Decision regret up to 6 years after sleeve gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is one of the most popular types of weight loss surgery today but is neither risk-free nor universally effective. We previously demonstrated that 5% of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) patients and up to 20% of gastric banding patients report overall regret 4 years after surgery. This study explores patients' attitudes toward their decision to have SG and decision regret rates up to 6 years postoperatively. METHODS: We surveyed 185 patients who were at least 6 months post-SG (response rate 30%). We used a modified version of the Decision Regret Scale developed by Brehaut et al. We converted responses to a 0-100 scale so that higher scores (> 50) reflect greater regret. We characterized patients who expressed having overall decision regret (score > 50) vs. those who did not (≤ 50). Demographic and preoperative clinical information was extracted from the online medical records. RESULTS: Of 185 SG patients, only 13 (7%) reported regret scores > 50 (i.e. high decision regret). Mean time from SG to survey completion was 41 months (range 6-76 months). Unadjusted comparisons between the two groups revealed that patients with high regret scores had lower mean weight loss (32.1% vs. 48.9% EBMIL), and reported less improvement in quality-of-life (QoL), such as physical health (46.2% vs. 93.5% "somewhat" or "significantly" improved). The two groups were similar in short-term complications, but those reporting overall regret were more likely to report GI complaints such as bloating (61.5% vs. 30.4%). Finally, patients with regret scores > 50 were more likely to be further out from SG (median time since surgery 61.8 vs. 41.1 months). CONCLUSION: In our study, very few patients reported regret (7%) up to 6 years postoperatively, in line with prior reports after RYGB. Those with regret reported poorer QoL.

Preoperative Depression Status and 5 Year Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in the PCORnet Bariatric Study Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether depression status before metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) influenced 5-year weight loss, diabetes, and safety/utilization outcomes in the PCORnet Bariatric Study. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Research on the impact of depression on MBS outcomes is inconsistent with few large, long-term studies. METHODS: Data were extracted from 23 health systems on 36,871 patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy (SG; n=16,158) or gastric bypass (RYGB; n=20,713) from 2005-2015. Patients with and without a depression diagnosis in the year before MBS were evaluated for % total weight loss (%TWL), diabetes outcomes, and postsurgical safety/utilization (reoperations, revisions, endoscopy, hospitalizations, mortality) at 1, 3, and 5 years after MBS. RESULTS: 27.1% of SG and 33.0% of RYGB patients had preoperative depression, and they had more medical and psychiatric comorbidities than those without depression. At 5 years of follow-up, those with depression, versus those without depression, had slightly less %TWL after RYGB, but not after SG (between group difference = 0.42%TWL, P = 0.04). However, patients with depression had slightly larger HbA1c improvements after RYGB but not after SG (between group difference = - 0.19, P = 0.04). Baseline depression did not moderate diabetes remission or relapse, reoperations, revision, or mortality across operations; however, baseline depression did moderate the risk of endoscopy and repeat hospitalization across RYGB versus SG. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with depression undergoing RYGB and SG had similar weight loss, diabetes, and safety/utilization outcomes to those without depression. The effects of depression were clinically small compared to the choice of operation.

Effects of Diet on 10-Year Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk (from the DASH Trial).

Although modern risk estimators, such as the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Pooled Cohort Equation, play a central role in the decisions of patients to start pharmacologic therapy to prevent atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), there is limited evidence to inform expectations for 10-year ASCVD risk reduction from established lifestyle interventions. Using data from the original DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension) trial, we determined the effects of adopting the DASH diet on 10-year ASCVD risk compared with adopting a control or a fruits and vegetables (F/V) diet. The DASH trial included 459 adults aged 22 to 75 years without CVD and not taking antihypertensive or diabetes mellitus medications, who were randomized to controlled feeding of a control diet, an F/V diet, or the DASH diet for 8 weeks. We determined 10-year ASCVD risk with the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Pooled Cohort Equation based on blood pressure and lipids measured before and after the 8-week intervention. Compared with the control diet, the DASH and F/V diets changed 10-year ASCVD risk by -10.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] -14.4 to -5.9) and -9.9% (95% CI -14.0 to -5.5) respectively; these effects were more pronounced in women and Black adults. There was no difference between the DASH and F/V diets (-0.4%, 95% CI -6.9 to 6.5). ASCVD reductions attributable to the difference in systolic blood pressure alone were -14.6% (-17.3 to -11.7) with the DASH diet and -7.9% (-10.9 to -4.8) with the F/V diet, a net relative advantage of 7.2% greater relative reduction from DASH compared with F/V. This was offset by the effects on high-density lipoprotein of the DASH diet, which increased 10-year ASCVD by 8.8% (5.5 to 12.3) compared with the more neutral effect of the F/V diet of -1.9% (-5.0 to 1.2). In conclusion, compared with a typical American diet, the DASH and F/V diets reduced 10-year ASCVD risk scores by about 10% over 8 weeks. These findings are informative for counseling patients on both choices of diet and expectations for 10-year ASCVD risk reduction.

Primary Care Providers' Perceptions of the Acceptability, Appropriateness, and Feasibility of a Mammography Decision Aid for Women Aged 75 and Older.

Background. Clinicians need to find decision aids (DAs) useful for their successful implementation. Therefore, we aimed to conduct an exploratory study to learn primary care clinicians' (PCPs) perspectives on a mammography DA for women ≥75 to inform its implementation. Methods. We sent a cross-sectional survey to 135 PCPs whose patients had participated in a randomized trial of the DA. These PCPs practiced at 1 of 11 practices in Massachusetts or North Carolina. PCPs were asked closed-ended and open-ended questions on shared decision making (SDM) around mammography with women ≥75 and on the DA's acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. Results. Eighty PCPs participated (24 [30%] from North Carolina). Most (n = 69, 86%) thought that SDM about mammography with women ≥75 was extremely/very important and that they engaged women ≥75 in SDM around mammography frequently/always (n = 49, 61%). Regarding DA acceptability, 60% felt the DA was too long. Regarding appropriateness, 70 (89%) thought it was somewhat/very helpful and that it would help patients make more informed decisions; 55 (70%) would recommend it. Few (n = 6, 8%) felt they had other resources to support this decision. Regarding feasibility, 53 (n = 67%) thought it would be most feasible for patients to receive the DA before a visit from medical assistants rather than during or after a visit or from health educators. Most (n = 62, 78%) wanted some training to use the DA. Limitations. Sixty-nine percent of PCPs in this small study practiced in academic settings. Conclusions. Although PCPs were concerned about the DA's length, most found it helpful and informative and felt it would be feasible for medical assistants to deliver the DA before a visit. Implications. Study findings may inform implementation of this and other DAs.

High-Risk Alcohol Use and Disordered Eating Behavior Before and 1 Year After Sleeve Gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests a rise in alcohol misuse after some bariatric procedures. Whether undergoing sleeve gastrectomy raises the risk of high-risk alcohol use is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the risk of high-risk alcohol use 1 year after sleeve gastrectomy and collect preliminary data on potential associations between disordered eating and high-risk drinking post-surgery. METHODS: We interviewed 97 patients before and 1 year after sleeve gastrectomy and assessed for high-risk alcohol use via a modified version of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C). Eating behavior was assessed using the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire Revised-18 (TFEQ-R18). RESULTS: The prevalence of high-risk drinking increased from 13.4% prior to surgery to 22.7% 1 year after sleeve gastrectomy; 16.5% of our sample reported new high-risk drinking equivalent to an incidence of 19.0%. New high-risk drinkers appeared more likely to report lower cognitive restraint scores and higher scores for emotional and uncontrolled eating at baseline and had larger improvements in disordered eating scores post-surgery although these differences approached, but did not reach, statistical significance. CONCLUSION: One in five non-high-risk drinkers developed new high-risk alcohol intake 1 year after sleeve gastrectomy. New high-risk drinkers appear to have greater disordered eating at baseline and reported greater improvement in eating behavior than those who did not develop new high-risk drinking. These results are consistent with the addiction transfer hypothesis postulating that some patients may replace disordered eating with alcohol misuse after sleeve gastrectomy.

Effects of dietary macronutrients on serum urate: results from the OmniHeart trial.

BACKGROUND: Dietary recommendations to prevent gout emphasize a low-purine diet. Recent evidence suggests that the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet reduces serum urate while also improving blood pressure and lipids. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of DASH-style diets emphasizing different macronutrient proportions on serum urate reduction. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of the Optimal Macronutrient Intake Trial to Prevent Heart Disease feeding study, a 3-period, crossover design, randomized trial of adults with prehypertension or hypertension. Participants were provided with 3 DASH-style diets in random order, each for 6 wk. Each DASH-style diet emphasized different macronutrient proportions: a carbohydrate-rich (CARB) diet, a protein-rich (PROT) diet, and an unsaturated fat-rich (UNSAT) diet. In the PROT diet, approximately half of the protein came from plant sources. We compared the effects of these diets on serum urate at weeks 4 and 6 of each feeding period. RESULTS: Of the 163 individuals included in the final analysis, the mean serum urate at baseline was 5.1 mg/dL. Only the PROT diet reduced serum urate from baseline at the end of the 6-wk feeding period (-0.16 mg/dL; 95% CI: -0.28, -0.04; P = 0.007). Neither the CARB diet (-0.03 mg/dL; 95% CI: -0.14, 0.09; P = 0.66) nor the UNSAT diet (-0.01 mg/dL; 95% CI: -0.12, 0.09; P = 0.78) reduced serum urate from baseline. The PROT diet lowered serum urate by 0.12 mg/dL (95% CI: -0.20, -0.03; P = 0.006) compared with CARB and by 0.12 mg/dL (95% CI: -0.20, -0.05; P = 0.002) compared with UNSAT. CONCLUSIONS: A DASH-style diet emphasizing plant-based protein lowered serum urate compared with those emphasizing carbohydrates or unsaturated fat. Future trials should test the ability of a DASH-style diet emphasizing plant-based protein to lower serum urate and prevent gout flares in patients with gout. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00051350.

Racial Disparities in Acute Coronary Syndrome Management Within a Universal Healthcare Context: Insights From the AMI-OPTIMA Trial.

BACKGROUND: Although prior studies have demonstrated racial disparities regarding acute coronary syndrome (ACS) care within private or mixed healthcare systems, few researchers have explored such disparities within universal healthcare systems. We aimed to evaluate the quality and outcomes of in-hospital ACS management for White patients vs patients of colour, within a universal healthcare context. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of the Acute Myocardial Infarction - Knowledge Translation to Optimize Adherence to Evidence-Based Therapy study, a cluster-randomized trial evaluating a knowledge-translation intervention at 24 hospitals in Quebec, Canada (years: 2009 and 2012). The primary endpoint was coronary catheterization. The secondary endpoints included in-hospital mortality, percutaneous and surgical coronary revascularization, major bleeding, total stroke, and discharge prescription of evidence-based medical therapy. RESULTS: Of 3444 included patients, 2738 were White, and 706 were people of colour. The mean age was 68.2 years (33.3% women) among White patients and 69.5 years (36.0% women) among patients of colour. Patients of colour were less likely to undergo in-hospital coronary catheterization than were White patients (74.5% vs 80.3%, P = 0.001). This difference was attenuated after adjusting for patient-level characteristics (odds ratio 0.89; 95% confidence interval 0.73-1.09), and it was eliminated after adjusting for hospital-level characteristics (odds ratio 1.04; 95% confidence interval 0.73-1.49). CONCLUSIONS: Racial disparity in coronary catheterization for ACS persists within a universal healthcare context. Patients' comorbidities and hospital-level factors may be partially responsible for this inequality. Future research on cardiovascular healthcare in patients with diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds in universal healthcare systems is needed to remediate racial inequality in ACS management.

CONTEXTE: Bien que des études antérieures aient démontré l'existence de disparités raciales dans la prise en charge du syndrome coronarien aigu (SCA) au sein de systèmes de santé privés ou mixtes, peu de chercheurs ont étudié ces disparités au sein de systèmes universels de soins de santé. Nous avons cherché à évaluer la qualité et les résultats de la prise en charge du SCA à l'hôpital pour les patients blancs par rapport aux patients de couleur, dans un contexte de soins de santé universels. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Nous avons effectué une analyse a posteriori de l'étude AMI-OPTIMA, un essai sur échantillon en grappes aléatoire évaluant une intervention d'application des connaissances dans 24 hôpitaux du Québec, au Canada (années : 2009 et 2012). Le paramètre d'évaluation principal était le cathétérisme coronaire. Les paramètres d'évaluation secondaires comprenaient la mortalité à l'hôpital, la revascularisation coronaire percutanée et chirurgicale, l'hémorragie majeure, l'accident vasculaire cérébral et la prescription au congé d'un traitement médical fondé sur des données probantes. RÉSULTATS: Sur les 3444 patients étudiés, 2738 étaient blancs et 706 étaient des personnes de couleur. L'âge moyen était de 68,2 ans (33,3 % de femmes) chez les patients blancs, et de 69,5 ans (36,0 % de femmes) chez les patients de couleur. Les patients de couleur étaient moins susceptibles de subir un cathétérisme coronaire à l'hôpital que les patients blancs (74,5 % contre 80,3 %, p = 0,001). Cette différence a été atténuée après ajustement pour tenir compte des caractéristiques des patients (rapport de cotes : 0,89; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % : 0,73-1,09), et éliminée après ajustement pour tenir compte des caractéristiques des hôpitaux (rapport de cotes : 1,04; IC à 95 % : 0,73-1,49). CONCLUSIONS: La disparité raciale en ce qui a trait au cathétérisme coronaire pour un SCA persiste dans un contexte de soins de santé universels. Les comorbidités des patients et des facteurs liés à l'hôpital peuvent être partiellement responsables de cette inégalité. De plus amples recherches sur les soins cardiovasculaires chez les patients de diverses origines raciales ou ethniques dans les systèmes universels de soins de santé sont nécessaires pour remédier aux inégalités raciales dans la prise en charge du SCA.

Effect of a Mammography Screening Decision Aid for Women 75 Years and Older: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Guidelines recommend that women 75 years and older be informed of the benefits and harms of mammography before screening. Objective: To test the effects of receipt of a paper-based mammography screening decision aid (DA) for women 75 years and older on their screening decisions. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cluster randomized clinical trial with clinician as the unit of randomization. All analyses were completed on an intent-to-treat basis. The setting was 11 primary care practices in Massachusetts or North Carolina. Of 1247 eligible women reached, 546 aged 75 to 89 years without breast cancer or dementia who had a mammogram within 24 months but not within 6 months and saw 1 of 137 clinicians (herein referred to as PCPs) from November 3, 2014, to January 26, 2017, participated. A research assistant (RA) administered a previsit questionnaire on each participant's health, breast cancer risk factors, sociodemographic characteristics, and screening intentions. After the visit, the RA administered a postvisit questionnaire on screening intentions and knowledge. Interventions: Receipt of the DA (DA arm) or a home safety (HS) pamphlet (control arm) before a PCP visit. Main Outcomes and Measures: Participants were followed up for 18 months for receipt of mammography screening (primary outcome). To examine the effects of the DA, marginal logistic regression models were fit using generalized estimating equations to allow for clustering by PCP. Adjusted probabilities and risk differences were estimated to account for clustering by PCP. Results: Of 546 women in the study, 283 (51.8%) received the DA. Patients in each arm were well matched; their mean (SD) age was 79.8 (3.7) years, 428 (78.4%) were non-Hispanic white, 321 (of 543 [59.1%]) had completed college, and 192 (35.2%) had less than a 10-year life expectancy. After 18 months, 9.1% (95% CI, 1.2%-16.9%) fewer women in the DA arm than in the control arm had undergone mammography screening (51.3% vs 60.4%; adjusted risk ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.95; P = .006). Women in the DA arm were more likely than those in the control arm to rate their screening intentions lower from previsit to postvisit (69 of 283 [adjusted %, 24.5%] vs 47 of 263 [adjusted %, 15.3%]), to be more knowledgeable about the benefits and harms of screening (86 [adjusted %, 25.5%] vs 32 [adjusted %, 11.7%]), and to have a documented discussion about mammography with their PCP (146 [adjusted %, 47.4%] vs 111 [adjusted %, 38.9%]). Almost all women in the DA arm (94.9%) would recommend the DA. Conclusions and Relevance: Providing women 75 years and older with a mammography screening DA before a PCP visit helps them make more informed screening decisions and leads to fewer women choosing to be screened, suggesting that the DA may help reduce overscreening. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02198690.

Racial and insurance disparities among patients presenting with chest pain in the US: 2009-2015.

BACKGROUND: Nationally representative studies have shown significant racial and socioeconomic disparities in the triage and diagnostic evaluation of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain. However, these studies were conducted over a decade ago and have not been updated amidst growing awareness of healthcare disparities. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to reevaluate the effect of race and insurance type on triage acuity and diagnostic testing to assess if these disparities persist. METHODS: We identified ED visits for adults presenting with chest pain in the 2009-2015 National Hospital Ambulatory Health Care Surveys. Using weighted logistic regression, we examined associations between race and payment type with triage acuity and likelihood of ordering electrocardiography (ECG) or cardiac enzymes. RESULTS: A total of 10,441 patients met inclusion criteria, corresponding to an estimated 51.4 million patients nationwide. When compared with white patients, black patients presenting with chest pain were less likely to have an ECG ordered (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.69-0.99). Patients with Medicare, Medicaid, and no insurance were also less likely to have an ECG ordered compared to patients with private insurance (Medicare: OR = 0.79, CI = 0.63-0.99; Medicaid: OR = 0.67, CI = 0.53-0.84; no insurance: OR = 0.68, CI = 0.55-0.84). Those with Medicare and Medicaid were less likely to be triaged emergently (Medicare: OR = 0.84, CI = 0.71-0.99; Medicaid: OR = 0.76, CI = 0.64-0.91) and those with Medicare were less likely to have cardiac enzymes ordered (OR = 0.84, CI = 0.72-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Persistent racial and insurance disparities exist in the evaluation of chest pain in the ED. Compared to earlier studies, disparities in triage acuity and cardiac enzymes appear to have diminished, but disparities in ECG ordering have not. Given current Class I recommendations for ECGs on all patients presenting with chest pain emergently, our findings highlight the need for improvement in this area.