Novel Regimens of Bedaquiline-Pyrazinamide Combined with Moxifloxacin, Rifabutin, Delamanid and/or OPC-167832 in Murine Tuberculosis Models.

A recent landmark trial showed a 4-month regimen of rifapentine, pyrazinamide, moxifloxacin, and isoniazid (PZMH) to be noninferior to the 6-month standard of care. Here, two murine models of tuberculosis were used to test whether novel regimens replacing rifapentine and isoniazid with bedaquiline and another drug would maintain or increase the sterilizing activity of the regimen. In BALB/c mice, replacing rifapentine in the PZM backbone with bedaquiline (i.e., BZM) significantly reduced both lung CFU counts after 1 month and the proportion of mice relapsing within 3 months after completing 1.5 months of treatment. The addition of rifabutin to BZM (BZMRb) further increased the sterilizing activity. In the C3HeB/FeJ mouse model characterized by caseating lung lesions, treatment with BZMRb resulted in significantly fewer relapses than PZMH after 2 months of treatment. A regimen combining the new DprE1 inhibitor OPC-167832 and delamanid (BZOD) also had superior bactericidal and sterilizing activity compared to PZM in BALB/c mice and was similar in efficacy to PZMH in C3HeB/FeJ mice. Thus, BZM represents a promising backbone for treatment-shortening regimens. Given the prohibitive drug-drug interactions between bedaquiline and rifampin or rifapentine, the BZMRb regimen represents the best opportunity to combine, in one regimen, the treatment-shortening potential of the rifamycin class with that of BZM and deserves high priority for evaluation in clinical trials. Other 4-drug BZM-based regimens and BZOD represent promising opportunities for extending the spectrum of treatment-shortening regimens to rifamycin- and fluoroquinolone-resistant tuberculosis.

Advances in clinical trial design: Weaving tomorrow's TB treatments.

Christian Lienhardt and co-authors discuss the conclusions of the PLOS Medicine Collection on advances in clinical trial design for development of new tuberculosis treatments.

Development of new TB regimens: Harmonizing trial design, product registration requirements, and public health guidance.

Christian Lienhardt and colleagues discuss the importance of communication and coordination between regulators, researchers, and policy makers to ensure tuberculosis trials provide high-quality evidence for policy decisions.

Isoniazid-Rifapentine for Latent Tuberculosis Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

CONTEXT: Latent tuberculosis infection diagnosis and treatment is a strategic priority for eliminating tuberculosis in the U.S. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has recommended the short-course regimen of 3-month isoniazid-rifapentine administered by directly observed therapy. However, longer-duration regimens remain the most widely prescribed latent tuberculosis infection treatments. Limitation on adoption of 3-month isoniazid-rifapentine in the U.S. might be because of patients' preference for self-administered therapy, providers' lack of familiarity with 3-month isoniazid-rifapentine, or lack of resources to support directly observed therapy. This review examines the most recent evidence regarding 3-month isoniazid-rifapentine's effectiveness, safety, and treatment completion when directly compared with other latent tuberculosis infection regimens primarily comprising 9-month isoniazid treatment. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Using Community Guide methodology, reviewers identified, evaluated, and summarized available evidence published during January 2006-June 2017. Analysis of the data was completed in 2017. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The analysis included 15 unique studies. Three-month isoniazid-rifapentine was determined to be equal to other latent tuberculosis infection regimens in effectiveness (OR=0.89, 95% CI=0.46, 1.70), and has higher treatment completion (87.5%, 95% CI=83.2%, 91.3%) compared with other latent tuberculosis infection regimens (65.9%, 95% CI=53.5%, 77.3%). Three-month isoniazid-rifapentine was associated with similar risk to other latent tuberculosis infection regimens for adverse events (relative risk=0.59, 95% CI=0.23, 1.52); discontinuing treatment because of adverse events (relative risk=0.48, 95% CI=0.17, 1.34); and death (relative risk=0.79, 95% CI=0.56, 1.11). CONCLUSIONS: The 3-month isoniazid-rifapentine regimen is as safe and effective as other recommended latent tuberculosis infection regimens and achieves significantly higher treatment completion rates.

Daily dosing of rifapentine cures tuberculosis in three months or less in the murine model.

BACKGROUND: Availability of an ultra-short-course drug regimen capable of curing patients with tuberculosis in 2 to 3 mo would significantly improve global control efforts. Because immediate prospects for novel treatment-shortening drugs remain uncertain, we examined whether better use of existing drugs could shorten the duration of treatment. Rifapentine is a long-lived rifamycin derivative currently recommended only in once-weekly continuation-phase regimens. Moxifloxacin is an 8-methoxyfluoroquinolone currently used in second-line regimens. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Using a well-established mouse model with a high bacterial burden and human-equivalent drug dosing, we compared the efficacy of rifapentine- and moxifloxacin-containing regimens with that of the standard daily short-course regimen based on rifampin, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide. Bactericidal activity was assessed by lung colony-forming unit counts, and sterilizing activity was assessed by the proportion of mice with culture-positive relapse after 2, 3, 4, and 6 mo of treatment. Here, we demonstrate that replacing rifampin with rifapentine and isoniazid with moxifloxacin dramatically increased the activity of the standard daily regimen. After just 2 mo of treatment, mice receiving rifapentine- and moxifloxacin-containing regimens were found to have negative lung cultures, while those given the standard regimen still harbored 3.17 log10 colony-forming units in the lungs (p < 0.01). No relapse was observed after just 3 mo of treatment with daily and thrice-weekly administered rifapentine- and moxifloxacin-containing regimens, whereas the standard daily regimen required 6 mo to prevent relapse in all mice. CONCLUSIONS: Rifapentine should no longer be viewed solely as a rifamycin for once-weekly administration. Our results suggest that treatment regimens based on daily and thrice-weekly administration of rifapentine and moxifloxacin may permit shortening the current 6 mo duration of treatment to 3 mo or less. Such regimens warrant urgent clinical investigation.

Clinical evaluation of the nelfinavir-rifabutin interaction in patients with tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus infection.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To characterize the bidirectional interaction between twice-daily nelfinavir and twice-weekly rifabutin and isoniazid in patients with tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Three clinical research centers. PATIENTS: Seven patients with HIV-related tuberculosis. INTERVENTION: Rifabutin 300 mg and isoniazid 15 mg/kg (maximum dose 900 mg) twice/week were administered for at least 2 weeks during the continuation phase of tuberculosis treatment. Antiretroviral therapy with nelfinavir 1250 mg twice/day and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors was then added. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients underwent blood sampling for pharmacokinetic analysis during the continuation phase of tuberculosis therapy and after a median of 21 days after the addition of antiretroviral treatment. When rifabutin was coadministered with nelfinavir, its area under the concentration-time curve from 0-21 hours (AUC(0-21)) increased 22% (geometric mean 5.01 microg.hr/ml [90% confidence interval (CI) 3.25-7.71] with nelfinavir vs 4.10 microg.hr/ml [90% CI 3.18-5.27] without nelfinavir; geometric mean ratio 1.22 [90% CI 0.78-1.92]). Also, the AUC(0-21) for the active metabolite, desacetylrifabutin, increased significantly (geometric mean ratio 3.46, 90% CI 1.84-6.47, p=0.009). In the presence of rifabutin, the pharmacokinetic parameters of nelfinavir and its principal metabolite M8 were similar to those of patients not taking rifabutin. No drug interaction between nelfinavir and isoniazid was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of rifabutin and isoniazid without dosage adjustment during twice-weekly tuberculosis therapy with nelfinavir-based antiretroviral therapy resulted in rifabutin exposures within the acceptable ranges for safety and efficacy. Therefore, this combination is an appropriate option for the simultaneous treatment of tuberculosis and HIV infection when tuberculosis therapy is given twice weekly.

Potent twice-weekly rifapentine-containing regimens in murine tuberculosis.

RATIONALE: Recent studies have demonstrated that intermittent administration of rifamycin-based regimens results in higher rates of tuberculosis relapse and treatment failure compared with daily therapy. Twice-weekly treatment with rifampin, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide may be improved by increasing Mycobacterium tuberculosis exposure to rifamycin by substituting rifapentine for rifampin. METHODS: To test this hypothesis, we compared the activities of standard daily and twice-weekly rifampin plus isoniazid-based regimens to those of twice-weekly rifapentine plus isoniazid- or moxifloxacin-containing regimens in the murine model of tuberculosis. Relapse rates were assessed after 4, 5, and 6 mo of treatment to assess stable cure. Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of rifampin and rifapentine were also determined. RESULTS: After 2 mo of treatment, twice-weekly therapy with rifapentine (15 or 20 mg/kg), moxifloxacin, and pyrazinamide was significantly more active than standard daily or twice-weekly therapy with rifampin, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide. Stable cure was achieved after 4 mo of twice-weekly rifapentine plus isoniazid- or moxifloxacin-containing therapy, but only after 6 mo of standard daily therapy. Twice-weekly rifapentine (15 mg/kg) displayed more favorable pharmacodynamics than did daily rifampin (10 mg/kg). CONCLUSIONS: By virtue of the enhanced rifamycin exposure, twice-weekly regimens containing rifapentine (15 or 20 mg/kg) may permit shortening the current treatment duration by 2 mo. Such regimens warrant clinical investigation.

Weekly moxifloxacin and rifapentine is more active than the denver regimen in murine tuberculosis.

RATIONALE: Treatment of tuberculosis with an efficacious once-weekly regimen would be a significant achievement in improving patient adherence. Currently, the only recommended once-weekly continuation phase regimen of isoniazid plus rifapentine (10 mg/kg) is inferior to standard twice-weekly therapy with isoniazid plus rifampin and is, therefore, restricted to non-high-risk patients. The substitution of moxifloxacin, a new 8-methoxyfluoroquinolone, for isoniazid and an increase in the dose of rifapentine could augment the activity of once-weekly regimens. METHODS: To test this hypothesis we evaluated the sterilizing activity of improved once-weekly rifapentine-based continuation phase regimens in a murine model that mimics the treatment of high-risk patients with tuberculosis. The bactericidal activity of standard daily therapy and standard intermittent therapy ("Denver" regimen) was also assessed to evaluate the effect of intermittent drug administration during the initial phase of therapy. RESULTS: After 2 mo of treatment, lung colony-forming unit counts were 1 log(10) lower in mice treated with standard daily therapy than with the Denver regimen. During the continuation phase, the sterilizing activity of once-weekly moxifloxacin plus rifapentine (15 mg/kg) was significantly greater than that of the predominantly twice-weekly Denver regimen of isoniazid plus rifampin. No significant difference in sterilizing activity was detected between once-weekly isoniazid plus rifapentine (15 mg/kg) and the Denver regimen. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the efficacy of the once-weekly isoniazid plus rifapentine continuation phase regimen can be increased by substituting moxifloxacin for isoniazid and by increasing the dose of rifapentine to a clinically acceptable level of 15 mg/kg.

Moxifloxacin-containing regimens of reduced duration produce a stable cure in murine tuberculosis.

In a recent experimental study using the mouse model of tuberculosis, treatment with a combination of rifampin, moxifloxacin, and pyrazinamide was able to shorten the time to negative lung cultures by up to 2 months compared with the standard regimen of rifampin, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide. To confirm that this substitution of moxifloxacin for isoniazid permits a shorter duration of treatment, a second study was performed in which mice were assessed for relapse after treatment with combination therapy for 3, 4, 5, or 6 months. Although no relapse was observed among mice treated for at least 4 months with rifampin, moxifloxacin, and pyrazinamide, mice treated with rifampin, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide required 6 months of treatment before no relapse could be detected. For mice treated with rifampin, moxifloxacin, and pyrazinamide, similar efficacy was noted whether pyrazinamide was administered for 1 month, 2 months, or the entire duration of therapy. These results suggest that the use of rifampin, moxifloxacin, and pyrazinamide may substantially shorten the duration of therapy needed to cure human tuberculosis and that the full benefit of pyrazinamide in this regimen may be realized after just 1 month of treatment.