High Prevalence of Atrial Fibrillation in a Lithuanian Stroke Patient Cohort.

Background and Objectives: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with a five-fold increased risk for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We aimed to estimate the prevalence of AF in a Lithuanian cohort of stroke patients, and its impact on patients regarding case fatality, functional outcome, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at 90 days. Materials and Methods: A single-center prospective study was carried out for four non-consecutive months between December 2018 and July 2019 in one of the two comprehensive stroke centers in Eastern Lithuania. A telephone-based follow-up was conveyed at 90 days using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and EuroQoL five-dimensional three-level descriptive system (EQ-5D-3L) with a self-rated visual analog scale (EQ-VAS). One-year case fatality was investigated. Results: We included 238 AIS patients with a mean age of 71.4 ± 11.9 years of whom 45.0% were female. A striking 97 (40.8%) AIS patients had a concomitant AF, in 68 (70.1%) of whom the AF was pre-existing. The AIS patients with AF were at a significantly higher risk for a large vessel occlusion (LVO; odds ratio 2.72 [95% CI 1.38−5.49], p = 0.004), and had a more severe neurological impairment at presentation (median NIHSS score (interquartile range): 9 (6−16) vs. 6 (3−9), p < 0.001). The LVO status was only detected in those who had received computed tomography angiography. Fifty-five (80.9%) patients with pre-existing AF received insufficient anticoagulation at stroke onset. All patients received a 12-lead ECG, however, in-hospital 24-h Holter monitoring was only performed in 3.4% of AIS patients without pre-existing AF. Although multivariate analyses found no statistically significant difference in one-year stroke patient survival and favorable functional status (mRS 0−2) at 90 days, when adjusted for age, gender, reperfusion treatment, baseline functional status, and baseline NIHSS, stroke patients with AF had a significantly poorer self-perceived HRQoL, indicated by a lower EQ-VAS score (regression coefficient ± standard error: ß = −11.776 ± 4.850, p = 0.017). Conclusions: In our single-center prospective observational study in Lithuania, we found that 40.8% of AIS patients had a concomitant AF, were at a higher risk for an LVO, and had a significantly poorer self-perceived HRQoL at 90 days. Despite the high AF prevalence, diagnostic tools for subclinical AF were greatly underutilized.

Validation and Factor Analysis of the Lithuanian Version of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to validate the Lithuanian version of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI-L), investigate its reliability, and perform factor analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A standard protocol of translation was followed for psychometric instruments. A total of 108 patients (75.9% women), mean age 51.9 years, with peripheral or central dizziness and vertigo participated in our cross-sectional study. The internal consistency was measured by Cronbach's alpha coefficient and corrected item-total correlations (CI-TCs). After a week, 65 of the recruited patients were again asked to fill out Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI)-L to ascertain test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation, ICC). Concurrent validation was performed using Pearson correlation between the total score and subscales of DHI-L and the eight scales of Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36). Finally, the factor structure of the DHI was assessed by principal component analysis (PCA). RESULTS: The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was very high (0.91). CI-TCs for DHI-L total scale ranged from 0.33 to 0.67. The correlations between DHI and SF-36 were high to weak. The ICC was excellent for the total score and its subscales. Our proposed two-factor model explained 44.5% of the variance. The first factor indicated disability in daily activities and psychological effect of handicap. The second factor comprised of items that pertained to postural instability. CONCLUSION: The DHI-L has shown good reliability and validity. Results did not support the original subscale structure of the DHI. As more studies need to be done to restructure DHI, we recommend only using the total DHI score as a measure of dizziness handicap.

Diagnosis and treatment choices of suspected benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: current approach of general practitioners, neurologists, and ENT physicians.

PURPOSE: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is a frequently underdiagnosed cause of vertigo, potentially due to the underuse of diagnostic and therapeutic canalith repositioning procedures (CRPs). We aimed to investigate self-reported use of the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to BPPV patients by Lithuanian neurologists, ear, nose, and throat (ENT) physicians, and general practitioners (GPs), and to explore potential reasons for the underuse of the maneuvers. METHODS: Neurologists, ENT physicians, and GPs were invited to complete a written questionnaire focused on diagnostic and therapeutic practices related to BPPV. Between-group differences and associations between responses were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: In total, 97 neurologists, 85 ENT physicians and 142 GPs (21.1%, 26.8%, and 5.7%, respectively, of all corresponding licensed Lithuanian physicians) completed the questionnaire. 24% of neurologists, 33% ENT physicians and 50% GPs do not perform diagnostic maneuvers for patients with suspected BPPV, and 28%, 61%, and 84%, respectively, do not perform CRPs. Years of clinical experience was a negative predictor of CRP performance [OR 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.99), p = 0.001]. Frequent reasons for not performing CRPs were time taken for the procedure, fear of provoking symptoms, and lack of knowledge. All physicians frequently ordered additional imaging or consultations for suspected BPPV and reported prescribing a range of medications. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of Lithuanian neurologists, ENT physicians, and GPs do not employ diagnostic maneuvers and CRPs for BPPV patients, contrary to established guidelines. Lack of expertise and time available is a common culprit that leads to unnecessary drug prescribing and investigation.