ABSTRACT
The value of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing for cervical cancer screening is well established; however, its use as a primary screening option or as a reflex test after atypical cytology results is now gaining wider acceptance. The importance of full genotyping and viral load determination has been demonstrated to enhance the clinical understanding of the viral infection progression during follow-up or after treatment, thereby providing clinicians with supplementary tools for optimized patient management. We developed a new analysis method for the RIATOL quantitative PCR assay, and validated and implemented it in the laboratory of clinical molecular pathology at Algemeen Medisch Laboratorium (AML), under national accreditation and following the International Organization for Standardization guidelines. This study presents the successful validation of a high-throughput, multitarget HPV analysis method, with enhanced accuracy on both qualitative and quantitative end results. This is achieved by software standardization and automation of PCR curve analysis and interpretation, using data science and artificial intelligence. Moreover, the user-centric functionality of the platform was demonstrated to enhance both staff training and routine analysis workflows, thereby saving time and laboratory personnel resources. Overall, the integration of the FastFinder plugin semi-automatic analysis algorithm with the RIATOL real-time quantitative PCR assay proved to be a remarkable advancement in high-throughput HPV quantification, with demonstrated capability to provide highly accurate clinical-grade results and to reduce manual variability and analysis time.
ABSTRACT
Clinically validated human papillomavirus (HPV) assays are crucial in cervical cancer screening. In this study, we evaluated the Allplex HPV HR Detection assay (Seegene, SouthKorea) for its clinical accuracy and reproducibility according to the international criteria, using the RealTime High Risk HPV m2000 assay (Abbott, USA) as standard comparator. The Allplex HPV HR assay exhibits significant non-inferior sensitivity to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade (CIN) 2 or worse (CIN2+) with a ratio of 1.00 (95% CI: 0.97-1.03, P = 0.006), insignificant non-inferior sensitivity to detect CIN3+ with a ratio of 1.00 (95% CI: 0.88-1.13, P = 0.098), and non-inferior specificity to exclude CIN2+ with a ratio of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.99-1.00, P < 0.001) compared to the standard comparator. In addition, the assay shows an excellent reproducibility within the same laboratory [96.5% (95% CI: 94.6-97.9) with a kappa value of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.95)] and between laboratories [96.7% (95% CI: 94.8-98.0) with a kappa value of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.95)] for overall high-risk HPV positivity as well as for each individual HPV type. Pooling our study data with those of another independent study supports the consistency of our findings. We conclude that both the clinical accuracy to detect cervical precancer and the reproducibility of Allplex HPV HR Detection assay fulfill the international validation criteria of use in cervical cancer screening.IMPORTANCEThe clinical validation of human papillomavirus (HPV) assays in accordance with well-established international guidelines is crucial to ensure that only validated assays are used in the context of screening (Meijer et al., Int J Cancer, 2009). The guidelines, developed by an international consortium, require that a novel HPV assay has non-inferior accuracy against a standard comparator test for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade (CIN) 2 or worse (CIN2+). Additionally, a new HPV assay should meet specific criteria for both intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility to ensure the assay consistently exhibits technical precision and robust performance. Pooling our study data with those of another independent study supports the consistency of our findings. In conclusion, both the clinical accuracy to detect cervical precancer and the reproducibility of Allplex HPV HR Detection assay fulfill the international validation criteria of use in cervical cancer screening.
Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer , Papillomaviridae , Papillomavirus Infections , Sensitivity and Specificity , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Early Detection of Cancer/standards , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Reproducibility of Results , Adult , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology , Middle Aged , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , AgedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Self-collection of cervical samples to detect high-risk human papillomavirus (hr-HPV) is a trending topic in primary cervical cancer screening. This study evaluates the applicability of a self-sampling device to routine molecular procedures for hr-HPV detection. METHODS: In a primary health care facility in Kinshasa, Congo, 187 self-collected samples (Evalyn Brush) were gathered and sent to Ghent University Hospital (UZ Ghent) and Algemeen Medisch Labo (AML) in Belgium where routine tests for hr-HPV were applied (Abbott RealTime hr-HPV and qPCR (E6/E7), respectively). Sample type effect was evaluated by comparing the internal control (IC) between the self-collected samples and routine, clinician-taken samples randomly selected from the UZ Ghent archive. RESULTS: In UZ Ghent an error was encountered in 9.1% (17/187) of self-collected samples due to a lack of IC signal. The hr-HPV prevalence in the remaining 170 samples was 18,8%. Comparing IC results between the self-collected and clinician-collected groups, a significant difference (p < 0,001) was found, with higher IC signals in the clinician-collected group. In AML, an error was encountered in 17.6% (33/187) of samples, including 16/17 of the UZ Ghent. The remaining sample with IC error gave a negative result in AML. Among the 154 samples without IC error at AML, a correlation of 90% was seen between both laboratories with a 77% negativity rate. CONCLUSION: Testing the self-collected specimens by 2 routine hr-HPV tests gave a high IC error rate (9.1-17.6%). A possible solution would be to differentiate cut-offs for IC values depending on sample type, as currently used cut-offs are set for clinician-taken samples.
Subject(s)
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Papillomavirus Infections , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Human Papillomavirus Viruses , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Papillomaviridae , Democratic Republic of the Congo , Specimen Handling/methods , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
Cutaneous warts are benign skin lesions caused by the human papillomavirus (HPV). Even though they are considered benign, they can have a considerable impact on the quality of life and cause serious illness in certain immunocompromised populations. Studies have shown that the efficacy of wart treatment is dependent on the causative HPV type. Therefore, in this article, we aim to determine the HPV genotype-specific prevalence in cutaneous warts of a Flemish population as part of the Omnivirol-Salycilic acid randomized controlled trial. Swab samples of cutaneous warts (n = 269) were collected during enrollment. The DNA extraction was performed on the automated NucliSENS® easyMAG® system (bioMérieux). The samples were analyzed with two separate in-house PCR assays capable of detecting the most prevalent cutaneous HPV types (i.e. wart-associated HPV qPCR) as well as the most relevant mucosal types (i.e. RIATOL qPCR assay). In total, the type-specific prevalence of 30 distinct HPV genotypes was determined. The beta-globin gene was used as a cellularity control and for viral load quantification. Data concerning wart persistence, previous treatment, wart type, and other relevant wart and patient characteristics was collected through a baseline questionnaire. The study population consisted mostly of persistent warts considering that 98% (n = 263) of the sampled skin lesions were older than six months and 92% (n = 247) had undergone previous treatment. The most prominent wart type was the mosaic verruca plantaris (42%, n = 113). The most prevalent HPV types were cutaneous HPV types 27 (73%, n = 195), 57 (63%, n = 169), and 2 (42%, n = 113). Only 2% (n = 6) of the lesions was HPV negative. The highest median viral loads were observed with HPV27 and 57 (i.e. 6.29E+04 and 7.47E+01 viral copies per cell respectively). The multivariate analysis found significant associations between wart persistence and certain wart types, the number of warts, and HPV genotypes. Based on these findings, persistent warts are more likely to: (1) be verruca vulgaris, verruca plantaris simple or mosaic, (2) to manifest as multiple warts, (3) and to be negative for HPV type 2 or 4. These characteristics can be useful in the clinical setting for future risk stratification when considering treatment triage and management. Trial registration: NCT05862441, 17/05/2023 (retrospectively registered).
Subject(s)
Foot Diseases , Papilloma , Papillomavirus Infections , Warts , Humans , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Prevalence , Belgium/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Warts/epidemiology , Warts/pathology , Papillomaviridae/genetics , DNA, Viral/geneticsABSTRACT
The VALHUDES protocol was established to evaluate clinical accuracy of human papillomavirus (HPV) assays to detect cervical precancer on first-void urine (FVU) and vaginal self-samples versus matched clinician-collected cervical samples (CCSs). Here we evaluated clinical performance of Alinity m HR HPV assay in a colposcopy referral population. Home-collected FVU (Colli-Pee FV 5020) 1 day before colposcopy (n = 492), at-clinic collected dry vaginal self-samples [multi-Collect Swab (mC; n = 493), followed by Evalyn Brush (EB; n = 233) or Qvintip (QT; n = 260)] and matched CCSs, were available for the study. Sensitivity to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) of Alinity testing on FVU (ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.85-1.03), mC (ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.94-1.06), and EB/QT (ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.85-1.00) was not different to CCSs. Specificity on FVU was similar to CCS (ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.95-1.10), whereas specificity on mC was lower (ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.90), but on EB/QT was higher (ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.15) than on CCS. Accuracy on EB (sensitivity ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.87-1.05; specificity ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.06-1.31) was slightly better than on QT (sensitivity ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.75-1.03; specificity ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.92-1.09). In conclusion, clinical sensitivity of Alinity assay on all self-sample types was similar to cervical specimens. Adjustment of signal thresholds improved assay's accuracy to detect CIN2+ in all self-sample types.
Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Human Papillomavirus Viruses , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Specimen Handling/methods , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
The implementation of cervical screening based on human papillomavirus (HPV) continues to progress rapidly across countries. Evidence has shown that assays detecting high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) are more effective than cytology-based screening. Validation of new hrHPV DNA assays requires both noninferior clinical accuracy compared to a standard comparator for cervical precancer and good reproducibility. This study builds upon previous diagnostic accuracy assessments of the RIATOL HPV genotyping qPCR assay and aims to evaluate the international validation criteria for reproducibility. The intra- and interreproducibility of the RIATOL-qPCR assay were assessed using 550 remnant cervical cell material from the cytology archive of the National Reference Center for HPV in Belgium. Specimens were collected in the context of cervical cancer screening and tested in two different laboratories. The international reproducibility criteria include the lower bound of 95% confidence interval of the intra- and interlaboratory agreement regarding the detection of hrHPV DNA exceeding 87% with kappa ≥0.50. The RIATOL-qPCR assay demonstrated excellent intralaboratory reproducibility, achieving an overall agreement of 98.2 (95% CI 96.6-99.1%) and a kappa of 0.96. Interlaboratory testing showed an overall agreement of 98.5 (95% CI 97.1-99.4%) with a kappa of 0.97. The RIATOL-qPCR assay fulfills the third criterion for HPV test reproducibility requirement for use in cervical cancer screening.
Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Early Detection of Cancer , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Genotype , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Reproducibility of Results , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Human Papillomavirus Viruses , DNAABSTRACT
Background: In previous years, several cutaneous disorders have been associated with human papillomavirus (HPV); however, the exact role of HPV remains largely unknown. The lack of optimization and standardization of the pre-analytical phase forms a major obstacle. The aim of this study was to develop an accurate/patient-friendly sampling method for skin disorders, with cutaneous warts as a case study. Methods: Various sample processing techniques, pre-treatment protocols and DNA extraction methods were evaluated. Several sampling methods were examined, that is, skin scrapings, swabs and a tape-based method. Quantification of DNA yield was achieved by beta-globin real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and a wart-associated HPV genotyping qPCR was used to determine the HPV prevalence. Results: All samples tested positive for beta-globin. Skin scrapings had significantly higher yield than both swab and tape-based methods (p < 0.01), the latter two did not significantly differ from each other (p > 0.05). No significant difference in DNA yield was found between cotton and flocked swabs (p > 0.05). All swabs were HPV positive, and although there were some discrepancies in HPV prevalence between both swabs, an overall good strength of agreement was found [κ = 0.77, 95% CI (0.71-0.83)]. Conclusion: Although skin scrapings produced the highest DNA yield, patient discomfort was an important limitation of this method. Considering that in combination with our optimized DNA extraction procedure, all samples gave valid results with the less invasive swab methods preferred. Standardization of the pre-analytical phase is the first step in establishing a link between HPV and specific skin disorders and may have significant downstream diagnostic as well as therapeutic implications.
ABSTRACT
The accuracy of high-risk human papillomavirus testing with the Xpert HPV assay on vaginal self-samples was compared with clinician-taken samples within the VALidation of HUman papillomavirus assays and collection DEvices for Self-samples and urine samples (VALHUDES) framework. Five-hundred and twenty-three women were recruited in five Belgian colposcopy clinics, of whom 483 (median age, 40 years; interquartile range, 31 to 49 years) were included in the main analysis (226 collected with Evalyn Brush and 257 collected with Qvintip). Cervical samples were collected with Cervex-Brush. Colposcopy and histology outcomes were considered as the reference standard. The Xpert HPV assay had similar accuracy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia ≥2 on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples [relative sensitivity, 0.96 (95% CI, 0.91-1.02); and relative specificity, 0.96 (95% CI, 0.89-1.04)]. The relative accuracy slightly differed by vaginal collection device [sensitivity ratios of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.90-1.06) and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.87-1.02) for Evalyn and Qvintip, respectively; specificity ratios of 1.06 (95% CI, 0.95-1.19) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80-0.98) for Evalyn and Qvintip, respectively]. No difference in cycle threshold values was observed between vaginal and cervical samples. In conclusion, the sensitivity of Xpert HPV assay for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia ≥2 on vaginal self-samples was similar to that of cervical specimens. The clinical specificity was lower than on clinician-collected samples when self-samples were taken with Qvintip.
Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Adult , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Vagina , Specimen Handling , Sensitivity and Specificity , Early Detection of CancerABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In this study, we evaluated accuracy of HPV testing on self-samples versus clinician-taken samples through the VALHUDES protocol. VALHUDES was designed as a diagnostic test accuracy study, where women referred to colposcopy collected self-samples followed by clinician-taken cervical samples. METHODS: Four hundred eighty-five women recruited in five colposcopy clinics (median age = 40 years; IQR, 31-49) with valid results for all specimens were included in the main analysis: 230 vaginal self-samples were collected with Evalyn Brush and 255 with Qvintip. Cervical samples were taken by the gynecologist with the Cervex-Brush. HPV testing was performed with BD Onclarity HPV assay (Onclarity). Colposcopy and histology were used as the reference standard for accuracy estimation. RESULTS: The sensitivity for CIN2+ on vaginal self-samples overall was not different from cervical samples (ratio = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.90-1.03), whereas specificity was significantly higher (ratio = 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02-1.16). However, the relative accuracy (self- vs. clinician sampling) differed by vaginal collection device: relative sensitivity and specificity ratios of 1.00 (95% CI, 0.94-1.06) and 1.15 (95% CI, 1.05-1.25), respectively for Evalyn-Brush; 0.91 (95% CI, 0.79-1.04) and 1.03 (95% CI, 0.95-1.13), respectively for Qvintip. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical accuracy of BD Onclarity HPV assay on vaginal self-samples was not different from cervical samples. IMPACT: VALHUDES study showed that HPV testing with Onclarity HPV on vaginal self-samples is similarly sensitive compared with cervical specimens. However, differences in accuracy by self-sampling devices, although not significant, were noted. Onclarity HPV testing on vaginal self-samples following validated collection and handling procedures may be used in primary cervical cancer screening.
Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Adult , Papillomaviridae , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Specimen Handling/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Vaginal SmearsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Urine collection is a non-invasive self-sampling method offering the prospect of reaching women un(der)-screened for cervical cancer. The VALHUDES research framework was designed to address the lack of clinical accuracy data for high-risk (hr)HPV testing using urine samples. OBJECTIVES: Here, we report on the analytical and clinical accuracy of hrHPV testing on first-void urine, collected at home, using an extended HPV genotyping assay. STUDY DESIGN: Paired first-void urine (Colli-Pee with UCM, Novosanis; index test) and clinician-collected cervical samples (Cervex-Brush, Rovers in PreservCyt Solution, Hologic; comparator test) were collected from 492 women aged 19 to 72 years attending colposcopy (reference test, with histology if indicated) (VALHUDES; NCT03064087). Extended HPV genotyping was performed on paired samples with the BD Onclarity HPV Assay. Cut-offs defined for cervical samples were also applied for first-void urine. RESULTS: HrHPV testing in first-void urine was similarly sensitive for both CIN2+ (ratio 1.00; 95% CI: 0.93-1.07) and CIN3 (ratio 0.98; 95% CI: 0.88-1.08), and marginally less specific for Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections
, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia
, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
, Adult
, Aged
, DNA, Viral/genetics
, DNA, Viral/urine
, Diagnostic Tests, Routine
, Early Detection of Cancer/methods
, Female
, Genotype
, Humans
, Middle Aged
, Papillomaviridae/genetics
, Sensitivity and Specificity
, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis
ABSTRACT
The VALHUDES framework (NCT03064087) was established to evaluate the clinical accuracy of HPV testing on self-samples compared with HPV testing on matched clinician-taken cervical samples. Women referred to colposcopy due to previous cervical abnormalities were recruited at five Belgian colposcopy centers. A total of 486 pairs of matched cervical samples and vaginal self-samples were included in the analysis (228 collected with Evalyn Brush and 258 with Qvintip). The dry vaginal brushes were transferred into 20 mL ThinPrep PreservCyt solution. All specimens were tested with the Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV assay (Abbott RT). Testing on vaginal and cervical specimens was considered the index and comparator tests, respectively, and colposcopy and histology as the reference standard. The clinical sensitivity for CIN2+ of Abbott RT (cutoff ≤32 cycle number [CN]) on vaginal self-samples (Evalyn Brush and Qvintip combined) was 8% lower than on the cervical clinician-collected samples (ratio = 0.92 [95% CI, 0.87 to 0.98]), while the specificity was similar (ratio = 1.04 [95% CI, 0.97 to 1.12]). Sensitivity (ratio = 0.95 [95% CI, 0.89 to 1.02]) and specificity (ratio = 1.11 [95% CI, 0.995 to 1.23]) on Evalyn Brush samples was similar to cervical, while on Qvintip samples, the sensitivity was 12% lower than cervical samples (ratio = 0.88 [95% CI, 0.78 to 0.998]) with similar specificity (0.99 [95% CI, 0.90 to 1.10]). Exploratory cutoff optimization (cutoff ≤35 CN) resulted in an improvement of the relative sensitivity (self-sampling versus clinician sampling: ratio = 0.96 [95% CI, 0.91 to 1.02]) but yielded a loss in relative specificity (ratio = 0.92 [0.85 to 1.00]). The clinical accuracy of Abbott RT differed from the self-sampling device. However, after cutoff optimization, the sensitivity on self-samples taken with either of two vaginal brushes became similar to clinician-collected samples. IMPORTANCE Self-samples are becoming a crucial part of HPV-based cervical cancer screening programs to reach nonattendee women and increase screening coverage. Therefore, the VALHUDES framework was established to validate and evaluate HPV tests and devices on self-samples. Here, in the present manuscript, we evaluated the accuracy of the RealTime High Risk HPV assay (Abbott RT) on two different vaginal devices to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade two or higher (CIN2+). The study results demonstrated that the Abbott RT assay is similarly accurate on vaginal self-samples as on matched clinician-taken cervical samples after adjusting cutoff values. Moreover, we observed that some vaginal devices perform better than others in CIN2+ detection. We also underline the necessity of standardization and validation of general workflow and sample handling procedures for vaginal self-samples.
Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/pathology , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Specimen Handling/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Interventions to reach women who do not participate regularly in screening may reduce the risk of cervical cancer. Self-collection of a vaginal specimen has been shown to increase participation. The relative clinical accuracy of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing on first-void urine (with Colli-Pee) and on vaginal self-samples versus on cervical clinician-collected samples is being investigated in the VALHUDES trial. The current study assesses attitudes and experiences regarding self-sampling among women enrolled in VALHUDES. METHODS: Questionnaires from 515 women (age 25-64 years [N = 498]; < 25 [N = 10], age ≥ 65 [N = 3], enrolled between December 2017 - January 2020) referred to colposcopy because of previous cervical abnormalities and enrolled in VALHUDES (NCT03064087) were analysed. RESULTS: Of the 515 participants, nearly all women confirmed that self-sampling may help in reaching under-screened women (93%). Nevertheless, 44% of the participants stated before starting collection that a clinician-collected sample is more effective than a self-collected sample. After self-sampling, the large majority of women (> 95%) declared that instructions for self-collection were clear, that collection was easy, and that they were confident about having performed the procedure correctly, for both urine and vaginal collection. However, a proportion of women found self-sampling unpleasant (9.5% [49/515] for urine collection; 18.6% [96/515] and 15.5% [80/515] for vaginal sampling with cotton swabs or plastic brushes, respectively). For their next screening round, 57% would prefer self-sampling whereas 41% opted for collection by a clinician. Among women preferring self-sampling, 53% would choose for urine collection, 38% for vaginal self-collection and 9% had no preference. Age did not modify preferences. CONCLUSION: We conclude that both urine and vaginal self-sampling are well accepted by women, with a preference for urine sampling. Although the large majority of women are confident in their ability to perform self-sampling, four to five over ten women preferred specimen collection by a clinician. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study VALHUDES was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03064087 ).
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Urine self-sampling has gained increasing interest for cervical cancer screening. In contrast to analytical performance, little information is available regarding the clinical accuracy for high-risk Human Papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing on urine. METHODS: VALHUDES is a diagnostic test accuracy study comparing clinical accuracy to detect high-grade cervical precancer (CIN2+) of HPV testing on self-collected compared to clinician-collected samples (NCT03064087). Disease outcome was assessed by colposcopy and histology. The Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV assay performance was evaluated on Colli-Pee collected first-void urine with cervical outcomes as comparator. RESULTS: As no assay cut-off for urine has been clinically validated, we used the predefined cut-off for cervical samples (CN ≤ 32). Using this cut-off, hrHPV testing was similarly sensitive (relative sensitivity 0.95; 95% CI: 0.88-1.01) and specific (relative specificity 1.03; 95% CI: 0.95-1.13) for detection of CIN2+ compared to testing cervical samples. In the subgroup of women of 30 years and older, similar relative sensitivity (0.97; 95% CI: 0.89-1.05) and specificity (1.02; 95% CI: 0.93-1.12) was found. Additionally, an exploratory cut-off (CN ≤ 33.86) was defined which further improved sensitivity and analytical test performance. CONCLUSION: HrHPV-DNA based PCR testing on home-collected first-void urine has similar accuracy for detecting CIN2+ compared to cervical samples taken by a clinician.
Subject(s)
Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/urine , Adult , Aged , Cervix Uteri/pathology , Cervix Uteri/virology , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Urine/virology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/urine , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Young Adult , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/urine , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virologyABSTRACT
Cutaneous warts are infectious disorders caused by human papillomavirus (HPV). A recent study revealed that the HPV genotype influences the natural course and response to treatment for plantar warts, suggesting that HPV genotyping could potentially be used to optimize wart treatment schemes. For this purpose, a wart-associated HPV genotyping assay was developed. The assay was subjected to an intensive validation process including, i.a., empiric determination of the annealing temperature, primer-probe optimization, evaluation of the analytical specificity and sensitivity, viral load quantification, and qualitative as well as quantitative analysis of intra-run repeatability and inter-run reproducibility. The newly developed assay was employed in a small-scale HPV genotyping study of wart biopsies (n = 50). The assay exhibited an analytical type-specific sensitivity and specificity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 83.9%-100%). The limit of quantification of the tested sequences corresponded to less than 17 viral copies/µl, while the limit of detection was less than 5 copies/µl. Very good to excellent agreements were gained between intra- and inter-run measurements (κ = 0.85-1.00) and coefficients of variation of the quantitative agreements were less then 3%. 22.5% (95% CI: 11%-39%) of the analyzed biopsies were negative for the tested HPV types, while 35% (95% CI: 21%-52%) contained multiple infections. The wart-associated HPV quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay was proven to be highly sensitive and specific. Multiple HPV infections were detected in 35% of lesions, contradicting the current literature claiming that in immunocompetent patients only 4%-16% of warts exhibit multiple HPV infections. This assay is qualified to be implemented in development of future genotype specific wart treatment strategies.
Subject(s)
Genotype , Genotyping Techniques/standards , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Skin/virology , Warts/virology , DNA, Viral/genetics , Genotyping Techniques/methods , Humans , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Reproducibility of Results , Skin/pathology , Viral LoadABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Screening of unvaccinated women remains essential to mitigate the high morbidity/mortality of cervical cancer. Here, we compared visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), recommended by WHO as the most cost-effective screening approach in LMICs, with HPV-based screening, and usage of p16INK4a/Ki-67 dual stain cytology. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled women participating in a VIA-based cervical cancer screening program in two peri-urban health centers of Kenya. Consenting women had a VIA examination preceded by collection of a liquid-based cytology sample from the cervix stored in PreservCyt medium (Hologic®). Analysis of all samples included a hrHPV DNA test and evaluation of a p16INK4a /Ki-67 (CINtecPLUS®) dual stained slide that was prepared using the ThinPrep® 2000 Processor and evaluated by a pathologist trained in the methodology. RESULTS: In 701 of a total of 800 women aged 18-64 years, all three investigations were performed and data could be analyzed. The HPV, VIA and dual stain cytology positivity were 33%, 7%, and 2% respectively. The HPV positivity rate of VIA positive cases was 32%. The five most common HPV types were HPV16, 52, 68, 58 and 35. The OR among HIV infected women of an HPV infection, VIA positivity and positive dual stain cytology were 2.6 (95%CI 1.5-4.3), 1.9 (95%CI 0.89-4.4) and 3.4 (95%CI 1.07-10.9) respectively. The sensitivity of VIA to detect a p16INK4a/Ki-67 positive transforming infection was 13% (95%CI 2-38). CONCLUSIONS: Primary HPV testing appears feasible and should be considered as a primary screening test also in LMICs. The poor sensitivity of VIA renders it unsuitable as a triage test for HPV positive women. The utility of p16INK4a/Ki-67 dual stain cytology as a triage test for HPV positive women in LMICs should be further studied.
ABSTRACT
Cutaneous warts comprise an extremely common condition caused by infection with the human papillomavirus (HPV). Although most verrucae will disappear spontaneously, many patients do seek treatment. Current wart treatments do not target the cause of the lesion directly, resulting in variable treatment efficacies and high wart recurrence rates. AV2 is a broad-spectrum antiviral drug, that is capable of deactivating HPV. It is however not able to destruct the already infected cells, which raises the need for an additional ablative treatment i.e. salicylic acid (SA). Implementation of AV2-Salicylic acid (AV2-SA) combination therapy would ensure permanent lesion clearance by on the one hand inactivation of HPV by AV2, and on the other hand elimination of the lesion by SA treatment. The primary aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of AV2-SA treatment versus standard SA treatment, by comparing cure and recurrence rates of cutaneous warts between the two treatment groups (at 12 weeks and six months after randomization). The second aim is to assess the safety and tolerability of AV2-SA therapy. The third aim is to identify subgroups of cutaneous warts that have favorable response to treatment, by comparing cure rates in an HPV genotype-specific manner. This randomized controlled trial will enroll 260 participants with cutaneous warts who will either receive the AV2-SA combination therapy or SA control treatment. Real time monitoring will be possible by daily photographs sent via WhatsApp™ (a messaging application) as well as online follow-up questionnaires administered on several occasions. HPV genotyping will be performed on swab self-samples.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: New rapid and low-cost molecular tests for cervical cancer screening, such as the OncoE6 Cervical Test, are emerging and could be alternatives for low-income and middle-income countries. To this end, we evaluated the clinical performance of the OncoE6 Cervical Test in detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) among HIV-infected women in Bujumbura, Burundi. METHODS: From June to December 2017, a cross-sectional study was conducted in 680 HIV-positive women at the University Hospital. Women aged 25-65 years who declared having had vaginal intercourse were consecutively recruited, and cervical specimens for OncoE6, liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping were obtained and visual inspection with acetic acid performed. Thereafter, participants underwent a colposcopic examination. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the different tests were calculated with reference to 'colposcopic-histological' diagnoses, and areas under the receiver operating curves of OncoE6 and cytology tests were compared. RESULTS: The prevalence of CIN was 4.9%, and OncoE6 positivity was 3.1%. OncoE6 sensitivity varied from poor to low with increasing disease severity (42.1%, 95% CI 19.9% to 64.3% at CIN2+ threshold; and 58.3%, 95% CI 30.4% to 86.2% at CIN3+ threshold). OncoE6 had the highest specificity compared with all other tests used together. The performance of the OncoE6 test was significantly lower compared with cytology at atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASCUS+) cut-off (AUC=0.68 vs 0.85, p=0.03) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL+) cut-off (AUC=0.68 vs 0.83, p=0.04) for CIN2+ diagnoses. However, the performance of the OncoE6 test was similar to that of cytology at high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL+) cut-off (AUC=0.68 vs 0.76; p=0.30) for CIN2+ diagnoses and was also similar to that of cytology at all cut-offs (ASCUS+, LSIL+ and HSIL+) for CIN3+ diagnoses (p1=0.76, p2=0.95 and p3=0.50, respectively). CONCLUSION: The current OncoE6 test proved to be a point-of-care test. However, given its poor performance for CIN2+ diagnoses, we do not recommend it for primary screening. We recommend to enrich it with more oncogenic HPV types, which may improve the performance of the test akin to that of cytology.
Subject(s)
Atypical Squamous Cells of the Cervix/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , HIV Infections/complications , Oncogene Proteins, Viral/analysis , Papillomaviridae/metabolism , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Atypical Squamous Cells of the Cervix/virology , Biopsy , Burundi , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/complications , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/virology , Colposcopy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Cytological Techniques , Female , Human Papillomavirus DNA Tests , Humans , Middle Aged , Oncogene Proteins, Viral/metabolism , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sensitivity and Specificity , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/complications , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/complications , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Persistent infection with high-risk types of human papillomavirus (HPV) is the preeminent factor driving the development of cervical cancer. There are large gaps in knowledge about both the role of pregnancy in the natural history of HPV infection and the impact of HPV on pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: This single-site prospective cohort substudy, nested within an international multisite randomized controlled trial, assessed prevalence, incident cases, and persistence of type-specific HPV infection, and the association between persistence of high-risk HPV infection with pregnancy outcomes among HIV-infected pregnant women in Kenya, including HIV transmission to infants. Type-specific HPV was assessed using a line probe assay in pregnancy and again at 3 months after delivery. HIV status of children was determined using polymerase chain reaction at 6 weeks. RESULTS: In total, 84.1% (206/245) of women had a high-risk HPV infection at enrollment. Three quarters (157/206) of these infections persisted postpartum. Persistence of HPV16 and/or HPV18 types was observed in more than half (53.4%; 39/73) of women with this infection at enrollment. Almost two-thirds had an incident high-risk HPV infection postpartum, which was not present in pregnancy (62.5%), most commonly HPV52 (19.0%). After adjustments, no association was detected between persistent high-risk HPV and preterm birth. All mothers of the 7 cases of infant HIV infection had persistent high-risk HPV infection (P = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: High levels of high-risk HPV infection and type-specific persistence were documented, heightening the urgency of mass role out of HPV vaccination. The association between HPV persistence and HIV transmission is a novel finding, warranting further study.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnant Women , Adolescent , Adult , Female , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Human papillomavirus 16/genetics , Human papillomavirus 18/genetics , Humans , Infant , Kenya/epidemiology , Longitudinal Studies , Pregnancy , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Human papillomaviruses are the most important causative agents for invasive cervical cancer development. HPV type-specific vaccination and HPV cervical cancer screening methods are being widely recommended to control the disease but the epidemiology of the circulating HPV types may vary locally. The circulating HPV-strains have never been assessed in Burundi. This study determined the prevalence and genotype-specific distribution of HPV in four different strata in Burundi: HIV-infected or non-infected and women living in rural or urban areas. Implications for HPV diagnosis and vaccine implementation was discussed. METHODS: Four cross-sectional surveys were conducted in Burundi (2013 in a rural area and 2016 in urban area) among HIV-infected and uninfected women living in rural and urban areas. Liquid-Based Cytology (LBC) and HPV genotyping were performed and risk factors for HPV infection and cervical pre-cancer lesions were determined using logistic regression model. RESULTS: HPV prevalence was very high in urban area with significant differences between HIV-positive and negative women (p<0.0001). In fact, 45.7% of HIV-positive participants were infected with any HPV type and all were infected with at least one HR/pHR-HPV type. Among the HIV-negative participants, 13.4% were HPV-infected, of whom, only four women (2.7%) were infected with HR/pHR-HPV types. In rural area, HPV infection did not significantly differ between HIV-positive and negative women (30.0% and 31.3% respectively; p = 0.80). In urban area, multiple infections with HR/pHR-HPV types were detected in 13.9% and 2.7% among HIV-positive and negative women respectively (p<0.0001), whereas in rural area, multiple infections with HR/pHR-HPV types were detected in 4.7% and 3.3% of HIV-positive and negative women respectively (p = 0.56). The most prevalent HR/pHR-HPV types in HIV-positive women living in urban area were HPV 52, 51, 56, 18 and 16 types. In HIV-negative women living in urban area, the most prevalent HR/pHR-HPV types were HPV 66, 67, 18, 45 and 39 types. In HIV-positive women living in rural area, the most prevalent HR/pHR-HPV types were HPV 66, 16, 18 and 33 types. In HIV-negative women living in rural area, the most prevalent HR/pHR-HPV types were HPV 16, 66, 18, 35 and 45 types. Independent risk factors associated with cervical lesions were HPV and HIV infections. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high burden of HR and pHR-HPV infections, in particular among HIV-infected women living in urban area. The study points out the need to introduce a comprehensive cervical cancer control programme adapted to the context. This study shows that the nonavalent vaccine covers most of the HR/pHR-HPV infections in rural and urban areas among HIV-infected and uninfected women.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections/epidemiology , Papillomaviridae , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adult , Burundi , Female , Genotype , HIV Infections/complications , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/therapeutic use , Prevalence , Social Planning , Urban Renewal , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To study the influence of human papillomavirus (HPV) virions present in different sperm fractions of male partners of women undergoing IUI on fertility outcome. DESIGN: Prospective noninterventional multicenter study. SETTING: Inpatient hospital fertility centers. PATIENT(S): Seven hundred thirty-two infertile couples undergoing 1,753 IUI cycles with capacitated sperm. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Biochemical and clinical pregnancy rate in IUI cycles with HPV-positive or HPV-negative semen. RESULT(S): Five hundred seventy-three infertile couples undergoing 1,362 IUI cycles were enrolled. Work-up of the 1,362 sperm samples that were used for IUI generated 3,444 separate sperm fractions. Each of the sperm fractions was tested with quantitative polymerase chain reaction for 18 different HPV types (6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 53, 56, 58, 59, 66, 67, and 68). HPV prevalence in sperm was 12.5%/IUI cycle. When infectious HPV virions were detected in sperm, a significant decrease in clinical pregnancies was observed when compared with HPV-negative cycles (2.9% vs. 11.1 %/cycle). Above a ratio of 0.66 HPV virions/spermatozoon no pregnancies occurred (sensitivity 100%, specificity 32.5%). CONCLUSION(S): Women inseminated with HPV-positive sperm had 4 times fewer clinical pregnancies compared with women who had HPV-negative partners. Detection of HPV virions in sperm is associated with a negative IUI outcome and should be part of routine examination and counseling of infertile couples. EUROPEAN CLINICAL TRIALS DATABASE NUMBER: 2017-004791-56.