Fragility Fractures: Diagnosis and Treatment.

Fragility fractures are estimated to affect 3 million people annually in the United States. As they are associated with a significant mortality rate, the prevention of these fractures should be a priority for orthopedists. At-risk patients include the elderly and those with thyroid disease, diabetes, hypertension, and heart disease. Osteoporosis is diagnosed by the presence of a fragility fracture or by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in the absence of a fragility fracture. In 2011, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended that all women ≥65 years should be screened for osteoporosis by DXA. Women <65 years with a 10-year fracture risk =∕> than that of a 65-year-old white woman should also be screened for osteoporosis. Lifestyle changes, such as calcium and vitamin D supplementation, exercise, and smoking cessation, are non-pharmacologic treatment options. The National Osteoporosis Foundation recommends treating osteoporosis with pharmacotherapy in patients with a high risk for fracture (T score <-2.5) or history of fragility fracture. Understanding risk factors and eliminating medications known to cause decreased BMD are vital to prevention and will be necessary to limit these fractures and their associated expenses in the future.

Proximal Periprosthetic Femur Fractures: Strategies for Internal Fixation.

As the number of patients living with total hip arthroplasty continues to rise, there will be an increase in periprosthetic fractures requiring surgical treatment. Treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures below a well-fixed hip arthroplasty stem presents a unique set of challenges. A review of the existing literature on surgical technique, including plate selection and configuration, proximal fixation options, and use of allograft, can serve to guide treatment of these challenging injuries. While not conclusive, the literature supports using soft tissue preserving techniques, bicortical proximal fixation, and fixation spanning the length of the femur.

Effect of computerized tomography on classification and treatment plan for patellar fractures.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of computerized tomography (CT) scan on both fracture classification and surgical planning of patellar fractures. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Academic level I trauma center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons analyzed radiographs of 41 patellar fractures. Each fracture was classified (OTA/AO classification), and a treatment plan was developed using plain radiographs alone. The process was repeated (4-6 weeks later) with addition of CT scan. After 12 months, the 2-step analysis was repeated and interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility were assessed. RESULTS: Suboptimal intra- and interobserver reliability was found for the surgical plan and classification using the OTA/AO system, despite the addition of a CT scan. After addition of CT, reviewers modified the classification in 66% of cases and treatment plan in 49%. CT frequently demonstrated a distinctive and severely comminuted distal pole fracture; this fracture pattern was present in 88% of cases and was unappreciated on plain radiographs in 44% of those cases. This pattern is unaccounted for by the present OTA/AO classification. CONCLUSIONS: CT facilitates improved delineation of patellar fracture patterns. Understanding the distal pole fracture pattern is fundamental in choosing a fixation construct. A fracture-specific classification system, based on CT scans, should be developed.

Sciatic nerve release following fracture or reconstructive surgery of the acetabulum. Surgical technique.

BACKGROUND: Sciatic neuropathy associated with acetabular fractures can result in disabling long-term symptoms. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effect of sciatic nerve release on sciatic neuropathy associated with acetabular fractures and reconstructive acetabular surgery. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2004, ten patients with sciatic neuropathy associated with an acetabular fracture were treated with release of the sciatic nerve from scar tissue and heterotopic bone. Additional surgical procedures included open reduction and internal fixation of the acetabulum (five patients), removal of hardware and total hip arthroplasty (three patients), and removal of hardware alone (one patient). The average age of the patients was forty-three years. All patients were followed with serial examinations and assessments for a minimum of one year (average, twenty-six months). RESULTS: All patients had partial to complete relief of radicular pain, of diminished sensation, and of paresthesias after the nerve release. Four of seven patients with motor loss and two of five patients with a footdrop demonstrated improvement in function after the nerve release. No patient had evidence of worsening on neurologic examination after the release. CONCLUSIONS: Sciatic nerve release during reconstructive acetabular surgery can decrease the sensory symptoms of preoperative sciatic neuropathy associated with a previous acetabular fracture. Motor symptoms, however, are less likely to resolve following nerve release.

Long-term consequences of pelvic trauma patients with thromboembolic disease treated with inferior vena caval filters.

BACKGROUND: The use of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters for prevention of pulmonary embolism (PE) in high-risk trauma patients is well accepted. High rates of recurrent venous thrombosis, however, and postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) have been reported in nonsurgical patients with medical comorbidities. Patients with pelvic trauma and thromboembolic disease have a unique thrombogenic pathophysiology, and the long-term consequences of filter placement in these patients are unknown. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of patients who sustained pelvic trauma, and who developed venous thrombosis and were treated with a vena caval filter. METHODS: A cohort of 102 consecutive patients was treated for a pelvic or acetabular fracture who developed deep vein thrombosis (DVT) preoperatively and had a caval filter placed. Thromboembolic events and complications were evaluated by both retrospective chart review and a prospective questionnaire. Eighty-eight patients (86%) returned the questionnaire at an average follow-up of 4 years. RESULTS: No patients were readmitted to the hospital for recurrent venous thrombosis or PE. Six patients (7%) described new swelling in the lower extremities, and one (1%) demonstrated evidence of PTS. No deaths occurred related to PE. CONCLUSIONS: The use of IVC filters appears to be safe and effective in preventing PE in patients with pelvic trauma and established venous thrombosis. The risk of recurrent DVT is low and PTS is negligible in these patients. Filter placement use is not associated with the same long-term complications as in patients with thrombosis because of chronic medical comorbidities.

Sciatic nerve release following fracture or reconstructive surgery of the acetabulum.

BACKGROUND: Sciatic neuropathy associated with acetabular fractures can result in disabling long-term symptoms. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effect of sciatic nerve release on sciatic neuropathy associated with acetabular fractures and reconstructive acetabular surgery. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2004, ten patients with sciatic neuropathy associated with an acetabular fracture were treated with release of the sciatic nerve from scar tissue and heterotopic bone. Additional surgical procedures included open reduction and internal fixation of the acetabulum (five patients), removal of hardware and total hip arthroplasty (three patients), and removal of hardware alone (one patient). The average age of the patients was forty-three years. All patients were followed with serial examinations and assessments for a minimum of one year (average, twenty-six months). RESULTS: All patients had partial to complete relief of radicular pain, of diminished sensation, and of paresthesias after the nerve release. Four of seven patients with motor loss and two of five patients with a footdrop demonstrated improvement in function after the nerve release. No patient had evidence of worsening on neurologic examination after the release. CONCLUSIONS: Sciatic nerve release during reconstructive acetabular surgery can decrease the sensory symptoms of preoperative sciatic neuropathy associated with a previous acetabular fracture. Motor symptoms, however, are less likely to resolve following nerve release.

Plate fixation of ununited humeral shaft fractures: effect of type of bone graft on healing.

BACKGROUND: Delayed union or nonunion of a fracture of the humerus is an infrequent but debilitating complication. Open reduction and internal fixation combined with autologous bone-grafting can result in reliable healing of the fracture; however, there is morbidity associated with the bone-graft donor site. This study was designed to evaluate healing of ununited fractures of the humeral shaft treated by one surgeon at one institution with a strict and consistent surgical protocol but with the use of two different types of bone graft: autologous iliac crest bone graft and demineralized bone matrix. METHODS: A consecutive retrospective cohort series was analyzed. From 1992 to 1999, forty-five patients with an aseptic, atrophic delayed union or nonunion of a humeral shaft fracture were treated with open reduction and internal fixation with a plate and autologous iliac crest bone graft. The mean time from the fracture to the surgery was 14.0 months, and the mean duration of follow-up was 32.8 months. From 2000 to 2003, thirty-three patients with the same condition were treated with the same protocol with the exception that demineralized bone matrix was used instead of autologous iliac crest bone graft. The mean time from the fracture to the surgery in that group was 22.6 months, and the mean duration of follow-up was 20.4 months. All patients in both groups were assessed clinically and radiographically. RESULTS: Osseous union was noted clinically and radiographically following the index surgery in 100% of the forty-five patients treated with autologous bone graft and 97% (thirty-two) of the thirty-three patients treated with demineralized bone matrix. The mean time to union was 4.5 months in the group treated with autologous bone graft and 4.2 months in the group treated with demineralized bone matrix. The overall functional outcome did not differ between the groups; however, twenty (44%) of the autologous bone-graft recipients had donor site morbidity, including a prolonged pain in the majority and a superficial infection requiring irrigation and débridement in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Healing of an ununited humeral shaft fracture can be achieved consistently with rigid plate fixation and lag-screw compression augmented with either autologous cancellous bone graft or commercially available demineralized bone matrix. The harvest of the autologous bone graft is frequently associated with complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Orthopaedic trauma in the pregnant patient.

Trauma affects up to 8% of pregnancies and is the leading cause of death among pregnant women in the United States. A pregnancy test is mandated for all females of childbearing age who are involved in trauma. Orthopaedic trauma in the pregnant patient is managed similarly to that for all trauma patients. Initial resuscitation efforts should focus on the pregnant patient because stable patient vital signs provide the best chance for fetal survival. In the stable patient, fetal assessment and a pelvic examination are mandatory. Radiographs as well as abdominal ultrasound of the patient and fetal ultrasound are useful. No known biologic risks are associated with magnetic resonance imaging, and no specific fetal abnormalities have been linked with standard low-intensity magnetic resonance imaging. Emergency surgery can be safely performed in most pregnant patients. Avoiding patient hypotension and using left lateral decubitus positioning increase the likelihood of success for the patient and fetus. An experienced multidisciplinary team consisting of an obstetrician, perinatologist, orthopaedic surgeon, anesthesiologist, radiologist, and nursing staff will optimize the treatment of both the pregnant patient and her fetus.