Oral administration of tipranavir with long-chain triglyceride results in moderate intestinal lymph targeting but no efficient delivery to HIV-1 reservoir in mesenteric lymph nodes.

The introduction of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) led to substantial improvement in mortality and morbidity of HIV-1 infection. However, the poor penetration of antiretroviral agents to HIV-1 reservoirs limit the ability of the antiretroviral agents to eliminate the virus. Mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs) are one of the main HIV-1 reservoirs in patients under suppressive cART. Intestinal lymphatic absorption pathway substantially increases the concentration of lipophilic drugs in mesenteric lymph and MLNs when they are co-administered with long-chain triglyceride (LCT). Chylomicrons (CM) play a crucial role in the intestinal lymphatic absorption as they transport drugs to the lymph lacteals rather than blood capillary by forming CM-drug complexes in the enterocytes. Thus, lipophilic antiretroviral drugs could potentially be delivered to HIV-1 reservoirs in MLNs by LCT-based formulation approach. In this study, protease inhibitors (PIs) were initially screened for their potential for intestinal lymphatic targeting using a computational model. The candidates were further assessed for their experimental affinity to CM. Tipranavir (TPV) was the only-candidate with substantial affinity to both artificial and natural CM in vitro and ex vivo. Pharmacokinetics and biodistribution studies were then performed to evaluate the oral bioavailability and intestinal lymphatic targeting of TPV in rats. The results showed similar oral bioavailability of TPV with and without co-administration of LCT vehicle. Although LCT-based formulation led to 3-fold higher concentrations of TPV in mesenteric lymph compared to plasma, the levels of the drug in MLNs were similar to plasma in both LCT-based and lipid-free formulation groups. Thus, LCT-based formulation approach alone was not sufficient for effective delivery of TPV to MLNs. Future efforts should be directed to a combined highly lipophilic prodrugs/lipid-based formulation approach to target TPV, other PIs and potentially other classes of antiretroviral agents to viral reservoirs within the mesenteric lymphatic system.

Untimed Efavirenz Drug Levels After Switching From Brand to Generic Formulations: A Short Communication.

BACKGROUND: In British Columbia, antiretrovirals are distributed at no cost to patients via a publicly funded program, using generic formulations if available. A generic efavirenz-emtricitabine-tenofovir DF (EFV-FTC-TDF) combination pill became available in April 2018. The authors compared EFV untimed drug levels in subjects switching from brand to generic EFV-FTC-TDF. METHODS: Archived plasma HIV viral load samples were identified for consenting participants who switched from brand to generic EFV-FTC-TDF; 3 preswitch and 2-3 postswitch samples, collected ≥1 month apart were assessed for each subject. "Untimed" EFV concentrations with unknown dosing and collection time were assessed using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Participants' mean, minimum, and maximum EFV levels were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Participants with EFV levels in the range associated with lower risks of virologic failure and central nervous system toxicity (1000-4000 ng/mL), preswitch and postswitch, were enumerated. RESULTS: EFV levels were assessed in 297 preswitch and 249 postswitch samples from 99 participants, having exposure to brand and generic EFV for a median of 103 (Q1-Q3: 87-116) and 10.3 (Q1-Q3: 8.9-11.7) months, respectively. The final brand sample was collected at a median of 98 days preswitch; the first generic sample was collected at a median of 133 days postswitch. No significant differences were observed in participant mean EFV levels before (median 1968 ng/mL; Q1-Q3: 1534-2878 ng/mL) and after (median 1987 ng/mL; Q1-Q3: 1521-2834 ng/mL) switch (P = 0.85). Eighty participants had mean EFV levels within the 1000-4000 ng/mL range on the brand drug, of which 74 remained within this range postswitch. CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistically significant differences between untimed EFV levels in patients switching from the brand to generic EFV combination pill. Given the long elimination half-life of EFV, untimed drug levels may be a convenient way to estimate product bioequivalence.

Post-marketing experience with nevirapine extended release (XR) tablets: effectiveness and tolerability in a population-based cohort in British Columbia, Canada.

BACKGROUND: Nevirapine 400 mg extended release tablets (nevirapine-XR) are a once-daily alternative to nevirapine 200 mg immediate release tablets (nevirapine-IR). Study objectives were to describe the effectiveness and tolerability of nevirapine-XR in clinical practice and, for patients who switched from once daily 2×200 mg nevirapine-IR to nevirapine-XR, compare virological suppression and plasma nevirapine concentrations during each treatment period. METHODS: HIV-1-infected adults entered the study cohort if they initiated nevirapine-XR in British Columbia (BC) Canada between 1 April 2012 and 30 September 2012 and were followed until 30 September 2013. Demographic and clinical variables were abstracted from the BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS databases. Patients who switched from once daily nevirapine-IR to nevirapine-XR were monitored for 6 months pre- and post-switch with comparison of virological suppression (McNeamer's test) and median random plasma nevirapine concentrations (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test) in each period. RESULTS: The 536 nevirapine-XR-treated patients were 96% male, median (IQR) age 49.9 (44.0-56.9) years. Median follow-up was 15.6 (14.7-16.5) months, with 474/536 (88%) maintaining virological suppression. Emergent drug resistance developed in 5/536 (1%), adverse drug reactions in 17/536 (3%) and, although 31/536 (6%) reported 'whole' tablets in their stools, this was not associated with adverse outcomes. Among the 305 patients who switched from nevirapine-IR to nevirapine-XR, median (IQR) random plasma nevirapine concentration was higher during nevirapine-IR 5,000 (3,690-6,090) ng/ml than nevirapine-XR 3,930 (3,050-5,150) ng/ml (P<0.001), but there was no difference in virological suppression, 89% and 87% respectively (P=0.414). CONCLUSIONS: This post-marketing study affirms the effectiveness and tolerability of nevirapine-XR as an alternative to nevirapine-IR in adults.