Quality improvements based on detailed and precise terminology.

This article describes a comparative study within intensive care where possibilities for quality monitoring have been examined regarding the data input. The study compared the results of making quality statistics based on ICD10 and on SNOMED CT. The article describes the method deployed for defining the subset used in the study and how the data comparison has been established. The study shows that the use of a more granulated, precise and well defined terminology used in daily clinical work can help clinicians doing better quality monitoring and quality development and at the same time may reduce time and costs in quality management. The study shows further that the use of an international terminology can increase the possibilities of international benchmarking and research. The article ends up by drawing attention to some challenges which must be dealt with especially regarding reimbursement.

Can openEHR archetypes be used in a national context? The Danish archetype proof-of-concept project.

Semantic interoperability and secondary use of data are important informatics challenges in modern healthcare. Connected Digital Health Denmark is investigating if the openEHR reference model, archetypes and templates could be used for representing and exchanging clinical content specification and could become a candidate for a national logical infrastructure for semantic interoperability. The Danish archetype proof-of-concept project has tried out some elements of the openEHR methodology in cooperation with regions and vendors. The project has pointed out benefits and challenges using archetypes, and has identified barriers that need to be addressed in the next steps.