ABSTRACT
Aim: Pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has an unfavorable prognosis; therefore, making accurate predictions of outcomes is crucial for tailoring treatment plans. The termination of resuscitation rules must accurately predict unfavorable outcomes. In this study, we aimed to assess if the current termination of resuscitation rules for adults can predict factors associated with unfavorable outcomes in pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and examine the relationship between these factors and unfavorable outcomes. Methods: A retrospective nationwide cohort study of pediatric cases registered in the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine Multicenter Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Registry from June 1, 2014, to December 31, 2020, was conducted. The association between the current termination of resuscitation rules and outcomes, such as 30-day mortality and unfavorable 30-day neurological outcomes following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, was evaluated. Results: A total of 1,216 participants were included. The positive predictive value for predicting 30-day mortality for each termination of resuscitation rule exceeded 0.9. The specificity and positive predictive value for predicting unfavorable 30-day neurological outcomes were 1.00, indicating that no rules identified favorable outcomes. Factors such as no bystander witness, no return of spontaneous circulation before hospital arrival, no automated external defibrillator or defibrillator use, and no bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation were associated with poor 30-day mortality and neurological outcomes. Conclusion: Adult termination of resuscitation rules had a high positive predictive value for predicting pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. However, surviving cases make it challenging to use these rules for end-of-resuscitation decisions, indicating the need for identifying new rules to help predict neurological outcomes.