Characteristics of peripheral refractive errors in eyes of patients with non-amblyopic myopic anisometropia.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to investigate relative peripheral refractive (RPR) characteristics in children with non-amblyopic myopic anisometropia and explore potential associations between relative peripheral refractive errors (RPRE) and myopia. METHODS: Relative peripheral refractive errors were assessed in 64 children diagnosed with non-amblyopic myopic anisometropia utilizing multispectral refraction topography (MRT). Two eyes of each patient were divided into into the more myopia eyes group (ME) and the fellow eyes group (FE). Evaluated parameters encompassed total defocus values (TRDV), defocus values at eccentricities spanning 0 to 15 degrees (RDV-15), 0 to 30 degrees (RDV-30), 0 to 45 degrees (RDV-45), as well as superior (RDV-S), inferior (RDV-I), temporal (RDV-T), and nasal (RDV-N) positions. RESULTS: The study revealed a noteworthy contrast in TRDV values between Group ME (0.52 ± 0.36) and Group FE (0.17 ± 0.41), with a substantial significance (P < 0.0001). While no significant RDV-15 difference emerged between Group ME (0.01 ± 0.05) and Group FE (-0.01 ± 0.07) (P > 0.05), a meaningful RDV-30 difference existed between Group ME (0.11 ± 0.14) and Group FE (0.03 ± 0.19) (P = 0.0017). A significant discrepancy in RDV-45 was also observed between Group ME (0.39 ± 0.29) and Group FE (0.13 ± 0.34) (P < 0.001). Notably, RDV-I and RDV-T positions demonstrated marked differences between Group ME and Group FE (P < 0.0001), whereas no significant disparity was noted in RDV-S and RDV-N positions (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Eyes exhibiting greater myopia manifested more hyperopic peripheral defocus in the context of anisometropia. MRT as a novel ophthalmic evaluation technique, holds promising potential for broader clinical applications in the future.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of removing bandage contact lenses on the fourth and seventh postoperative day after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy.

Purpose: To compare the differences in the removal of bandage contact lenses (BCLs) at 4 and 7 days after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) in term of visual rehabilitation, eye discomfort, and postoperative complications. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with myopia undergoing TransPRK; in Group 1, the BCLs were removed on the 4th postoperative day, while in Group 2, the BCLs were removed on the 7th postoperative day. All patients underwent a 6-month follow-up, including slit-lamp examination and visual acuity assessment. Subjective evaluations of pain and eye discomfort were recorded after the BCLs removal. Results: In total, 376 eyes of 191 patients in Group 1 and 346 eyes of 177 patients in Group 2 were enrolled. The two groups were matched for sex, age, preoperative corrected distance visual acuity, and tear film break-up time. Patients in Group 1 exhibited slightly lower levels of myopia, resulting in a shallower ablation depth and shorter ablation time than those in Group 2. No statistically significant differences in visual acuity recovery, haze severity, and incidence of infectious keratitis were observed within 6 months after surgery between the two groups. However, patients in Group 2 experienced significantly fewer discomfort symptoms (discharge, foreign body sensation, and blurred vision) after BCLs removal than patients in Group 1 and had fewer postoperative complications (recurrent corneal epithelial erosion). Conclusion: Delayed removal of the BCLs one week after TransPRK effectively alleviated early discomfort symptoms and reduced the risk of recurrent corneal epithelial erosion without increasing the likelihood of infectious keratitis.

[A design of refractometer based on blur circle].

OBJECTIVE: Design a convenient and stable eye refractometer based on the theory of blur circle. METHODS: Analyze the retinal blur circle in both Emsly reduced eye model and Liou & Brennan 1997 eye model by ZEMAX. Design the coefficients including PD (pupil diameter) and NO' (length between node point and fovea) with the purpose of improving the accuracy. At last, compare the clinical optometry data from this refractor with the data obtained from optometry hospital in Wenzhou. RESULTS: The blur circle diameters are nearly the same in both reduced eye model and the Liou & Brennan 1997 eye model. With the PD = 4 mm and NO' = 20 mm, the refractor shows a fine accuracy in optometry. The paired t test shows that the myopia group and the astigmatism axial direction group have no statistical difference between the data from the blur circle refractor and the hospital (P > 0.05), while the astigmatism degree group has the result of P = 0.41 which may be caused by the poor cooperation of pediatric patients. 80% of the astigmatism degree data differ from the data from the hospital in less than 0.75D. CONCLUSION: The blur circle refractor, with the features of convenience and fine accuracy, is promised to be a new style of refractometer in the future.