ABSTRACT
Background: Metacognitive Training (MCT) is widely used and effective in reducing positive symptoms in psychosis. Physical exercise, such as Water Aerobics (WA), improves general health, quality of life and symptoms as a low impact activity that allows social interactions. Preliminary results suggest a relationship between dopamine and psychotic symptoms, through SP transcription factors, SP1 and SP4 biomarkers. The aims of the project are to evaluate the efficacy of a combined intervention (WA and MCT) for psychosis to improve psychotic symptoms, physical health, and transcription levels of SP biomarkers. Materials and methods: This is a unicentric randomized controlled trial of three parallel intervention groups: MCT, WA and combined intervention. The estimated sample will be 48 patients with a psychotic spectrum disorder diagnosis. The assessment will be performed at baseline and at 2-months' follow-up. Instruments used in the assessment will include clinical, cognitive, metacognitive, social cognitive and psychosocial variables. Discussion: This will be the first study investigating the impact of the combination of MCT and WA in psychosis. Moreover, it will be the first study analyzing changes in the transcriptional biomarkers SP1 and SP4 after interventions. The results of this study may have clinical implications contributing to the improvement of treatment selection. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier: NCT05455593.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to assess the relationship between social functioning and clinical symptoms in people with schizophrenia, analyzing the influence of both global social functioning and the specific aspects of social functioning, assertiveness and communication skills in the explanation of type of symptoms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive study composed of 125 people diagnosed with schizophrenia was performed. Patients were assessed with the Communication Skills Questionnaire (CSQ), the Gambrill and Richey Assertiveness Inventory (GR), the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) and the Global Assessment of Social Functioning Scale (SOFAS), Social Functioning Scale (SFS), Life Skills Profile (LSP) scale and the Clinical Global Impression scale for Schizophrenia (CGI-S). RESULTS: SOFAS, LSP and GR are related to each of the subscales and total scores of symptoms (p<0.05-0.001). The multiple regressions show that SOFAS and GR explained 59% of the total symptoms. SOFAS and GR, accounting for 65% of the variance, explain positive symptoms. GR and SOFAS explained 34% of the variance of negative symptoms. SOFAS, CSQ and LSP, accounting for 20% of the variance, explain depressive symptoms. SOFAS explained 46% of the variance of cognitive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest the usefulness of social functioning assessment in the explanation of clinical symptoms in people with schizophrenia. Moreover, our results point out that not only negative and cognitive symptoms, but also positive and depressive symptoms, should be taken into account in the rehabilitation process in order to improve patient adaptation in the community.
Subject(s)
Schizophrenia , Humans , Schizophrenia/diagnosis , Social Interaction , Cross-Sectional Studies , Multivariate AnalysisABSTRACT
Introduction: The aim of the present study was to assess the relationship between social functioning and clinical symptoms in people with schizophrenia, analyzing the influence of both global social functioning and the specific aspects of social functioning, assertiveness and communication skills in the explanation of type of symptoms. Material and methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study composed of 125 people diagnosed with schizophrenia was performed. Patients were assessed with the Communication Skills Questionnaire (CSQ), the Gambrill and Richey Assertiveness Inventory (GR), the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) and the Global Assessment of Social Functioning Scale (SOFAS), Social Functioning Scale (SFS), Life Skills Profile (LSP) scale and the Clinical Global Impression scale for Schizophrenia (CGI-S). Results: SOFAS, LSP and GR are related to each of the subscales and total scores of symptoms (p<0.050.001). The multiple regressions show that SOFAS and GR explained 59% of the total symptoms. SOFAS and GR, accounting for 65% of the variance, explain positive symptoms. GR and SOFAS explained 34% of the variance of negative symptoms. SOFAS, CSQ and LSP, accounting for 20% of the variance, explain depressive symptoms. SOFAS explained 46% of the variance of cognitive symptoms. Conclusions: Our findings suggest the usefulness of social functioning assessment in the explanation of clinical symptoms in people with schizophrenia. Moreover, our results point out that not only negative and cognitive symptoms, but also positive and depressive symptoms, should be taken into account in the rehabilitation process in order to improve patient adaptation in the community. (AU)
Introducción: El objetivo del presente estudio fue evaluar la relación entre el funcionamiento social y los síntomas en las personas esquizofrénicas, analizando la influencia del funcionamiento social global y los aspectos específicos del funcionamiento social, la asertividad y las competencias de comunicación en la explicación del tipo de síntomas. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo transversal integrado por 125 personas con diagnóstico de esquizofrenia. Se evaluó a los pacientes utilizando Communication Skills Questionnaire (CSQ), Gambrill and Richey Assertiveness Inventory (GR), Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) y Global Assessment of Social Functioning Scale (SOFAS), Social Functioning Scale (SFS), Life Skills Profile (LSP) scale y Clinical Global Impression scale for Schizophrenia (CGI-S). Resultados: SOFAS, LSP y GR están relacionadas con cada una de las sub-escalas y puntuaciones totales de los síntomas (p<0,05-0,001). Las regresiones múltiples muestran que SOFAS y GR justifican el 59% de los síntomas totales. SOFAS y GR, que representan el 65% de la varianza, explican los síntomas positivos. GR y SOFAS justificaron el 34% de la varianza de síntomas negativos. SOFAS, CSQ y LSP, que representaron el 20% de la varianza, justificaron los síntomas depresivos. SOFAS justificó el 46% de la varianza de los síntomas cognitivos. Conclusiones: Nuestros hallazgos sugieren la utilidad de la evaluación del funcionamiento social para explicar los síntomas clínicos de las personas esquizofrénicas. Además, nuestros resultados apuntan que, no solo deberían considerarse en el proceso de rehabilitación los síntomas negativos y cognitivos, sino también los síntomas positivos y depresivos, a fin de mejorar la adaptación del paciente dentro de la comunidad. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Schizophrenia/diagnosis , Schizophrenia/rehabilitation , Interpersonal Relations , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Cross-Sectional Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , CommunicationABSTRACT
Profile of Community Recovery Services users has changed over the years and has become more diverse. To explore the evolution of treatment needs, this study aimed to identify users' needs, from the point of view of different agents implicated in the recovery process. We explored the consistency between the agents using the focus group technique. We defined four groups (n = 58): service users, family members, professionals, and referring professionals. We pre-identified topics related to recovery, such as illness-related losses, imaginary of CRS, expectations, activities, and life goals. All agents recognised losses related to the mental illness, the need for carrying activities out of the Community Recovery Services, and for including families in the recovery process. The groups differed in some areas, such as the identification of activities that should be encouraged, or the importance of promoting vital expectations. Our findings suggest that it is important to identify the needs of different agents involved in the recovery process. There is consistency in the service users' needs, but there are some differences that need to be considered. Interventions should be personalised, covering functional, cognitive, and relational losses related to the mental illness.
Subject(s)
Community Mental Health Services , Mental Disorders , Mental Health Services , Humans , Mental Health , Spain , Mental Disorders/therapy , Health PersonnelABSTRACT
The objective of the study was to test the usability of 'Feeling Master' as a psychotherapeutic interactive gaming tool with LEGO cartoon faces showing the five basic emotions, for the assessment of emotional recognition in people with schizophrenia in comparison with healthy controls, and the relationship between face affect recognition (FER), attributional style, and theory of mind (ToM), which is the ability to understand the potential mental states and intentions of others. Nineteen individuals with schizophrenia (SZ) and 17 healthy control (HC) subjects completed the 'Feeling Master' that includes five basic emotions. To assess social cognition, the group with schizophrenia was evaluated with the Personal and Situational Attribution Questionnaire (IPSAQ) for the assessment of attributional style and the Hinting Task (ToM). Patients with SZ showed significant impairments in emotion recognition and their response time appeared to be slower than the HC in the recognition of each emotion. Taking into account the impairment in the recognition of each emotion, we only found a trend toward significance in error rates on fear recognition. The correlations between correct response on the 'Feeling Master' and the hinting task appeared to be significant in the correlation of surprise and theory of mind. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that the 'Feeling Master' could be useful for the evaluation of FER in people with schizophrenia. These results sustain the notion that impairments in emotion recognition are more prevalent in people with schizophrenia and that these are related with impairment in ToM.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to assess the relationship between social functioning and clinical symptoms in people with schizophrenia, analyzing the influence of both global social functioning and the specific aspects of social functioning, assertiveness and communication skills in the explanation of type of symptoms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive study composed of 125 people diagnosed with schizophrenia was performed. Patients were assessed with the Communication Skills Questionnaire (CSQ), the Gambrill and Richey Assertiveness Inventory (GR), the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) and the Global Assessment of Social Functioning Scale (SOFAS), Social Functioning Scale (SFS), Life Skills Profile (LSP) scale and the Clinical Global Impression scale for Schizophrenia (CGI-S). RESULTS: SOFAS, LSP and GR are related to each of the subscales and total scores of symptoms (p<0.05-0.001). The multiple regressions show that SOFAS and GR explained 59% of the total symptoms. SOFAS and GR, accounting for 65% of the variance, explain positive symptoms. GR and SOFAS explained 34% of the variance of negative symptoms. SOFAS, CSQ and LSP, accounting for 20% of the variance, explain depressive symptoms. SOFAS explained 46% of the variance of cognitive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest the usefulness of social functioning assessment in the explanation of clinical symptoms in people with schizophrenia. Moreover, our results point out that not only negative and cognitive symptoms, but also positive and depressive symptoms, should be taken into account in the rehabilitation process in order to improve patient adaptation in the community.
ABSTRACT
Women with schizophrenia have shown better social and clinical functioning than men in several previous studies. The aim of this study was to assess gender differences in social functioning of people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia who are in psychosocial rehabilitation treatment in Catalonia, using several different one-dimensional and multidimensional measures of clinical and social functioning. Gender differences were found only in several daily life activities, in which women showed better functioning: independence-competence (pâ¯=â¯0.006) and independence-performance (pâ¯=â¯0.017). No other differences between genders were observed. Our results clearly suggest that women with schizophrenia undergoing the rehabilitation process could benefit as do men from psychosocial intervention in order to improve social skills and functioning.
Subject(s)
Psychiatric Rehabilitation/statistics & numerical data , Schizophrenia/rehabilitation , Schizophrenic Psychology , Sex Factors , Social Adjustment , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young AdultABSTRACT
Self-stigma specifically in people with schizophrenia has been little studied. The aims of the present study were to validate a new instrument for the assessment of self-stigma (SSQ) and to assess the relationship between self-stigma and social functioning in people with schizophrenia. A sample of 76 people with schizophrenia was assessed at two moments in time with the SSQ, the PDD (stigma), two scales of social functioning (LSP, SFS), and a scale of general functioning (GAF). The results indicated that SSQ presented good psychometric properties, with Cronbach's alpha ranging between 0.75 and 0.901. The stability of the instrument was between 0.836 and 0.402. Three factors were found in the factor analysis (social discrimination, perceived capabilities, concealment of the disease), explaining 62.66% of the total variance. A relationship was found between self-stigma and social functioning in people with schizophrenia, especially in relation to social contact. In conclusion, the SSQ seems to be a valid and reliable questionnaire for the assessment of self-stigma in people with schizophrenia, and interventions should be designed to cope with self-stigma in order to improve the social functioning of people who suffer schizophrenia.
Subject(s)
Schizophrenic Psychology , Social Adjustment , Social Stigma , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adaptation, Psychological , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Perception , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Social Discrimination , Young AdultABSTRACT
This present study describes the validation of the Communication Skills Questionnaire (CSQ) in people with schizophrenia. A total of 125 clinically stable people in rehabilitation treatment who were diagnosed with schizophrenia were included. For convergent and discriminant validity the following tests were administered; the Gambrill and Richie (GR) Assertiveness Inventory, the Social Functioning Scale (SFS), Life Skills Profile (LSP), Clinical Global Impression scale for schizophrenia (CGI-S) and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale. Internal consistency of the CSQ had a Cronbach׳s alpha of 0.96. Test-retest reliability showed coefficients between 0.60 and 0.70. Convergent validity showed significant relations at p<0.0001 for all instruments assessed. None of the subscales used for assessing discriminant validity showed a significant correlation with the CSQ except for the CGI-S depression subscale. The instrument shows good psychometric properties and demonstrates that it is a useful instrument for evaluating communication skills in people with schizophrenia.
Subject(s)
Communication , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data , Schizophrenia/rehabilitation , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
Objetivo: Validar la versión española del Cuestionario de Asertividad de Gambrill y Richey en personas con esquizofrenia. Método: La muestra está compuesta por 125 personas con esquizofrenia en tratamiento en uno de los centros de rehabilitación psicosocial que participan en el estudio. Los instrumentos utilizados para valorar la validez discriminante y convergente son: el cuestionario de habilidades de comunicación(CSQ); la Escala de Funcionamiento Social(EFS); el Perfil de Habilidades de la Vida Cotidiana(LSP);la Escala de Impresión Clínica Global (ICG) y la Escala de Funcionamiento Global(GAF). Resultados: La consistencia interna del instrumento muestra un alfa de Cronbach de .935 en la escala total. Los coeficientes de correlación intraclase para valorar la consistencia temporal del instrumento oscilan entre .21 y .78. El instrumento muestra validez convergente con la escala CSQ y con las subescalas de comunicación y aislamiento social (p < .001-.05). Con el resto de subescalas de funcionamiento social muestra validez divergente. Con la CGI muestra validez divergente con la probabilidad de respuesta, sin embargo encontramos que hay validez convergente entre las subescalas de CGI y la subescala de grado de malestar del instrumento (p < .012-.042). Conclusiones: El instrumento muestra unas buenas características psicométricas y parece útil para la valoración de las habilidades sociales en una muestra de personas con esquizofrenia
Objective: To validate the Spanish version of the questionnaire Gambrill and Richey Assertiveness for people with schizophrenia. Method: he sample comprised a total of 125 people with schizophrenia on treatment in one of the psychosocial rehabilitation centers participating in the study. The instruments used to assess convergent and discriminant validity are the Communication Skills Questionnaire (CSQ); the Social Functioning Scale(SFS); the Life Skills Profile(LSP); the Clinical Global Impression Scale(CGI) and the Global Functioning Scale (GAF). Results: Internal consistency of the instrument shows a Cronbach alpha of .935 in the full scale. The intraclass correlation coefficients to assess the instrument's internal consistency ranged between .21 and .78. The instrument shows a convergent validity with CSQ scale and the subscales of communication and social isolation (p < .001-.05). With the rest of social functioning sub-scales shows divergent validity. With the CGI shows divergent validity with the probability of response, and convergent validity between the subscales of CGI and the degree of distress subscale of the instrument (p < .012-.042). Conclusions: The instrument shows good psychometric characteristics and appears useful for assessing social skills in a sample of people with schizophrenia
Subject(s)
Humans , Schizophrenia , Neuropsychological Tests , Assertiveness , Activities of Daily Living/psychology , Communication , Executive Function , Social AdjustmentABSTRACT
Introducción y objetivos: Pocos son los estudios que evaluan la autopercepción del estigma social en las personas que padecen esquizofrenia. El objetivo del presente estudio consiste en analizar la percepción sobre la esquizofrenia que tienen las personas que la padecen. Material y métodos: Se realizaron dos sesiones en cuatro grupos focales de personas con esquizofrenia que estaban siendo atendidas en servicios de rehabilitación psicosocial del Parc Sanitari de Sant Joan de Déu. A partir de un guión establecido se valoraron un total de 11 áreas abordadas en los grupos. Resultados: Las áreas de peligrosidad, culpa, pérdida de roles sociales y miedo al rechazo fueron aquellas que más mencionaron y más preocupaban a las personas que participaron en los grupos focales. Conclusión: Intervenciones para reducir el estigma social en la comunidad y en los propios usuarios/as deberían ser tenidas en cuenta, especialmente en estas área (AU)
Introduction and Objetives: Few studies evaluated the perception of social stigma in people with schizophrenia. The aim of this study was to analyze the perception of people who suffers schizophrenia. Material and methods: Two sessions in four focus groups of people with schizophrenia who were being treated in psychosocial rehabilitation services Sanitari Parc de Sant Joan de Déu were done. A total of 11 areas (guided by a screenplay) were assessed in the groups. Results: The areas of danger, guilt, lost of social roles and fear of rejection were those most concerned and most mencioned by the people who took part in focus groups. Conclusion: Interventions to reduce social stigma in the community and in the self- users should be taken into account, especially in these areas (AU)