ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Since 2012, in line with the World Health Organization (WHO) resolution WHA63.12 of 05/21/2010, the Italian National Blood Center has been promoting patient blood management (PBM). In order to verify the level of PBM implementation nationwide, we submitted a survey to all healthcare providers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In line with what was proposed in the international scientific literature in the field, a series of indicators were used derived from the four main blocks related to PBM strategies: the management of patient anemia; the optimization of hemostasis; blood conservation strategies; patient-centred decision-making. We also added two blocks containing important information on general PBM management and other PBM-related aspects. RESULTS: The survey showed good implementation of anemia screening programs in accordance with the timelines established by national and international guidelines, and the single unit policy is used in line with national guideline recommendations. However, the survey also revealed limited auditing of PBM programs and reduced monitoring and reporting of clinical outcomes and indicators. DISCUSSION: The first national survey on the level of PBM implementation in Italy shows widespread adoption of diagnostic-therapeutic care pathways aimed at the diagnosis and treatment of anemia in the perioperative setting.
ABSTRACT
Between August and September 2023, three distinct autochthonous dengue virus transmission events occurred in Lazio, Italy, with the main event in Rome. The events involved three different dengue serotypes. No link with previous imported cases was identified. Here we describe the epidemiological and phylogenetic analysis of the first autochthonous cases and the implemented control actions. The multiple transmission events call for a strengthening of the vector control strategies and future research to better characterise the risk in countries like Italy.
Subject(s)
Dengue , Disease Outbreaks , Humans , Phylogeny , Italy/epidemiology , Serogroup , Dengue/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The high safety of homologous blood components, together with the introduction of the Patient Blood Management strategy, has led to the progressive abandonment of preoperative autologous blood donation (PAD) in surgery. Furthermore, recent scientific publications provide evidence about the non-usefulness of PAD in the collection of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) from bone marrow (BM), also in consideration of harvest procedure safety. Nevertheless, no conclusive studies have been published yet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood Establishments (BE) and Bone Marrow Collection Centers (BMCC) participated in a specific qualitative survey proposed by Italian National Blood and Transplant centers with the support of the relevant Italian Scientific Societies. The survey aimed at evaluating the policy adopted for PAD in related and unrelated adult HSC donors in Italy during the period 2018-2020. RESULTS: Forty-one BE corresponding to 37 BMCC filled in the questionnaire. Of 830 BM donors, 661 (80%) underwent 1063 PAD (mean 1.6 PAD/donor). The remaining 169 donors (20%) underwent BM harvest without PAD. No serious adverse events were reported for either donor group. In the case of ineligibility of donors for the PAD program, due to low hemoglobin values, 7/10 centers shifted donors to peripheral blood stem cell collection and three centers chose a different donor. Remarkably, only 51% of the PAD units requested were eventually transfused during the BM harvest process. Finally, the iron support policy among centers was heterogeneous. DISCUSSION: The results of this survey show that PAD is heterogeneously applied in Italian BMCC, as in other countries. However, all BMCC except two are willing to adopt a Patient Blood Management strategy as an alternative approach to adult related and unrelated BM donor harvests.
Subject(s)
Blood Donation , Bone Marrow Transplantation , Adult , Humans , Bone Marrow Transplantation/adverse effects , Tissue Donors , Hematopoietic Stem Cells , Italy , Blood DonorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The latest European Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) outbreak occurred in Italy in 2017, in the municipalities of Anzio and Rome (Lazio Region), with a secondary outbreak in the Calabrian Region. Most CHIKV infections are symptomatic but about 15% of people who acquire the infection may be asymptomatic. A retrospective study was conducted with the aim of assessing the prevalence of recent/ongoing CHIKV infections on the blood donor population in the Lazio Region, during the 2017 outbreak (including in the period before it was detected). METHODS: The study was conducted on 4595 plasma samples from donors who donated in 14 different Blood Establishments in the Lazio Region, in the period June-November 2017. A total of 389 of these samples were collected in provinces not affected by the outbreak and were used as negative controls. All samples were tested for IgM detection by the use of an ELISA test, and positive samples were tested for confirmation through the use of a PRNT. Molecular tests were performed on sera that were found to be IgM-positive or borderline. RESULTS: A total of 41 (0.89%) blood donors tested positive for IgM. None of these positive IgM ELISA results was confirmed either by PRNT or by molecular tests. CONCLUSIONS: Our study has shown no evidence of recent/ongoing CHIKV infection in blood donors of the affected area.
Subject(s)
Chikungunya Fever , Antibodies, Viral , Blood Donors , Disease Outbreaks , Humans , Immunoglobulin M , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: West Nile (WNV) and Usutu (USUV) are emerging vector-borne zoonotic flaviviruses. They are antigenically very similar, sharing the same life cycle with birds as amplification host, Culicidae as vector, and man/horse as dead-end host. They can co-circulate in an overlapping geographic range. In Europe, surveillance plans annually detect several outbreaks. METHODS: In Italy, a WNV/USUV surveillance plan is in place through passive and active surveillance. After a 2018 WNV outbreak, a reinforced integrated risk-based surveillance was performed in four municipalities through clinical and serological surveillance in horses, Culicidae catches, and testing on human blood-based products for transfusion. RESULTS: Eight WNV cases in eight equine holdings were detected. Twenty-three mosquitoe catches were performed and 2367 specimens of Culex pipiens caught; 17 pools were USUV positive. A total of 8889 human blood donations were tested, and two asymptomatic donors were USUV positive. CONCLUSIONS: Different surveillance components simultaneously detected WNV only in horses and USUV only in humans and mosquitoes. While in endemic areas (i.e. northern Italy) entomological surveillance is successfully used as an early detection warning, this method in central Italy seems ineffective. To achieve a high level of sensitivity, the entomological trapping effort should probably exceed a reasonable balance between cost and performance. Besides, WNV/USUV early detection can be addressed by horses and birds. Further research is needed to adapt the surveillance components in different epidemiological contexts.
Subject(s)
Culex/virology , Flavivirus Infections/veterinary , Flavivirus Infections/virology , Flavivirus/isolation & purification , Mosquito Vectors/virology , West Nile Fever/veterinary , West Nile Fever/virology , West Nile virus/isolation & purification , Animals , Culex/physiology , Epidemiological Monitoring , Flavivirus/classification , Flavivirus/genetics , Flavivirus Infections/epidemiology , Flavivirus Infections/transmission , Horse Diseases/epidemiology , Horse Diseases/transmission , Horse Diseases/virology , Horses , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Mosquito Vectors/physiology , West Nile Fever/epidemiology , West Nile Fever/transmission , West Nile virus/classification , West Nile virus/geneticsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the number of actually Severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infected blood donors applying a statistical forecasting model. BACKGROUND: Following the outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic, a drop in blood donation has been observed. It is crucial to determine the actual number of potential SARS-CoV-2-positive donors to define the measures and ensure adequate blood supply. METHODS: The cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 positivity, calculated on the general population, was applied to the donor population by estimating the number of positive subjects. The calculation model was validated by the linear interpolation method. The number of blood units actually discarded based on post-donation information was also taken into account. RESULTS: Three months after the outbreak, 5322 donors were estimated to be positive for SARS-CoV-2 and were therefore potentially excluded from donation. A total of units of blood components were discarded following post donation information. The estimated number of donors deceased (180) and the number of clinically recovered individuals in the same period was also considered. CONCLUSION: This forecasting model can be used to obtain information on blood donors' involvement during future SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks, especially in case of changes concerning epidemiology, incidence by age bracket and geographical distribution and also for new outbreaks of emerging viruses.
Subject(s)
Blood Donors/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Blood Banks/supply & distribution , Blood Safety/statistics & numerical data , Donor Selection/statistics & numerical data , Female , Forecasting , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Young AdultABSTRACT
Hemostatic resuscitation is currently considered a standard of care for the management of life-threatening hemorrhage, but in some critical settings the access to high quantities of blood components is problematic. Whole blood (WB) transfusion has been proposed as an alternative modality for hemostatic resuscitation of traumatic major bleeding. To assess the efficacy and safety of WB in trauma-associated massive bleeding, we performed a systematic review of the literature. We selected studies comparing WB transfusions to transfusion of blood components (COMP) in massive trauma bleeding; both randomized clinical trial (RCT) and observational studies were considered. The outcomes were mortality (30-day/in-hospital and 24-h mortality) and adverse events/transfusion reactions. The effect sizes were crude odds ratio (OR), adjusted OR and hazard ratio (HR). The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for RCTs, and the ROBIN-1 tool for observational studies. The overall quality of the available evidence was assessed with the GRADE system. One RCT (2 reports) and 6 cohort studies were included (3642 adult patients; 675 receiving WB, 2967 receiving COMP). Three studies were conducted in military setting, and 4 in civilian setting. In the overall analysis, 30-day/in-hospital and 24-h mortality did not differ significantly between groups (very low quality of the evidence due to high risk of bias, imprecision and inconsistency). After adjustment for baseline covariates in three cohort studies, the OR for mortality was significantly lower in WB recipients compared to COMP (OR 0.22; 95% CIs 0.10/0.45) (moderate grade of evidence). Adverse events and transfusion reactions were overlooked and not consistently reported. The available evidence does not allow to draw definite conclusions on the short-term and long-term efficacy and safety of WB transfusion compared to COMP transfusion. Further well designed research is needed.
Subject(s)
Blood Component Transfusion , Hemorrhage/therapy , Multiple Trauma , Resuscitation/methods , HumansABSTRACT
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a viral respiratory illness caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has been recently recognized as a systemic disorder inducing a prothrombotic state. The molecular mechanisms underlying the hypercoagulable state seen in patients with COVID-19 is still incompletely understood, although it presumably involves the close link between inflammatory and hemostatic systems. The laboratory coagulation monitoring of severely ill COVID-19 patients is mandatory to identify those patients at increased thrombotic risk and to modulate thromboprophylaxis accordingly. In this review, we summarize the current understanding on the pathogenesis, epidemiology, clinical and laboratory features and management of coagulopathy associated with COVID-19.
Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/genetics , Blood Coagulation Disorders/etiology , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Blood Coagulation Disorders/prevention & control , Blood Coagulation Disorders/virology , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Humans , Inflammation/complications , Inflammation/epidemiology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Thromboembolism/etiology , Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Thrombosis/epidemiology , Thrombosis/prevention & controlABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Rare acquired bleeding disorders include a wide spectrum of coagulopathies characterized by spontaneous or post-trauma and post-surgery hemorrhages in patients without a previous personal or family history of bleeding. AREAS COVERED: This review, based on a Medline/PubMed search during the last 20 years, will focus mainly on rare acquired bleeding disorders caused by autoantibodies against coagulation factors, including autoantibodies against factor VIII (acquired hemophilia A), von Willebrand factor (acquired von Willebrand syndrome) and other coagulation factors (factors V, X, XI, and XIII). The pathogenic, laboratory, and clinical features of these rare hemorrhagic conditions will be discussed, with particular attention to their management. EXPERT OPINION: The treatment of rare acquired bleeding disorders includes the control of bleeding and the elimination of the autoantibody and of the underlying disease, when present. As the bleeding clinical phenotype is often severe, the management of affected patients is particularly challenging. Thus, while an early diagnosis of the acquired coagulopathy is essential to start the most appropriate treatment and to improve patients' outcomes, the support of specialized centers is equally important to provide a correct management of such complicated cases.
Subject(s)
Autoantibodies , Blood Coagulation Factor Inhibitors , Blood Coagulation Factors , Hemophilia A , Rare Diseases , von Willebrand Diseases , Autoantibodies/blood , Autoantibodies/immunology , Blood Coagulation Factor Inhibitors/blood , Blood Coagulation Factor Inhibitors/immunology , Blood Coagulation Factors/immunology , Blood Coagulation Factors/metabolism , Hemophilia A/blood , Hemophilia A/immunology , Humans , Rare Diseases/blood , Rare Diseases/immunology , von Willebrand Diseases/blood , von Willebrand Diseases/immunologyABSTRACT
Introduction: Hemophilia A and B are congenital bleeding disorders. The current standard management of patients with severe hemophilia is prophylaxis which is given intravenously two or three times weekly; however, this is associated with a significant burden on the quality of life of the patient. The main attempts to improve the management of hemophilia is hence through the development of a new generation of products with properties facilitating prophylaxis and/or a better control of bleeding.Areas covered: This review describes the preclinical and phase 1/2 studies investigating the innovative products for the management of hemophilia patients with or without coagulation factor inhibitors.Expert opinion: Numerous innovative therapeutics, including factor concentrates and non-clotting factor-based therapies with extended half-life, are under clinical investigation. Among replacement therapies for hemophilia A, the results from phase 1/2 studies indicate that the most interesting products are those bioengineered using XTEN fusion technology. The anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor antibody concizumab is the most innovative and interesting agent among non-clotting factor products. If the results of ongoing trials confirm the preliminary positive results, these promising agents will provide further improvements in the management and quality of life of patients with hemophilia.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Animals , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacology , Drug Development , Drugs, Investigational/pharmacokinetics , Drugs, Investigational/pharmacology , Hemophilia A/physiopathology , Humans , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In Italy, the use of nucleic acid testing for hepatitis B virus (HBV) in donor screening has allowed the detection of infections in the window phase, as well as the presence of occult infections which could potentially be transmitted. The aim of this study was to analyse the trends of epidemiological data focused on HBV infection in blood donors and to estimate the residual risk of transmitting HBV from both the window phase and occult infection over a 10-year period in Italy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from the Italian Haemovigilance System which includes the results of screening tests for transfusion transmissible infections. During the period of this survey (2009-2018), the molecular methods used for HBV screening were transcription-mediated amplification and polymerase chain reaction tests. Prevalence and incidence were calculated. The residual risk was estimated by applying the incidence-window period model for acute cases and a more recently reported model for estimating the risk due to occult infections. RESULTS: A total of 17,424,535 blood donors and 30,842,794 donations were tested for HBV. Altogether, 6,250 donors tested positive for HBV markers: 4,782 (175.6×105) were first time donors and 1,468 (10.0×105) were repeat donors. The prevalence of HBV markers in first time donors was 275.9×105 in 2009, declining to 143.6×105 in 2018. The incidence of new infections was 3.37×105 in 2009 and 2.17×105 in 2018. The overall residual risk for HBV amounted to 1 in 2,566,854 donations calculated as the sum of risks of both acute infections in the window period (1 in 5,835,306 donations) and occult infections (1 in 4,582,270 blood units). DISCUSSION: In Italy, the residual risk of transfusing a blood unit infected with HBV, both from window phase and occult infections, is currently very low, amounting to levels that can be considered tolerable.
Subject(s)
Blood Donors , Blood Safety , Hepatitis B , Transfusion Reaction , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Hepatitis B/blood , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Hepatitis B/transmission , Humans , Incidence , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Prevalence , Transfusion Reaction/blood , Transfusion Reaction/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Pathogen reduction (PR) of selected blood components is a technology that has been adopted in practice in various ways. Although they offer great advantages in improving the safety of the blood supply, these technologies have limitations which hinder their broader use, e.g. increased costs. In this context, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), in co-operation with the Italian National Blood Centre, organised an expert consultation meeting to discuss the potential role of pathogen reduction technologies (PRT) as a blood safety intervention during outbreaks of infectious diseases for which (in most cases) laboratory screening of blood donations is not available. The meeting brought together 26 experts and representatives of national competent authorities for blood from thirteen European Union and European Economic Area (EU/EEA) Member States (MS), Switzerland, the World Health Organization, the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and Health Care of the Council of Europe, the US Food and Drug Administration, and the ECDC. During the meeting, the current use of PRTs in the EU/EEA MS and Switzerland was verified, with particular reference to emerging infectious diseases (see Appendix). In this article, we also present expert discussions and a common view on the potential use of PRT as a part of both preparedness and response to threats posed to blood safety by outbreaks of infectious disease.
Subject(s)
Blood Component Transfusion , Blood Safety , Communicable Disease Control , Communicable Diseases , Expert Testimony , Transfusion Reaction , Communicable Diseases/blood , Communicable Diseases/epidemiology , Europe , European Union , Humans , Transfusion Reaction/epidemiology , Transfusion Reaction/prevention & controlABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been used in different non-transfusion indications due to its role in tissue regeneration and healing. The aim of this overview of systematic reviews (umbrella review) is to provide a summary of the existing research syntheses related to PRP use for sports-related muscle, tendon and ligament injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature searches were performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library to identify systematic reviews focusing on PRP use for sports-related muscle, tendon and ligament injuries. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the checklist for systematic reviews and research syntheses developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute and the GRADE assessment. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Five studies evaluated PRP use for acute muscle injury, and 17 evaluated PRP use for tendon and ligament injury. Studies were heterogeneous in terms of the dose and number of PRP injections, and the control groups. Three of the 5 reviews evaluating acute muscle injury concluded that PRP had no effect on the outcomes considered. One review shows superior efficacy of rehabilitation exercise compared to PRP. One review shows that PRP may result in an earlier return to sport for acute grade I-II injury. Eight out of the 17 reviews evaluating PRP for tendon and ligament injuries show a statistically significant (p<0.05) difference in pain and/or function outcome measures favouring PRP compared to controls, although most of the observed differences were small. Adverse events data and quality of life outcomes were rarely analysed or reported in the included studies and were considered clinically insignificant. DISCUSSION: In most of the included reviews, the available evidence was judged to be of low/very low quality due to risk of bias, inconsistency and imprecision, thus making the level of certainty of these findings low and not adequate to support the general use of PRP in this setting.
Subject(s)
Blood Component Transfusion , Ligaments/injuries , Muscle, Skeletal/injuries , Platelet-Rich Plasma , Sports , Tendon Injuries/therapy , Humans , Sports MedicineABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the benefit of platelet rich plasma (PRP) in oral surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic search of the literature. The GRADE system was used to assess the certainty of the body of evidence. RESULTS: We found 21 randomised controlled trials that met our inclusion criteria: 12 studies included patients with periodontal defects, five studies focused on healing of extraction sockets, three studies on sinus lift augmentation, and one study on periapical osseous defects. However, for the quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis), we evaluated "periodontal defects" studies only, since for other clinical contexts the number of studies were too low and the procedural heterogeneity was too high to allow pooling of data. PRP-containing regimens were compared to non-PRP-containing regimens. Primary outcomes for the evaluation of periodontal defects were probing depths, clinical attachment level, gingival recession, and radiographic bone defect. It is not usually clear whether or not the use of PRP compared to controls affects "probing depth" at long-term follow up; the between group differences were small and unlikely to be of clinical importance (i.e., very low quality of evidence). For the other outcomes analysed ("clinical attachment levels", "gingival recession", "bony defect"), we observed a very slight marginal clinical benefit of PRP compared to controls. The available evidence for these comparisons was rated as low quality as most of the studies selected showed inconsistency, imprecision, and risk of bias. DISCUSSION: Evidence from a comparison between the use in oral surgery of PRP-containing regimens compared to other regimens not-containing PRP was of low quality. The results of the meta-analysis, limited to studies in patients with periodontal defects, document that PRP was slightly more effective compared to controls not-containing PRP.
Subject(s)
Oral Surgical Procedures/methods , Platelet-Rich Plasma , Humans , Periodontal Diseases/surgery , Platelet-Rich Plasma/metabolism , Treatment Outcome , Wound HealingABSTRACT
Patient Blood Management (PBM) is a multimodal, multidisciplinary approach adopted to limit the use and the need for allogeneic blood transfusion in all at-risk patients with the aim of improving their clinical outcomes. Although PBM usually refers to surgical patients, its clinical use has gradually evolved over the last few years and it now also refers to medical conditions. This review will critically analyse the current knowledge on the use of PBM programmes in surgical and non-surgical patients.
Subject(s)
Blood Transfusion , Practice Management, Medical/organization & administration , Transfusion Medicine/organization & administration , Humans , Transfusion Medicine/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The use of blood-derived eye drops for topical treatment of ocular surface diseases has progressively increased in recent years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To evaluate the use of serum eye drops in ocular surface disorders, we performed a systematic search of the literature. RESULTS: In this systematic review, we included 19 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the use of serum eye drops in 729 patients compared to controls. For the quantitative synthesis, we included only 10 RCTs conducted in patients with dry eye syndrome comparing autologous serum to artificial tears. At 2-6 weeks, no clear between-group differences in Schirmer test (MD 1.05; 95% CI: -0.17-2.26) and in fluorescein staining (MD -0.61; 95% CI: -1.50-0.28) were found (very low-quality evidence, down-graded for inconsistency, serious risk of biases, and serious imprecision). Slightly higher increase in tear film break-up time (TBUT) scores in autologous serum compared to control (MD 2.68; 95% CI: 1.33-4.03), and greater decrease in ocular surface disease index (OSDI) in autologous serum compared to control (MD -11.17; 95% CI: -16.58 - -5.77) were found (low quality evidence, down-graded for serious risk of bias, and for inconsistency). For the Schirmer test, fluorescein staining and TBUT, data were also available at additional follow-up timing (2-12 months): no clear between-group differences were found, and the quality of the evidence was graded as low/very-low. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with dry eye syndrome, it is unclear whether or not the use of autologous serum compared to artificial tears increases Schirmer test and fluorescein staining scores at short-term and medium-/long-term follow up. Some benefit at short-term follow up for the outcome of TBUT and OSDI was observed, but the quality of the evidence was low.
Subject(s)
Dry Eye Syndromes/drug therapy , Lubricant Eye Drops/therapeutic use , Administration, Topical , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
One of the most serious complications of the treatment of severe haemophilia A is the development of alloantibodies against exogenous factor VIII (FVIII). Inhibitors render factor replacement therapy ineffective, exposing patients to a remarkably high risk of morbidity and mortality. Besides the well-known bypassing agents (i.e. activated prothrombin complex concentrate and recombinant activated factor VII) used to treat or prevent bleeding in haemophilia patients with inhibitors, there is growing interest in newer haemostatic therapies that are not based on the replacement of the deficient FVIII. This review will focus on the most interesting among these innovative therapies, emicizumab, and will provide an update on its current stage of clinical development.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bispecific/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Blood Coagulation Factor Inhibitors/blood , Factor VIII , Factor VIIa/therapeutic use , Hemophilia A , Isoantibodies/blood , Factor VIII/antagonists & inhibitors , Factor VIII/metabolism , Hemophilia A/blood , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Humans , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Chronic red blood cell transfusion is the first-line treatment for severe forms of thalassaemia. This therapy is, however, hampered by a number of adverse effects, including red blood cell alloimmunisation. The aim of this systematic review was to collect the current literature data on erythrocyte alloimmunisation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic search of the literature which identified 41 cohort studies involving 9,256 patients. RESULTS: The prevalence of erythrocyte alloimmunisation was 11.4% (95% CI: 9.3-13.9%) with a higher rate of alloimmunisation against antigens of the Rh (52.4%) and Kell (25.6%) systems. Overall, alloantibodies against antigens belonging to the Rh and Kell systems accounted for 78% of the cases. A higher prevalence of red blood cell alloimmunisation was found in patients with thalassaemia intermedia compared to that among patients with thalassaemia major (15.5 vs 12.8%). DISCUSSION: Matching transfusion-dependent thalassaemia patients and red blood cell units for Rh and Kell antigens should be able to reduce the risk of red blood cell alloimmunisation by about 80%.
Subject(s)
Erythrocyte Transfusion/adverse effects , Erythrocytes/immunology , Rh Isoimmunization , Rh-Hr Blood-Group System/immunology , Thalassemia , Transfusion Reaction , Humans , Prevalence , Rh Isoimmunization/epidemiology , Rh Isoimmunization/immunology , Rh Isoimmunization/prevention & control , Thalassemia/epidemiology , Thalassemia/immunology , Thalassemia/therapy , Transfusion Reaction/epidemiology , Transfusion Reaction/immunology , Transfusion Reaction/prevention & controlABSTRACT
Absolute or functional iron deficiency is the most prevalent cause of anaemia in surgical patients, and its correction is a fundamental strategy within "Patient Blood Management" programmes. Offering perioperative oral iron for treating iron deficiency anaemia is still recommended, but intravenous iron has been demonstrated to be superior in most cases. However, the long-standing prejudice against intravenous iron administration, which is thought to induce anaphylaxis, hypotension and shock, still persists. With currently available intravenous iron formulations, minor infusion reactions are not common. These self-limited reactions are due to labile iron and not hypersensitivity. Aggressively treating infusion reactions with H1-antihistamines or vasopressors should be avoided. Self-limited hypotension during intravenous iron infusion could be considered to be due to hypersensitivity or vascular reaction to labile iron. Acute hypersensitivity reactions to current intravenous iron formulation are believed to be caused by complement activation-related pseudo-allergy. However, though exceedingly rare (<1:250,000 administrations), they should not be ignored, and intravenous iron should be administered only at facilities where staff is trained to evaluate and manage these reactions. As preventive measures, prior to the infusion, staff should inform all patients about infusion reactions and identify those patients with increased risk of hypersensitivity or contraindications for intravenous iron. Infusion should be started at a low rate for a few minutes. In the event of a reaction, the very first intervention should be the immediate cessation of the infusion, followed by evaluation of severity and treatment. An algorithm to scale the intensity of treatment to the clinical picture and/or response to therapy is presented.
Subject(s)
Administration, Intravenous/adverse effects , Anaphylaxis/chemically induced , Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/drug therapy , Hypotension/chemically induced , Iron/adverse effects , Anaphylaxis/prevention & control , Anaphylaxis/therapy , Disease Management , Humans , Hypotension/prevention & control , Hypotension/therapy , Iron/administration & dosage , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Between September 15 and November 11, 2017, the area of Rome was subjected to cessation of donation in an area of approximately 1,300,000 inhabitants and with a 5-day quarantine for the rest of metropolitan areas due to Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) outbreak. Quarantine was applied to red blood cell (RBC) and plasma units while platelet concentrates (PCs) were subjected to pathogen inactivation methods (PIMs). Quarantine was based on an active recall of all donors and, in case of declared absence of any symptom or illness, on release of RBC and plasma units after 5 days. Four regional centers in which PIMs were already performed were charged for PIMs for the rest of Rome's area. These centers increased by 236% their previous PIM procedures, producing additional 1425 pathogen-reduced (PR) PCs in 57 days, beside their production (996 PR PCs) for local needs. The emergency support was close to the maximal production capacity of the four centers and was successful only thanks to the limited length of emergency. No adverse events were reported by all centers through a passive hemovigilance approach and by a follow-up of approximately 4 months. None of the donors referred symptoms or illness at recall and none of the blood products were discarded after quarantine. To date, no cases of CHIKV-transmitted infection were reported in transfused patients. This experience has taught some relevant strategic and organizing aspects that should be taken into account when an infectious outbreak must be faced in a large metropolitan area.