Population Pharmacokinetics (PopPK) Support for Pediatric Dosing of Biological Products.

This study assesses the use of population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) in supporting pediatric dosing of novel biological drug products. The labeling for biologic drug products approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from 2002 until 2021 was reviewed to identify those with a pediatric indication. For the drugs with a pediatric indication, the dosing regimen(s) based on age groups, dosing strategy, the use of PopPK to support the dose, and the types of pediatric clinical trials were reviewed. Data were collected from FDA's review documents and product labels on the Drugs@FDA website, and as needed, more clinical trial details were collected from PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov. The role of PopPK analyses in dosing was captured when mentioned in the label or review as playing a role in selecting the approved pediatric dose and/or in verifying the adequacy of the studied dose to support labeling. Between 2002 and 2021, FDA approved 169 biological products, and 78 of 169 (46%) products have an approved indication for which the label contains dosing recommendations for pediatric use. For the 78 products approved in pediatrics, there was a total of 180 clinical trials that included pediatric patients. Phase 3 pediatric trials commonly supported pediatric approval and dosing for the reviewed products (64%, 50/78 products; 56.1%, 101/180 trials). PopPK analyses were reported to play a critical role in dose selection, prediction, and verification for 40 of the 78 products (51%), including informing pediatric dosing in the absence of pediatric data (e.g., drugs approved under animal rule), comparing exposures to the exposure range observed in adults, and informing alternative dosing strategies in certain age or body weight groups. PopPK analyses have been applied in a variety of ways to inform pediatric dosing and support extrapolation from adult data or other pediatric age groups for biologics. Understanding and learning from these past cases on the use of pharmacometrics tools to support pediatric dosing of biological products can inform future pediatric development programs.

2023 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis: EU IVDR 2017/746 Implementation/Impact, IVD/CDx/CLIA Approved Assays, High Dimensional Cytometry, Multiplexing Technologies, LBA Tissue Analysis, Vaccine Study Endpoints, Cell-Based Assays for Biomarkers, Cell Therapy and Vaccines (PART 2 - Recommendations on Development & Validation of Biomarkers, IVD, CDx, Cell-Based, Flow Cytometry, Ligand-Binding and Enzyme Assays; Advanced Critical Reagents Strategies).

The 17th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (17th WRIB) took place in Orlando, FL, USA on 19-23 June 2023. Over 1000 professionals representing pharma/biotech companies, CROs, and multiple regulatory agencies convened to actively discuss the most current topics of interest in bioanalysis. The 17th WRIB included 3 Main Workshops and 7 Specialized Workshops that together spanned 1 week to allow an exhaustive and thorough coverage of all major issues in bioanalysis of biomarkers, immunogenicity, gene therapy, cell therapy and vaccines.Moreover, in-depth workshops on "EU IVDR 2017/746 Implementation and impact for the Global Biomarker Community: How to Comply with these NEW Regulations" and on "US FDA/OSIS Remote Regulatory Assessments (RRAs)" were the special features of the 17th edition.As in previous years, WRIB continued to gather a wide diversity of international, industry opinion leaders and regulatory authority experts working on both small and large molecules as well as gene, cell therapies and vaccines to facilitate sharing and discussions focused on improving quality, increasing regulatory compliance, and achieving scientific excellence on bioanalytical issues.This 2023 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2023 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons.This publication (Part 2) covers the recommendations on Biomarkers, IVD/CDx, LBA and Cell-Based Assays. Part 1A (Mass Spectrometry Assays and Regulated Bioanalysis/BMV), P1B (Regulatory Inputs) and Part 3 (Gene Therapy, Cell therapy, Vaccines and Biotherapeutics Immunogenicity) are published in volume 16 of Bioanalysis, issues 9 and 7 (2024), respectively.

Clinical pharmacology considerations for first-in-human clinical trials for enzyme replacement therapy.

Inborn errors of metabolism (IEM) such as lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs) are conditions caused by deficiency of one or more key enzymes, cofactors, or transporters involved in a specific metabolic pathway. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) provides an exogenous source of the affected enzyme and is one of the most effective treatment options for IEMs. In this paper, we review the first-in-human (FIH) protocols for ERT drug development programs supporting 20 Biologic License Applications (BLA) approved by the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) at the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the period of May 1994 to September 2023. We surveyed study design elements across these FIH protocols including study population, dosage form, dose selection, treatment duration, immunogenicity, biomarkers, and study follow-up. A total of 18 FIH trials from 20 BLAs were identified and of those, 72% (13/18) used single ascending dose (SAD) and/or multiple ascending dose (MAD) study design, 83% (15/18) had a primary objective of assessing the safety and tolerability, 72% (13/18) included clinical endpoint assessments, and 94% (17/18) included biomarker assessments as secondary or exploratory endpoints. Notably, the majority of ERT products tested the approved route of administration and the approved dose was tested in 83% (15/18) of FIH trials. At last, we offer considerations for the design of FIH studies.

Pharmacokinetics-Bridging Between Autoinjectors and Prefilled Syringes for Subcutaneous Injection: Case Examples Revealing a Knowledge Gap.

Comparative pharmacokinetics (PK) studies have efficiently served as the bridge between autoinjectors and prefilled syringes given the underlying principles that comparable exposure could translate to comparable efficacy and safety. This article discusses approaches used to address uncertainties associated with the observation of noncomparable PK leading to the successful introduction of new autoinjector devices for monoclonal antibody and Fc-fusion protein products. Information from seven case examples suggests a knowledge gap that warrants attention in autoinjector development.

Clinical Pharmacology Approaches to Support Approval of New Routes of Administration for Therapeutic Proteins.

Intravenous or subcutaneous routes of administration (ROAs) are common dosing routes for therapeutic proteins. Eleven therapeutic proteins with approval for one ROA have subsequently received approval for a second ROA. The clinical programs supporting the second ROA consistently leveraged data from the first ROA and included studies that characterized the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of the drug administered by the new ROA to identify an appropriate dosage regimen. The selected dosing regimen was then further evaluated in clinical trials designed with various primary end points. All programs implemented model-informed drug development approaches to ensure that the selected regimens would achieve comparable systemic exposures (PK-based bridging) or pharmacodynamic (PD) responses (PD-based bridging) as the reference ROA. To support the approval of a second ROA, these programs either demonstrated noninferiority in PK, PD, and/or clinical end points for the second ROA, or established efficacy and safety through a comparison to a placebo treatment. The accumulative examples showed that clinical trials which provided the primary evidence to support approvals of the second ROA generally demonstrated noninferiority in the systemic exposures regardless of being specified as an end point or not in the study protocols. The experience to date supports the use of PK- and PD-based bridging approaches not only in the selection of dosing regimens for a second ROA to be tested in clinical studies, but also for providing evidence of effectiveness to support approval, when appropriate.

A survey of FDA Approved Monoclonal Antibodies and Fc-fusion Proteins for Manufacturing Changes and Comparability Assessment.

OBJECTIVE: Manufacturing changes occur commonly throughout stages of biologics development and may result in product quality attribute changes. As changes in critical quality attributes have the potential to affect clinical safety and efficacy of products, it is imperative to ensure the quality and clinical performance before introducing the after-change products. Thus, we embarked on this project to understand what data have supported the manufacturing changes for licensed products with pre- and post-approval changes. METHODS: We surveyed the manufacturing changes of 85 monoclonal antibodies and 10 Fc fusion proteins approved by the Food and Drug Administration as of December 25, 2021. After collecting the type and timing of changes for these products, we investigated the approaches that provided supporting data for the changes. The source documents included reports submitted by applicants and FDA's regulatory reviews. RESULTS: Analytical comparability was assessed to support all identified manufacturing changes. Supporting clinical data were available in 92% of these manufacturing changes; including data from pharmacokinetic comparability studies alone (3%), other studies on efficacy or safety (70%) and a combination of both (19%). Clinical pharmacokinetic comparability data contributed to supporting substantial changes, such as host cell type or master cell bank changes, concentration or formulation changes, and changes from pre-filled syringes to autoinjectors, especially when introduced after completing pivotal studies. CONCLUSION: Our comprehensive retrospective analysis provides an understanding of the regulatory experience and industry practice, which could facilitate developing appropriate comparability approaches to support manufacturing changes in the future.

Challenging the Norm: A Multidisciplinary Perspective on Intravenous to Subcutaneous Bridging Strategies for Biologics.

The transition from intravenous (i.v.) to subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of biologics is a critical strategy in drug development aimed at improving patient convenience, compliance, and therapeutic outcomes. Focusing on the increasing role of model-informed drug development (MIDD) in the acceleration of this transition, an in-depth overview of the essential clinical pharmacology, and regulatory considerations for successful i.v. to s.c. bridging for biologics after the i.v. formulation has been approved are presented. Considerations encompass multiple aspects beginning with adequate pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (i.e., exposure-response) evaluations which play a vital role in establishing comparability between the i.v. and s.c. routes of administrations. Selected key recommendations and points to consider include: (i) PK characterization of the s.c. formulation, supported by the increasing preclinical understanding of the s.c. absorption, and robust PK study design and analyses in humans; (ii) a thorough characterization of the exposure-response profiles including important metrics of exposure for both efficacy and safety; (iii) comparability studies designed to meet regulatory considerations and support approval of the s.c. formulation, including noninferiority studies with PK and/or efficacy and safety as primary end points; and (iv) comprehensive safety package addressing assessments of immunogenicity and patients' safety profile with the new route of administration. Recommendations for successful bridging strategies are evolving and MIDD approaches have been used successfully to accelerate the transition to s.c. dosing, ultimately leading to improved patient experiences, adherence, and clinical outcomes.

Dose selection for biological enzyme replacement therapy indicated for inborn errors of metabolism.

This paper summarizes key features of the dose-finding strategies used in the development of 11 approved new molecular entities that are first-in-class enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), with a goal to gain insight into the dose exploration approaches to inform efficient dose-finding in future development of biological products for Inborn Errors of Metabolism (IEM). Dose exploration should preferably begin in in vitro studies, followed by testing multiple doses in an appropriate animal disease model, when available, which can provide important information for dose assessment in humans. Performing adequate dose-finding in early phase clinical studies in a well-defined study population, including pediatric subjects, is generally critical to inform dose selection for pivotal trials; alternatively, additional dose exploration can be incorporated as part of a pivotal trial. Two important considerations for successful dose selection include (1) identifying appropriate disease-specific endpoints, including pharmacodynamic (PD) end points and intermediate clinical end points or clinical end points, and (2) designing a study with adequate treatment durations for evaluating these end points. Appropriately selected PD biomarkers is useful for dose selection, and early development of these biomarkers can facilitate the overall clinical development program. Optimization of ERT doses, as well as evaluations of patient intrinsic factors and/or immune tolerance strategies may be necessary to overcome antibody responses or increase efficacy in IEM.

Evaluation of Truncated AUC as an Alternative Measure to Assess Pharmacokinetic Comparability in Bridging Biologic-Device Using Prefilled Syringes and Autoinjectors.

Pharmacokinetic (PK) comparisons between therapeutic biologics have largely been based on the total area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and the maximum concentration (Cmax ). For biologics with a long half-life, a PK comparability study may be long in duration and costly to conduct. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether a truncated AUC (tAUC) can be used to assess PK comparability when bridging prefilled syringe (PFS) and autoinjector (AI) treatment options for biologics with a long half-life. Fifteen biologics license applications (BLAs) were included to determine the concordance and geometric percent coefficient of variation (%CV) between tAUCs evaluated on days 7, 14, 21, and 28 and AUC evaluated to infinity (AUC0-inf ). Concordance is established if the tAUCs are comparable with AUC0-inf . Trial simulation was performed to examine the effect of the absorption rate constant (ka ) and sample size on the concordance of tAUCs. The tAUCs evaluated on day 14, 21, and 28 had 100% concordance with AUC0-inf for all 15 BLAs. The concordance of tAUC evaluated at day 7 was 87.5%. Based on the trial simulation, tAUC evaluated to day 28 post-dose can achieve high concordance (≥85%) for biologics exhibiting linear or nonlinear elimination with a ka of ≥0.1/day and with a sample size of 70 subjects per arm. tAUC appears to be a promising alternative PK measure, relative to AUC0-inf , for PK comparability assessments.

Impact of Organ Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Therapeutic Peptides and Proteins.

The kidneys and liver are major organs involved in eliminating small-molecule drugs from the body. Characterization of the effects of renal impairment (RI) and hepatic impairment (HI) on pharmacokinetics (PK) have informed dosing in patients with these organ impairments. However, the knowledge about the impact of organ impairment on therapeutic peptides and proteins is still evolving. In this study, we reviewed how often therapeutic peptides and proteins were assessed for the effect of RI and HI on PK, the findings, and the resulting labeling recommendations. RI effects were reported in labeling for 30 (57%) peptides and 98 (39%) proteins and HI effects for 20 (38%) peptides and 55 (22%) proteins. Dose adjustments were recommended for RI in 11 of the 30 (37%) peptides and 10 of the 98 (10%) proteins and for HI in 7 of the 20 (35%) peptides and 3 of the 55 (5%) proteins. Additional actionable labeling includes risk mitigation strategies; for example, some product labels have recommended avoid use or monitor toxicities in patients with HI. Over time, there is an increasing structural diversity of therapeutic peptides and proteins, including the use of non-natural amino acids and conjugation technologies, which suggests a potential need for reassessing the need to evaluate the effect of RI and HI. Herein, we discuss scientific considerations for weighing the risk of PK alteration due to RI or HI for peptide and protein products. We briefly discuss other organs that may affect the PK of peptides and proteins administered via other delivery routes.

Leveraging Clinical Pharmacology Data to Assess Biosimilarity and Interchangeability of Insulin Products.

There is over a hundred years of clinical experience with insulin for the treatment of diabetes. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first insulin biosimilar interchangeable product in 2021 for improving glycemic control in adults and pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Several recombinant insulin products are available in the United States, including the recently approved biosimilar insulins. The approval of the biosimilar insulin products was based on comparative analytical characterizations and comparative pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) data. The primary objective of this review is to discuss the scientific considerations in the demonstration of biosimilarity of a proposed insulin biosimilar to a reference product and the role of clinical pharmacology studies in the determination of biosimilarity and interchangeability. Euglycemic clamp studies are considered a "gold standard" for insulin PK and PD characterization and have been widely used to determine the time-action profiles of rapid-acting, intermediate-acting, and long-acting insulin products. Clinical pharmacology aspects of study design, including selection of appropriate dose, study population, PK, and PD end points, are presented. Finally, the role of clinical pharmacology studies in the interchangeability assessment of insulin and the regulatory pathways used for insulin and the experience with follow-on insulins and the two recently approved biosimilar insulin products is discussed.

Model-Based Approach to Selecting Pegfilgrastim Dose for Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Similarity Studies in Biosimilar Development.

This study applied modeling and simulation (M&S) approaches to evaluate the sensitivity of pegfilgrastim pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics (PDs) to changes in dose amount, and linear or nonlinear clearance (CL) over pegfilgrastim subcutaneous dose of 2-6 mg. A previously published model was adapted to better describe pegfilgrastim PK and PD data in healthy subjects and used in simulation. Nonlinear CL accounts for 98% and 77%, respectively, of the total CL of pegfilgrastim at 2 and 6 mg. The sensitivity analyses showed: (i) PK of 2 and 6 mg doses are similarly sensitive to detect differences for a 5% change in dose; (ii) PK of 2 mg dose is more sensitive to changes in receptor binding affinity, a model parameter for nonlinear CL, and a product quality attribute characterized with orthogonal methods as part of demonstrating analytical similarity between products; (iii) PK of approved 6 mg dose is more sensitive to changes in linear CL, which has not been associated with any specific product quality attributes, and (iv) the PDs are not sensitive to changes in linear or nonlinear CL. Taken together, our analyses support that the approved pegfilgrastim dose of 6 mg is appropriate for detecting differences between a biosimilar and the reference products in pegfilgrastim PK and PD similarity studies. The described M&S approaches can be adopted to support dose selection for biosimilars with nonlinear PK and complex PK-PD interplay.

Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers Evidentiary Considerations for Biosimilar Development and Approval.

A biosimilar is a biological product that is highly similar to and has no clinically meaningful differences from a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved reference product. The development and approval of biosimilars is critical to enhancing the availability of safe, effective, and affordable treatment options for patients. Utilization of pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarkers can help streamline biosimilar development programs as the current process can be costly and time-consuming. Whereas PD biomarkers have not been prominently used across biosimilar approvals to date, moving forward, there is ample opportunity to increase the use of PD biomarkers in biosimilar development programs in place of comparative clinical studies with efficacy end point(s). This includes utilizing PD biomarkers that were not used as surrogate end points in approval of reference products. This mini-review summarizes how PD biomarkers have been used in biosimilar development programs to date and then discusses evidentiary considerations for PD biomarkers. In addition, study design considerations for clinical pharmacokinetic and PD assessment of proposed biosimilars are discussed. Finally, the FDA's applied regulatory science activities related to PD biomarkers for biosimilars conducted in support of the FDA's Biosimilars Action Plan are reviewed. This included conducting three clinical studies to address information gaps about PD biomarkers for biosimilars and inform general methodological best practices. In summary, enhancing our understanding of key evidentiary considerations and optimal study designs for incorporating PD biomarkers in the evaluation of proposed biosimilars can help bring more treatment options to patients faster.

Considerations for Use of Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers to Support Biosimilar Development - (II) A Randomized Trial with IL-5 Antagonists.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance describes how pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarkers can be used to address residual uncertainty and demonstrate no clinically meaningful differences between a proposed biosimilar and its reference product without relying on clinical efficacy end point(s). Pilot studies and modeling can inform dosing for such PD studies. To that end, we conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, single-dose, parallel-arm clinical study in healthy participants to evaluate approaches to address information gaps, inform best practices for analysis of biomarker samples and study results, and apply emerging technologies in biomarker characterization. Seventy-two healthy participants (n = 8 per arm) received either placebo or 1 of 4 doses of the interleukin-5 inhibitors mepolizumab (3-24 mg) or reslizumab (0.1-0.8 mg/kg). A clinical study using doses lower than approved therapeutic doses was combined with modeling and simulation to evaluate the dose-response relationship of the biomarker eosinophils. There was no dose-response relationship for eosinophil counts due to variability, although the mepolizumab 24 mg and reslizumab 0.8 mg/kg doses showed clear effects. Published indirect-response models were used to explore eosinophil data across doses from this study and the unstudied therapeutic doses. Simulations were used to calculate typical PD metrics, such as baseline-adjusted area under the effect curve and maximum change from baseline. The simulation results demonstrate sensitivity of eosinophils as a PD biomarker and indicate doses lower than the approved doses would have PD responses overlapping with variability in the placebo arm. The simulation results further highlight the utility of model-based approaches in supporting use of PD biomarkers in biosimilar development.

Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers for Biosimilar Development and Approval: A Workshop Summary.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Biosimilars Guidance describes how biosimilars may be approved based on clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarker data, without comparative clinical studies with efficacy end points. This type of clinical development program, however, has only been implemented for a small number of FDA-approved biosimilar products over the last decade. To encourage the use of PD biomarkers in biosimilar development and approval, the Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy collaborated with the FDA to host a two-day virtual public workshop entitled "Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers for Biosimilar Development and Approval" on September 20-21, 2021. The public workshop was a forum for global regulators, biopharmaceutical developers, and academic researchers to discuss the current and future role of PD biomarkers in improving the efficiency of biosimilar development and approval. The workshop objectives included: (i) discuss the current and potential future state of leveraging PD biomarkers for biosimilar development and approval; (ii) summarize the FDA's initiatives to advance biosimilar development; (iii) describe stakeholders' experience with PD biomarkers in biosimilar development; and (iv) explain research efforts to promote broader application of PD biomarkers in biosimilar development. This document summarizes presentations and panel discussions from each session of the two-day September 2021 public workshop covering the application of PD biomarkers for biosimilar development.

Considerations for Use of Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers to Support Biosimilar Development - (III) A Randomized Trial with Interferon Beta-1a Products.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has taken steps to bring efficiency to the development of biosimilars, including establishing guidance for the use of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PD) similarity study data without a comparative clinical study with efficacy end point(s). To better understand the potential role for PD biomarkers in biosimilar development and inform best practices for biomarker selection and analysis, we conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, single-dose, parallel-arm clinical study in healthy participants. Eighty-four healthy participants (n = 12 per dose arm) received either placebo or one of three doses of either interferon ß-1a (7.5-30 µg) or pegylated interferon ß-1a (31.25-125 µg) to evaluate the maximum change from baseline and the baseline-adjusted area under the effect curve for the biomarkers neopterin in serum and myxovirus resistance protein 1 in blood. Both PD biomarkers increased following product administration with clear separation from baseline (neopterin: 3.4-fold and 3.9-fold increase for interferon ß-1a and pegylated interferon ß-1a, respectively; myxovirus resistance protein 1: 19.0-fold and 47.2-fold increase for interferon ß-1a and pegylated interferon ß-1a, respectively). The dose-response curves support that therapeutic doses were adequately sensitive to detect differences in both PD biomarkers for consideration in a PD similarity study design. Because baseline levels of both biomarkers are low compared with on-treatment values, there was little difference in using PD measures adjusted to baseline compared with the results without baseline adjustment. This study illustrates potential methodologies for evaluating PD biomarkers and an approach to address information gaps when limited information is publicly available for one or more PD biomarkers.

Prescriber Perspectives on Biosimilar Adoption and Potential Role of Clinical Pharmacology: A Workshop Summary.

The approval and adoption of biosimilar products are essential to contain increasing healthcare costs and provide more affordable choices for patients. Despite steady progress in the number of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) biosimilar approvals over the years, biosimilar adoption in the United States has been slow and gradual, largely driven by payers rather than clinicians. In order to better understand the barriers to biosimilar adoption in the clinic, the University of Maryland Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (M-CERSI) and the FDA jointly hosted a virtual workshop on April 13, 2022, titled "Biosimilars: A Decade of Experience and Future Directions - Strategies for Improving Biosimilar Adoption and the Potential Role of Clinical Pharmacology." This summary documents the experiences of four leading academic clinicians with specialties in oncology, rheumatology, gastroenterology, and endocrinology and their perspectives on how to increase biosimilar adoption, including the role of clinical pharmacology. Besides systemic changes in pricing and reimbursement, there is a need for additional education of a broad range of providers, including advanced care practitioners, and patients themselves. Educational efforts highlighting the rigor of the studies that support the approval of biosimilars-including the clinical pharmacology studies-and the benefits of biosimilars, can play a major role in improving biosimilar acceptance.

Evaluating the Utility of Proteomics for the Identification of Circulating Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers of IFNß-1a Biologics.

Proteomics has the potential to identify pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarkers for similarity assessment of proposed biosimilars without relying on clinical efficacy end points. In this study, with 36 healthy participants randomized to therapeutic doses of interferon-beta 1a products (IFNß-1a) or pegylated-IFNß-1a (pegIFNß-1a) approved to treat multiple sclerosis or placebo, we evaluated the utility of a proteomic assay that profiles > 7,000 plasma proteins. IFNß-1a and pegIFNß-1a resulted in 248 and 528 differentially expressed protein analytes, respectively, between treatment and placebo groups over the time course. Thirty-one proteins were prioritized based on a maximal fold change ≥ 2 from baseline, baseline adjusted area under the effect curve (AUEC) and overlap between the 2 products. Of these, the majority had a significant AUEC compared with placebo in response to either product; 8 proteins showed > 4-fold maximal change from baseline. We identified previously reported candidates, beta-2microglobulin and interferon-induced GTP-binding protein (Mx1) with ~ 50% coefficient of variation (CV) for AUEC, and many new candidates (including I-TAC, C1QC, and IP-10) with CVs ranging from 26%-129%. Upstream regulator analysis of differentially expressed proteins predicted activation of IFNß1 signaling as well as other cytokine, enzyme, and transcription signaling networks by both products. Although independent replication is required to confirm present results, our study demonstrates the utility of proteomics for the identification of individual and composite candidate PD biomarkers that may be leveraged to support clinical pharmacology studies for biosimilar approvals, especially when biologics have complex mechanisms of action or do not have previously characterized PD biomarkers.