Radiation and Chemo-Sensitizing Effects of DNA-PK Inhibitors Are Proportional in Tumors and Normal Tissues.

Inhibitors of DNA-dependent protein kinase (PRKDC; DNA-PK) sensitize cancers to radiotherapy and DNA-damaging chemotherapies, with candidates in clinical trials. However, the degree to which DNA-PK inhibitors also sensitize normal tissues remains poorly characterized. In this study, we compare tumor growth control and normal tissue sensitization following DNA-PK inhibitors in combination with radiation and etoposide. FaDu tumor xenografts implanted in mice were treated with 10 to 15 Gy irradiation ± 3 to 100 mg/kg AZD7648. A dose-dependent increase in time to tumor volume doubling following AZD7648 was proportional to an increase in toxicity scores of the overlying skin. Similar effects were seen in the intestinal jejunum, tongue, and FaDu tumor xenografts of mice assessed for proliferation rates at 3.5 days after treatment with etoposide or 5 Gy whole body irradiation ± DNA-PK inhibitors AZD7648 or peposertib (M3814). Additional organs were examined for sensitivity to DNA-PK inhibitor activity in ATM-deficient mice, where DNA-PK activity is indicated by surrogate marker γH2AX. Inhibition was observed in the heart, brain, pancreas, thymus, tongue, and salivary glands of ATM-deficient mice treated with the DNA-PK inhibitors relative to radiation alone. Similar reductions are also seen in ATM-deficient FaDu tumor xenografts where both pDNA-PK and γH2AX staining could be performed. DNA-PK inhibitor-mediated sensitization to radiation and DNA-damaging chemotherapy are not only limited to tumor tissues, but also extends to normal tissues sustaining DNA damage. These data are useful for interpretation of the sensitizing effects of DNA damage repair inhibitors, where a therapeutic index showing greater cell-killing effects on cancer cells is crucial for optimal clinical translation.

Detection of FLASH-radiotherapy tissue sparing in a 3D-spheroid model using DNA damage response markers.

PURPOSE: The oxygen depletion hypothesis has been proposed as a rationale to explain the observed phenomenon of FLASH-radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) sparing normal tissues while simultaneously maintaining tumor control. In this study we examined the distribution of DNA Damage Response (DDR) markers in irradiated 3D multicellular spheroids to explore the relationship between FLASH-RT protection and radiolytic-oxygen-consumption (ROC) in tissues. METHODS: Studies were performed using a Varian Truebeam linear accelerator delivering 10 MeV electrons with an average dose rate above 50 Gy/s. Irradiations were carried out on 3D spheroids maintained under a range of O2 and temperature conditions to control O2 consumption and create gradients representative of in vivo tissues. RESULTS: Staining for pDNA-PK (Ser2056) produced a linear radiation dose response whereas γH2AX (Ser139) showed saturation with increasing dose. Using the pDNA-PK staining, radiation response was then characterised for FLASH compared to standard-dose-rates as a function of depth into the spheroids. At 4 °C, chosen to minimize the development of metabolic oxygen gradients within the tissues, FLASH protection could be observed at all distances under oxygen conditions of 0.3-1 % O2. Whereas at 37 °C a FLASH-protective effect was limited to the outer cell layers of tissues, an effect only observed at 3 % O2. Modelling of changes in the pDNA-PK-based oxygen enhancement ratio (OER) yielded a tissue ROC g0-value estimate of 0.73 ± 0.25 µM/Gy with a km of 5.4 µM at FLASH dose rates. CONCLUSIONS: DNA damage response markers are sensitive to the effects of transient oxygen depletion during FLASH radiotherapy. Findings support the rationale that well-oxygenated tissues would benefit more from FLASH-dose-rate protection relative to poorly-oxygenated tissues.

DNA-PK inhibitor AZD7648 is a more portent radiosensitizer than PARP inhibitor Olaparib in BRCA1/2 deficient tumors.

The effectiveness of radiotherapy depends on the sensitivities of 'normal' and cancer cells to the administered radiation dose. Increasing the radiosensitivity of cancers by inhibiting DNA damage repair is a goal of much current research, however success depends on avoiding concomitant sensitization of normal tissues inevitably irradiated during therapy. In this study we investigated the mechanisms of radiosensitization for DNA-PK and PARP inhibitors by examining the impacts on proliferating vs quiescent cell populations. Experiments were performed in BRCA1/2null and wild-type parental cancer models in vitro and in vivo. Overall AZD7648 has greater radiosensitizing activity relative to Olaparib, with BRCA2-deficient models showing the greatest sensitivity. However, DNA-PK inhibitor AZD7648 also produced greater toxicity in all irradiated mice. While both DNA-PK and PARP inhibition sensitizes wild type tumor cells to radiation, in BRCA1/2 deficient cells PARP inhibition by Olaparib had limited radiosensitization capacity. Quiescent cells are more radioresistant than proliferating cells, and these were also effectively sensitized by AZD7648 while Olaparib was unable to increase radiation-induced cell kill, even in BRCA1/2null cells. These findings underscore the distinct mechanisms of radiosensitization for DNA-PK and PARP inhibitors. While DNA-PK inhibitors are able to target both proliferating and non-proliferating tumor cells for greater overall anti-cancer benefit, their application is limited by exacerbation of normal tissue toxicities. Conversely, PARP inhibitors exhibit selective activity for proliferating cells, providing a mechanism for targeting activity to cancers, but due to poor activity in non-proliferating cells they have an overall reduced impact on tumor growth control. This study highlights the importance of creating a therapeutic ratio with DNA damage repair inhibition radiation sensitizing strategies.

DNA-PK inhibition extends the therapeutic effects of Top2 poisoning to non-proliferating cells, increasing activity at a cost.

Type II topoisomerase (Top2) poisoning therapy is used to treat a broad range of cancers via induction of double strand breaks (DSBs) in cells undergoing replication and transcription. Preventing the repair of DSBs via inhibition of DNA-PK, an inhibitor of non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), increases cell kill with Top2 poisons and has led to the initiation of several clinical trials. To elucidate the cellular mechanisms leading to synergistic activity of dual DNA-PK/Top2 inhibition we looked at their effects in cycling versus non-cycling cells, in 3D spheroids and in xenograft models. Combined DNA-PK/Top2 inhibition was found to not only increase the cell kill in proliferating cells, the cell population that is typically most vulnerable to Top2 poisoning, but also in non-proliferative but transcriptionally active cells. This effect was observed in both cancer and normal tissue models, killing more cells than high concentrations of etoposide alone. The combination treatment delayed tumor growth in mice compared to Top2 poisoning alone, but also led to increased toxicity. These findings demonstrate sensitization of Top2ß-expressing, non-cycling cells to Top2 poisoning by DNA-PK inhibition. Expansion of the target cell population of Top2 poison treatment to include non-proliferating cells via combination with DNA damage repair inhibitors has implications for efficacy and toxicity of these combinations, including for inhibitors of DNA-PK currently in clinical trial.