ABSTRACT
Introduction: The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) has put forward two key proposals for diagnosing sarcopenia: the EWGSOP1 in 2010 and the EWGSOP2 in 2019. These proposals are currently the most widely used guidelines for diagnosing sarcopenia. However, data on the prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) based on EWGSOP criteria are limited. This study aimed to: (a) establish the prevalence of sarcopenia in an elderly Spanish cohort of women with RA using both EWGSOP1 and EWGSOP2 criteria; and (b) evaluate the effectiveness of the SARC-F questionnaire in detecting sarcopenia. Methods: In this observational, cross-sectional study, 67 women aged over 65 years who met the ACR 2010 criteria for RA were consecutively recruited from a tertiary university hospital. Assessments included: (a) demographic and anthropometric data; (b) RA-related variables (disease history, analytical evaluation, activity, disability, quality of life); and (c) sarcopenia-related variables (muscle strength, gait speed, skeletal muscle mass, and SARC-F questionnaire). The prevalence of sarcopenia was determined using both EWGSOP1 and EWGSOP2 criteria. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the SARC-F questionnaire for detecting sarcopenia were calculated. Results: The prevalence of sarcopenia was 43% according to the EWGSOP1 criteria and 16% according to the EWGSOP2 criteria. Patients diagnosed with sarcopenia based on the latter criteria also met the EWGSOP1's criteria for sarcopenia. Agreement between the two sets of EWGSOP criteria was poor. The SARC-F questionnaire demonstrated an inherently high sensitivity (100%) as well as good specificity (75%) and diagnostic accuracy (79%) in detecting sarcopenia according to EWGSOP2 criteria. Conclusions: The prevalence rate of sarcopenia among elderly Spanish women with RA varies significantly depending on whether EWGSOP1 or EWGSOP2 criteria are applied. The SARC-F questionnaire is effective for predicting sarcopenia when used in conjunction with the EWGSOP2 criteria, which is currently the most accepted standard in clinical practice.
ABSTRACT
Objetivo: Analizar el papel de enfermería en el abordaje de la espondiloartritis axial (EspAax) y plantear propuestas que permitan incluir el rol de las consultas de enfermería en reumatología (CER) en la certificación de calidad de las unidades especializadas. Métodos: Revisión sistemática del rol de enfermería en los sistemas de certificación de calidad en el abordaje de la EspAax, seguida de conferencia de consenso con participación de 3enfermeras especializadas en reumatología para determinar elementos que considerar en futuras revisiones de las normas de certificación. Resultados: La revisión sistemática arrojó 5documentos relevantes. Ninguna de las publicaciones revisadas proponía estándares aplicables a la labor asistencial de enfermería en el manejo de pacientes con EspAax, aunque contemplaban actividades propias de este colectivo. Las propuestas consensuadas para incorporar el rol de las CER en las normas de certificación de las unidades monográficas de EspAax incluyeron: equipamientos y recursos básicos, organización, administración de tratamientos farmacológicos y promoción de la adherencia, programas estandarizados para EspAax, consulta telemática para control del paciente estable y promoción de la continuidad asistencial y registro de medidas de resultados informados por los pacientes. Conclusiones: La literatura sobre estándares de calidad y normas de certificación de las unidades monográficas de EspAax es escasa y apenas refleja el papel de las CER en la provisión de una atención de calidad. Las propuestas consensuadas en este trabajo incorporarían las CER en las normas de certificación de calidad. En el futuro, la mayor presencia de CER en España debiera ir acompañada de la actualización de los estándares.(AU)
Objective: To analyse the role of nursing in the approach to axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and to make proposals to include the role of rheumatology nursing consultations (RECs) in the quality certification of these specialized units. Methods: A systematic review of the nursing role in quality certification systems in the management of axSpA was conducted. Subsequently a consensus conference was held with the participation of 3rheumatology nurses to determine elements that should be considered in future revisions of certification standards. Results: The systematic review yielded 5papers as relevant. None of the publications reviewed explicitly proposed standards applicable to nursing care in the management of patients with axSpA, although they contemplated the activities of this professional group. The proposals agreed upon to incorporate the role of RECs in the certification standards for axSpA monographic units included the following: basic equipment and resources, organization, administration of pharmacological treatments and promotion of adherence, standardized programmes for axSpA, telematic consultation (e-consultation) for monitoring the stable patient and promoting continuity of care and registry of patient-reported outcome measures. Conclusions: The literature on quality standards and certification standards for axSpA monographic units is scarce and hardly reflects the role of RECs in providing quality care. The consensus proposals in this study would incorporate RECs into quality certification standards. In the future, the increased presence of RECs in Spain should be accompanied by a review of the indicators regarding their role.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Health Sciences , Consensus Development Conferences as Topic , Certification , Spondylarthritis , Quality of Health Care , Nursing , Nurse Specialists , Rheumatology , Rheumatic DiseasesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To analyse the role of nursing in the approach to axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and to make proposals to include the role of rheumatology nursing consultations (RECs) in the quality certification of these specialized units. METHODS: A systematic review of the nursing role in quality certification systems in the management of axSpA was conducted. Subsequently a consensus conference was held with the participation of three rheumatology nurses to determine elements that should be considered in future revisions of certification standards. RESULTS: The systematic review yielded five papers as relevant. None of the publications reviewed explicitly proposed standards applicable to nursing care in the management of patients with axSpA, although they contemplated the activities of this professional group. The proposals agreed upon to incorporate the role of RECs in the certification standards for axSpA monographic units included the following: basic equipment and resources, organization, administration of pharmacological treatments and promotion of adherence, standardized programmes for axSpA, telematic consultation for monitoring the stable patient, registry of patient-reported outcome measures and e-consultation. CONCLUSIONS: The literature on quality standards and certification standards for axSpA monographic units is scarce and hardly reflects the role of RECs in providing quality care. The consensus proposals in this study would incorporate RECs into quality certification standards. In the future, the increased presence of RECs in Spain should be accompanied by a review of the indicators regarding their role.
