Assessment of cardiac parameters after the administration of nicorandil before primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Objective: To assess cardiac troponin I and creatine kinase-myocardial band levels, electrocardiogram changes and major adverse cardiac events after treatment with nicorandil before primary percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: The comparative, analytical study was conducted from October to November 2022 at the Pharmacology Department of Army Medical College, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, in collaboration with the Rawalpindi Institute of Cardiology, Rawalpindi. The sample comprised ST-elevated myocardial infarction patients of either gender aged at least 30 years with an ejection fraction of at least 35% undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Participants were selected based on the above-mentioned inclusion and informed consent was taken before their enrolment in this research study. The sample was randomised into control group A receiving conventional acute coronary syndrome treatment, and intervention group B receiving nicorandil in addition to the conventional treatment. Cardiac troponin I and creatine kinase-myocardial band levels, electrocardiogram changes, and major adverse cardiac events noted and compared. Data was analysed using SPSS 26. RESULTS: Of the 140 patients, 70(50%) were in each of the 2 groups. In group B, 60(85.7%) patients achieved a completely settled ST segment on electrocardiogram compared to 25(35.7%) in group A (p=0.001). There was a significant inter-group difference with respect to cardiac troponin I value 6 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention and major adverse cardiac events (p<0.05), but creatine kinase-myocardial band level was no significantly different between the groups (p=0.761). Conclusion: Prophylactic use of nicorandil in ST-elevated myocardial infarction patients decreased the incidence of reperfusion injury.

Role Of Granisetron In Minimising Use Of Meperidine As A Rescue Drug For Post Spinal Shivering.

BACKGROUND: Shivering is one of the most common adverse outcomes associated with the administration of spinal anaesthesia, which, when clinically relevant, leads to numerous detrimental effects on the human body. Hence, its management becomes imperative. Meperidine, an opioid analgesic, is the drug of choice for this condition. However, the use of meperidine is controversial, as it carries the devastating adverse effect of respiratory depression. We explored the role of granisetron, a 5HT3 antagonist and a commonly used antiemetic premedication, in minimising the incidence of post-spinal shivering and decreasing the use of meperidine as a rescue drug. METHODS: Overall, 160 parturient patients, between the ages 18-50, undergoing uncomplicated, elective caesarean section, were enrolled in the study, and randomized into two groups with 80 participants each: Group A received 3ml of normal saline, and Group B was administered 3 mg granisetron,15 minutes before spinal anaesthesia institution. Incidence of clinically relevant shivering (score of 3 or more) was noted, and it was recorded whether meperidine was used or not. RESULTS: 67.5% of participants in Group A, and 32.5% of patients in Group B, experienced clinically relevant shivering, with 62.5% of patients in Group A and 28.75% in Group B warranting the use of meperidine. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of incidence of clinically relevant shivering, and meperidine consumption (p-value <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Premedication with 3 mg granisetron effectively attenuates the occurrence of post-spinal shivering and, hence, lowers the requirement of meperidine as rescue medication.

Granisetron versus Ondansetron: Comparison of 5HT3 antagonists in preventing spinal anaesthesia induced hemodynamic instability in obstetric patients.

Objectives: To evaluate and compare the Ondansetron and Granisetron in preventing spinal anaesthesia induced hemodynamic instability in obstetric patients. Methods: The comparative analytical study was conducted at Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, from September to October, 2021. One hundred and twenty pregnant women undergoing cesarean section, were enrolled in the study via non probability convenience sampling, and divided into three groups containing 40 participants each based on the type of antiemetic premedication they received, if any: Group N were those not requiring antiemetic premedication, Group O consisted of those given ondansetron 4mg, and Group G had those receiving 3mg granisetron, 15 minutes prior to administration of spinal anaesthesia. Systolic blood pressures and heart rates were recorded before and at multiple intervals after spinal anaesthesia was administered. Episodes of hypotension and bradycardia were recorded. Requirement of phenylephrine and atropine as rescue drugs was recorded for each participant. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in incidence of hypotension among the three groups (p value <0.001), with both drugs being superior to the control group (p value <0.001 for both), and 3mg granisetron being superior to 4mg ondansetron (p value <0.001). As for incidence of bradycardia, ondansetron and granisetron were superior to control group (p value 0.03 and <0.001 respectively), but there was no significant difference between the two drug groups (p value 0.094). Conclusion: High dose granisetron (3mg) is superior to low dose ondansetron (4mg) in preventing hemodynamic fluctuations induced by spinal anaesthesia.