Pregnancies in Women With Kidney Failure on Home Dialysis in the United States.

Introduction: Women with kidney failure have impaired fertility and are at a higher risk of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Little is known about pregnancies in women receiving maintenance home dialysis in the United States. Methods: Using data from the United States Renal Data System (USRDS), a cohort of 26,387 women aged 15 to 49 years with kidney failure receiving maintenance home dialysis from 2005 to 2018 was examined. We calculated pregnancy rates and identified factors, including the modality associated with pregnancy receiving home dialysis. Results: Overall, 437 pregnancies were identified in 26,837 women on home dialysis. The unadjusted pregnancy rate was 8.6 per 1000 person-years (PTPY). The unadjusted pregnancy rate was higher on home hemodialysis (16.0 vs. 7.5 PTPY) than on peritoneal dialysis. Women receiving home hemodialysis had a higher adjusted likelihood of pregnancy than women receiving peritoneal dialysis (hazard ratio [HR], 2.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.79-3.05). Compared with women aged 20 to 24 years, the likelihood of pregnancy was lower in women aged 30 to 34 years (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.96), 35 to 39 years (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.35-0.79), 40 to 44 years (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.21-0.49), and 45 to 49 years (HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.13-0.33). Whereas Black women had a higher likelihood of pregnancy (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.07-1.83), there was no difference in likelihood of pregnancy in Asian, Hispanic, and Native Americans as compared to Whites. Body mass index, cause of kidney failure, socioeconomic status, rurality, predialysis nephrology care, or dialysis vintage were not significantly associated with pregnancy on home dialysis. Conclusion: The pregnancy rate in women with kidney failure undergoing home dialysis is higher with home hemodialysis than with peritoneal dialysis. Younger age and Black race or ethnicity are associated with a higher likelihood of pregnancy among women receiving home dialysis. This information can guide clinicians in preconception counselling and making informed treatment decisions for pregnant women on home dialysis.

Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Complications after Insertion by Surgeons, Radiologists, or Nephrologists.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The Advancing American Kidney Health Initiative aims to increase rates of utilization of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in the United States. One of the first steps to PD is successful catheter placement, which can be performed by surgeons, interventional radiologists, or nephrologists. We examined the association between operator subspecialty and risk of needing a follow-up procedure in the first 90 days after initial PD catheter implantation. Overall, we found that 15.5% of catheters required revision, removal, or a second catheter placement within 90 days. The odds of requiring a follow-up procedure was 36% higher for interventional radiologists and 86% higher for interventional nephrologists compared with general surgeons. Further research is needed to understand how to optimize the function of catheters across different operator types. BACKGROUND: The US government has implemented incentives to increase the use of PD. Successful placement of PD catheters is an important step to increasing PD utilization rates. Our objective was to compare initial outcomes after PD catheter placement by different types of operators. METHODS: We included PD-naïve patients insured by Medicare who had a PD catheter inserted between 2010 and 2019. We examined the association between specialty of the operator (general surgeon, vascular surgeon, interventional radiologist, or interventional nephrologist) and odds of needing a follow-up procedure, which we defined as catheter removal, replacement, or revision within 90 days of the initial procedure. Mixed logistic regression models clustered by operator were used to examine the association between operator type and outcomes. RESULTS: We included 46,973 patients treated by 5205 operators (71.1% general surgeons, 17.2% vascular surgeons, 9.7% interventional radiologists, 2.0% interventional nephrologists). 15.5% of patients required a follow-up procedure within 90 days of the initial insertion, of whom 2.9% had a second PD catheter implanted, 6.6% underwent PD catheter removal, and 5.9% had a PD catheter revision within 90 days of the initial insertion. In models adjusted for patient and operator characteristics, the odds of requiring a follow-up procedure within 90 days were highest for interventional nephrologists (HR, 1.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.56 to 2.22) and interventional radiologists (odds ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.58) followed by vascular surgeons (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.14) compared with general surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: The probability of needing a follow-up procedure after initial PD catheter placement varied by operator specialty and was higher for interventionalists and lowest for general surgeons.

Home-Based Dialysis: A Primer for the Internist.

Home-based dialysis modalities offer both clinical and practical advantages to patients. The use of the home-based modalities, peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis, has been increasing over the past decade after a long period of decline. Given the increasing frequency of use of these types of dialysis, it is important for clinicians to be familiar with how these types of dialysis are performed and key clinical aspects of care related to their use in patients with end-stage kidney disease.

Contemporary Practice of Anemia Treatment Among Dialysis Patients in the United States.

Introduction: The treatment of anemia is a major activity in the care of patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (HD). The comparative effectiveness of new pharmacologic treatments, relative to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), should be anticipated on the bases of controlled trials and current practice. We describe the contemporary practice of anemia treatment in a national cohort of patients undergoing maintenance HD. Methods: We analyzed the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) data to identify adult patients undergoing in-facility HD in 2016 to 2019. Using the Consolidated Renal Operations in a Web-Enabled Network (CROWNWeb) dataset, we identified hemoglobin and ESA utilization (agent and cumulative dose) during each patient-month, as well as intravenous (IV) iron utilization, ferritin, and transferrin saturation. We compared ESA dosing during the study era to dosing in the Normal Hematocrit Cardiac Trial (NHCT), conducted in the 1990s. We assessed ESA hyporesponsiveness by estimating the prevalence of the following: (i) high erythropoietin resistance index (ERI) and (ii) either 3 or 6 consecutive months with hemoglobin <10 g/dl. Results: Nearly two-thirds of patient-months had hemoglobin of 10.0 to 11.9 g/dl. Mean ESA utilization was 76.7% per month, with increasing use of pegylated epoetin beta. ESA dosing was stable; epoetin alfa dosing was slightly lower than in the low-target arm of the NHCT. The prevalence of ESA hyporesponsiveness was 22.2% if defined by high ERI, but only 2.1% to 6.0% if defined by 3 to 6 consecutive months with hemoglobin <10 g/dl. Median transferrin saturation was 22.3% with high ERI and persistently low hemoglobin. Conclusion: Hemoglobin and ESA dosing distributions are stable, with epoetin alfa dosing below the low-target arm of the NHCT. Persistently low hemoglobin occurs infrequently and may reflect iron depletion.

Patient-Centered Quality Measures for Dialysis Care: A Report of a Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) Scientific Workshop Sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation.

Providing high-quality patient-centered care is the central mission of dialysis facilities. Assessing quality and patient-centeredness of dialysis care is necessary for continuous dialysis facility improvement. Based predominantly on readily measured items, current quality measures in dialysis care emphasize biochemical and utilization outcomes, with very few patient-reported items. Additionally, current metrics often do not account for patient preferences and may compromise patient-centered care by limiting the ability of providers to individualize care targets, such as dialysis adequacy, based on patient priorities rather than a fixed numerical target. Developing, implementing, and maintaining a quality program using readily quantifiable data while also allowing for individualization of care targets that emphasize the goals of patients and their care partners provided the motivation for a September 2022 Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) Workshop on Patient-Centered Quality Measures for Dialysis Care. Workshop participants focused on 4 questions: (1) What are the outcomes that are most important to patients and their care partners? (2) How can social determinants of health be accounted for in quality measures? (3) How can individualized care be effectively addressed in population-level quality programs? (4) What are the optimal means for collecting valid and robust patient-reported outcome data? Workshop participants identified numerous gaps within the current quality system and favored a conceptually broader, but not larger, quality system that stresses highly meaningful and adaptive measures that incorporate patient-centered principles, individual life goals, and social risk factors. Workshop participants also identified a need for new, low-burden tools to assess patient goals and priorities.

Initial Management and Potential Opportunities to Deprescribe Dialysis among Patients with AKI-D Patients after Hospital Discharge.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Dialysis-requiring AKI (AKI-D) now accounts for more than 15% of outpatient hemodialysis initiations; over 30% of these patients with AKI-D may have potential to recover. However, little is known about strategies currently used to treat outpatient AKI-D and screen for recovery. In this study of 1754 patients with AKI-D, we found that ( 1 ) the initial dialysis orders were similar to those of patients with contemporary incident ESKD, despite different treatment goals; ( 2 ) timed urine collections were completed in only a minority of patients; and ( 3 ) most patients with AKI-D who recovered discontinued dialysis without ever having been weaned from their initial dialysis prescription, suggesting there may be substantial opportunity to wean dialysis sooner.

Setting Up Home Dialysis Programs: Now and in the Future.

Home dialysis utilization has been growing in the United States over the past decade but still lags behind similar socioeconomic nations. More than half of dialysis facilities in the United States either are not licensed to offer home dialysis or, despite a license, have no patients dialyzing at home, and many programs have a relatively small census. Multiple stakeholders, including patients, health care providers, and payers, have identified increased home dialysis use as an important goal. To realize these goals, nephrologists and kidney care professionals need a sound understanding of the key considerations in home dialysis center operation. In this review, we outline the core domains required to set up and operate a home dialysis program in the United States now and in the future.

Increased Access, Persistent Disparities: Trends in Disparities in Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) Use, 2009-2019.

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) use has increased in the United States since 2009, but how this has affected disparities in PD use is unclear. We used data from the United States Renal Data System to identify a cohort of incident dialysis patients from 2009 to 2019. We used logistic regression models to examine how odds of PD use changed by demographic characteristics. The incident PD population increased by 203% from 2009 to 2019, and the odds of PD use increased in every subgroup. PD use increased more among older people because the odds for those aged 75 years or older increased 15% more per 5-year period compared with individuals aged 18-44 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.64 to 1.73 versus OR 1.46, 95% CI, 1.42 to 1.50). The odds of PD use increased 5% more per 5-year period among Hispanic people compared with White people (OR 1.58, 95% CI, 1.53 to 1.63 versus OR 1.51, 95% CI, 1.48 to 1.53). There was no difference in odds of PD initiation among people who were Black, Asian, or of another race. The odds of PD use increased 5% more for people living in urban areas compared with people living in nonurban areas (5-year OR 1.54, 95% CI, 1.52 to 1.56 versus 5-year OR 1.46, 95% CI, 1.42 to 1.50). The odds of PD use increased 7% more for people living in socioeconomically advantaged areas compared with people living in more deprived areas (5-year OR 1.60, 95% CI, 1.56 to 1.63 for neighborhoods with lowest Social Deprivation Index versus 5-year OR 1.50, 95% CI, 1.48 to 1.53 in the most deprived areas). Expansion of PD use led to a reduction in disparities for older people and for Hispanic people. Although PD use increased across all strata of socioeconomic deprivation, the gap in PD use between people living in the least deprived areas and those living in the most deprived areas widened.

Association of Nondihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blockers Versus ß-Adrenergic Receptor Blockers With Risk of Heart Failure Hospitalization.

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are interrelated and often coexisting conditions in older adults. Although equally recommended, nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (non-DHP CCBs), such as diltiazem and verapamil, are less often used than ß blockers. Because recent studies suggested that ß-blocker use in both HFpEF and AF may increase the risk for HF, we tested whether non-DHP CCBs were associated with lower HF hospitalization risk than ß blockers. We examined fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries who were aged ≥66 years, had HFpEF or AF, and newly initiated a ß blocker (n = 83,458) or non-DHP CCB (n = 18,924) from 2014 to 2018. The outcomes of HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality were analyzed using multivariable-adjusted Cox regression in the full cohort and, separately, in the subset without a recent hospital or skilled nursing discharge. Follow-up was analyzed using 2 frameworks: intention-to-treat and censored-at-drug-switch-or-discontinuation. There was a modestly protective association of non-DHP CCBs for the risk of HF hospitalization. Before drug switch or discontinuation, the use of diltiazem or verapamil was associated with decreased risk of HF hospitalization in the full cohort (hazard ratio [HR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81 to 1.00, p = 0.05) and in the subgroup (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.89, p = 0.003). However, the association with all-cause mortality tended to favor ß blockers, including in the intention-to-treat analysis (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.25, p <0.001). In conclusion, compared with ß blockers, the initiation of diltiazem or verapamil in patients with HFpEF or AF may be associated with fewer HF hospitalization events but also with more all-cause deaths.

Association of the End-Stage Renal Disease Treatment Choices Payment Model With Home Dialysis Use at Kidney Failure Onset From 2016 to 2022.

Importance: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services designed a mandatory payment model to incentivize home dialysis use: the End-Stage Renal Disease Treatment Choices (ETC). Outpatient dialysis facilities and health care professionals providing nephrology services were randomly assigned to ETC participation at the hospital referral region level. Objective: To assess the association between ETC and home dialysis use in the incident dialysis population in its first 18 months of implementation. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cohort study with controlled, interrupted time series analysis of the US End-Stage Renal Disease Quality Reporting System database was conducted, using generalized estimating equations. All adults initiating home-based dialysis in the US between January 1, 2016, and June 30, 2022, without a prior kidney transplant were included in the analysis. Exposures: Prior to vs after ETC onset in January 1, 2021, and random assignment to ETC participation of facilities and health care professionals involved in patient care. Main Outcomes and Measures: Percentage of patients started on incident home dialysis and yearly change in percentage initiating home dialysis. Results: A total of 817 177 adults initiated home dialysis during the study period, of whom 750 314 were included in the study cohort. The cohort included 41.4% women; 26.2% of the patients were Black, 17.4% were Hispanic, and 49.1% were White. Approximately half (49.6%) of the patients were aged at least 65 years. A total of 31.2% received care from health care professionals assigned to ETC participation, and 33.6% had Medicare fee-for-service coverage. Overall, home dialysis use increased from 10.0% in January 2016 to 17.4% in June 2022. Home dialysis use increased more in ETC markets than in non-ETC markets after January 2021 (by 1.07%; 95% CI, 0.16%-1.97%). The rate of increase in home dialysis use in the entire cohort nearly doubled after January 2021 to 1.66% per year (95% CI, 1.14%-2.19%) compared with before 2021, when the rate was 0.86% per year (95% CI, 0.75%-0.97%), but the difference in rate of increase in home dialysis use was not significant between ETC and non-ETC markets. Conclusions and Relevance: This study noted that, although the overall rate of dialysis use at home was greater after ETC implementation, the increase occurred more among patients in ETC markets than among those in non-ETC markets. These findings suggest that federal policy and financial incentives affected care for the entire incident dialysis population in the US.

Disparities in SGLT2 Inhibitor or Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist Initiation Among Medicare-Insured Adults With CKD in the United States.

Rationale & Objective: Information regarding disparities in initiating sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is limited. We examined sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with the initiation of SGLT2i, GLP-1RA, or second-generation sulfonylureas in a Medicare Fee-For-Service patient population with CKD and type 2 diabetes. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting & Participants: The 20% random sample of Medicare Fee-For-Service claims, 2012-2018. Exposures: Patients' sociodemographic and clinical factors. Outcomes: Use of SGLT2i, GLP-1RA, or sulfonylureas. Analytical Approach: Patients with a newly initiated prescription of SGLT2i, GLP-1RA, or second-generation sulfonylureas from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2018, were identified. Multinomial logistic regression model was used to evaluate demographic and clinical factors associated with the initiation of SGLT2i, GLP-1RA, or second-generation sulfonylureas. Results: The study cohort comprised 53,029 adults (aged greater than or equal to 18 years) with CKD and type 2 diabetes, of whom 10.0%, 17.4%, and 72.6% had a first prescription for SGLT2i, GLP-1RA, and sulfonylurea, respectively. Patients aged greater than or equal to 75 years versus those aged 65-74 years had lower odds to start SGLT2i or GLP-1RA compared with sulfonylureas. Black patients were associated with lower odds of initiation of SGLT2i (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.61-0.74) and GLP-1RA (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.68-0.79), compared with White patients. Hispanic and Asian patients had lower odds of initiation of GLP-1RA. Patients with cardiovascular disease or hyperlipidemia had higher odds to start SGLT2i or GLP-1RA. Limitations: CKD and type 2 diabetes diagnosis; CKD stage; and patient clinical status were identified with diagnosis or procedure codes. There is potential for residual confounding with the use of retrospective data. Conclusions: The results of this study identified disparities in the use of SGLT2i and GLP-1RA in patients with CKD. Black and older patients were significantly less likely to be initiated on SGLT2i or GLP-1RA than on second-generation sulfonylureas.

Associations of COVID-19 Outcomes with Dialysis Modalities and Settings.

How maintenance dialysis modality, dialysis setting, and residence in a nursing facility have jointly associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related outcomes in the United States is relevant to future viral outbreaks. Using Medicare claims, we determined the incidence of COVID-19-related infection, hospitalization, and death between March 15, 2020 and June 5, 2021. The exposure was one of five combinations of dialysis modality and care setting: in-facility hemodialysis without a recent history of skilled nursing facility care, in-facility hemodialysis with a recent history of skilled nursing facility care, hemodialysis in a skilled nursing facility, home hemodialysis, and (home) peritoneal dialysis. Patient-weeks were pooled to estimate the adjusted associations of event incidence with each dialysis modality/setting during four intervals in 2020-2021. Relative to in-facility hemodialysis without a recent history of skilled nursing facility care, home dialysis was associated with 36%-60% lower odds of all events during weeks 12-23 of 2020; 24%-37% lower odds of all events during weeks 24-37 of 2020; 20%-33% lower odds of infection and hospitalization during the winter of 2020-2021; and similar odds of all events thereafter. In contrast, exposure to skilled nursing facilities was associated with 570%-1140% higher odds of all events during spring of 2020, although excess risk attenuated as the pandemic transpired, especially among patients who received hemodialysis in skilled nursing facilities. In conclusion, home dialysis was associated with lower risks of COVID-19 diagnosis, hospitalization, and death until vaccines were available, whereas care in skilled nursing facilities was associated with higher risks.

Hidden Costs Associated with Conversion from Peritoneal Dialysis to Hemodialysis.

Background: Increasing use of peritoneal dialysis (PD) will likely lead to increasing numbers of patients transitioning from PD to hemodialysis (HD). We describe the characteristics of patients who discontinued PD and converted to HD, trajectories of acute-care encounter rates and the total cost of care both before and after PD discontinuation, and the incidence of modality-related outcomes after PD discontinuation. Methods: We analyzed data in the United States Renal Data System to identify patients aged ≥12 years who were newly diagnosed with ESKD in 2001-2017, initiated PD during the first year of ESKD, and discontinued PD in 2009-2018. We estimated monthly rates of hospital admissions, observation stays, emergency department encounters, and Medicare Parts A and B costs during the 12 months before and after conversion from PD to HD, and the incidence of home HD initiation, death, and kidney transplantation after conversion to in-facility HD. Results: Among 232,699 patients who initiated PD, there were 124,213 patients who discontinued PD. Among them, 68,743 (55%) converted to HD. In this subgroup, monthly rates of acute-care encounters and total costs of care to Medicare sharply increased during the 6 months preceding PD discontinuation, peaking at 96.2 acute-care encounters per 100 patient-months and $20,701 per patient in the last month of PD. After conversion, rates decreased, but remained higher than before conversion. Among patients who converted to in-facility HD, the cumulative incidence of home HD initiation, death, and kidney transplantation at 24 months was 3%, 25%, and 7%, respectively. Conclusions: The transition from PD to HD is characterized by high rates of acute-care encounters and health-care expenditures. Quality improvement efforts should be aimed at improving transitions and encouraging both home HD and kidney transplantation after PD discontinuation.

Hypoglycemia Risk With SGLT2 Inhibitors or Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists Versus Sulfonylureas Among Medicare Insured Adults With CKD in the United States.

Rationale & Objective: Information on safety issues of newer glucose-lowering medications from a large population perspective in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with type 2 diabetes is limited. Our study aimed to examine hypoglycemia risk associated with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) versus second-generation sulfonylureas in a general population of older patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes, across race, age, sex, and socioeconomic subgroups. Study Design: Retrospective cohort. Setting & Participants: The 20% random sample of Medicare fee-for-service claims, 2012-2018. Exposures: Use of SGLT2is, GLP-1RAs, or sulfonylureas. Outcomes: Hypoglycemic events resulting in health care utilization. Analytical Approach: Cox proportional hazard model evaluated the 90-day risk of hypoglycemia associated with SGLT2is or GLP-1RAs versus sulfonylureas. Results: A total of 18,567 adults (mean age: 73 years) with CKD and type 2 diabetes was included; 14.0% (n = 2,528) had a prescription for a SGLT2i or GLP-1RA, and 86.0% (n = 16,039) with a sulfonylurea. Compared with sulfonylureas, use of SGLT2is or GLP-1RAs was associated with a significantly lower risk of hypoglycemia (adjusted HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.14-0.65). Black individuals had higher risk of developing hypoglycemia than White individuals (adjusted HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.07-2.26). Low-income subsidy compared to no low-income subsidy status was associated with higher risk of hypoglycemic events. The risk of hypoglycemia also increased with higher comorbid condition score. Limitations: CKD and type 2 diabetes diagnosis, CKD stage, and patient clinical status were identified with diagnosis or procedure codes. There is potential for residual confounding with use of retrospective data. Conclusions: Use of SGLT2is or GLP-1RAs compared with sulfonylureas was associated with a lower risk of hypoglycemia among patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes. Black race was not only associated with lower use of newer agents with demonstrated cardiovascular and kidney benefits and lower hypoglycemia risk, but also with a higher rate of hypoglycemic events as compared with White individuals.

Trends, Social Context, and Transplant Implications of Obesity Among Incident Dialysis Patients in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant programs have variable thresholds to accept obese candidates. This study aimed to examine trends and the social context of obesity among United States dialysis patients and implications for kidney transplant access. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 1 084 816 adults who initiated dialysis between January 2007 and December 2016 using the United States Renal Data System data. We estimated national body mass index (BMI) trends and 1-y cumulative incidence of waitlisting and death without waitlisting by BMI category (<18.5 kg/m 2 , ≥18.5 and <25 kg/m 2 [normal weight], ≥25 and <30 kg/m 2 [overweight], ≥30 and <35 kg/m 2 [class 1 obesity], ≥35 and <40 kg/m 2 [class 2 obesity], and ≥40 kg/m 2 [class 3 obesity]). We then used Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard regression models to examine associations between BMI category and 1-y waitlisting with death as a competing risk and tested for effect modification by End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) network, patient characteristics, and neighborhood social deprivation index. RESULTS: The median age was 65 (interquartile range 54-75) y, 43% were female, and 27% were non-Hispanic Black. From 2007 to 2016, the adjusted prevalence of class 1 obesity or higher increased from 31.9% to 38.2%. Class 2 and 3 obesity but not class 1 obesity were associated with lower waitlisting rates relative to normal BMI, especially for younger individuals, women, those of Asian race, or those living in less disadvantaged neighborhoods ( pinteraction < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Obesity prevalence is rising among US incident dialysis patients. Relative to normal BMI, waitlisting rates with class 2 and 3 obesity were lower and varied substantially by region, patient characteristics, and socioeconomic context.