Different patterns of Robertsonian fusion pairing in Bovidae and the house mouse: the relationship between chromosome size and nuclear territories.

Using a dataset of karyotypic changes reported for bovids and the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus) together with information from the cattle (Bos taurus) and mouse genomes, we examined two principal variables that have been proposed to predict chromosomal positioning in the nucleus, chromosome size and GC content. These were expected to influence the distribution of Robertsonian (Rb) fusions, the predominant mode of chromosomal change in both taxa. We found the largest chromosomes to be most frequently involved in fusions in bovids, and confirm earlier reports that chromosomes of intermediate size were the most frequent fusers in mice. We then tested whether chromosomal positioning can explain Rb fusion frequencies. We classified chromosomes into groups by size and considered the frequency of interactions between specific groups. Among the interactions, mouse chromosomes showed a slight tendency to fuse with neighbouring chromosomes, in line with expectations of chromosomal positioning, but also resembling predictions from meiotic spindle-induced bias. Bovids, on the other hand, showed no trend in interactions, with small chromosomes being the least frequent partner for all size classes. We discuss the results in terms of nuclear organization at various cell cycle stages and the proposed mechanisms of Rb fusion formation, and note that the difference can be explained by (i) considering bovid species generally to be characterized by a greater intermingling of chromosomal size classes than the house mouse, or (ii) by the vastly different timescales underpinning their evolutionary histories.

DNA sequence error rates in Genbank records estimated using the mouse genome as a reference.

We estimate DNA sequence error rates in Genbank records containing protein-coding and non-coding DNA sequences by comparing sequences of the inbred mouse strain C57BL/6J, sequenced as part of the mouse genome project and independently by other laboratories. C57BL/6J was produced by more than 100 generations of brother-sister mating, and can be assumed to be virtually free of residual polymorphism and mutational variation, so differences between independent sequences can be attributed to error. The estimated single nucleotide error rate for coding DNA is 0.10% (SE 0.012%), which is substantially lower than previous estimates for error rates in Genbank accessions. The estimated single nucleotide error rate for intronic DNA sequences (0.22%; SE 0.051%) is significantly higher than the rate for coding DNA. Since error rates for the mouse genome sequence are very low, the vast majority of the errors we detected are likely to be in individual Genbank accessions. The frequency of insertion-deletion (indel) errors in non-coding DNA approaches that of single nucleotide errors in non-coding DNA, whereas indel errors are uncommon in coding sequences.