Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
BMC Cancer ; 20(1): 1212, 2020 Dec 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33298017

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little is known about treatment expectations of patients with spinal metastases undergoing radiotherapy and/or surgery. Assuming that patients with spinal metastases share characteristics with patients who had spinal surgery for non-cancer related conditions and with advanced cancer patients, we performed a systematic review to summarize the literature on patient expectations regarding treatment outcomes of spinal surgery and advanced cancer care. METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO for studies between 2000 and sep-2019. Studies including adult patients (> 18 years), undergoing spinal surgery or receiving advanced cancer care, investigating patients' pre-treatment expectations regarding treatment outcomes were included. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts and full-texts, extracted data and assessed methodological quality. RESULTS: The search identified 7343 articles, of which 92 were selected for full-text review. For this review, 31 articles were included. Patients undergoing spinal surgery had overly optimistic expectations regarding pain and symptom relief, they underestimated the probability of functional disability, and overestimated the probability of (complete) recovery and return to work. Studies highlighted that patients feel not adequately prepared for surgery in terms of post-treatment expectations. Similarly, advanced cancer patients receiving palliative treatment often had overly optimistic expectations regarding their survival probability and cure rates. CONCLUSIONS: Patients tend to have overly optimistic expectations regarding pain and symptom relief, recovery and prognosis following spinal surgery or advanced cancer care. Pretreatment consultation about the expected pain and symptom relief, recovery and prognosis may improve understanding of prognosis, and promote and manage expectations, which, in turn, may lead to better perceived outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020145151 .


Subject(s)
Anticipation, Psychological , Motivation , Neurosurgical Procedures/psychology , Patients/psychology , Radiotherapy/psychology , Spinal Neoplasms/secondary , Activities of Daily Living , Adult , Aged , Counseling , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/etiology , Pain/psychology , Qualitative Research , Quality of Life , Recovery of Function , Socioeconomic Factors , Spinal Neoplasms/psychology , Spinal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Spinal Neoplasms/surgery , Treatment Outcome
2.
Acta Oncol ; 58(2): 251-256, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30513233

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Decreasing the radiation dose in the surgical area is important to lower the risk of wound complications when surgery and radiotherapy are combined for the treatment of spinal metastases. The purpose of this study was to compare the radiation dose in the surgical area for spinal metastases between single fraction external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), single fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and single fraction SBRT with active sparing (SBRT-AS) of the posterior surgical area. METHODS: Radiotherapy treatment plans for EBRT, SBRT and SBRT-AS of the posterior surgical area were created for 13 patients with spinal metastases. A single fraction of 8Gy was prescribed to the spinal metastasis in the EBRT plan. For the SBRT treatment plans, a single fraction of 18Gy was prescribed to the metastasis and 8Gy to the rest of the vertebral body. For the SBRT plan with active sparing the dose in the designated surgical area was minimized without compromising the dose to the organs at risk. RESULTS: The median dose in the surgical area was 2.6Gy (1.6-5.3Gy) in the SBRT plan with active sparing of the surgical area compared to a median dose of 3.7Gy (1.6-6.3Gy) in the SBRT plan without sparing and 6.5Gy (3.5-9.1Gy) in the EBRT plans (p < .001). The radiation doses to the spinal metastases and organs at risk were not significantly different between the SBRT plan with and without sparing the surgical area. CONCLUSIONS: The radiation dose to the surgical area is significantly decreased with the use of SBRT compared to EBRT. Active sparing of the surgical area further decreased the mean radiation dose in the surgical area without compromising the dose to the spinal metastasis and the organs at risk.


Subject(s)
Organ Sparing Treatments/methods , Radiosurgery/methods , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Spinal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Cohort Studies , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Organs at Risk/pathology , Organs at Risk/radiation effects , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy, Image-Guided/methods , Spinal Neoplasms/pathology , Spinal Neoplasms/secondary , Spinal Neoplasms/surgery , Spine/pathology , Tumor Burden
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...