Does spinopelvic alignment affect femoral head cartilage and the proximal femoral physis in slipped capital femoral epiphysis? A finite element analysis.

BACKGROUND: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis is a prevalent pediatric hip disorder. Recent studies suggest the spine's sagittal profile may influence the proximal femoral growth plate's slippage, an aspect not extensively explored. This study utilizes finite element analysis to investigate how various spinopelvic alignments affect shear stress and growth plate slip. METHODS: A finite element model was developed from CT scans of a healthy adult male lumbar spine, pelvis, and femurs. The model was subjected to various sagittal alignments through reorientation. Simulations of two-leg stance, one-leg stance, walking heel strike, ascending stairs heel strike, and descending stairs heel strike were conducted. Parameters measured included hip joint contact area, stress, and maximum growth plate Tresca (shear) stress. FINDINGS: Posterior pelvic tilt cases indicated larger shear stresses compared to the anterior pelvic tilt variants except in two leg stance. Two leg stance resulted in decreases in the posterior tilted pelvi variants hip contact and growth plate Tresca stress compared to anterior tilted pelvi, however a combination of posterior pelvic tilt and high pelvic incidence indicated larger shear stresses on the growth plate. One leg stance and heal strike resulted in higher shear stress on the growth plate in posterior pelvic tilt variants compared to anterior pelvic tilt, with a combination of posterior pelvic tilt and high pelvic incidence resulting in the largest shear. INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that posterior pelvic tilt and high pelvic incidence may lead to increased shear stress at the growth plate. Activities performed in patients with these alignments may predispose to biomechanical loading that shears the growth plate, potentially leading to slip.

Pelvic Ring Fractures: A Biomechanical Comparison of Sacral and Lumbopelvic Fixation Techniques.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Pelvic ring fractures are becoming more common in the aging population and can prove to be fatal, having mortality rates between 10% and 16%. Stabilization of these fractures is challenging and often require immediate internal fixation. Therefore, it is necessary to have a biomechanical understanding of the different fixation techniques for pelvic ring fractures. METHODS: A previously validated three-dimensional finite element model of the lumbar spine, pelvis, and femur was used for this study. A unilateral pelvic ring fracture was simulated by resecting the left side of the sacrum and pelvis. Five different fixation techniques were used to stabilize the fracture. A compressive follower load and pure moment was applied to compare different biomechanical parameters including range of motion (contralateral sacroiliac joint, L1-S1 segment, L5-S1 segment), and stresses (L5-S1 nucleus stresses, instrument stresses) between different fixation techniques. RESULTS: Trans-iliac-trans-sacral screw fixation at S1 and S2 showed the highest stabilization for horizontal and vertical displacement at the sacral fracture site and reduction of contralateral sacroiliac joint for bending and flexion range of motion by 165% and 121%, respectively. DTSF (Double transiliac rod and screw fixation) model showed highest stabilization in horizontal displacement at the pubic rami fracture site, while the L5_PF_W_CC (L5-Ilium posterior screw fixation with cross connectors) and L5_PF_WO_CC (L5-Ilium posterior screw fixation without cross connectors) showed higher rod stresses, reduced L1-S1 (approximately 28%), and L5-S1 (approximately 90%) range of motion. CONCLUSIONS: Longer sacral screw fixations were superior in stabilizing sacral and contralateral sacroiliac joint range of motion. Lumbopelvic fixations displayed a higher degree of stabilization in the horizontal displacement compared to vertical displacement of pubic rami fracture, while also indicating the highest rod stresses. When determining the surgical approach for pelvic ring fractures, patient-specific factors should be accounted for to weigh the advantages and disadvantages for each technique.

Biomechanical Effects of Thoracic Flexibility and Stiffness on Lumbar Spine Loading: A Finite Element Analysis Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of thoracic stiffness on mechanical stress in the lumbar spine during motion. METHODS: To evaluate the effect of preoperative thoracic flexibility, stiff and flexible spine models were created by changing the material properties of ligaments and discs in the thoracic spine. Total laminectomy was performed at L4/5 in stiff and flexible models. A biomechanical investigation and finite element analysis were performed preoperatively and postoperatively. A hybrid loading condition was applied, and the range of motion (ROM) at each segment and maximum stress in the discs and pars interarticularis were computed. RESULTS: In the preoperative model with the stiff thoracic spine, lumbar disc stress, lumbar ROM, and pars interarticularis stress at L5 increased. In contrast, as the thoracic spine became more flexible, lumbar disc stress, lumbar ROM, and pars interarticularis stress at L5 decreased. All L4/5 laminectomy models had increased instability and ROM at L4/5. To evaluate the effect of thoracic flexibility on the lumbar spine, differences between the stiff and flexible thoracic spine were examined: Differences in ROM and intervertebral disc stress at L4/5 in flexion between the stiff and flexible thoracic spine were respectively 0.7° and 0.0179 MPa preoperatively and 1.5° and 0.0367 MPa in the L4/5 laminectomy model. CONCLUSIONS: Biomechanically, disc stress and pars interarticularis stress decrease in the flexible thoracic spine. Flexibility of the thoracic spine reduces lumbar spine loading and could help to prevent stress-related disorders.

Biomechanical evaluation of multi-rod constructs to stabilize an S1 pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO): a finite element analysis.

PURPOSE: To develop and validate a finite element (FE) model of a sacral pedicle subtraction osteotomy (S1-PSO) and to compare biomechanical properties of various multi-rod configurations to stabilize S1-PSOs. METHODS: A previously validated FE spinopelvic model was used to develop a 30° PSO at the sacrum. Five multi-rod techniques spanning the S1-PSO were made using 4 iliac screws and a variety of primary rods (PR) and accessory rods (AR; lateral: Lat-AR or medial: Med-AR). All constructs, except one, utilized a horizontal rod (HR) connecting the iliac bolts to which PRs and Med-ARs were connected. Lat-ARs were connected to proximal iliac bolts. The simulation was performed in two steps with the acetabula fixed. For each model, PSO ROM and maximum stress on the PRs, ARs, and HRs were recorded and compared. The maximum stress on the L5-S1 disc and the PSO forces were captured and compared. RESULTS: Highest PSO ROMs were observed for 4-Rods (HR + 2 Med-AR). Constructs consisting of 5-Rods (HR + 2 Lat-ARs + 1 Med-AR) and 6-Rods (HR + 2 Lat-AR + 2 Med-AR) had the lowest PSO ROM. The least stress on the primary rods was seen with 6-Rods, followed by 5-Rods and 4-Rods (HR + 2 Lat-ARs). Lowest PSO forces and lowest L5-S1 disc stresses were observed for 4-Rod (Lat-AR), 5-Rod, and 6-Rod constructs, while 4-Rods (HR + Med-AR) had the highest. CONCLUSION: In this first FE analysis of an S1-PSO, the 4-Rod construct (HR + Med-AR) created the least rigid environment and highest PSO forces anteriorly. While 5- and 6-Rods created the stiffest constructs and lowest stresses on the primary rods, it also jeopardized load transfer to the anterior column, which may not be favorable for healing anteriorly. A balance between the construct's rigidity and anterior load sharing is essential.

The Effect of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Lumbar Spine Stenosis with Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis: A Finite Element Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS) with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) can require revision surgery because of the intervertebral instability after decompression. However, there is a lack of mechanical analyses for decompression procedures for LSS with DISH. METHODS: This study used a validated, three-dimensional finite element model of an L1-L5 lumbar spine, L1-L4 DISH, pelvis, and femurs to compare the biomechanical parameters (range of motion [ROM], intervertebral disc, hip joint, and instrumentation stresses) with an L5-sacrum (L5-S) and L4-S posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). A pure moment with a compressive follower load was applied to these models. RESULTS: ROM of L5-S and L4-S PLIF models decreased by more than 50% at L4-L5, respectively, and decreased by more than 15% at L1-S compared with the DISH model in all motions. The L4-L5 nucleus stress of the L5-S PLIF increased by more than 14% compared with the DISH model. In all motions, the hip stress of DISH, L5-S, and L4-S PLIF had very small differences. The sacroiliac joint stress of L5-S and L4-S PLIF models decreased by more than 15% compared with the DISH model. The stress values of the screws and rods in the L4-S PLIF model was higher than in the L5-S PLIF model. CONCLUSIONS: The concentration of stress because of DISH may influence adjacent segment disease on the nonunited segment of PLIF. A shorter-level lumbar interbody fixation is recommended to preserve ROM; however, it should be used with caution because it could provoke adjacent segment disease.

Effects of Sacral Slope Changes on the Intervertebral Disc and Hip Joint: A Finite Element Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Spinopelvic parameters are vital components that must be considered when treating patients with spinal disease. Several finite element (FE) studies have explored spinopelvic parameters such as sacral slope (SS) and the impact on the lumbar spine, although no study has examined the effect on the hip and sacroiliac joint (SIJ) on varying SS angles. Therefore, it is necessary to have a biomechanical understanding of the impact on the spinopelvic complex. METHODS: An FE lumbar, pelvis, and femur model was created from computed tomography scans of a 55-year-old female patient with no abnormalities. Three models were created: a normal model (SS = 26°), a model with high SS (SS = 30°), and a model with low SS (SS = 20°). These models underwent loading for flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressures, hip joint, and SIJ contact stresses were analyzed. RESULTS: The high SS model (SS = 30°) indicated the highest ROM in the L5-S1 (slip angle) level and the highest intradiscal pressures. The highest average hip and SIJ contact stresses were present in this model, although the low SS model (SS = 20°) in extension had the largest stresses for the hip and SIJ. CONCLUSIONS: The results provide evidence that patients with higher SS may be more prone to increased ROM at the slip angle (L5-S1). In addition, patients with higher SS were shown to have higher contact stresses on the hip joint and SIJ, potentially leading to SIJ dysfunction. Clinically, correcting lumbar lordosis including SS is important; however, a high SS may have a negative impact on the intervertebral disc, SIJ, and hip joint.

The Effect of Anterior-Only, Posterior-Only, and Combined Anterior Posterior Fixation for Cervical Spine Injury with Soft Tissue Injury: A Finite Element Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This finite element analysis aimed to investigate the effects of surgical procedures for cervical spine injury. METHODS: A three-dimensional finite element model of the cervical spine (C2-C7) was created from computed tomography. This model contained vertebrae, intervertebral discs, anterior longitudinal ligament, and posterior ligament complex. To create the cervical spine injury model, posterior ligament complex and anterior longitudinal ligament at C3-C4 were resected and the center of the intervertebral disc was resected. We created posterior-only fixation (PF), anterior-only fixation (AF), and combined anterior-posterior fixation (APF) models. A pure moment with a compressive follower load was applied, and range of motion, annular/nucleus stress, instrument stress, and facet forces were analyzed. RESULTS: In all motion except for flexion, range of motion of PF, AF, and APF models decreased by 80%-95%, 85%-93%, and 97%-99% compared with the intact model. C3-C4 annulus stress of PF, AF, and APF models decreased by 28%-72%, 96%-100%, and 99%-100% compared with the intact model. Facet contact forces of PF, AF, and APF models decreased by 77%-79%, 97%-99%, and 77%-86% at C3-C4 compared with the intact model. Screw stress in the PF model was higher than in the APF model, and plate stress in the AF model was lower than in the APF model, but bone graft stress in the AF model was higher than in the APF model. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical stabilization was preserved by the APF model. Regarding range of motion, the PF model had an advantage compared with the AF model except for flexion. An understanding of biomechanics provides useful information for the clinician.

Total disc replacement alters the biomechanics of cervical spine based on sagittal cervical alignment: A finite element study.

Introduction: The correlation between cervical alignment and clinical outcome of total disc replacement (TDR) surgery is arguable. We believe that this conflict exists because the parameters that influence the biomechanics of the cervical spine are not well understood, specifically the effect of TDR on different cervical alignments. Methods: A validated osseo-ligamentous model from C2-C7 was used in this study. The C2-C7 Cobb angle of the base model was modified to represent: lordotic (-10°), straight (0°), and kyphotic (+10°) cervical alignment. The TDR surgery was simulated at the C5-C6 segment. The range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressure, annular stresses, and facet loads were computed for all the models. Results: The ROM results demonstrated kyphotic alignment after TDR surgery to be the most mobile when compared to intact base model (41% higher in flexion-extension, 51% higher in lateral bending, and 27% higher in axial rotation) followed by straight and lordotic alignment, respectively. The annular stresses for the kyphotic alignment when compared to intact base model were higher at the index level (33% higher in flexion-extension and 48% higher in lateral bending) compared to other alignments. The lordotic model demonstrated higher facet contact forces at the index level (75% higher in extension than kyphotic alignment, 51% higher in lateral bending than kyphotic alignment, and 78% higher in axial rotation than kyphotic alignment) when compared among the three alignment models. Conclusion: Preoperative cervical alignment should be an integral part of surgical planning for TDR surgery as different cervical alignments may significantly alter the postsurgical outcomes.

Biomechanical analysis of laminectomy, laminoplasty, posterior decompression with instrumented fusion, and anterior decompression with fusion for the kyphotic cervical spine.

PURPOSE: Anterior and posterior decompressions for cervical myelopathy and radiculopathy may lead to clinical improvements. However, patients with kyphotic cervical alignment have sometimes shown poor clinical outcomes with posterior decompression. There is a lack on report of mechanical analysis of the decompression procedures for kyphotic cervical alignment. METHODS: This study employed a three-dimensional finite element (FE) model of the cervical spine (C2-C7) with the pre-operative kyphotic alignment (Pre-OK) model and compared the biomechanical parameters (range of motion (ROM), annular stresses, nucleus stresses, and facet contact forces) for four decompression procedures at two levels (C3-C5); laminectomy (LN), laminoplasty (LP), posterior decompression with fusion (PDF), and anterior decompression with fusion (ADF). Pure moment with compressive follower load was applied to these models. RESULTS: PDF and ADF models' global ROM were 40% at C2-C7 less than the Pre-OK, LN, and LP models. The annular and nucleus stresses decreased more than 10% at the surgery levels for ADF, and PDF, compared to the Pre-OK, LN, and LP models. However, the annular stresses at the adjacent cranial level (C2-C3) of ADF were 20% higher. The nucleus stresses of the caudal adjacent level (C5-C6) of PDF were 20% higher, compared to other models. The PDF and ADF models showed a less than 70% decrease in the facet forces at the surgery levels, compared to the Pre-OK, LN, and LP models. CONCLUSION: The study concluded that posterior decompression, such as LN or LP, increases ROM, disc stress, and facet force and thus can lead to instability. Although there is the risk of adjacent segment disease (ASD), PDF and ADF can stabilize the cervical spine even for kyphotic alignments.

Soft Tissue Injury in Cervical Spine Is a Risk Factor for Intersegmental Instability: A Finite Element Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Soft tissue cervical spine injury (CSI) has the possibility of causing cervical segmental instability, which can lead to spinal cord injury. There is a lack of certainty in assessing whether soft tissue CSI is unstable or not. This biomechanical study aimed to investigate the risk factors of soft tissue CSI. METHODS: A 3-dimensional finite element model of the ligamentous cervical spine (C2-C7) was created from medical images. Three soft tissue injury models were simulated at C4-C5: 1) posterior ligament complex (PLC) injury, 2) intervertebral disk (ID) with anterior longitudinal ligament injury (IDI), and 3) anterior longitudinal ligament, PLC, and ID injury (API) model. Pure moment with compressive follower load was applied, and the range of motion, annular stress, nucleus stress, and facet forces were analyzed. RESULTS: For the IDI and API models, the range of motion increased at the injury level in extension (by 101%) and left/right axial rotations (>30%) compared with the intact model. The IDI and API models showed an increase of >50% in annular and nucleus stresses at the injury level in extension and left/right rotations compared with the intact model. The PLC injury showed similar stresses as the intact model except for flexion. The facet contact forces of IDI and API models increased more than 100% compared with other models in all motions. CONCLUSIONS: In CSI, all soft tissues have a key role in stabilizing cervical spine, but ID is the most important component of all.