Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring using a multi-sensor probe lowers the risk of esophageal injury in cryo and radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring is a commonly used strategy to reduce esophageal thermal injury in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AFib). OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare the incidence of endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (EDEL) between two commonly used esophageal luminal temperature probes. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing ablation with esophageal luminal temperature monitoring and upper endoscopy within 24 h after ablation were included. RESULTS: Four hundred forty-five patients (64 ± 10 years, 44% female) were included. Esophageal temperature monitoring was done with a single-sensor probe in 213 (48%) and multi-sensor probe in 232 (52%). Cryoballoon (CB) ablation was performed in 118 (27%) and radiofrequency (RF) ablation in 327 (73%) of patients. EDEL was present in 94 (22.9%) of which 85 were mild, 8 were moderate, and 1 was severe, and none progressed to atrial-esophageal fistula. The use of the multi-sensor probe during CB ablation was associated with a reduction in EDEL compared to single sensor (6.8% vs 24.3%; P = 0.016). Similarly, in the RF ablation group, EDEL was present in 19.5% of the multi-sensor group vs 32.8% in the single-sensor group (P = 0.001). Logistic regression showed that multi-sensor probe use was associated with reduction in EDEL with an odds ratio of 0.23 in CB ablation (P = 0.024) and 0.44 for RF ablation (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring during AFib ablation using a multi-sensor probe was associated with a significant reduction in EDEL compared to a single-sensor probe.

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation results in significant QTc prolongation in the postoperative period.

BACKGROUND: The corrected QT interval (QTc) is a measure of ventricular repolarization time, and a prolonged QTc increases risk for malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) may increase QTc but its effects have not been well studied. OBJECTIVE: Determine the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of patients presenting for PVI in sinus and atrial fibrillation with postoperative QTc prolongation in a large cohort. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective study of consecutive atrial fibrillation ablations. QTc durations using Bazett correction were obtained from electrocardiograms at different postoperative intervals and compared to preoperative QTc. We studied clinical outcomes including clinically significant ventricular arrhythmia and death. A multivariable model was used to identify factors associated with clinically significant QTc prolongation, defined as ΔQTc ≥60 ms or new QTc duration ≥500 ms. RESULTS: A total of 352 PVIs were included in this study. We observed a statistically significant increase in mean QTc compared to baseline (446.3 ± 37.8 ms) on postoperative day (POD)0 (471.7 ± 38.2 ms, P < .001) and at POD1 (456.5 ± 35.0 ms, P < .001). There was no significant difference at 1 month (452.4 ± 33.5 ms, P = .39) and 3 months (447.3 ± 40.0 ms, P = .78). Sixty-six patients (19.2%) developed ΔQTc ≥60 ms or QTc ≥500 ms on POD0, with 4.1% persisting past 90 days. Female sex (odds ratio [OR] = 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.01-3.29, P = .047) and history of coronary artery disease (OR = 2.16, 95% CI = 1.03-4.55, P = .042) were independently predictive of QTc prolongation ≥500 ms or ΔQTc ≥60 ms. There were no episodes of clinically significant ventricular arrhythmia or death attributable to arrhythmia. CONCLUSION: QTc duration increased significantly immediately post-PVI and returned to baseline by 1 month. PVI did not provoke significant ventricular arrhythmias in our cohort.

Esophageal Thermal Injury Following Cryoballoon Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the rate and predictors of endoscopically detected esophageal thermal lesions (EDEL) in patients who underwent cryoballoon atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation (CBA). BACKGROUND: EDEL is a known complication of catheter ablation for AF and is the inciting factor for atrial esophageal fistula formation. METHODS: An observational study was conducted of patients with AF presenting for CBA. Pre-procedural magnetic resonance imaging was used to retrospectively evaluate the distance between the atrial endocardium and the esophageal lumen (AED). Intraprocedural esophageal luminal temperature and balloon temperatures were recorded. All patients underwent upper endoscopy (EGD) 24 h post-ablation. Clinical, anatomical, and ablation parameters were analyzed using logistic regression for association with thermal injury. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients (37% women; 71% paroxysmal AF) were included in the study. Esophageal thermal injury was detected on EGD in 21 patients (22%). EDEL was mostly mild (20 of 21 patients) and severe in only 1 of 21 patients. Univariate logistic regression identified gastroesophageal reflux disease to be associated with increased risk of thermal injury (odds ratio [OR]: 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00 to 10.46; p = 0.04), whereas a wider AED was protective (OR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.515; p = 0.002). Esophageal wall thickness was also protective (OR: 0.04; 95% CI: 0.002 to 0.864; p = 0.04). In multivariate analysis, only AED (OR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.77; p = 0.018) and obesity (OR: 4.63; 95% CI: 1.13 to 18.97; p = 0.033) were associated with EDEL. Esophageal luminal temperature, number, and duration of cryoballoon applications and balloon temperature were not predictors of EDEL. CONCLUSIONS: EDEL following CBA occurred in 22% of patients and was mostly mild. Obesity and atrioesophageal distance were independently associated with increased risk.