Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Phys Med ; 123: 103405, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38870645

ABSTRACT

The effect of mammography measurement conditions was investigated to evaluate their impact on measurement uncertainties in clinical practice. The most prominent physical X-ray beam quantities i.e., - air kerma, half-value layer, and X-ray tube voltage - were examined by measuring the response of two ionization chambers and six X-ray multimeters (XMMs) of different models. Measurements were performed using several anode/filter combinations and both with and without the compression paddle in the X-ray beam. Maximum differences of higher than 6 % were found for all quantities when the dosimeter displayed value was compared with the reference value or the variation within the clinical anode/filter combinations Mo/Mo and Mo/Rh were considered. The study showed that the calibration procedure with the W/Al anode/filter combination was reliable only for ionization chambers, and the response of XMMs varies in such a way that the calibration coefficient cannot be predicted between various measurement conditions used in calibration and clinical practices. XMM calibrations are typically performed without a compression paddle in the beam, and the response of the XMM changes when radiation quality is slightly altered. If XMM specific data is not available, based on this study, an additional uncertainty of 2 % (k = 1) could be used as a typical estimate, at least for air kerma measurements. XMMs should be used for clinical measurements in mammography only with correct settings. If the correct settings are not available, the XMMs should not be used or used only with extreme caution.


Subject(s)
Mammography , Mammography/instrumentation , Calibration , Uncertainty , Radiometry/instrumentation , Radiation Dosimeters
2.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 200(9): 842-847, 2024 Jun 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38828501

ABSTRACT

Imaging parameters, frequencies and resulting patient organ doses in treatments of prostate cancer were assessed in Finnish radiotherapy centres. Based on a questionnaire to the clinics, Monte Carlo method was used to estimate organ doses in International Commission on Radiological Protection standard phantom for prostate, bladder, rectum and femoral head. The results show that doses from cone beam computed tomography imaging have reduced compared to earlier studies and are between 3.6 and 34.5 mGy per image for the above-mentioned organs and for normal sized patients. There still is room for further optimization of the patient exposure, as many centres use the default imaging parameters, and the length of the imaged region may not be optimal for the purpose.


Subject(s)
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Monte Carlo Method , Patient Positioning , Prostatic Neoplasms , Radiotherapy Dosage , Humans , Male , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Finland , Radiation Dosage , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Organs at Risk/radiation effects , Rectum/radiation effects , Urinary Bladder/radiation effects , Urinary Bladder/diagnostic imaging , Femur Head/radiation effects , Prostate/radiation effects , Prostate/diagnostic imaging
3.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 199(13): 1423-1430, 2023 Aug 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37491894

ABSTRACT

In radiation beam-profile measurements, an accurate positioning of the detector with high position resolution is essential. For this purpose, we built a scanning device capable of moving a detector in three dimensions (3D) using mainly parts from a commercial 3D-printer. The accuracy and repeatability of movement was tested with caliper, laser displacement sensor and repeated 60Co beam-profile measurements in a water phantom. The results from the caliper and the sensor showed position accuracy for the scanner to be better than $\pm$150 µm. The standard deviation of the error in position from laser sensor measurements was approximately 30 µm, and the beam profile scans showed a maximum deviation from the mean position of 50 µm. The effect of volume averaging correction factors on 60Co beam-profile was investigated with two different sized ionization chambers. The differences in the profiles were reduced significantly after applying the correction factors.


Subject(s)
Radiometry , Water , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiometry/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL