Inhaled volatile anesthetics in the intensive care unit.

The discovery and utilization of volatile anesthetics has significantly transformed surgical practices since their inception in the mid-19th century. Recently, a paradigm shift is observed as volatile anesthetics extend beyond traditional confines of the operating theatres, finding diverse applications in intensive care settings. In the dynamic landscape of intensive care, volatile anesthetics emerge as a promising avenue for addressing complex sedation requirements, managing refractory lung pathologies including acute respiratory distress syndrome and status asthmaticus, conditions of high sedative requirements including burns, high opioid or alcohol use and neurological conditions such as status epilepticus. Volatile anesthetics can be administered through either inhaled route via anesthetic machines/devices or through extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuitry, providing intensivists with multiple options to tailor therapy. Furthermore, their unique pharmacokinetic profiles render them titratable and empower clinicians to individualize management with heightened accuracy, mitigating risks associated with conventional sedation modalities. Despite the amounting enthusiasm for the use of these therapies, barriers to widespread utilization include expanding equipment availability, staff familiarity and training of safe use. This article delves into the realm of applying inhaled volatile anesthetics in the intensive care unit through discussing their pharmacology, administration considerations in intensive care settings, complication considerations, and listing indications and evidence of the use of volatile anesthetics in the critically ill patient population.

Cumulative epinephrine dose during cardiac arrest and neurologic outcome after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: Epinephrine is recommended without an apparent ceiling dosage during cardiac arrest. However, excessive alpha- and beta-adrenergic stimulation may contribute to unnecessarily high aortic afterload, promote post-arrest myocardial dysfunction, and result in cerebral microvascular insufficiency in patients receiving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of adults (≥ 18 years) who received ECPR at large academic ECMO center from 2018 to 2022. Patients were grouped based on the amount of epinephrine given during cardiac arrest into low (≤ 3 mg) and high (> 3 mg) groups. The primary endpoint was neurologic outcome at hospital discharge, defined by cerebral performance category (CPC). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between cumulative epinephrine dosage during arrest and neurologic outcome. RESULTS: Among 51 included ECPR cases, the median age of patients was 60 years, and 55% were male. The mean cumulative epinephrine dose administered during arrest was 6.2 mg but ranged from 0 to 24 mg. There were 18 patients in the low-dose (≤ 3 mg) and 25 patients in the high-dose (> 3 mg) epinephrine groups. Favorable neurologic outcome at discharge was significantly greater in the low-dose (55%) compared to the high-dose (24%) group (p = 0.025). After adjusting for age, those who received higher doses of epinephrine during the arrest were more likely to have unfavorable neurologic outcomes at hospital discharge (odds ratio 4.6, 95% CI 1.3, 18.0, p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: After adjusting for age, cumulative epinephrine doses above 3 mg during cardiac arrest may be associated with unfavorable neurologic outcomes after ECPR and require further investigation.

Palliative care in the cardiovascular intensive care unit: A systematic review of current literature.

BACKGROUND: There has been an evolution in the disease severity and complexity of patients presenting to the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). There are limited data evaluating the role of palliative care in contemporary CICU practice. METHODS: PubMed Central, CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were evaluated for studies on palliative care in adults (≥18 years) admitted with acute cardiovascular conditions - acute myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, advanced heart failure, post-cardiac surgery, spontaneous coronary artery dissection, Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, and pulmonary embolism - admitted to the CICU, coronary care unit or cardiovascular intensive care unit from 1/1/2000 to 8/8/2022. The primary outcome of interest was the utilization of palliative care services. Secondary outcomes of included studies were also addressed. Meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity. RESULTS: Of 5711 citations, 30 studies were included. All studies were published in the last seven years and 90 % originated in the United States. Twenty-seven studies (90 %) were retrospective analyses, with a majority from the National Inpatient Sample database. Heart failure was the most frequent diagnosis (47 %), and in-hospital mortality was reported in 67 % of studies. There was heterogeneity in the timing, frequency, and background of the care team that determined palliative care consultation. In two randomized trials, there appeared to be improvement in quality of life without an impact on mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the growing recognition of the role of palliative care, there are limited data on palliative care consultation in the CICU.

Unresponsiveness of Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time to Bivalirudin in Adults Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is the standard for monitoring bivalirudin but demonstrates a nonlinear response at higher drug concentrations. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between bivalirudin dose and aPTT in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to determine a threshold where aPTT unresponsiveness occurs. Two hundred fourteen adults receiving bivalirudin during ECMO between 2018 and 2022 were included. Piecewise regression in a linear mixed effects model was used to determine a bivalirudin dose threshold of 0.21 mg/kg/hr for aPTT unresponsiveness. For doses of less than 0.21 mg/kg/hr (n = 135), every 0.1 mg/kg/hr dose increase led to an aPTT increase of 11.53 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 9.85-13.20) seconds compared to only a 3.81 (95% CI = 1.55-6.06) seconds increase when dose was greater than or equal to 0.21 mg/kg/hr (n = 79) (pinteraction < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression, venovenous configuration (odds ratio [OR] = 2.83, 95% CI = 1.38-5.77) and higher fibrinogen concentration (OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.05-1.42) were associated with greater odds of unresponsiveness, whereas older age (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.63-0.98), kidney dysfunction (OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.25-0.92), and a higher baseline aPTT (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.82-0.97) were associated with lower odds. Alternative methods are necessary to ascertain bivalirudin's hemostatic impact when doses exceed 0.21 mg/kg/hr during ECMO.

Position Paper on the Reporting of Norepinephrine Formulations in Critical Care from the Society of Critical Care Medicine and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Joint Task Force.

OBJECTIVES: To provide guidance on the reporting of norepinephrine formulation labeling, reporting in publications, and use in clinical practice. DESIGN: Review and task force position statements with necessary guidance. SETTING: A series of group conference calls were conducted from August 2023 to October 2023, along with a review of the available evidence and scope of the problem. SUBJECTS: A task force of multinational and multidisciplinary critical care experts assembled by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. INTERVENTIONS: The implications of a variation in norepinephrine labeled as conjugated salt (i.e., bitartrate or tartrate) or base drug in terms of effective concentration of norepinephrine were examined, and guidance was provided. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were significant implications for clinical care, dose calculations for enrollment in clinical trials, and results of datasets reporting maximal norepinephrine equivalents. These differences were especially important in the setting of collaborative efforts across countries with reported differences. CONCLUSIONS: A joint task force position statement was created outlining the scope of norepinephrine-dose formulation variations, and implications for research, patient safety, and clinical care. The task force advocated for a uniform norepinephrine-base formulation for global use, and offered advice aimed at appropriate stakeholders.

Tranexamic Acid for Bleeding Management in Adult Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

This study described the outcomes of patients receiving topical, nebulized, endobronchial, or systemic tranexamic acid (TXA) for bleeding events while on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We performed a single-center case series including adult patients >18 years old supported on either venovenous (VV) or venoarterial (VA) ECMO from January 1, 2014, to April 21, 2021. The primary outcome was hemostatic control defined as a composite of initial cessation of therapeutic interventions to mitigate bleeding or resumption of anticoagulation if previously held. Secondary outcomes included changes in transfusion requirements and lysis at 30-minute (LY30) values, venous thromboembolism (VTE) events, and seizures. In total, 47 patients were included for full analysis. There were 19 patients with surgical bleeds, 18 patients with medical bleeds, and 10 patients with multiple bleeds. Overall, initial hemostatic control was achieved in 79%, 67%, and 90% of patients, respectively. Pre- and post-TXA transfusion requirements were not significantly different ( p = 0.2), although the intraindividual change in median LY30 was -5.1% compared with baseline (95% confidence interval [CI], -12.4% to -1.5%, p = 0.005). The occurrence of VTE and seizures was relatively low and similar among patient bleeding groups. Tranexamic acid provided initial hemostatic control in roughly three quarters of patients with bleeding events on ECMO and side effects were infrequent.

'How to' Guide for Pharmacist-led Implementation of Beta-Lactam Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in the Critically Ill.

Beta-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can improve precision dosing and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients, but has not been implemented widely in the United States. Mayo Clinic recently implemented a beta-lactam TDM program. This single-center experience forms the basis of the manuscript which outlines practical considerations involved with implementation, including the pharmacist's role as a leader. Our implementation effort focused on three primary domains. First, we aimed to ensure a supportive organizational infrastructure. Early leadership engagement by the pharmacist-led core team facilitated advocacy for the clinical need, allocation of resources, and assay development. Second, core clinical workflows were developed that addressed the preferred patient population for use, desirable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic targets, and the preferred sampling strategy. Clinical tools to guide pharmacists in interpreting the results (e.g., pharmacokinetics calculator) and documenting decisions were developed. Third, stakeholders were offered repeated exposure to evidence and expertise to facilitate understanding and application of the new practice. This act of 'individual internalization' seems to be uniquely important to beta-lactam TDM implementation compared with implementation of other antimicrobial TDM programs. Educational strategies and supportive materials that were developed were focused on providing substantive and varied information tailored to the stakeholders' role in the process. For pharmacists, this included both clinical and operational considerations. A continuous improvement plan to support management of the process was instituted to address necessary updates and changes that inevitably emerged. In summary, the described approach to implementation of a pharmacist led beta-lactam TDM program could be used as a roadmap to aid other institutions that aim to develop such a program.

Intraoperative Versus Postoperative Hydroxocobalamin for Vasoplegic Shock in Cardiothoracic Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Hydroxocobalamin inhibits nitric oxide pathways contributing to vasoplegic shock in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of intraoperative versus postoperative application of hydroxocobalamin for vasoplegic shock in patients undergoing CPB. DESIGN: This was a historic cohort study. SETTING: The study was conducted at a quaternary academic cardiovascular surgery program. PARTICIPANTS: Adults undergoing cardiac surgery using CPB were participants in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Hydroxocobalamin (5 g) intravenously over 15 minutes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The treatment groups were assigned based on the receipt location of hydroxocobalamin (ie, intensive care unit [ICU] versus operating room [OR]). The primary outcome was vasopressor-free days in the first 14 days after CPB. Of the 112 patients included, 37 patients received hydroxocobalamin in the OR and 75 in the ICU. Patients in the OR group were younger than those in the ICU group (57.5 v 63.9 years, p = 0.007), with statistically similar American Society of Anesthesiologists scores. The mean CPB duration was 3.4 hours in the OR group and 2.9 hours in the ICU group (p = 0.09). In both groups, the norepinephrine-equivalent dose of vasopressors at hydroxocobalamin was 0.27 µg/kg/min. Days alive and free of vasopressors were not different between the OR and ICU groups (estimated difference 0.48 [95% CI -1.76-2.72], p = 0.67). The odds of postoperative renal failure, mesenteric ischemia, ICU, hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality were also similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: A difference in vasopressor-free days after CPB was not found between patients who received hydroxocobalamin intraoperatively versus postoperatively for vasoplegic shock.

Major Publications in the Critical Care Pharmacotherapy Literature: 2022.

OBJECTIVES: A number of trials related to critical care pharmacotherapy were published in 2022. We aimed to summarize the most influential publications related to the pharmacotherapeutic care of critically ill patients in 2022. DATA SOURCES: PubMed/Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online and the Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology Pharmacotherapy Literature Update. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials, prospective studies, or systematic review/meta-analyses of adult critically ill patients assessing a pharmacotherapeutic intervention and reporting clinical endpoints published between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2022, were included in this article. DATA EXTRACTION: Articles from a systematic search and the Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology Pharmacotherapy Literature Update were included and stratified into clinical domains based upon consistent themes. Consensus was obtained on the most influential publication within each clinical domain utilizing an a priori defined three-round modified Delphi process with the following considerations: 1) overall contribution to scientific knowledge and 2) novelty to the literature. DATA SYNTHESIS: The systematic search and Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology Pharmacotherapy Literature Update yielded a total of 704 articles, of which 660 were excluded. The remaining 44 articles were stratified into the following clinical domains: emergency/neurology, cardiovascular, gastroenterology/fluids/nutrition, hematology, infectious diseases/immunomodulation, and endocrine/metabolic. The final article selected from each clinical domain was summarized following a three-round modified Delphi process and included three randomized controlled trials and three systematic review/meta-analyses. Article topics summarized included dexmedetomidine versus other sedatives during mechanical ventilation, beta-blocker treatment in the critically ill, restriction of IV fluids in septic shock, venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in critically ill adults, duration of antibiotic therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa ventilator-associated pneumonia, and low-dose methylprednisolone treatment in severe community-acquired pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: This concise review provides a perspective on articles published in 2022 that are relevant to the pharmacotherapeutic care of critically ill patients and their potential impact on clinical practice.