Disposable Gastrointestinal Scopes: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopes are an essential tool in the diagnosis, screening, and treatment of gastrointestinal diseases. In 2019, the Food and Drug Administration issued a news release, recommending that duodenoscope manufacturers and health care facilities phase out fully reusable duodenoscopes with fixed endcaps in lieu of duodenoscopes that are either fully disposable or those that contain disposable endcaps. With this study, we systematically reviewed the published literature on single-use disposable gastrointestinal scopes to describe the current state of the literature and provide summary recommendations on the role of disposable gastrointestinal endoscopes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For our inclusion criteria, we searched for studies that were published in the year 2015 and afterward. We performed a literature search in PubMed using the keywords, "disposable," "reusable," "choledochoscope," "colonoscope," "duodenoscope," "esophagoscope," "gastroscope," and "sigmoidoscope." After our review, we identified our final article set, including 13 articles relating to disposable scopes, published from 2015 to 2023. RESULTS: In this review, we show 13 articles discussing the infection rate, functionality, safety, and affordability of disposable gastrointestinal scopes in comparison to reusable gastrointestinal scopes. Of the 3 articles that discussed infection rates (by Forbes and colleagues, Ridtitid and colleagues, and Ofosu and colleagues), each demonstrated a decreased risk of infection in disposable gastrointestinal scopes. Functionality was another common theme among these articles. Six articles (by Muthusamy and colleagues, Bang and colleagues, Lisotti and colleagues, Ross and colleagues, Kang and colleagues, and Forbes and colleagues) demonstrated comparable functionality of disposable scopes to reusable scopes. The most reported functionality issue in disposable scopes was decreased camera resolution. Disposable scopes also showed comparable safety profiles compared with reusable scopes. Six articles (by Kalipershad and colleagues, Muthusamy and colleagues, Bang and colleagues, Lisotti and colleagues, Luo and colleagues, and Huynh and colleagues) showed comparable rates of AEs, whereas 1 article (by Ofosu and colleagues) demonstrated increased rates of AEs with disposable scopes. Lastly, a cost analysis was looked at in 3 of the articles. Two articles (by Larsen et al and Ross and colleagues) remarked that further research is needed to understand the cost of disposable scopes, whereas 1 article (by Kang and colleagues) showed a favorable cost analysis. CONCLUSIONS: After a review of the literature published since the 2015 Food and Drug Administration safety communication, disposable scopes have been shown to be effective in decreasing infection risks while maintaining similar safety profiles to conventional reusable scopes. However, more research is required to compare disposable and reusable scopes in terms of functionality and cost-effectiveness.

Vein of Galen Malformations in adults.

OBJECTIVE: Vein of Galen Malformations (VoGM) are rare vascular malformations, typically seen in pediatric age groups. Even more rarely, VoGM's may be seen later in adulthood. In this case report and systematic review, we provide a thorough description of the current literature as well as provide a case example exploring the diagnosis, imaging, treatment, and management of VoGM in adults. METHODS: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, we performed a systematic literature search for all relevant cases and case series of VoGM in adult patients. The reference list of all articles were reviewed for additional relevant cases. Articles were included if they described a VoGM of a patient over the age of 18 years old and published in English. 149 articles were originally identified and 26 described cases met our inclusion criteria. RESULTS: In our literature review we found 26 patients that met our inclusion criteria. We found 14 male patients and 12 female patients. The mean age at presentation was 37.2 years (median=34 years, SD= 13.6 years). The most common presenting symptoms of patient were headache (n = 9), seizure (n = 6), and vomiting (n = 4). Of the 12 cases which clearly reported the subtype of VoGM, the choroidal type was more frequently seen (n = 10) compared to the mural type (n = 2). In 3 patients, the VoGM was thrombosed at time of diagnosis. Of the 26 patients, endovascular treatment was performed most frequently (n = 8) but some received microsurgical treatment (n = 4) or were treated conservatively (n = 6). Other treatment modalities included (ventriculoperitoneal shunt, ventriculostomy) (n = 5). In 3 cases treatment was not specified. In comparison to VoGM seen in pediatric or neonatal populations, VoGM in adults generally resulted in more favorable outcomes with only 2 patients reported to have passed away following treatment. CONCLUSION: VoGM remains a rare finding amongst the adult population. Hence, we described the clinical presentation, treatment modalities, and outcomes of the cases described in the English literature. Perhaps due to the rate of thrombosis and the unique angioarchitecture seen in adult VoGM patients, outcomes were generally more favorable than those described in the literature in pediatric or neonate VoGM patients.

Meniscal Extrusion: A Critical Analysis Review.

➢: Pathologic meniscal extrusion can compromise meniscal function, leading to increased contact forces in the tibiofemoral compartment and the acceleration of osteoarthritic changes. ➢: Extrusion is typically defined as radial displacement of ≥3 mm outside the tibial border and is best diagnosed via magnetic resonance imaging, although ultrasonography has also demonstrated encouraging diagnostic utility. ➢: Surgical management of meniscal extrusion is based on the underlying etiology, the patient's symptom profile, the preexisting health of the articular surface, and the risk of future chondral injury and osteoarthritis.