98% completed at least six of eight cycles. ddDCEP was more cost-effective than contemporary carboplatin-based regimens. This novel approach offers an economically viable and effective alternative to current chemoimmunotherapy regimens, and merits further investigation.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Docetaxel/therapeutic use , Epirubicin/therapeutic use , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Platinum/therapeutic use , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Taxoids/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Neoadjuvant TherapyABSTRACT
Patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) have limited therapeutic options and poor survival. There is a need for the development of newer therapies. Sodium valproic acid (VPA) is a short-chain fatty acid histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor with antitumor activity in preclinical models of PROC. Synergism with conventional cytotoxic agents like etoposide has been demonstrated. In this prospective, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study, we included patients ≥ 18 years with histologically or cytologically confirmed PROC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) 0-3. Patients received oral VPA 60 mg/kg/day in three divided doses for 3 days (D1-D3), followed by oral etoposide 50 mg once daily for two consecutive weeks (D4-D17). Serum samples were collected to assess peak VPA drug levels. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. We sought to show an improvement in response rate from 25% (historically with oral etoposide) to 40% with the addition of VPA. 27 patients were enrolled in the study, and 18 [median age: 52 (45-59) years; serous histology:17 (94%); ECOG-PS 2 or 3: 14 (78%)] were evaluable for the response after 4 months. Nine patients were lost from follow-up before achieving the primary endpoint (mainly due to Covid-related lockdown issues). The median number of prior lines of treatment was 2 (1-3). ORR was 0% according to GCIG criteria. The disease was stable in two patients [clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 11%]. The median OS and PFS were 7 months and 2 months, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were reported in 6 (33%) patients. The addition of valproic acid to oral etoposide in patients with PROC and poor general condition was not helpful and failed to improve responses compared to those historically achieved with single-agent etoposide. However, further phase 2 randomized controlled trials with larger sample size can be done to confirm the findings.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lymphoma, Follicular , Ovarian Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Communicable Disease Control , Cytotoxins , Etoposide , Female , Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors , Histone Deacetylases , Humans , Middle Aged , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Sodium , Valproic Acid/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery for gastric cancer improves survival but is difficult to administer due to poor tolerance. Combination chemotherapy with Docetaxel (Taxotere), Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) and Capecitabine (Xeloda) (TEX) is used in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. The efficacy and tolerability of this regimen (TEX) post resection of gastric cancer have not been studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma, post resection without any prior chemotherapy between July 2007 and May 2011 and treated with TEX regimen administered as T 35 mg/m2 and E 50 mg/m2 on days (d) 1, 8 and X 625 mg/m2 bid (twice daily) on d 1-14 every 21 days were included in this retrospective analysis. Patient's electronic medical records were studied and data on tolerance, progressionfree survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was collected. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were treated with adjuvant TEX chemotherapy, majority 40 (68%) had distal gastric cancer. All patients underwent a D1 gastrectomy, and resection was performed for 44 (75%). Only 14 (24%) patients had more than 15 nodes studied in the resected specimen. Distribution for stages I, II and III is 14 (24%), 30 (52%) and 14 (24%), respectively. After a median follow-up of 40 months, the 3-year relapse free survival was 58% (95% CI: 42-68), and estimated median OS was 71 months (95% CI: 19-123 months). Twenty-three (40%) required dose reduction due to toxicity. Grade 3 or 4 toxicity was recorded for 22 (37%). Half (52%) of patients completed all planned chemotherapy of six cycles. CONCLUSION: Post resection of gastric adenocarcinoma adjuvant triplet TEX chemotherapy is a feasible and effective outpatient regimen. Diarrhoea, neutropenia and neuropathy were the common dose limiting toxicity. Post-surgery only half the numbers of patients are able to complete all planned cycles.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer is associated with poor prognosis and access to anti-HER2 treatment is still a challenge in lower-middle income countries. The availability of the biosimilar trastuzumab has improved access by lowering the costs. We report the pattern of use of neoadjuvant ± adjuvant trastuzumab and outcomes in patients with HER2-positive non-metastatic breast cancer treated with regimens incorporating shorter durations of therapy and the use of the biosimilar trastuzumab compared to the innovator. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with non-metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant ± adjuvant trastuzumab (innovator (n = 34 (33%)) and biosimilar (n = 70 (67%)) manufactured by Biocon Biologics) with chemotherapy. Information regarding chemotherapy regimens, duration of trastuzumab use (≤12 weeks and >12 weeks), pathological response (Miller Payne grade), disease free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and safety data were collected from electronic medical records. RESULTS: A total of 135 patients were analysed with a median age of 51 years (range: 23-82); of these, 57% were postmenopausal, 31.8% were hormone receptor positive and 62.9% had stage III disease. The overall pathological complete response (p-CR) in both breast and axilla increased to 37.6% in patients treated with trastuzumab preoperatively as compared to 22.2% in patients who did not receive any trastuzumab. Patients receiving innovator trastuzumab and biosimilar trastuzumab showed a p-CR of 28.5% and 41.7%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 42 months (range: 3-114), there were 18 relapses and 11 deaths. The 3-year DFS was 87.1% and OS was 92.2%. Cardiac dysfunction developed in 4 of 78 (5.1%) evaluable patients. CONCLUSION: Access to anti-HER2 therapy in the treatment of non-metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer in resource-constrained settings has improved significantly with the availability of the biosimilar trastuzumab. Imbalances in patient profiles at baseline in routine clinical practice led to inconclusive outcomes of ≤12 weeks versus >12 weeks trastuzumab treatment. However, on the basis of historical data, patients could be offered shorter duration of trastuzumab when a standard 1-year treatment of adjuvant trastuzumab is not feasible in resource-constrained settings. The p-CR using the biosimilar trastuzumab in neoadjuvant treatment has been observed to be comparable to the innovator trastuzumab.
ABSTRACT
Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCLs) constitute 40% of all non-Hodgkin lymphoma and it represent a heterogeneous group of neoplasms rather than a single clinicopathological entity. We analysed the outcomes and clinical features based on the cell of origin in a series of patients with DLBCL from our institute. Medical case records of all newly diagnosed DLBCL treated in our institute from January 2015 to July 2017 were analysed for this study. Cell of origin classification was based on immunohistochemistry using Hans algorithm. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to determine survival. Ninety-five patients were diagnosed to have DLBCL subtype. Immunophenotypic subtyping was available for 71 patients. The median age at diagnosis was 56 years with no difference between Germinal centre B cell (GCB) and non-Germinal centre B cell (non-GCB) subtypes. Approximately 44% of patients had extra-nodal disease, stomach being the commonest site. Forty percent of patients had stage III/IV disease. Bulky disease and extra-nodal presentation was predominantly seen with non-GCB subtype (46% vs 20% and 36% vs 29% respectively). Rituximab was used in 75% of the patients with DLBCL. The 2-year disease-free survival was 70% versus 53% (p = 0.38) in GCB versus non-GCB subtype. This is one of the few data on DLBCL patients reported from India which has described outcomes based on the cell of origin. The disease-free survival in our country appears to be superior in GCB subtype which needs to be confirmed in a larger subset of patients.