Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Language
Publication year range
1.
Inorg Chem ; 61(33): 13058-13066, 2022 Aug 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35838661

ABSTRACT

It is a great challenging task for selectivity control of both CO2 photoreduction and water splitting to produce syngas via precise microenvironment regulation. Herein, a series of UiO-type Eu-MOFs (Eu-bpdc, Eu-bpydc, Rux-Eu-bpdc, and Rux-Eu-bpydc) with different surrounding confined spaces were designed and synthesized. These photosensitizing Rux-Eu-MOFs were used as the molecular platform to encapsulate the [CoII4(dpy{OH}O)4(OAc)2(H2O)2]2+ (Co4) cubane cluster for constructing Co4@Rux-Eu-MOF (x = 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4) heterogeneous photocatalysts for efficient CO2 photoreduction and water splitting. The H2 and CO yields can reach 446.6 and 459.8 µmol·g-1, respectively, in 10 h with Co4@Ru0.1-Eu-bpdc as the catalyst, and their total yield can be dramatically improved to 2500 µmol·g-1 with the ratio of CO/H2 ranging from 1:1 to 1:2 via changing the photosensitizer content in the confined space. By increasing the N content around the cubane, the photocatalytic performance drops sharply in Co4@Ru0.1-Eu-bpydc, but with an enhanced proportion of CO in the final products. In the homogeneous system, the Co4 cubane was surrounding with Ru photosensitizers via week interactions, which can drive water splitting into H2 with >99% selectivity. Comprehensive structure-function analysis highlights the important role of microenvironment regulation in the selectivity control via constructing homogeneous and heterogeneous photocatalytic systems. This work provides a new insight for engineering a catalytic microenvironment of the cubane cluster for selectivity control of CO2 photoreduction and water splitting.


Subject(s)
Carbon Dioxide , Photosynthesis , Catalysis , Photosensitizing Agents , Water
2.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 43(5): 805-821, Sept.-Oct. 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-892886

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Aim: The role of low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy (LI-ESWT) in erectile dysfunction (ED) is not clearly determined. The purpose of this study is to investigate the short-term efficacy and safety of LI-ESWT for ED patients. Materials and Methods: Relevant studies were searched in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WANFANG and VIP databases. Effective rate in terms of International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) and Erectile Hardness Score (EHS) at about 1XSmonth after LI-ESWT was extracted from eligible studies for meta-analysis to calculate risk ratio (RR) of effective treatment in ED patients treated by LI-ESWT compared to those receiving sham-treatment. Results: Overall fifteen studies were included in the review, of which four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were for meta-analysis. Effective treatment was 8.31 [95°/o confidence interval (CI): 3.88-17.78] times more effective in the LI-ESWT group (n=176) than in the sham-treatment group (n= 101) at about 1 month after the intervention in terms of EHS, while it was 2.50 (95% CI: 0.74-8.45) times more in the treatment group (n= 121) than in the control group (n=89) in terms of IIEF-EF. Nine-week protocol with energy density of 0.09mJ/mm2 and 1500 pluses seemed to have better therapeutic effect than five-week protocol. No significant adverse event was reported. Conclusion: LI-ESWT, as a noninvasive treatment, has potential short-term therapeutic effect on patients with organic ED irrespective of sensitivity to PDE5is. Owing to the limited number and quality of the studies, more large-scale, well-designed and longterm follow-up time studies are needed to confirm our analysis.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation/methods , Erectile Dysfunction/therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome , High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation/adverse effects
3.
Int Braz J Urol ; 43(5): 805-821, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28379665

ABSTRACT

AIM: The role of low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy (LI-ESWT) in erectile dysfunction (ED) is not clearly determined. The purpose of this study is to investigate the short-term efficacy and safety of LI-ESWT for ED patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Relevant studies were searched in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WANFANG and VIP databases. Effective rate in terms of International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) and Erectile Hardness Score (EHS) at about 1month after LI-ESWT was extracted from eligible studies for meta-analysis to calculate risk ratio (RR) of effective treatment in ED patients treated by LI-ESWT compared to those receiving sham-treatment. RESULTS: Overall fifteen studies were included in the review, of which four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were for meta-analysis. Effective treatment was 8.31 [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.88-17.78] times more effective in the LI-ESWT group (n=176) than in the sham-treatment group (n=101) at about 1 month after the intervention in terms of EHS, while it was 2.50 (95% CI: 0.74-8.45) times more in the treatment group (n=121) than in the control group (n=89) in terms of IIEF-EF. Nine-week protocol with energy density of 0.09mJ/mm2 and 1500 pluses seemed to have better therapeutic effect than five-week protocol. No significant adverse event was reported. CONCLUSION: LI-ESWT, as a noninvasive treatment, has potential short-term therapeutic effect on patients with organic ED irrespective of sensitivity to PDE5is. Owing to the limited number and quality of the studies, more large-scale, well-designed and long-term follow-up time studies are needed to confirm our analysis.


Subject(s)
Erectile Dysfunction/therapy , High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation/methods , High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL